1
|
Tesfai FM, Nagi J, Morrison I, Boal M, Olaitan A, Chandrasekaran D, Stoyanov D, Lanceley A, Francis N. Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:1480-1497. [PMID: 38610108 PMCID: PMC11266631 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a growing emphasis on proficiency-based progression within surgical training. To enable this, clearly defined metrics for those newly acquired surgical skills are needed. These can be formulated in objective assessment tools. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the literature reporting on available tools for objective assessment of minimally invasive gynecological surgery (simulated) performance and evaluate their reliability and validity. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search (1989-2022) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science in accordance with PRISMA. The trial was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) ID: CRD42022376552. Randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative studies, prospective single-group (with pre- and post-training assessment) or consensus studies that reported on the development, validation or usage of assessment tools of surgical performance in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, were included. Three independent assessors assessed study setting and validity evidence according to a contemporary framework of validity, which was adapted from Messick's validity framework. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the modified medical education research study quality instrument (MERSQI) checklist. Heterogeneity in data reporting on types of tools, data collection, study design, definition of expertise (novice vs. experts) and statistical values prevented a meaningful meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 746 titles and abstracts were screened of which 72 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 37 different assessment tools were identified of which 13 represented manual global assessment tools, 13 manual procedure-specific assessment tools and 11 automated performance metrices. Only two tools showed substantive evidence of validity. Reliability and validity per tool were provided. No assessment tools showed direct correlation between tool scores and patient related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Existing objective assessment tools lack evidence on predicting patient outcomes and suffer from limitations in transferability outside of the research environment, particularly for automated performance metrics. Future research should prioritize filling these gaps while integrating advanced technologies like kinematic data and AI for robust, objective surgical skill assessment within gynecological advanced surgical training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freweini Martha Tesfai
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Iona Morrison
- Yeovil District HospitalSomerset Foundation NHS TrustYeovilUK
| | - Matt Boal
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Gynecological OncologyUniversity College of London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Anne Lanceley
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nader Francis
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Yeovil District HospitalSomerset Foundation NHS TrustYeovilUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pakkasjärvi N, Anttila H, Pyhältö K. What are the learning objectives in surgical training - a systematic literature review of the surgical competence framework. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:119. [PMID: 38321437 PMCID: PMC10848354 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05068-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To map the landscape of contemporary surgical education through a competence framework by conducting a systematic literature review on learning outcomes of surgical education and the instructional methods applied to attain the outcomes. BACKGROUND Surgical education has seen a paradigm shift towards competence-based training. However, a gap remains in the literature regarding the specific components of competency taught and the instructional methods employed to achieve these outcomes. This paper aims to bridge this gap by conducting a systematic review on the learning outcomes of surgical education within a competence framework and the instructional methods applied. The primary outcome measure was to elucidate the components of competency emphasized by modern surgical curricula. The secondary outcome measure was to discern the instructional methods proven effective in achieving these competencies. METHODS A search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, ProQuest Eric, and Cochrane databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, limited to 2017-2021. Keywords included terms related to surgical education and training. Inclusion criteria mandated original empirical studies that described learning outcomes and methods, and targeted both medical students and surgical residents. RESULTS Out of 42 studies involving 2097 participants, most concentrated on technical skills within competency-based training, with a lesser emphasis on non-technical competencies. The effect on clinical outcomes was infrequently explored. CONCLUSION The shift towards competency in surgical training is evident. However, further studies on its ramifications on clinical outcomes are needed. The transition from technical to clinical competence and the creation of validated assessments are crucial for establishing a foundation for lifelong surgical learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Pakkasjärvi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Section of Urology, University Children's Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Henrika Anttila
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsi Pyhältö
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Centre for Higher and Adult Education, Faculty of Education, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Popa C, Schlanger D, Prunoiu VM, Puia IC, Zaharie F. A novel step-by-step training program for transanal endoscopic surgery. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:327. [PMID: 37170198 PMCID: PMC10176938 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04296-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of our study is to develop an effective training platform for transanal endoscopic surgery and to validate a step-by-step training program for learning the basic skills necessary for this approach. METHODS We have designed a two-part study: an experimental study (with the aim to design the training platform and the training exercises - on synthetic and biological material) and a prospective analytical study, in order to validate the training program by enrolling as participants general surgery residents and specialists, without previous experience in transanal endoscopic interventions. The performance of the participants was assessed based on the time of completion, as well as the quality of the execution. RESULTS We have developed three different diameter platforms (5 cm, 7.5 and 10 cm), that can be used with both the TEO and TAMIS platforms; specific exercises were developed to train different surgical skills like manipulation of tissue, cutting, dissection and suturing. Forty participants were enrolled for the validation of the proposed training program (12 young residents, 16 senior residents and 12 specialist surgeons). A statistically significant improvement of the performance time, from round to round, was observed for all participants in all exercises. The time of completion for the exercises, considering the correct technical execution, was the shortest for more experienced surgeons: specialist surgeons, followed by senior residents and young residents. The biological material exercises, that closely recreate intraoperative conditions and had more strict technical requirements, were difficult to be performed by young residents; better completion rates were seen in senior residents, while all the participants in the specialist surgeons group have completed these exercises. CONCLUSIONS Our training program is an effective simulation based educational model for recreating intraoperative conditions particular to transanal endoscopic surgery. The proposed step-by-step training program has demonstrated to be useful in developing the important basic skills needed for transanal endoscopic surgery and assured the progress of all the participants, regardless of their surgical experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Călin Popa
- "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Street Emil Isac no 13, Cluj-Napoca, 400023, Romania
- Surgery Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof. Dr. O. Fodor", Street Croitorilor no 19-21, 400162, Cluj- Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Diana Schlanger
- "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Street Emil Isac no 13, Cluj-Napoca, 400023, Romania.
- Surgery Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof. Dr. O. Fodor", Street Croitorilor no 19-21, 400162, Cluj- Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Virgiliu Mihail Prunoiu
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Clinic I General and Oncological Surgery "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ion Cosmin Puia
- "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Street Emil Isac no 13, Cluj-Napoca, 400023, Romania
- Surgery Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof. Dr. O. Fodor", Street Croitorilor no 19-21, 400162, Cluj- Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Florin Zaharie
- "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Street Emil Isac no 13, Cluj-Napoca, 400023, Romania
- Surgery Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof. Dr. O. Fodor", Street Croitorilor no 19-21, 400162, Cluj- Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Orejuela FJ, Aschkenazi SO, Howard DL, Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Walter AJ, White A, Olivera CK, Sanses TV, Thompson J, Gala RB, Matteson K, Balk EM, Meriwether KV, Rahn DD. Gynecologic surgical skill acquisition through simulation with outcomes at the time of surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:29.e1-29.e24. [PMID: 35120886 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of simulation training vs traditional hands-on surgical instruction on learner operative skills and patient outcomes in gynecologic surgeries. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 12, 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative studies, and prospective single-group studies with pre- and posttraining assessments that reported surgical simulation-based training before gynecologic surgery were included. METHODS Reviewers independently identified the studies, obtained data, and assessed the study quality. The results were analyzed according to the type of gynecologic surgery, simulation, comparator, and outcome data, including clinical and patient-related outcomes. The maximum likelihood random effects model meta-analyses of the odds ratios and standardized mean differences were calculated with estimated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Twenty studies, including 13 randomized controlled trials, 1 randomized crossover trial, 5 nonrandomized comparative studies, and 1 prepost study were identified. Most of the included studies (14/21, 67%) were on laparoscopic simulators and had a moderate quality of evidence. Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional surgical teaching, high- and low-fidelity simulators improved surgical technical skills in the operating room as measured by global rating scales, and high-fidelity simulators decreased the operative time. Moderate quality evidence was found favoring warm-up exercises before laparoscopic surgery. There was insufficient evidence to conduct a meta-analysis for other gynecologic procedures. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports incorporating simulation-based training for a variety of gynecologic surgeries to increase technical skills in the operating room, but data on patient-related outcomes are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco J Orejuela
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
| | | | - David L Howard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV
| | - Peter C Jeppson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Sunil Balgobin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Andrew J Walter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Roseville, CA
| | - Amanda White
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Cedric K Olivera
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Tatiana V Sanses
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Jennifer Thompson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR
| | - Rajiv B Gala
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
| | - Kristen Matteson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ethan M Balk
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Kate V Meriwether
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - David D Rahn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ducournau F, Meyer N, Xavier F, Facca S, Liverneaux P. Learning a MIPO technique for distal radius fractures: Mentoring versus simple experience versus deliberate practice. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102939. [PMID: 33901718 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performance skills of a surgeon for a specific surgical technique range from 1 (novice) to 5 (expert). Mentoring can bring the surgeon to level 3. Simple experience rarely allows achievement of level 5, in contrast to deliberate practice, in which performance skills are improved by setting learning goals based on feedback about the trainee's previous performance. HYPOTHESIS When learning a technique for the internal fixation of distal radius fractures, the level of performance skills achieved is higher with deliberate practice than with mentoring or simple experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four surgeons each performed minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of 15 distal radius fractures. The procedures were recorded by an HD camera. The first five fractures (step 1) were treated after mentoring, the next 5 fractures after reading an article and viewing a reference video (step 2), and the last 5 fractures after viewing and commenting 20 short videos highlighting possible errors (step 3). Each recording of the procedures performed by the surgeons was scored using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS, 10 items on basic skills [B] and 10 on MIPO-specific skills [S]). RESULTS For the basic skills, the mean OSATS scores (on 50) were 31 for step 1, 31 for step 2, and 43 for step 3. For the specific skills, the mean OSATS scores (on 50) were 25 for step 1, 29 for step 2, and 48 for step 3. For overall skills (B+S), the mean OSATS score (on 100) was 56 for step 1, 60 for step 2, and 91 for step 3. DISCUSSION Our study confirms that the deliberate practice teaching method is more efficient in improving surgeon skills than simple experience. Deliberate practice consists of four essential steps: (i) setting a well-defined goal; (ii) being motivated to improve one's performance; (iii) receiving immediate feedback; and (iv) having multiple opportunities to repeat and gradually perfect one's performance. Our main hypothesis was verified, since the results of learning a MIPO technique, as assessed using the OSATS scale, were significantly better with a video-assisted deliberate practice technique than with mentoring or simple experience. CONCLUSION Video-assisted deliberate practice deserves to be widely used in order to optimise learning curves and to improve risk management in surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Ducournau
- Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Service de santé publique, GMRC, Strasbourg University Hospital, 67091 Strasbourg, France; ICube CNRS UMR7357, Strasbourg University, 2-4, rue Boussingault, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Fred Xavier
- Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Armand-Trousseau Hospital, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, 75571 Paris cedex 12, France
| | - Sybille Facca
- Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICube CNRS UMR7357, Strasbourg University, 2-4, rue Boussingault, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Liverneaux
- Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICube CNRS UMR7357, Strasbourg University, 2-4, rue Boussingault, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al Abbas AI, Wang C, Hamad AB, Knab LM, Rice MK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME. Mentorship and formal robotic proficiency skills curriculum improve subsequent generations' learning curve for the robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1849-1855. [PMID: 34059420 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is the accepted standard of care. The robotic distal (RDP) learning curve is 20-40 surgeries with operating time (ORT) as the most significant factor. This study evaluates how formal mentorship and a robotic skills curriculum impact the learning curve for subsequent generation surgeons. METHODS Consecutive RDP from 2008 to 2017 were evaluated. First Generation was two surgeons who started program without training or mentorship. Second Generation was the two surgeons who joined the program with mentorship. Third Generation was fellows who benefited from both formal training and mentorship. Multivariable models (MVA) were performed for ORT, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), and major complications (Clavien≥3). RESULTS A total of 296 RDP were performed of which 187 did not include other procedures: First Generation (n = 71), Second Generation (n = 50), and Third Generation (n = 66). ORT decreased by generation (p < 0.001) without any differences in CR-POPF or Clavien≥3. On MVA, earlier generation (p = 0.019), pre-operative albumin (p = 0.001) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (p = 0.019) were predictive of ORT. Increased BMI (p = 0.049) and neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.046) were predictive of CR-POPF. Fellow participation at the console increased over time. CONCLUSION Formal mentorship and a skills curriculum decreased the learning curve and complications were largely dependent on patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr I Al Abbas
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chi Wang
- Northshore University Healthsystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Ahmad B Hamad
- Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - L Mark Knab
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - MaryJoe K Rice
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - A James Moser
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jokinen E, Mikkola TS, Härkki P. Simulator training and residents' first laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:4874-4882. [PMID: 31768724 PMCID: PMC7572324 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07270-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hysterectomy rates are decreasing in many countries, and virtual reality simulators bring new opportunities into residents' surgical education. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of training in laparoscopic hysterectomy module with virtual reality simulator on surgical outcomes among residents performing their first laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS This randomized study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Helsinki University Hospital and Hyvinkää Hospital. We recruited twenty residents and randomly signed half of them to train ten times with the laparoscopic hysterectomy module on a virtual reality simulator, while the rest represented the control group. Their first laparoscopic hysterectomy was video recorded and assessed later by using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) forms and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scores and surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS The mean OSATS score for the Global Rating Scale (GRS) was 17.0 (SD 3.1) in the intervention group and 11.2 (SD 2.4) in the control group (p = 0.002). The mean procedure-specific OSATS score was 20.0 (SD 3.3) and 16.0 (SD 2.8) (p = 0.012), and the mean VAS score was 55.0 (SD 14.8) and 29.9 (SD 14.9) (p = 0.001). Operative time was 144 min in the intervention group and 165 min in the control group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.205). There were no differences between the groups in blood loss or direct complications. CONCLUSION Residents training with a virtual reality simulator prior to the first laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to perform better in the actual live operation. Thus, a virtual reality simulator hysterectomy module could be considered as a part of laparoscopic training curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Jokinen
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, P.O. Box 140, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Tomi S Mikkola
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, P.O. Box 140, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Päivi Härkki
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, P.O. Box 140, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|