1
|
Fujimoto D, Yonemura Y, Taniguchi K, Kobayashi H. Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Cytoreductive Surgery With Upper-Abdominal Peritonectomy for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei With Low Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index: A Pilot Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:196-200. [PMID: 38417107 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our study's objective was to provide the method for, and preliminary findings from, robot-assisted cytoreductive surgery (r-CRS) combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) with limited peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective pilot study on consecutive patients with PSM secondary to pseudomyxoma peritonei with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of under 10 who were indicated for r-CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritectomy. Perioperative and 30-day major morbidity and mortality characteristics were analyzed and compared with cases in which laparoscopic CRS (l-CRS) was performed under the same conditions. RESULTS Six patients underwent r-CRS combined with an upper-abdominal partial peritonectomy. Their mean PCI was 4.83. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of the operation was 156.8 minutes. There was no major complication and no mortality. The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 6.33 days. r-CRS resulted in less blood loss, a lower C-reactive protein level, and a shorter length of hospital stay that were significantly different compared with those of l-CRS. CONCLUSIONS This is the initial technical report of a robotic approach for CRS combined with upper-abdominal peritonectomy. r-CRS with a combined upper-abdominal peritonectomy was shown to be safe and feasible for PMP with limited PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Dissemination Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada-city, Japan
| | - Keizo Taniguchi
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pawar A, Warikoo V, Salunke A, Sharma M, Pandya S, Bhardwaj A, KS S, Aaron J. Outcomes of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (M-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC vs. open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies: a meta-analysis. Pleura Peritoneum 2024; 9:1-13. [PMID: 38558870 PMCID: PMC10980983 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) has shown better peri-operative outcomes with equivalent oncological outcomes in gastrointestinal and thoracic oncology. Open CRS (O-CRS) procedure accompanies inevitable and significant surgical morbidity in patients. The aim of the review article is to compare outcomes of M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC with open procedure in peritoneal surface malignancies. Content Comprehensive search of databases was done and total 2,807 articles were found (2793-PubMed and 14-Cochrane review). PRISMA flow chart was prepared and 14 articles were selected. Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using random-effects model (DerSimonian Laird) and fixed effect model. Publication bias was tested with Funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Quality of studies was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Summary and Outlook Patients in both groups [total (732), M-CRS(319), O-CRS(413)] were similar in demographic characteristics. Peri-operative outcomes were significantly better in M-CRS group in terms of blood loss SMD=-2.379, p<0.001 (95 % CI -2.952 to -1.805), blood transfusion RR=0.598, p=0.011 (95 % CI 0.402 to 0.889), bowel recovery SMD=-0.843, p=0.01 (95 % CI -1.487 to -0.2), hospital stay SMD=-2.348, p<0.001 (95 % CI -3.178 to -1.519) and total morbidity RR=0.538, p<0.001 (95 % CI 0.395 to 0.731). Duration of surgery SMD=-0.0643 (95 % CI -0.993 to 0.865, p=0.892) and CC0 score RR=1.064 (95 % CI 0.992 to 1.140, p=0.083) had no significant difference. Limited studies which evaluated survival showed similar outcomes. This meta-analysis shows that M-CRS and HIPEC/EPIC is feasible and has better peri-operative outcomes compared to open procedure in patients with limited peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) peritoneal surface malignancies. Survival outcomes were not calculated. Further studies are warranted in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajinkya Pawar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Vikas Warikoo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Mohit Sharma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Amol Bhardwaj
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sandeep KS
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Jebin Aaron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Durán-Martínez M, Gómez-Dueñas G, Rodriguez-Ortíz L, Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Gordón-Suárez A, Casado-Adam Á, Rufián-Peña S, Valenzuela-Molina F, Rufián-Andujar B, Vázquez-Borrego MC, Romero-Ruiz A, Briceño-Delgado J, Arjona-Sánchez Á. Laparoscopic versus open approach for interval cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:66-74. [PMID: 37903884 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10508-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of carcinomatosis from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of both laparoscopic and open approach for interval CRS+HIPEC in a matched cohort of patients with advanced EOC. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including 254 patients treated with interval CRS-HIPEC between January 2016 and December 2021 was performed. Patients with primary disease and limited carcinomatosis (PCI ≤ 10) were selected. A comparative analysis of patients treated by either open (O-CRS-HIPEC) or the laparoscopic (L-CRS-HIPEC) approach was conducted. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and perioperative outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were finally selected and enrolled into two comparable groups in this study. Of these, 14 patients were treated by interval L-CRS-HIPEC and 39 by interval O-CRS-HIPEC. The L-CRS-HIPEC group had a shorter hospital stay (5.6 ± 1.9 vs. 9.7 ± 9.8 days; p < 0.001) and a shorter time to return to systemic chemotherapy (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 10.3 ± 16.8 weeks; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between both groups. The 2-year OS and DFS was 100% and 62% in the L-CRS-HIPEC group versus 92% and 60% in the O-CRS-HIPEC group, respectively (p = 0.96; p = 0.786). CONCLUSION This study suggests that the use of interval L-CRS-HIPEC for primary advanced EOC is associated with shorter hospital stay and return to systemic treatment while obtaining similar oncological results compared to the open approach. Further prospective research is needed to recommend this new approach for these strictly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lidia Rodriguez-Ortíz
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Sanchez-Hidalgo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Antonio Gordón-Suárez
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Ángela Casado-Adam
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sebastián Rufián-Peña
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Francisca Valenzuela-Molina
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Blanca Rufián-Andujar
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - María Carmen Vázquez-Borrego
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Antonio Romero-Ruiz
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Av. Menendez Pidal, 14004, Cordoba, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le Linn Y, Seo CJ, Wong JSM, Ong CAJ, Chia CS. An Asian Tertiary Centre's Early Experience with Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:175-180. [PMID: 37359940 PMCID: PMC10284765 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01632-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of open cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown improved oncological survival in terms of treating peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). However, this procedure often comes with associated morbidity. The move towards use of laparoscopic surgery in this field is postulated to lead to a reduction in morbidity and earlier return to function, but literature on its use for CRS and HIPEC has been scarce. We performed a retrospective review of 6 patients with PSM who underwent laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC in our institution and analysed the patient characteristics, oncological history, perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 0 (IQR 0-1.25). All 6 patients had appendiceal primaries. Median operative time was 285 min (IQR 228.8-300); median length of stay was 7.5 days (IQR 5-8.8). All patients achieved complete cytoreduction, and there was no conversion to open surgery. One patient developed port site infection and another 2 patients subsequently developed adhesions. Median follow-up time was 35 (IQR 17.5-41) months. No patients had developed recurrence at the time of data collection. We conclude that in patients with limited PCI sore (< 2), laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC are safe and feasible. With increasing experience, a select group of patients with limited PSM may be treated via minimally invasive surgery, minimising the morbidity of a traditional laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Le Linn
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Chin Jin Seo
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jolene Si Min Wong
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
- Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR Research Entities, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durán-Martínez M, Gómez-Dueñas G, Rodriguez-Ortíz L, Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Suárez AG, Casado-Adam Á, Rufián-Peña S, Andujar BR, Valenzuela-Molina F, Vázquez-Borrego MC, Romero-Ruiz A, Briceño-Delgado J, Arjona-Sánchez Á. Learning curve for minimal invasive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:146. [PMID: 37046100 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02882-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefits of the minimally invasive approach for performing cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (L-CRS + HIPEC) have been described previously, associating an early recovery with similar oncologic outcomes in patients with limited peritoneal carcinomatosis. Currently, no studies are focusing on the learning curve for this emerging procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the L-CRS + HIPEC learning curve and its knock-on effect on the perioperative outcomes. METHODS We identified all consecutive unselected patients who underwent L-CRS + HIPEC by a single surgeon between April 2016 and January 2022 (n = 51). Patients who underwent risk-reducing CRS + HIPEC (PCI = 0) or initial conversion due to an intraoperative PCI > 10 were excluded from the final analysis. To evaluate the learning curve, perioperative data were analysed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Major morbidity occurred in one patient (3.8%). The difficulty of the L-CRS + HIPEC procedures was categorised as low in 23.1% (n = 6), intermediate in 19.2% (n = 5), and advanced in 57.7% (n = 15). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.4 ± 1.5 days. No patient had a conversion to open surgery. The learning curve was divided into two distinct phases: the learning phase (1-14) and the consolidation phase (15-26). A significant decrease in the operative time (375 ± 103.1 vs 239.2 ± 63.6 min) was observed with no differences in complexity, the number of peritonectomy procedures, or morbidity. CONCLUSION L-CRS + HIPEC is a complex procedure that must be performed in a high-volume and experienced oncologic unit, requiring a learning curve to achieve the consolidation condition, which could be established after 14 procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lidia Rodriguez-Ortíz
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Sanchez-Hidalgo
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Antonio Gordon Suárez
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Ángela Casado-Adam
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Sebastián Rufián-Peña
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Blanca Rufián Andujar
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Francisca Valenzuela-Molina
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - María Carmen Vázquez-Borrego
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | - Antonio Romero-Ruiz
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain.
- GE09 Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncological Surgery, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Cordoba, Menendez Pidal Av 14004, Cordova, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rooks CO, Hughes T, Rodgers S, Brister K, Christopher WO, Orr WS. Robotic Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Am Surg 2023:31348231161709. [PMID: 36868581 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231161709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is traditionally an open operation given the dissection required during cytoreduction. There are reports of minimally invasive HIPECs, but CRS to an accepted completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) has been described less frequently. We report a patient with metastatic low-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasm (LAMN) to the peritoneum treated with robotic CRS-HIPEC. A 49-year-old male presented to our center following a laparoscopic appendectomy at an outside facility with final pathology showing LAMN. He had a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score of 5 determined by diagnostic laparoscopy. Given the small amount of peritoneal disease, he was deemed a candidate for robotic CRS-HIPEC. Cytoreduction was completed robotically with a CCR score of 0. He then received HIPEC with mitomycin C. This case shows the feasibility of robotic-assisted CRS-HIPEC for select LAMNs. When appropriately selected, we advocate for the continued use of this minimally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton O Rooks
- Department of Surgery, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Tara Hughes
- Department of Surgery, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Skylar Rodgers
- Department of Surgery, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Kelly Brister
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Wade O Christopher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - W Shannon Orr
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 21693University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gupta V, Rao TS, Raju KVVN, Iyer RR, Ahmed SM, Shah M, Nagaraju R. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Optimal Interval Cytoreduction Surgery (LOICS) in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancers Having Low Burden Disease. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:270-276. [PMID: 36891449 PMCID: PMC9986363 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01682-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy has been increasingly utilised for cytoreduction surgery in patients with early ovarian cancers. The present study tries to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic interval cytoreduction surgery (LOICS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) having low burden residual disease. A retrospective study of was done of AOC's who underwent LOICS between 2010 and 2014. Epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent interval cytoreduction surgery were included and analysed for short-term and long-term outcomes. In all, 36 patients with stage III ovarian cancers were included in the analysis. Twenty-two (61.1%) were grade 3 and 14 (38.8%) were grade 2, and no patient had grade 1 tumour. Stage wise majority were stage IIIC (94.4%) followed by 2 (5.5%) in stage IIIA. There was 1 postoperative complication (2.5%) and no intraoperative complications. Median time to discharge and to start chemotherapy was 5 days and 23 days respectively. After a median follow-up of 60 months, 3 patients (8.3%) were lost to follow-up and the remaining 33 patients were analysed for survival outcomes. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 58.3% and 36.1% respectively. The median RFS and OS were 24 months and 51 months, respectively. Most recurrences involved the peritoneum (82.6%), and 5 patients (21.7%) had nodal recurrence alone. Laparoscopic optimal interval cytoreduction is feasible in patients with advanced ovarian cancers provided the disease burden permits optimal surgery, especially in centres with expertise in complex laparoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Gupta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - TSubramanyeshwar Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - KVVN Raju
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - R. Rajagopalan Iyer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - Syed Murtaza Ahmed
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - Manan Shah
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Rd No 10, Hyderabad, 500034 India
| | - Ramchandra Nagaraju
- Department of Surgical Oncology, American Institute of Oncology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sommariva A, Valle M, Gelmini R, Tonello M, Carboni F, De Manzoni G, Sorrentino L, Pasqual EM, Bacchetti S, Sassaroli C, Di Giorgio A, Framarini M, Marrelli D, Casella F, Federici O. Laparoscopic Cytoreduction Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM): Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010279. [PMID: 36612274 PMCID: PMC9818987 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has gained increasing acceptance in clinical practice. Performing CRS and HIPEC laparoscopically represents a challenging and intriguing technical evolution. However, the experiences are limited, and the evidence is low. This retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC within the Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam. Clinical, perioperative, and follow-up data were extracted and collected on prospectively maintained databases. We added a systematic review according to the PRISMA method for English-language articles through April 2022 using the keywords laparoscopic, hyperthermic, HIPEC, and chemotherapy. From 2016 to 2022, fourteen patients were treated with Lap-CRS-HIPEC with curative intent within the Italian centers. No conversion to open was observed. The median duration of surgery was 487.5 min. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 3, and complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. Two patients (14.3%) had major postoperative complications, one requiring reintervention. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, eleven patients were alive without disease (78.6%), two patients developed recurrence (14.3%), and one patient died for unrelated causes (7.1%). The literature review confirmed these results. In conclusion, current evidence shows that Lap-CRS-HIPEC is feasible, safe, and associated with a favorable outcome in selected patients. An accurate patient selection will continue to be paramount in choosing this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-423-421306
| | - Mario Valle
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- SC Chirurgia Generale d’Urgenza ed Oncologica, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Tonello
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Unit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lorena Sorrentino
- SC Chirurgia Generale d’Urgenza ed Oncologica, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Pasqual
- AOUD Center Advanced Surgical Oncology, DAME University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Bacchetti
- AOUD Center Advanced Surgical Oncology, DAME University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Cinzia Sassaroli
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale” IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Framarini
- Surgery and Advanced Oncological Therapy Unit, Ospedale “GB.Morgagni-L.Pierantoni”—AUSL Forlì, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Daniele Marrelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Francesco Casella
- Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Orietta Federici
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Upper-Abdominal Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian Cancer—Therapeutic Rationale, Surgical Anatomy and Techniques of Cytoreduction. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES DEVELOPMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/std12010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the cornerstone of treating advanced ovarian cancer. Approximately 60–70% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will have involvement in the upper abdomen or the supracolic compartment of the abdominal cavity. Though the involvement of this region results in poorer survival compared, complete cytoreduction benefits overall survival, making upper-abdominal cytoreduction an essential component of CRS for advanced ovarian cancer. The upper abdomen constitutes several vital organs and large blood vessels draped with the parietal or visceral peritoneum, common sites of disease in ovarian cancer. A surgeon treating advanced ovarian cancer should be well versed in upper-abdominal cytoreduction techniques, including diaphragmatic peritonectomy and diaphragm resection, lesser omentectomy, splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy, liver resection, cholecystectomy, and suprarenal retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Other procedures such as clearance of the periportal region, Glisson’s capsulectomy, clearance of the superior recess of the lesser sac, and Morrison’s pouch are essential as these regions are often involved in ovarian cancer. This manuscript covers the surgical anatomy of the upper abdomen, the techniques and therapeutic rationale of upper-abdominal cytoreduction, and specific measures for perioperative management of these patients. The main focus is the description of various peritonectomies and regional lymphadenectomies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kepenekian V, Bhatt A, Péron J, Alyami M, Benzerdjeb N, Bakrin N, Falandry C, Passot G, Rousset P, Glehen O. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:698-718. [PMID: 36071285 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, in line with advances in the management of most abdominopelvic metastatic diseases, considerable progress has been made over the past decade. An improved understanding of disease biology has led to the more accurate prediction of neoplasia aggressiveness and the treatment response and has been reflected in the proposal of new classification systems. Achieving complete cytoreductive surgery remains the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment of PSMs. Alongside centralization in expert centres, enabling the delivery of multimodal and multidisciplinary strategies, preoperative management is a crucial step in order to select patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Depending on the specific PSM, the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and of perioperative systemic chemotherapy, in particular, in the neoadjuvant setting, is established in certain scenarios but questioned in several others, although more prospective data are required. In this Review, we describe advances in all aspects of the management of PSMs including disease biology, assessment and improvement of disease resectability, perioperative management, systemic therapy and pre-emptive management, and we speculate on future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahan Kepenekian
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Julien Péron
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Department of Onco-Geriatry, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Radiology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France. .,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102840. [PMID: 35628966 PMCID: PMC9143396 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a poor prognostic factor for all malignancies. This extent of metastatic disease progression remains difficult to treat with systemic therapies due to poor peritoneal vascularization resulting in limited drug delivery and penetration into tissues. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are surgical interventions that directly target peritoneal tumors and have improved outcomes for PC resulting from appendiceal and colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these radical therapies, long-term survival remains infrequent, and recurrence is common. The reasons for these outcomes are multifactorial and signal the need for the continued development of novel therapeutics, techniques, and approaches to improve outcomes for these patients. Here, we review landmark historical studies that serve as the foundation for current recommendations, recent discoveries, clinical trials, active research, and areas of future interest in CRS/HIPEC to treat PC originating from appendiceal and colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chang SC, Fingerhut A, Chen WTL. Short and long-term outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal and appendiceal cancer peritoneal metastasis: Propensity score-matched comparison between laparoscopy vs. open approaches. Surg Oncol 2022; 43:101766. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
13
|
Shaltiel T, Solomon D, Pletcher ER, Golas BJ, Magge DR, Sarpel U, Labow DM, Cohen NA. Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6153-6161. [PMID: 35080674 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09034-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of laparoscopy in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is not well established. Herein, we describe our early experience of laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC in patients with low-volume peritoneal disease compared to patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC during the same time period. METHODS Using a prospectively maintained database, patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC were compared to a control cohort of patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC, matched for peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction, and tumor histology. RESULTS Between 2008 and 2017, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC and were compared to a matched control cohort of 32 patients who underwent open CRS/HIPEC. Clinical and demographic data were similar between the groups. PCI, number of resected organs, and optimal cytoreduction rates were comparable. Patients who underwent laparoscopic experienced a lower estimated blood loss, (median, [IQR 1-3]); 150 mL, [50-300] vs. 100 mL, [50-125], p = 0.04, shorter length of stay (median [IQR 1-3]; 4 days [3-6] vs. 6 days [5-8], p < 0.01, and a lower 30-day complication rate (6.3% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.577) and overall survival (p = 0.472) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary study demonstrates that laparoscopic CRS/HIPEC is feasible and safe for curative treatment in selected patients with low tumor volume. Minimally invasive CRS/HIPEC is associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter length of stay. There was no difference in long-term oncological outcomes between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Shaltiel
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Eric R Pletcher
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Benjamin J Golas
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Deepa R Magge
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Umut Sarpel
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Daniel M Labow
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Noah A Cohen
- Division of Surgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center, E. 98th Street. Suite 7A, Box 1103, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Appendiceal tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (RENAPE, RENAPATH, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:30-39. [PMID: 34815194 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of appendicular epithelial tumors (AT) and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) published in March 2020, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS All French medical societies specialized in the management of AT and PMP collaboratively established these recommendations based on literature until December 2019 and the results of a Delphi vote carried out by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International experts, and graded into 4 categories (A, B, C, Expert Agreement) according to their level of evidence. RESULTS AT and PMP are rare but represent a wide range of clinico-pathological entities with several pathological classification systems and different biological behaviors. Their treatment modalities may vary accordingly and range from simple surveillance or laparoscopic appendectomy to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and / or systemic chemotherapy. The prognosis of these neoplasms may also largely vary according to their pathological grade and spreading at diagnosis or during the follow-up. Given the rarity of certain situations, the therapeutic strategy adapted to each patient, must be discussed in a specialized multidisciplinary meeting after a specialized pathological and radiological pre-therapeutic assessment and a clinical examination by a surgeon specializing in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. CONCLUSION These recommendations are proposed to achieve the most beneficial strategy in a daily practice as the wide range and the rareness of these entities renders their management challenging. These guidelines are permanently being reviewed.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cusumano C, Carrere S, Bouillin A, Nougaret S, Khellaf L, Quénet F, Sgarbura O. Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in LAMN with small volume of peritoneal disease: a valuable option of treatment for good patient-related experience measures (PREMs). Surg Endosc 2021; 36:4757-4763. [PMID: 34845545 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08816-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the best effective treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). In the last years, the advances in histopathology have stratified PMP lesions in different degrees of aggressivity suggesting the possibility of a tailored treatment. In a subset of patients with small volume peritoneal disease, laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC is feasible. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of laparoscopic CRS + HIPEC in a monocentric series of patients under patient-related experience measures (PREMs). METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC with curative intent at Cancer Institute of Montpellier were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed. Selection criteria for laparoscopic approach were low-grade PMP with pathological confirmation prior to CRS-HIPEC, age < 75 years, no extra-peritoneal disease, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) < 10, and a limited history of abdominal surgery. A PREMS interview was conducted before analysis with all the included patients. Outcomes of interest included postoperative morbidity, medium-term survival, and PREMs. RESULTS Fourteen patients were operated on for low-grade PMP with a laparoscopic approach at our institution. Conversions to laparotomy were necessary in three patients, and postoperative complications were observed in three patients (Clavien 3b in one patient). In-hospital postoperative median stay was 9.5 days. No death or recurrence was observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic CRS-HIPEC for LAMN in presence of small peritoneal disease is feasible in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. According to our PREMs questionnaire, patients' expectations were satisfied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Cusumano
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de HautepierreHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sébastien Carrere
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - Alix Bouillin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - Stéphanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - Lakhdar Khellaf
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - François Quénet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 05, France. .,IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chang SC, Seow-En I, Ke TW, Chen HC, Chen YC, Tsai YY, Wang HM, Chen WTL. Laparoscopic total pelvic peritonectomy for colorectal cancer pelvic carcinomatosis: a retrospective case series and photographic/videographic step-by-step guide. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2178-2191. [PMID: 34494157 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08719-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis has been shown to prolong survival with acceptable morbidity rates. Total pelvic peritonectomy (TPP), or complete removal of all pelvic peritoneum, constitutes an important and technically challenging component of CRS. Here we report our experience and describe our technique of laparoscopic total pelvic peritonectomy (LTPP), using a photographic/videographic step-by-step guide. METHODS All patients who underwent LTPP for pelvic carcinomatosis from a colorectal origin were included in the study. Only patients with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score of ≤ 10 were selected for CRS with LTPP. Patients who had extra-abdominopelvic cavity metastases were excluded. The final decision to proceed with CRS was made following laparoscopic assessment. RESULTS From January 2017 to December 2020, 15 consecutive patients underwent LTPP for colorectal cancer pelvic carcinomatosis. Median patient age and PCI score was 53 years (range 33-78) and 8 (range 3-10), respectively. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. Thirteen patients (87%) underwent concomitant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The median operative duration was 748 min (interquartile range [IQR] 681-850). Median intra-operative blood loss and length of hospital stay was 100 ml (IQR 50-300) and 10 days (IQR 8-12), respectively. Five patients (33%) experienced 30-day post-operative morbidity, with one (6.7%) experiencing a higher grade (Clavien-Dindo IIIa) complication. Median follow-up duration was 13 months (IQR 3-19), during which four (27%) had systemic recurrence and one (6.7%) died after 15 months following peritoneal and systemic recurrences. CONCLUSION LTPP is a feasible option for low-volume pelvic carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. Strict patient selection is essential, and the procedure should be converted if the PCI score cannot be assessed or complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved. Proficiency at laparoscopic pelvic surgery is mandatory for performing LTPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Chi Chang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Isaac Seow-En
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tao-Wei Ke
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Chang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Yao Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hwei-Ming Wang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. .,Division of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, No. 199, Sec. 1, Xinglong Rd., Zhubei City, 302, Hsinchu County, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gutiérrez Delgado MDP, Carrasco Campos J, Mera Velasco S, Titos García A, Santoyo Santoyo J. A laparoscopic approach to peritoneal carcinomatosis surgery guided by indocyanine green: two cases in our centre - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2491-2492. [PMID: 34157217 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
18
|
Chen TC, Liang JT. Robotic low anterior resection with total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and en bloc pelvic peritonectomy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the multi-modal treatment of rectosigmoid cancer with peritoneal seeding - A video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1591-1592. [PMID: 33675572 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Chun Chen
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Surgical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Tung Liang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arjona-Sanchez A, Aziz O, Passot G, Salti G, Esquivel J, Van der Speeten K, Piso P, Nedelcut DS, Sommariva A, Yonemura Y, Turaga K, Selvasekar CR, Rodriguez-Ortiz L, Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Casado-Adam A, Rufian-Peña S, Briceño J, Glehen O. Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for limited peritoneal metastasis. The PSOGI international collaborative registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:1420-1426. [PMID: 33298341 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A laparoscopic approach for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (L-CRS+HIPEC) in highly selected patients has been reported in small cohorts with a demonstrable reduction in length of stay and post-operative morbidity. This study aims to analyse individual patient data from these international centres collected through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) L-CRS+HIPEC registry. METHODS An international registry was designed through a networking database (REDCAP®). All centres performing L-CRS+HIPEC were invited through PSOGI to submit data on their cases. Patient's characteristics, postoperative outcomes and survival were analysed. RESULTS Ten international centres contributed a total of 143 L-CRS+HIPEC patients during the study period. The most frequent indication was low grade pseudomyxoma peritonei in 79/143 (55%). Other indications were benign multicyst mesothelioma in 21/143(14%) and peritoneal metastasis from colon carcinoma in 18/143 (12,5%) and ovarian carcinoma in 13/143 (9%). The median PCI was 3 (2-5). The median length of stay was 6 (5-10) days, with 30-day major morbidity rate of 8.3% and 30-day mortality rate of 0.7%. At a median follow-up of 37 (16-64) months 126/143 patients (88.2%) were free of disease. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of these data demonstrates that L-CRS+HIPEC is a safe and feasible procedure in highly selected patients with limited peritoneal disease when performed at experienced centres. While short to midterm outcomes are encouraging in patients with less invasive histology, longer follow up is required before recommending it for patients with more aggressive cancers with peritoneal dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Arjona-Sanchez
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain.
| | - O Aziz
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G Passot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| | - G Salti
- Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare, Naperville, Illinois and University of Illinois, Chicago, USA
| | | | | | - P Piso
- Dept. for General and Visceral Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - D-S Nedelcut
- Dept. for General and Visceral Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - A Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - C R Selvasekar
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - L Rodriguez-Ortiz
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
| | - J M Sanchez-Hidalgo
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
| | - A Casado-Adam
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
| | - S Rufian-Peña
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
| | - J Briceño
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba and GE09, Group of Research in Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Oncologic Surgery. Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Risk of Omental Metastases in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1251-1256. [PMID: 32618618 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete cytoreductive surgery of macroscopic tumor is a potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine the risk of microscopic tumor involvement of the greater omentum in patients with normal-looking omentum at the time of cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases. DESIGN This was a cohort study. SETTINGS The prospective BIG-RENAPE database (NCT02823860) was analyzed. PATIENTS All patients who underwent a complete cytoreductive surgery with greater omentectomy for colorectal peritoneal metastases at a single institution between January 2005 and December 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Data regarding involvement of the greater omentum were extracted from surgical and pathological records. RESULTS Of 337 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases, 241 (71.51%) presented macroscopic omental invasion. Among the 96 patients who underwent a complete cytoreductive surgery with no macroscopic evidence of disease in the greater omentum during surgical exploration, 17 patients (17.70%) had microscopic evidence of tumor in the omentum. Patients with pathological evidence of omental tumor involvement were more likely to have a higher peritoneal cancer index (median 9 vs 4, p = 0.006). LIMITATIONS No survival analysis could be provided regarding the impact of omentectomy. CONCLUSION In patients with a normal-looking omentum during surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases, microscopic tumor was present in 17%. Routine greater omentectomy should be considered in these patients to ensure complete cytoreduction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B262.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823860 RIESGO DE METÁSTASIS OMENTALES EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGÍA CITORREDUCTORA, POR METÁSTASIS PERITONEALES COLORRECTALES: La cirugía citorreductora completa del tumor macroscópico, es un tratamiento potencialmente curativo, en pacientes con metástasis peritoneales colorrectales.Determinar el riesgo de afectación tumoral microscópica del epiplón mayor, en pacientes con epiplón de aspecto normal, al momento de la cirugía citorreductora por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales.Este fue un estudio de cohorte.Se analizó la base de datos prospectiva BIG-RENAPE (NCT02823860).Se incluyeron a todos los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía citorreductora completa con omentectomía mayor, por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, de una sola institución, entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017.Se extrajeron los datos de la afectación del epiplón mayor, de los registros quirúrgicos y patológicos.De 337 pacientes sometidos a cirugía citorreductora por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, 241 (71.51%) presentaron invasión omental macroscópica. Entre los 96 pacientes sometidos a cirugía citorreductora completa, sin evidencia macroscópica de enfermedad en el epiplón mayor, durante la exploración quirúrgica, 17 pacientes (17,70%) tuvieron en el epiplón, evidencia microscópica de tumor. Los pacientes con evidencia patológica de afectación del tumor omental, fueron más propensos a tener un índice de cáncer peritoneal más alto (mediana 9 frente a 4, p = 0,006).No se pudo obtener ningún análisis de supervivencia, sobre el impacto de la omentectomía.En pacientes con epiplón de aspecto normal, durante la cirugía por metástasis peritoneales colorrectales, estuvo presente el tumor microscópico, en el 17% de los casos. Se debe considerar una omentectomía mayor de rutina en estos pacientes, para asegurar una citorreducción completa. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B262.Identificador de ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02823860.
Collapse
|
21
|
Arjona-Sánchez A, Cortés-Guiral D, Duran-Martínez M, Villarejo-Campos P, Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Casado-Adam A, Rodriguez-Ortiz L, Romero-Ruiz A, Rufian-Andujar B, Espinosa-Redondo E, Valenzuela-Molina F, Rufián-Peña S, Briceño-Delgado J. Complete laparoscopic pelvic peritonectomy plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:1083-1088. [PMID: 32725353 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to present the technique for, and early results of complete laparoscopic pelvic peritonectomy (LPP) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS We conducted a study on consecutive patients who had LPP for limited peritoneal carcinomatosis (peritoneal carcinomatosis index < 10) from ovarian cancer, colon cancer and benign multicystic mesothelioma, from January 2017 to November 2019 at 2 referral centers in Spain. Perioperative, pathologic, 30-day major morbidity and mortality characteristics were analyzed. The surgical technique is shown in the attached video. RESULTS Twelve LPP + HIPEC were performed. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 100% of the patients, the median duration of the operation was 450 min (range 360-600 min). There were 2 cases (16%) of IIIa morbidity (trocar hernia and pleural effusion), and no mortality. The median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (range 4-10 days). The median length of follow-up was 10 months (range 2-30 months). There was a recurrence at the splenic hilum in 1 patient which was treated by laparoscopic splenectomy and one nodal recurrence at 13 months while all other patients are alive and free of disease at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This is the first technical video of a minimally invasive approach for complete pelvic peritonectomy plus omentectomy associated with HIPEC. For highly selected patients, this procedure presents a feasible and safe alternative to the maximally invasive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Arjona-Sánchez
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain. .,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain.
| | - D Cortés-Guiral
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Hospital Infanta Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Duran-Martínez
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain
| | | | - J M Sánchez-Hidalgo
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain.,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| | - A Casado-Adam
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain.,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| | - L Rodriguez-Ortiz
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain.,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| | - A Romero-Ruiz
- Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| | - B Rufian-Andujar
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain
| | - E Espinosa-Redondo
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain
| | - F Valenzuela-Molina
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain
| | - S Rufián-Peña
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain.,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| | - J Briceño-Delgado
- Oncologic and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Menedez Pidal Av., Córdoba, 14004, Spain.,Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, University Hospital Reina Sofıa, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stewart JH, Blazer DG, Calderon MJG, Carter TM, Eckhoff A, Al Efishat MA, Fernando DG, Foster JM, Hayes-Jordan A, Johnston FM, Lautz TB, Levine EA, Maduekwe UN, Mangieri CW, Moaven O, Mogal H, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI. The Evolving Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 58:100860. [PMID: 33832580 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason M Foster
- Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Fabian M Johnston
- Complex General Surgical Oncology Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ugwuji N Maduekwe
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Perry Shen
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rodríguez-Ortiz L, Arjona-Sánchez A, Ibañez-Rubio M, Sánchez-Hidalgo J, Casado-Adam A, Rufián-Peña S, Briceño-Delgado J. Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: a comparative matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1778-1785. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07572-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
24
|
Dumont F, Duchalais E, Aumont A, Thibaudeau E. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy by laparoscopy via a single-port approach for low-grade peritoneal malignancy. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:2789-2795. [PMID: 32166549 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07492-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a long and complex procedure. A minimal invasive approach is rarely performed. The feasibility of laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC via a single port (SP) approach is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of CRS and HIPEC with a SP approach. METHODS This study is IDEAL stage I-IIa. Patients with low grade and limited peritoneal malignancy were included in a tertiary care cancer center. Intra- and post-operative adverse events were recorded and classified according to medical and surgical dedicated classifications. The main objective measurement to assess feasibility was the conversion to open or multiport surgery. RESULTS A total of 12 highly selected patients were assessed. The median operating time was 240 min (range, 180-360) and two near miss events were reported. Two conversions to open and multiport surgery occurred. The median comprehensive complication index was 0 (range, 0-42.6) with two severe adverse events (Clavien-Dindo or CTC-AE ≥ 3). The median length of stay was 8.5 days (range, 5-13). CONCLUSION CRS and HIPEC via a laparoscopic SP approach are feasible and safe in the short term. The next step should be a prospective development study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dumont
- Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, West Cancer Institute, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44800, Saint Herblain, France.
| | - E Duchalais
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - A Aumont
- Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, West Cancer Institute, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44800, Saint Herblain, France
| | - E Thibaudeau
- Department of Digestive Oncological Surgery, West Cancer Institute, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44800, Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fields AC, Lu PW, Li GZ, Welten V, Jolissaint JS, Vierra BM, Saadat LV, Larson AC, Atkinson RB, Melnitchouk N. Current practices and future steps for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Curr Probl Surg 2020; 57:100727. [PMID: 32151327 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2019.100727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Pamela W Lu
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - George Z Li
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Vanessa Welten
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua S Jolissaint
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Lily V Saadat
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Abby C Larson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel B Atkinson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Enhanced postoperative recovery with minimally invasive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancies of gastrointestinal origin. Surg Oncol 2019; 33:38-42. [PMID: 32561097 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are the treatment of choice for select patients with peritoneal surface malignancies; however, the traditional open approach may be associated with significant morbidity. We evaluated postoperative outcomes with minimally invasive (MI) CRS and HIPEC. METHODS Review of our institutional database identified 47 patients who underwent optimal cytoreduction (CC0 or CC1). Those with a PCI ≤ 15 and primary malignancy of gastrointestinal origin were then selected for subgroup analysis. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors impacting postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Demographic data did not significantly differ between open (n = 24) and minimally invasive (n = 9) groups. The MI group had a mean age of 57.34 ± 14.92, BMI of 27.03 ± 4.27, Charlson comorbidity score of 1.78 ± 1.72, and PCI of 5.56 ± 5.08. Mean time to flatus (days) was 2.78 in the MI group and 5.04 in the open group (p < 0.001), and mean length of IV analgesic use (days) was 3.11 in the MI group compared to 6.00 in the open group (p = 0.006). Mean length of stay (days) was 5.11 in the MI group and 8.67 in the open group (p = 0.033). Surgical approach (p = 0.037) and BMI (p = 0.039) were the only factors impacting length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC is an excellent option for low volume peritoneal disease of gastrointestinal origin. A minimally invasive approach yields faster return of bowel function, reduced postoperative analgesia requirements, and shorter hospital stay.
Collapse
|
27
|
Alshammari T, Alshammari S, Hakami R, Alharbi A, Alyami M, Abdulla M, Bin Traiki T. Single-Port Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2019; 20:1648-1651. [PMID: 31704906 PMCID: PMC6859933 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.918064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Male, 35 Final Diagnosis: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm Symptoms: Abdominal pain Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Single port laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy Specialty: Surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turki Alshammari
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sulaiman Alshammari
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Riyadh Hakami
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alharbi
- Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha Abdulla
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thamer Bin Traiki
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arjona-Sánchez Á, Durán M, Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Rufian-Peña S. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian carcinoma treated by interval laparoscopic complete cytoreduction and HIPEC with extraction through natural orifice. Surg Oncol 2019; 31:14-15. [PMID: 31472328 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14015, Cordoba, Spain; CIBERehd, IMIBIC, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14015, Cordoba, Spain.
| | - Manuel Durán
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14015, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14015, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sebastián Rufian-Peña
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n. 14015, Cordoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sánchez-Hidalgo JM, Rodríguez-Ortiz L, Arjona-Sánchez Á, Rufián-Peña S, Casado-Adam Á, Cosano-Álvarez A, Briceño-Delgado J. Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:3484-3502. [PMID: 31367152 PMCID: PMC6658395 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lidia Rodríguez-Ortiz
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Sebastián Rufián-Peña
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Ángela Casado-Adam
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Antonio Cosano-Álvarez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Javier Briceño-Delgado
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Munoz-Zuluaga C, King MC, Sardi A, Ledakis P, Sittig M, Nieroda C, MacDonald R, Gushchin V. Selection and Characteristics of Patients with Peritoneal Dissemination from Appendiceal Cancer with Exceptional/Poor Survival After CRS/HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2268-2275. [PMID: 31041628 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07374-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival in peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal cancer after complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) varies within each histopathologic subtype. Analyzing patients with unique responses may uncover the mechanisms behind their extreme outcomes. We proposed a method to identify retrospectively and to characterize patients who responded exceptionally well or very poorly within each histopathologic subtype. METHODS Retrospective review of patients with low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), high-grade MCP (HGMCP), and HGMCP with signet ring cells (HGMCP-S) with complete CRS/HIPEC (CC-0/1) was performed. Patients were divided by recurrence status. Median follow-up was calculated for each. Exceptional responders (ExR) were defined as alive without recurrence after median follow-up of the nonrecurrent group. Poor responders (PoR) were defined as disease recurrence before median follow-up of the recurrent group. Perioperative characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS LGMCP, HGMCP, and HGMCP-S had 48 (41%), 19 (23%), and 7 (14%) ExR and 11 (10%), 20 (24%), and 20 (39%) PoR, respectively. All ExR had lower median PCI (26 vs. 36 [p = 0.004]; 13 vs. 33.5 [p < 0.001]; 3 vs. 29.5 [p = 0.001]). Fewer LGMCP and HGMCP ExR had abnormal tumor markers (36% vs. 90% [p = 0.003]; 22% vs. 74% [p = 0.003]). More HGMCP and HGMCP-S ExR had CC-0 (vs. CC-1) cytoreductions (84% vs. 50%, p = 0.041; 100% vs. 40%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Stratifying patients by recurrence status and follow-up time successfully selects ExR and PoR within each histopathologic subtype. Perioperative characteristics of ExR versus PoR differ across histopathologic subtypes, except for disease burden. Genetic analysis may further elucidate differences and aid in the development of novel targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Caitlin King
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Armando Sardi
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Panayotis Ledakis
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michelle Sittig
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carol Nieroda
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ryan MacDonald
- Center for Clinical Excellence, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vadim Gushchin
- The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|