Augmented rectangle technique for Billroth I anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Retrospective observational cohort study of laparoscopic surgical strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Laparoscopic surgery has been used to treat gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has been used when subtotal resection has been difficult, which enabled resection of these tumors. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent laparoscopic surgery in our hospital with the aim of reporting the surgical indications, procedures (especially for LECS), and outcomes of surgery. This study involved 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between April 2014 and March 2021. We classified the patients into two groups: laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (non-LECS group, n = 30) and LECS group (n = 25). LECS was performed in the upper stomach, in the greater curvature of the lower stomach, and in both intraluminal and intramural locations in the middle stomach. Non-LECS was selected for extraluminal and intramural tumors in the greater curvature of the upper stomach. There were no severe complications associated with the operation. There was one postoperative complication in the LECS group. The length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ between the LECS and non-LECS groups. We reported the surgical procedures for gastric SMTs in our hospital. It is essential to make full use of the multiple techniques reported in this article and examine the location of the tumor to avoid excess or insufficient resection. Our review of the present case series allowed us to select the appropriate surgical approach for gastric SMTs based on the lesion location and type of development.

Intracorporeal linear‑stapled gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Consideration of the intraoperative management of the duodenal wall between the transecting staple line and anastomotic staple line (Review)

The first part of the duodenum consists of the intraperitoneal segment, called the duodenal bulb, and the retroperitoneal segment. Regarding the blood supplying the duodenal bulb, which is the portion utilized in anastomosing the duodenum and remnant stomach following distal gastrectomy, the arterial pedicles branching off from the gastroduodenal artery are reported to reach the posterior wall first and then spread over the anterior wall, where they anastomose. When performing intracorporeal linear-stapled gastroduodenostomy following totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, the blood supply of the duodenal wall between the transecting staple line and anastomotic staple line needs to be considered because both transection of the duodenal bulb and the gastroduodenostomy are performed using an endoscopic linear stapler and the duodenal wall between the staple lines can be ischemic after the anastomosis. Since it needs to be decided intraoperatively whether this duodenal site is preserved or removed, the present review discusses the technical differences among several procedures for intracorporeal linear-stapled gastroduodenostomy, classifying them into two groups on the basis of the intraoperative management of this duodenal site. When this site is preserved, the blood supply of the duodenal wall needs to be retained with certainty. On the other hand, when this site is removed, the ischemic portion of the duodenal wall needs to be identified and removed. Furthermore, in both groups, an adequate anastomotic area needs to be secured. In conclusion, surgeons need to be familiar with the anatomical features of the duodenal bulb, including its blood perfusion and shape, when carrying out intracorporeal linear-stapled gastroduodenostomy.

Safety and efficacy of augmented-rectangle technique versus delta-shaped anastomosis for treating gastric cancer in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of augmented-rectangle technique (ART) versus delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) for treating gastric cancer in total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

In total, 99 patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent ART (n = 60) or DA (n = 39) were considered. Operative data, postoperative recovery, complications, quality of life, and endoscopic findings of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

The ART group had faster postoperative recovery than the DA group, and was better than DA regarding complications. The mode of reconstruction remained an independent predictor of complications, but not postoperative recovery. Dumping syndrome occurred in 3 (5.0%) and 2 patients (5.1%) of ART and DA groups within 30 days after surgery, and 3 (5.0%) and 2 patients (5.1%) 1 year after surgery. Regarding global health status on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale, the ART group had better outcomes than the DA group. Gastritis occurred in 38 (63.3%) and 27 (69.3%) patients of ART and DA groups, respectively. Residual food occurred in 8 (13.3%) and 11 (28.2%) patients of ART and DA groups. Reflux esophagitis occurred in 5 (8.3%) and 4 (10.3%) patients of ART and DA groups. Further, bile reflux occurred in 8 (13.3%) and 4 (10.3%) patients of ART and DA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ART has similar advantages to DA for total laparoscopic reconstruction and is superior to DA regarding the incidence of complications, complication grade, and global health status. Furthermore, ART may have potential advantages in postoperative recovery and anastomotic stenosis.

Successful Systemic Steroid Administration for the Treatment of Edematous Anastomotic Stenosis After the Laparoscopic Augmented Rectangle Technique for Billroth I Reconstruction for Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

Edematous anastomotic stenosis is a well-known complication following Billroth I anastomosis for distal gastrectomy. Currently, there is no established treatment for this condition. A 54-year-old female patient underwent the augmented rectangle technique for Billroth I reconstruction after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. On postoperative day (POD) 9, the patient started vomiting. During the conservative waiting period, edematous anastomotic stenosis was diagnosed using imaging on PODs 11 and 13. Systemic steroid administration was initiated on POD 13, and the drainage volume of the nasogastric tube decreased four days after initiation. The edematous anastomosis stenosis improved, and gastrografin flowed into the duodenum on POD 19. Food intake was started on POD 20. Oral steroid administration was continued after hospital discharge and gradually terminated. Systemic steroid treatment may help improve edematous anastomotic stenosis.

Comparison of Intracorporeal Trapezoidal-shaped Gastroduodenostomy and Delta-shaped Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic/robotic distal gastrectomy (LDG/RDG) as a treatment for early gastric cancer has become increasingly and widely accepted for its minimal invasiveness and proportionate outcomes. Over the years, in addition to the LDG/RDG technique and the lymphadenectomy and gastrectomy procedures, various reconstruction methods have been developed and further improved upon. In particular, the number of minimally invasive intracorporeal anastomosis reconstruction techniques has been increasing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 445 patients with gastric cancer who underwent reconstruction following LDG/RDG via either trapezoidal-shaped gastroduodenostomy (TAPESTRY; n=126) or delta-shaped anastomosis (DSA; n=319) at our hospital between April 2012 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Short-term surgical outcomes, including the operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications, were compared between the 2 groups. Anastomosis-related complications, namely leakage, bleeding, stricture, and delayed gastric emptying, were monitored and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

All operations were either performed or supervised by qualified surgeons. Patients' characteristics in the TAPESTRY group and the DSA group were biased in terms of the surgical approach, but they were well-balanced after propensity score matching. Overall anastomosis-related complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II or above) within 30 days after surgery in the TAPESTRY group were comparable with those in the DSA group, either all patients (1.5% vs. 5.0%, P=0.115) or after propensity score-matching analysis (2.1% vs. 6.5%, P=0.134). There were no records of reoperation or mortality during hospitalization in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

TAPESTRY was performed safely, with a low rate of anastomosis-related complications. These findings suggest that trapezoidal-shaped gastroduodenostomy could be a feasible option for reconstruction in patients undergoing LDG/RDG.

Long-term outcomes of postgastrectomy syndrome after total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the augmented rectangle technique

BACKGROUND

For total laparoscopic distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer, the reconstruction method is critical to the clinical outcome of the procedure. However, which reconstruction technique is optimal remains controversial. We originally reported the augmented rectangle technique (ART) as a reconstruction option for total laparoscopic Billroth I reconstructions. Still, little is known about its effect on long-term outcomes, specifically the incidence of postgastrectomy syndrome and its impact on quality of life.

AIM

To analyze postgastrectomy syndrome and quality of life after ART using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaire.

METHODS

At Juntendo University, a total of 94 patients who underwent ART for Billroth I reconstruction with total laparoscopic distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer between July 2016 and March 2020 completed the PGSAS-37 questionnaire. Multidimensional analysis was performed, comparing those 94 ART cases from our institution (ART group) to 909 distal gastrectomy cases with a Billroth I reconstruction from other Japanese institutions who also completed the PGSAS-37 as part of a larger national database (PGSAS group).

RESULTS

Patients in the ART group had significantly better total symptom scores in all the symptom subscales (i.e., esophageal reflux, abdominal pain, meal-related distress, indigestion, diarrhea, constipation, and dumping). The loss of body weight was marginally greater for those in the ART group than in the PGSAS group (-9.3% vs -7.9%, P = 0.054). The ART group scored significantly lower in their dissatisfaction of ongoing symptoms, during meals, and with daily life.

CONCLUSION

ART for Billroth I reconstruction provided beneficial long-term results for postgastrectomy syndrome and quality of life in patients undergoing total laparoscopic distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer.

Feasibility of augmented rectangle technique in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison with hemi-double stapling technique in a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Augmented rectangle technique (ART) anastomosis is a totally intracorporeal anastomosis of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), Billroth I (B1) reconstruction for gastric cancer, which secures a wide anastomotic stoma. Since the conventional extracorporeal hemi-double stapling technique (HD) may have a narrow anastomotic stoma, our aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of ART anastomosis by comparing the surgical outcomes with HD anastomosis.

METHODS

Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing LDG with B1 reconstruction were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into ART group (n = 40) and HD group (n = 49). Surgical outcomes including short-term outcomes, postoperative endoscopic findings, and nutritional factors 1 year after surgery were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In terms of short-term outcomes, blood loss was less (11.5 mL vs 40 mL, P = 0.011) and postoperative hospital stay was shorter (10 days vs 12 days, P = 0.022) in the ART group. In terms of endoscopic findings, residual food was less (P = 0.032) in the ART group. In terms of nutritional factors, percent decrease of visceral fat area (- 27.6% vs - 40.5%, P = 0.049) and subcutaneous fat area (- 25.7% vs - 39.3%, P = 0.050) 1 year after surgery attenuated in the ART group.

CONCLUSIONS

ART anastomosis is superior in perioperative course such as postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, a better nutritional recovery is expected by securing a wide anastomotic stoma leading to a favorable food passage.

Application of double layered end-to-end anastomosis with continuous manual suture for completing digestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

Background

We retrospectively reviewed and consecutively collected the clinical data of distal gastric cancer patients who received surgical treatment, and we discuss the safety and feasibility of double layered end-to-end anastomosis with continuous manual suture to complete digestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical data of 41 patients with distal gastric cancer from the gastroenterology department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, from September 2018 to August 2019, who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. During the operation, the method of double layered end-to-end anastomosis with continuous manual suture was used for Billroth type I anastomosis to complete digestive tract reconstruction. All patients have been given a follow-up visit and gastroscopy three months after the operation. The peri-operative clinical information and postoperative follow-up information were collected for analysis, and the clinical application value was evaluated.

Results

General information: male(n = 27), female(n = 14), age = 65.02(SD 9.94) years, and BMI = 23.52(SD 2.56) kg/m², Tumor location: antrum(32,78.0%), angle (6,14.6%), and body (3,7.3%). Clinical stage: I (27, 65.9%), II (7, 17.1%), and III (7, 17.1%). Operative information: operation time = 154.51(SD 33.37) min, anastomosis time = 26.88(SD 5.11) min; intraoperative bleeding = 66.34(SD 48.81) ml; first postoperative ambulation Median = 1(IQR 0) d, first postoperative flatus Median = 3(IQR 2) d, first postoperative diet Median = 3(IQR 1) d, postoperative hospital stay Median = 7(IQR 2) d, and total hospitalization cost = 10,935.00(SD 2205.72)USD. Differentiation degree: high and high-moderate (3,7.32%), moderate and poor-moderate (24, 58.54%), poor differentiation (14, 34.15%), dissected lymph nodes Median = 31(IQR 17), and positive lymph nodes Median = 0(IQR 1). Pathological stage: IA (20, 48.78%), IB (3, 7.32%), IIA (4, 9.76%), IIB (5, 12.20%), IIIA (1, 2.44%), IIIB (3, 7.32%), and IIIC (5, 12.20%). Complications (n = 4): lung infection (1, 2.44%), anastomotic leakage (1, 2.44%), and gastroparesis (2, 4.88%).

Conclusion

It is safe and feasible in clinical treatment to apply the method of double layered end-to-end anastomosis with continuous manual suture to complete digestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Comparison of Converse Ω Anastomosis and Extracorporeal Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Converse Ω anastomosis is a recently developed technique of delta-shaped anastomosis for intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy to simplify the anastomotic procedures and reduce their potential risks. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of converse Ω anastomosis, comparing it with conventional extracorporeal Billroth-I anastomosis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 169 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG with Billroth-I anastomosis anastomosis between April 2013 and March 2018, we selected 100 patients by propensity score matching (50 in the converse Ω anastomosis group and 50 in the extracorporeal anastomosis group). Patients' characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival time were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Median anastomosis time was significantly longer in the converse Ω group than in the extracorporeal group (40.0 vs. 30.5 min, P=0.005). However, the total procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Intraoperative blood loss volume was significantly lower in the converse Ω group than in the extracorporeal anastomosis group (40 vs. 120 mL, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative morbidity, mortality, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative body mass index and the prognostic nutritional index did not differ between the groups 1 year after surgery. There were no significant differences in overall survival and relapse-free survival between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Converse Ω anastomosis is feasible and safe. This novel technique can be adopted as a treatment option for reconstruction after LDG in patients with early-stage gastric cancer. Therefore, the risks and benefits of converse Ω anastomosis after LDG should be confirmed in larger cohorts.

Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative study of original and modified methods

BACKGROUND

Delta-shaped anastomosis (DA) has been widely accepted as a standard procedure for intracorporeal Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. We introduced DA in 2010 at our hospital and later developed a modified DA method in which a stapled corner of the duodenal stump was removed simultaneously with closure of an entry hole to reduce postoperative complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 507 patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with DA from October 2010 through December 2018 were retrospectively collected from our in-house database. On the basis of the reviewed data, patients were divided into two groups: the original DA group (org-DA, n = 392) and the modified DA group (mod-DA, n = 115). Surgical outcomes, postoperative nutritional parameters, and endoscopic findings 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Anastomotic stricture occurred in three patients (0.8%) in the org-DA group and one patient (0.9%) in the mod-DA group (P = 0.911). Anastomotic leakage was recorded in five patients (1.3%) in the org-DA group and none of the patients (0%) in the mod-DA group (P = 0.593). One year after surgery, the change in body weight in the org-DA group/mod-DA group was - 8.1%/- 7.0% (P = 0.285), and the change in hemoglobin level was - 5.0%/- 3.9% (P = 0.012). Endoscopic examination at the 1-year follow-up in the mod-DA group showed smaller amounts of food residue (P = 0.008) as well as less residual gastritis (P < 0.001) than in the org-DA group.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified DA method can be performed safely with a complication rate comparable with the original DA method. Furthermore, better postoperative function is expected because of its more natural anatomy and physiology resulting from the modified method.

Effectiveness and safety of a laparoscopic training system combined with modified reconstruction techniques for total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) is increasing due to some advantages over open surgery, which has generated interest in gastrointestinal surgeons. However, TLDG is technically demanding especially for lymphadenectomy and gastrointestinal reconstruction. During the course of training, trainee surgeons have less chances to perform open gastrectomy compared with that of senior surgeons.

AIM

To evaluate an appropriate, efficient and safe laparoscopic training procedures suitable for trainee surgeons.

METHODS

Ninety-two consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent TLDG plus Billroth I reconstruction using an augmented rectangle technique and involving trainees were reviewed. The trainees were taught a laparoscopic view of surgical anatomy, standard operative procedures and practiced essential laparoscopic skills. The TLDG procedure was divided into regional lymph node dissections and gastrointestinal reconstruction for analyzing trainee skills. Early surgical outcomes were compared between trainees and trainers to clarify the feasibility and safety of TLDG performed by trainees. Learning curves were used to assess the utility of our training system.

RESULTS

Five trainees performed a total of 52 TLDGs (56.5%), while 40 TLDGs were conducted by two trainers (43.5%). Except for depth of invasion and pathologic stage, there were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics. Trainers performed more D2 gastrectomies than trainees. The total operation time was significantly longer in the trainee group. The time spent during the lesser curvature lymph node dissection and the Billroth I reconstruction were similar between the two groups. No difference was found in postoperative complications between the two groups. The learning curve of the trainees plateaued after five TLDG cases.

CONCLUSION

Preparing trainees with a laparoscopic view of surgical anatomy, standard operative procedures and practice in essential laparoscopic skills enabled trainees to perform TLDG safely and feasibly.

Digestive tract reconstruction options after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

In addition to the popularity of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), many reconstructive procedures after LG have been reported. Surgical resection and lymphatic dissection determine long-term survival; however, the election of a reconstruction procedure determines the postoperative quality of life for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Presently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal reconstructive procedure. In this review, the current state of digestive tract reconstruction after LG is reviewed. According to the determining influence of the tumor site on the procedures of surgical resection and reconstruction, we divide these reconstruction procedures into three categories consistent with the resection procedures. We focus on the technical tips of every reconstruction procedure and examine the surgical outcomes (length of surgery and blood loss) and postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage and stricture) to facilitate gastrointestinal surgeons to understand the merits and demerits of every reconstruction procedure.

Functional Outcomes of Billroth I Gastroduodenostomy Using Linear Staplers in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study examined whether functional outcomes of linear-stapled Billroth I (LS-BI) in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) are comparable to those of circular-stapled Billroth I (CS-BI) in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with gastric cancer undergoing TLDG with LS-BI (n=50) or LADG with CS-BI (n=50). Postoperative endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach and nutritional status were evaluated.

RESULTS

The occurrence of grade 2 or more severe remnant gastritis in the LS-BI group (46.0%) was significantly higher than that in the CS-BI group (18.0%) (p=0.005), whereas there was no significant difference in the incidence of residual food and bile reflux between the two groups. Postoperative changes in body weight, and serum albumin and total protein levels were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TLDG with LS-BI may be a good alternative to LADG with CS-BI because of its comparable nutritional outcomes, but with a higher occurrence of remnant gastritis.