1
|
Yeung KTD, Vellaisamy R, Hussain A, Mingo O, Raobaikady R, Nicol D, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Cunningham D, Jiao LR. Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9. [PMID: 38874609 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient's recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient's post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery. METHODS Single surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery. RESULTS This is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities. CONCLUSION This case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Tai Derek Yeung
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK
| | - Rajendran Vellaisamy
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Aasim Hussain
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Olivia Mingo
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Ravishankar Raobaikady
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Shahnawaz Rasheed
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Long R Jiao
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK.
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Imperial College London, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Werey F, Allart K, Dembinski J, Yvart-Degardin J, Regimbeau JM. Multiplanar CT reconstructions allow optimization of the laparoscopic surgical approach for liver lesions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:420. [PMID: 37897546 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03160-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Resection of hepatic lesions can be difficult and requires careful analysis of pre-operative imaging. The aim of this study is to highlight the use of multiplanar CT reconstruction in liver surgery, which helps to anticipate intra-operative technical difficulties. METHODS We retrospectively selected the imaging of several patients managed for liver lesions in specific locations: liver dome (IVa, VIII), the left lobe (intra-parenchymal, left edge), and the antero-inferior edge of segment VI. The IWATE classification was used to grade the difficulty of these resections. RESULTS Multiplanar analysis has made it possible to change the level of difficulty of liver resection and to anticipate intra-operative difficulties. Frontal and/or sagittal section in addition to axial sections analysis increased the IWATE score. CONCLUSION Multi-planar reconstruction must be a tool used by the liver surgeon pre-operatively in order to limit intra-operative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Werey
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, F-80054, Amiens Cedex, France
| | - Kevin Allart
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, F-80054, Amiens Cedex, France
| | - Jeanne Dembinski
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, F-80054, Amiens Cedex, France
- SSPC UPJV 7518 (Simplifications Des Soins Patients Chirurgicaux Complexes - Simplification of Care of Complex Surgical Patients) Clinical Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, F-80054, Amiens, France
| | - Juliette Yvart-Degardin
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, F-80054, Amiens Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, F-80054, Amiens Cedex, France.
- SSPC UPJV 7518 (Simplifications Des Soins Patients Chirurgicaux Complexes - Simplification of Care of Complex Surgical Patients) Clinical Research Unit, Jules Verne University of Picardie, F-80054, Amiens, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vanetta C, Dreifuss NH, Angeramo CA, Baz C, Cubisino A, Schlottmann F, Masrur MA. Outcomes of same-day discharge sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:238-249. [PMID: 36209031 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Length of stay after bariatric surgery has progressively shortened. Same-day discharge (SDD) has been reported for the 2 most common bariatric procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and success of SDD following SG and RYGB. Systematic literature search on SDD after bariatric surgery was conducted in Medline, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase. SDD was defined as discharging the patient during the day of the bariatric operation, without an overnight stay. The primary outcomes of interest were successful SDD, readmission, and morbidity rates. The secondary endpoints included reoperation and mortality rates. A proportion meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of interest. A total of 14 studies with 33,403 patients who underwent SDD SG (32,165) or RYGB (1238) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seven studies with 5000 patients who underwent SDD SG were included in the quantitative analysis, and pooled proportions (PPs) were calculated for the outcomes of interest. The SDD success rate was 63%-100% (PP: 99%) after SG and 88%-98.1% after RYGB. The readmission rate ranged from .6% to 20.8% (PP: 4%) after SDD SG and 2.4%-4% after SDD RYGB. Overall morbidity, reoperation, and mortality were 1.1%-10% (PP:4%), .3%-2.1% (PP: 1%), and 0%-.1% (PP: 0%), respectively, for SDD SG, and 2.5%-4%,1.9%-2.5%, and 0%-.9%, respectively, for SDD RYGB. SDD after SG seems feasible and safe. The outcomes of SDDRYGB seem promising, but the evidenceis stilllimitedto draw definitive conclusions. Selection criteria and perioperative protocolsmust be standardized to adequately introduce this practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Vanetta
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Nicolás H Dreifuss
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Carolina Baz
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Antonio Cubisino
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazzotta AD, Kawaguchi Y, Pantel L, Tribillon E, Bonnet S, Gayet B, Soubrane O. Conditional cumulative incidence of postoperative complications stratified by complexity classification for laparoscopic liver resection: Optimization of in-hospital observation. Surgery 2023; 173:422-427. [PMID: 36041926 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal in-hospital observation periods associated with minimal risks of complications and unplanned readmission after laparoscopic liver resection are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the risks of postoperative complications over time. METHODS Surgical complexity of laparoscopic liver resection was stratified into grades I (low complexity), II (intermediate), and III (high) using our 3-level complexity classification. The cumulative incidence rate and conditional probability of postoperative complication and risk factors for complication Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II (defined as treatment-requiring complications) were assessed. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of treatment-requiring complications was higher in patients undergoing grade III resection than in patients undergoing grade I resection (32.3% vs 10.4%, P < .001) and grade II resection (32.3% vs 20.7%, P = .019). The conditional probability of postoperative complication stratified by our complexity classification decreased over time and was <10% for patients undergoing grade I resection on postoperative day 1, grade II resection on postoperative day 4, and grade III resection on postoperative day 10. CONCLUSION The conditional cumulative incidence of treatment-requiring complications for patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection is well stratified based on the 3-level complexity classification. Conditional complication risk analysis stratified by the 3 complexity grades may be useful for optimizing in-hospital observation after laparoscopic liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro D Mazzotta
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Louis Pantel
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Ecoline Tribillon
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Bonnet
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Brice Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Oliver Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Amro N, Abdurabu HY, Abdo N, Alqahtani S, Boutros A, Ebishi A, Al-Darwish A. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as Day Case Surgery vs Conventional Hospitalization: Results of the DAYSLEEVE Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; 18:1141-1149. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Dreifuss NH, Xie J, Schlottmann F, Cubisino A, Baz C, Vanetta C, Mangano A, Bianco FM, Gangemi A, Masrur MA. Risk Factors for Readmission After Same-Day Discharge Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis. Obes Surg 2022; 32:962-969. [PMID: 35060023 PMCID: PMC8773397 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-05919-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Same-day discharge after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is gaining popularity. We aimed to determine risk factors associated with readmission in patients who underwent same-day discharge SG. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for the period 2015–2018. Patients who underwent SG and were discharged the same day of the operation were included in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for readmission. Results A total of 466,270 SG were performed during the study period; 14,624 (3.1%) patients were discharged the same day and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 43.4 (14.7–80) years and 11,718 (80.1%) were female. Mean preoperative BMI was 43.7 ± 7.4 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 58.3 ± 32.4 min. Thirty-day reoperation, reintervention, and mortality rates were 0.7%, 0.7%, and 0.1%, respectively. Readmission rates were similar in same-day discharge and inpatient SG (2.9% vs. 3%, p = 0.5). Female sex (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15–2.00), preoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08–1.64), renal insufficiency (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.01–9.32), and intraoperative drain placement (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.37–2.31) were independent risk factors for readmission following same-day discharge SG. Conclusions
Same-day discharge SG appears to be safe and is associated with low readmission rates. However, the identification of preoperative and intraoperative variables associated with higher risk of readmission might help defining safer and more effective same-day discharge protocols. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas H Dreifuss
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Julia Xie
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Antonio Cubisino
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Carolina Baz
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Carolina Vanetta
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Alberto Mangano
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Francesco M Bianco
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Antonio Gangemi
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective stoma closure is a common, standardized procedure in digestive surgery. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of day-case surgery for elective stoma closure. DESIGN This is a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study of consecutive patients undergoing day-case elective stoma closure. SETTING This study was performed at a French tertiary hospital between January 2016 and June 2018. PATIENTS Elective stoma closure was performed by local incision with an ASA score of I, II, or stabilized III. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was the day-case surgery success rate in the overall population (all patients having undergone elective stoma closure) and in the per protocol population (patients not fulfilling any of the preoperative or perioperative exclusion criteria). The secondary end points (in the per protocol population) were the overall morbidity rate (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), the major morbidity rate (Clavien score ≥3), and day-case surgery quality criteria (unplanned consultation, unplanned hospitalization, and unplanned reoperation). RESULTS Between January 2016 and June 2018, 236 patients (the overall population; mean ± SD age: 54 ± 17; 120 men (51%)) underwent elective stoma closure. Fifty of these patients (21%) met all the inclusion criteria and constituted the per protocol population. The day-case surgery success rate was 17% (40 of 236 patients) in the overall population and 80% (40 of 50 patients) in the per protocol population. In the per protocol population, the overall morbidity rate was 30% and the major morbidity rate was 6%. Of the 40 patients with successful day-case surgery, the unplanned consultation rate and the unplanned hospitalization rate were both 32.5%. There were no unplanned reoperations. LIMITATIONS This was a single-center study. CONCLUSION In selected patients, day-case surgery for elective stoma closure is feasible and has acceptable complication and readmission rates. Day-case elective stoma closure can therefore be legitimately offered to selected patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B583. RESULTADOS A CORTO PLAZO DEL CIERRE DE ESTOMA AMBULATORIO UN ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL Y PROSPECTIVO ANTECEDENTES:El cierre electivo de un estoma es un procedimiento común y estandarizado en cirugía digestiva.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la viabilidad de la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre electivo de estomas.DISEÑO:Un estudio prospectivo, unicéntrico, no aleatorizado de pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo ambulatorio.ESCENARIO:Un hospital terciario francés entre enero de 2016 y junio de 2018.PACIENTES:Cierre electivo de estoma realizado por incisión local con una puntuación de la American Society of Anesthesiologists de I, II o III estabilizado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue la tasa de éxito de la cirugía ambulatoria en la población general (todos los pacientes habiendo sido sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo) y en la población por protocolo (pacientes que no cumplían con ninguno de los criterios de exclusión preoperatorios o perioperatorios). Los resultados secundarios (en la población por protocolo) fueron la tasa de morbilidad general (según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo), la tasa de morbilidad mayor (puntuación de Clavien ≥ 3) y los criterios de calidad de la cirugía ambulatoria (consulta no planificada, hospitalización no planificada y reoperación no planificada).RESULTADOS:Entre enero de 2016 y junio de 2018, 236 pacientes (la población general; edad media ± desviación estándar: 54 ± 17; 120 hombres (51%)) se sometieron al cierre electivo del estoma. Cincuenta de estos pacientes (21%) cumplieron todos los criterios de inclusión y constituyeron la población por protocolo. La tasa de éxito de la cirugía ambulatoria fue del 17% (40 de 236 pacientes) en la población general y del 80% (40 de 50 pacientes) en la población por protocolo. En la población por protocolo, la tasa de morbilidad general fue del 30% y la tasa de morbilidad mayor fue del 6%. De los 40 pacientes con cirugía ambulatoria exitosa, la tasa de consultas no planificadas y la tasa de hospitalización no planificada fueron ambas del 32.5%. No hubo reoperaciones no planificadas.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓN:En pacientes seleccionados, la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre electivo de estoma es factible y tiene tasas aceptables de complicaciones y reingreso. Por lo tanto, se puede ofrecer legítimamente el cierre electivo ambulatorio de estoma a pacientes seleccionados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B583.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shariq OA, Bews KA, McKenna NP, Dy BM, Lyden ML, Farley DR, Thompson GB, McKenzie TJ, Habermann EB. Is same-day discharge associated with increased 30-day postoperative complications and readmissions in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Surgery 2020; 169:289-297. [PMID: 33008614 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in minimally invasive surgery and perioperative care have decreased substantially the duration of time that patients spend recovering in hospital, with many laparoscopic procedures now being performed on an ambulatory basis. There are limited studies, however, on same-day discharge after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The objectives of this study were to investigate the outcomes and trends of ambulatory laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS Adult patients who underwent elective laparoscopic adrenalectomy between 2005 and 2016 were identified in the database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Baseline demographics and 30-day outcomes were compared between patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic adrenalectomy and those who were discharged after an inpatient stay. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modelling were used to investigate the association between same-day discharge and 30-day complications and unplanned readmissions. RESULTS Of the 4,807 patients included in the study, 88 (1.8%) underwent ambulatory laparoscopic adrenalectomy and 4,719 (98.2%) were admitted after the adrenalectomy. The same-day discharge group contained fewer obese patients (37.2% vs 50%; P = .04), a lesser proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists class III patients (45.5% vs 61%; P = .003), and more patients with primary aldosteronism (14.8% vs 6%; P = .002) compared with the inpatient group. After adjustment for confounders, same-day discharge was not associated with 30-day overall complications (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.35-3.85; P = .80) or unplanned readmissions (HR 2.77, 95% CI 0.86-8.96; P = .09). The percentage of laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed on an ambulatory basis at hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP remained low throughout the study period (0-3.1% per year) with no evidence of an increasing trend over time (P = .21). CONCLUSION Ambulatory laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to inpatient hospitalization in selected patients. Further study is needed to determine the cost savings, barriers to uptake, and optimal selection criteria for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omair A Shariq
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Katherine A Bews
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Benzon M Dy
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth B Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rahimli M, Perrakis A, Schellerer V, Andric M, Stockheim J, Lorenz E, Franz M, Arend J, Croner RS. A falciform ligament flap surface sealing technique for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted liver surgery. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12143. [PMID: 32699283 PMCID: PMC7376099 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69211-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Whether sealing the hepatic resection surface after liver surgery decreases morbidity is still unclear. Nevertheless, various methods and materials are currently in use for this procedure. Here, we describe our experience with a simple technique using a mobilized falciform ligament flap in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). We retrospectively analyzed the charts from 46 patients who received minor MILS between 2011 and 2019 from the same surgical team in a university hospital setting in Germany. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection, and 22 patients received robotic-assisted liver resection. Sixteen patients in the laparoscopic group and fourteen in the robotic group received a falciform ligament flap (FLF) to cover the resection surface after liver surgery. Our cohort was thus divided into two groups: laparoscopic and robotic patients with (MILS + FLF) and without an FLF (MILS-FLF). Twenty-eight patients (60.9%) in our cohort were male. The overall mean age was 56.8 years (SD 16.8). The mean operating time was 249 min in the MILS + FLF group vs. 235 min in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.682). The mean blood loss was 301 ml in the MILS + FLF group vs. 318 ml in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.859). Overall morbidity was 3.3% in the MILS + FLF group vs. 18.8% in the MILS-FLF group (p = 0.114). One patient in the MILS-FLF group (overall 2.2%), who underwent robotic liver surgery, developed bile leakage, but this did not occur in the MILS + FLF group. Covering the resection surface of the liver after minor minimally invasive liver resection with an FLF is a simple and cost-effective technique that does not prolong surgical time or negatively affect other perioperative parameters. In fact, it is a safe add-on step during MILS that may reduce postoperative morbidity. Further studies with larger cohorts will be needed to substantiate our proof of concept and results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rahimli
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - A Perrakis
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - V Schellerer
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Andric
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Stockheim
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - E Lorenz
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - M Franz
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Arend
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - R S Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rebibo L, Maurice KK, Nimier M, Ben Rehouma M, Montravers P, Msika S. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:1211-1217. [PMID: 31060908 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Day-case surgery (DCS) in digestive surgery is a hot topic, and new indications for DCS in the field of gastrointestinal surgery have recently been described. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular bariatric procedure in recent years. LSG is a reproducible, standardized procedure with a short operating time and possibly simple perioperative management. It therefore meets the criteria to be performed as a DCS procedure. Recently published series of LSG as DCS have demonstrated its feasibility. In this review on LSG performed as DCS, we focused on the management of risks associated with DCS and the results of such type of management. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases. Six studies were selected, comprising a total of 6227 patients. Most published series were retrospective single-center studies. Inclusion criteria were similar between most studies (primary sleeve gastrectomy for most series, patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 or a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 in the presence of co-morbidities), while exclusion criteria were based on literature data for some studies (using series on risk factors for morbidity and mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) and personal experience for other series. The mortality rate of LSG as DCS ranges 0%-.08%, while the overall complication rate ranges 0%-10%. The unplanned overnight admission rate after LSG ranges .8%-8%. The unscheduled hospitalization rates range 2.1%-8.5%. LSG performed as DCS is feasible with good results, but cannot be proposed for all patients. Good selection is necessary in others to avoid increased risk of morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Rebibo
- Department of Digestive, Esogastric and Bariatric Surgery, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot - Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Karim K Maurice
- Department of Digestive, Esogastric and Bariatric Surgery, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France; Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Martin Nimier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mouna Ben Rehouma
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Montravers
- Université Paris Diderot - Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Simon Msika
- Department of Digestive, Esogastric and Bariatric Surgery, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot - Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|