1
|
Panin SI, Nechay TV, Sazhin AV, Tyagunov AE, Shcherbakov NA, Bykov AV, Melnikov-Makarchuk KY, Yuldashev AG, Kuznetsov AA. Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Robot AI 2023; 10:1208611. [PMID: 37779579 PMCID: PMC10533995 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease. Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively. Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = -9 mL; 95% CI: [-26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group. Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. I. Panin
- Department of General Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - T. V. Nechay
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. V. Sazhin
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. E. Tyagunov
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - N. A. Shcherbakov
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. V. Bykov
- Department of General Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - K. Yu Melnikov-Makarchuk
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. G. Yuldashev
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. A. Kuznetsov
- Department of General Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McChesney SL, Hawkins AT. Anastomotic Considerations in Diverticulitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:57-62. [PMID: 36619284 PMCID: PMC9815908 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Diverticulitis is a common indication for colorectal surgery, both in the acute and the elective setting. The anastomosis between the colon and rectum is a critical component of colectomy for diverticular disease and should be approached thoughtfully. This article reviews important surgical considerations when creating a colorectal anastomosis in the setting of diverticular disease, whether following the reversal of an end colostomy, during an acute episode of diverticulitis, or electively for chronic or complicated disease. Timing of surgery and preoperative assessment, minimally invasive approaches, and intraoperative maneuvers and considerations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon L. McChesney
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenessee
| | - Alexander T. Hawkins
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenessee
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haas EM, de Paula TR, Luna-Saracho R, Smith MS, De Elguea-Lizarraga JIO, del Rio RS, Edgcomb M, LeFave JP. The success rate of robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE procedure) in a large cohort of consecutive unselected patients. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:683-691. [PMID: 36418639 PMCID: PMC9839785 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09717-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Robotic NICE procedure is a total intracorporeal natural orifice approach in which specimen extraction and anastomosis is accomplished without an abdominal wall incision other than the port sites themselves. We aim to present the success rate of the NICE procedure in a large cohort of unselected consecutive patients presenting with colorectal disease using a stepwise and reproducible robotic approach. METHODS Consecutive patients who presented with benign or malignant disease requiring left-sided colorectal resection and anastomosis between May 2018 and June 2021 were evaluated. Data abstracted included demographic, clinical data, disease features, intervention data, and outcomes data. The main outcome was success rate of Intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), transrectal extraction of specimen (TRSE), and conversion rate. RESULTS A total of 306 patients underwent NICE procedure. Diverticulitis was the main diagnosis (64%) followed by colorectal neoplasm (27%). Median operative time was 219 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. ICA was achieved in all cases (100%). TRSE was successfully achieved in 95.4% of cases. In 14 patients (4.6%), an abdominal incision was required due to inability to extract a bulky specimen through the rectum. There overall postoperative complications rate was 12.4%. Eight patients (2.6%) experienced postoperative ileus. There were no superficial or deep surgical site infection (SSI). Eleven patients (3.6%) developed organ SSI space including 5 patients with intra-abdominal abscess and 4 patients with anastomotic leak. There was one mortality (0.3%) due to toxic megacolon from resistant Clostridium difficile. The 30-day reoperation rate was 2.9% (n = 9) including six patients presenting with organ space SSI and three patients with postoperative obstruction at the diverting loop ileostomy site. CONCLUSION The NICE procedure is associated with a very high success rate for both intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal specimen extraction in a large cohort of unselected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M. Haas
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
- Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX USA
| | - Thais Reif de Paula
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Roberto Luna-Saracho
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Melissa S. Smith
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
- Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX USA
| | - Jose I. Ortiz De Elguea-Lizarraga
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | | | - Mark Edgcomb
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
- Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX USA
| | - Jean-Paul LeFave
- University of Houston College of Medicine, Chief Quality Colon and Rectal Surgery, HCA Healthcare Gulf Coast Division, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030 USA
- Houston Colon Foundation, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Larkins K, Mohan H, Apte SS, Chen V, Rajkomar A, Larach JT, Smart P, Heriot A, Warrier S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:1105-1116. [PMID: 35723895 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM Resection of diverticular disease can be technically challenging. Tissue planes can be difficult to identify intraoperatively due to inflammation or fibrosis. Robotic surgery may improve identification of tissue planes and dissection which can facilitate difficult minimally invasive resections. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the role of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery in diverticular resection. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The search was completed using PubMed, OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE. A total of 490 articles were retrieved, and studies reporting primary outcomes for robotic diverticular resection were included in the final analysis. A meta-analysis of studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgery was performed on rate of conversion to open surgery and complications. RESULTS Fifteen articles (8 cohort studies and 7 case series) reporting 3711 robotic diverticular resections were analysed. In comparison to laparoscopic, robotic surgery for diverticular disease was associated with a reduced conversion to open and a longer operating time. Meta-analysis showed robotic resection was associated with a lower conversion rate compared to laparoscopic surgery (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.49-0.66, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in grade III and above complications (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49-1.13, p = 0.17). Operating time was longer with a robotic approach (Hedge's G: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.04-0.81, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Robotic resection is a feasible and safe option in diverticular disease. Although associated with a longer operating time, robotic surgery may render diverticular disease resectable with a minimally invasive approach that would have otherwise necessitated a laparotomy. Randomised controlled data is required to better define the role of robotic surgery for diverticular disease resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Larkins
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sameer S Apte
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicky Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amrish Rajkomar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - José Tomás Larach
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Epworth HealthCare, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philip Smart
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Surgery Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Safety of robotic surgical management of non-elective colectomies for diverticulitis compared to laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:587-595. [PMID: 36048320 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01452-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Non-elective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) remains controversial, with minimal focus on robotics. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes for non-elective robotic colectomies for diverticulitis. All colectomies for diverticulitis in ACS-NSQIP between 2012 and 2019 were identified by CPT and diagnosis codes. Open and elective cases were excluded. Patients with disseminated cancer, ascites, and ventilator-dependence were excluded. Procedures were grouped by approach (laparoscopic and robotic). Demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Covariates with p < .1 were entered into multivariable logistic regression models for 30 day mortality, postoperative septic shock and reoperation. 6880 colectomies were evaluated (Laparoscopic = 6583, Robotic = 297). The laparoscopic group included more preoperative sepsis (31.6% vs. 10.8%), emergency cases (32.3% vs. 6.7%), and grade 3/4 wound classifications (53.3% vs. 42.8%). There was no difference in mortality, anastomotic leak, SSI, reoperation, readmission, or length of stay. The laparoscopic group had more postoperative sepsis (p = 0.001) and the robotic group showed increased bleeding (p = 0.011). In a multivariate regression model, increased age (OR = 1.083, p < 0.001), COPD (OR = 2.667, p = 0.007), dependent functional status (OR = 2.657, p = 0.021), dialysis (OR = 4.074, p = 0.016), preoperative transfusions (OR = 3.182, p = 0.019), emergency status (OR = 2.241, p = 0.010), higher ASA classification (OR = 3.170, p = 0.035), abnormal WBC (OR = 1.883, p = 0.046) were independent predictors for mortality. When controlling for confounders, robotic approach was not statistically significantly associated with septic shock or reoperation. When controlling for confounders, robotic approach was not a predictor for mortality, reoperation or septic shock. Robotic surgery is a feasible option for the acute management of diverticulitis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nechay TV, Panin SI, Sazhin AV, Bykov AV, Kuznetsov AA, Tyagunov AE, Melnikov-Makarchuk KY. [Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional endoscopic surgeries in the Russian Federation. (A systematic review and meta-analysis)]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2022:88-101. [PMID: 35658141 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202206188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Comparative assessment of immediate and long-term results of robot-assisted and conventional endoscopic technologies in the Russian Federation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Searching for primary trials devoted to robot-assisted (RAE) and traditional video endoscopic (TVE) surgeries in the Russian Federation was carried out in the e-library and CENTRAL Cochrane databases. We used the recommendations of the Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care (2017, 2019) and the current version of the Cochrane Community Guidelines (2021). These guidelines define the features of meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 26 Russian-language primary sources (3111 patients) including 1174 (38%) ones in the RAE group and 1937 (62%) patients in the TVE group. There were no randomized controlled trials in the Russian Federation, and all primary studies were non-randomized. We found no significant between-group differences in surgery time, incidence of intraoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss in thoracic surgery, urology and gynecology, conversion rate, postoperative hospital-stay, postoperative morbidity (in abdominal surgery, urology and gynecology), postoperative mortality. We observed slightly lower intraoperative blood loss for RAE in abdominal surgery and lower incidence of postoperative complications in robot-assisted thoracic surgery. These results can be compromised by methodological quality of comparative studies, significant heterogeneity and systematic errors. CONCLUSION Currently, we cannot confirm the benefits of robot-assisted technologies, since this approach does not worsen or improve treatment outcomes. Further high-quality studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T V Nechay
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - S I Panin
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - A V Sazhin
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Bykov
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - A A Kuznetsov
- Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia
| | - A E Tyagunov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Milone M, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, D’Amore A, Elmore U, Giglio MC, Rompianesi G, Vertaldi S, Troisi RI, Francis NK, De Palma GD. The Role of Robotic Visceral Surgery in Patients with Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020307. [PMID: 35207795 PMCID: PMC8878352 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal adhesions are a risk factor for conversion to open surgery. An advantage of robotic surgery is the lower rate of unplanned conversions. A systematic review was conducted using the terms “laparoscopic” and “robotic”. Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery; reporting data on conversion to open surgery for each group due to adhesions and studies including at least five patients in each group. The main outcomes were the conversion rates due to adhesions and surgeons’ expertise (novice vs. expert). The meta-analysis included 70 studies from different surgical specialities with 14,329 procedures (6472 robotic and 7857 laparoscopic). The robotic approach was associated with a reduced risk of conversion (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12–2.10, p = 0.007). The analysis of the procedures performed by “expert surgeons” showed a statistically significant difference in favour of robotic surgery (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12, p = 0.03). A reduced conversion rate due to adhesions with the robotic approach was observed in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.20–5.72, p = 0.02). The robotic approach could be a valid option in patients with abdominal adhesions, especially in the subgroup of those undergoing colorectal cancer resection performed by expert surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-333-299-3637
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (P.A.)
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.M.); (P.A.)
| | - Anna D’Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital and San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | | | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.D.); (M.C.G.); (G.R.); (S.V.); (R.I.T.); (G.D.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Solaini L, Bocchino A, Avanzolini A, Annunziata D, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G. Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1497-1507. [PMID: 35650261 PMCID: PMC9262793 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to review the new evidence to understand whether the robotic approach could find some clear indication also in left colectomy. METHODS A systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2022 in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases and comparing laparoscopic (LLC) and robotic left colectomy (RLC) was performed. All comparative studies evaluating robotic left colectomy (RLC) versus laparoscopic (LLC) left colectomy with at least 20 patients in the robotic arm were included. Abstract, editorials, and reviews were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies was used to assess the methodological quality. The random-effect model was used to calculate pooled effect estimates. RESULTS Among the 139 articles identified, 11 were eligible, with a total of 52,589 patients (RLC, n = 13,506 versus LLC, n = 39,083). The rate of conversion to open surgery was lower for robotic procedures (RR 0.5, 0.5-0.6; p < 0.001). Operative time was longer for the robotic procedures in the pooled analysis (WMD 39.1, 17.3-60.9, p = 0.002). Overall complications (RR 0.9, 0.8-0.9, p < 0.001), anastomotic leaks (RR 0.7, 0.7-0.8; p < 0.001), and superficial wound infection (RR 3.1, 2.8-3.4; p < 0.001) were less common after RLC. There were no significant differences in mortality (RR 1.1; 0.8-1.6, p = 0.124). There were no differences between RLC and LLC with regards to postoperative variables in the subgroup analysis on malignancies. CONCLUSIONS Robotic left colectomy requires less conversion to open surgery than the standard laparoscopic approach. Postoperative morbidity rates seemed to be lower during RLC, but this was not confirmed in the procedures performed for malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Solaini
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ,grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Antonio Bocchino
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Avanzolini
- grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Domenico Annunziata
- grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Davide Cavaliere
- grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ,grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giuliani G, Guerra F, Coletta D, Giuliani A, Salvischiani L, Tribuzi A, Caravaglios G, Genovese A, Coratti A. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic technique for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:101-109. [PMID: 34599362 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04038-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive surgery has been universally accepted as a valid option for the treatment of diverticular disease, provided specific expertise is available. Over the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the application of robotic approaches for diverticular disease. We aimed at evaluating whether robotic colectomy may offer some advantages over the laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of diverticular disease by meta-analyzing the available data from the medical literature. METHODS The PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web Of Sciences electronic databases were searched for literature up to December 2020. Inclusion criteria considered all comparative studies evaluating robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis eligible. The conversion rate to the open approach was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS The data of 4177 patients from nine studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics. Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy compared to those who underwent surgery with a robotic approach had a significantly higher risk of conversion into an open procedure (12.5% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.00001) and abbreviated hospital stay (p < 0.0001) at the price of a longer operating time (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION Compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, the robotic approach offers significant advantages in terms of conversion rate and shortened hospital stay for the treatment of diverticular disease. However, because of the lack of available evidence, it is impossible to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy.
| | - Francesco Guerra
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Diego Coletta
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Emergency Department - Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Angela Tribuzi
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Caravaglios
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Alfredo Genovese
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Urgency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Via Senese, 161, 58100, Grosseto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sheetz KH, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Regenbogen SE. Perioperative Outcomes and Trends in the Use of Robotic Colectomy for Medicare Beneficiaries From 2010 Through 2016. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:41-49. [PMID: 31617874 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance The use of robotic surgery for common operations like colectomy is increasing rapidly in the United States, but evidence for its effectiveness is limited and may not reflect real-world practice. Objective To evaluate outcomes of and trends in the use of robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy across diverse practice settings. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based study of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective colectomy was conducted between January 2010 and December 2016. We used an instrumental variable analysis to account for both measured and unmeasured differences in patient characteristics between robotic, open, and laparoscopic colectomy procedures. Data were analyzed from January 21, 2019, to March 1, 2019. Exposures Receipt of robotic colectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of postoperative medical and surgical complications and length of stay. Results A total of 191 292 procedures (23 022 robotic procedures [12.0%], 87 639 open procedures [45.8%], and 80 631 laparoscopic colectomy procedures [42.0%]) were included. Robotic colectomy was associated with a lower adjusted rate of overall complications than open colectomy (17.6% [95% CI, 16.9%-18.2%] vs 18.6% [95% CI, 18.4%-18.7%]; relative risk [RR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.98]). This difference was driven by lower rates of medical complications (15.5% [95% CI, 14.8%-16.2%] vs 16.9% [95% CI, 16.7%-17.1%]; RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.96]) because surgical complications were higher with the robotic approach (3.0% [95% CI, 2.8%-3.2%] vs 2.4% [95% CI, 2.3%-2.5%]; RR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]). There were no differences in complications between robotic and laparoscopic colectomy (11.1% [95% CI, 10.5%-11.6%] vs 11.0% [95% CI, 10.8%-11.2%]; RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.05]). There was an overall shift toward greater proportional use of robotic colectomy from 0.7% (457 of 65 332 patients) in 2010 to 10.9% (8274 of 75 909 patients) in 2016. In hospitals with the highest adoption of robotic colectomy between 2010 and 2016, increasing use of robotic colectomy (0.8% [100 of 12 522 patients] to 32.8% [5416 of 16 511 patients]) was associated with a greater replacement of laparoscopic operations (43.8% [5485 of 12 522 patients] to 25.2% [4161 of 16 511 patients]) than open operations (55.4% [6937 of 12 522 patients] to 41.9% [6918 of 16 511 patients]). Conclusions and Relevance While robotic colectomy was associated with minimal safety benefit over open colectomy and had comparable outcomes with laparoscopic colectomy, population-based trends suggest that it replaced a greater proportion of laparoscopic rather than open colectomy, especially in hospitals with the highest adoption of robotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle H Sheetz
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
| | - Edward C Norton
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor.,Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Justin B Dimick
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor.,Surgical Innovation Editor, JAMA Surgery
| | - Scott E Regenbogen
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Madiedo A, Hall J. Minimally Invasive Management of Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:113-120. [PMID: 33642951 PMCID: PMC7904339 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, management of complicated diverticular disease has involved open damage control operations with large definitive resections and colostomies. Studies are now showing that in a subset of patients who would typically have undergone an open Hartmann's procedure for Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis, a laparoscopic approach is equally safe, and has better outcomes. Similar patients may be good candidates for primary anastomosis to avoid the morbidity and subsequent reversal of a colostomy. While most operations for diverticulitis across the country are still performed open, there has been an incremental shift in practice toward minimally invasive approaches in the elective setting. The most recent data from large trials, most notably the SIGMA trial, found laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy is associated with fewer short-term and long-term complications, decreased pain, improvement in length of stay, and maintains better cost-effectiveness than open resections. Some studies even demonstrate that robotic sigmoid resections can maintain a similar if not more reduction in morbidity as the laparoscopic approach while still remaining cost-effective. Intraoperative approaches also factor into improving outcomes. One of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery is anastomotic leak, and many studies have sought to find ways to minimize this risk. Factors to consider to minimize incidence of leak are the creation of tension-free anastomoses, amount of contamination, adequacy of blood supply, and a patient's use of steroids. Techniques supported by data that decrease anastomotic leaks include preoperative oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel prep, intraoperative splenic flexure mobilization, low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, and use of indocyanine green immunofluorescence to assess perfusion. In summary, the management of benign diverticular disease is shifting from open, morbid operations for a very common disease to a minimally invasive approach. In this article, we review those approaches shown to have better outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and fewer complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Madiedo
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Hall
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Robotic natural-orifice IntraCorporeal anastomosis with Extraction (NICE procedure) for complicated diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:3205-3213. [PMID: 33619594 PMCID: PMC8116298 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08350-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Totally intracorporeal surgery for left-sided resection carries numerous potential advantages by avoiding crossing staple lines and eliminating the need for an abdominal incision. For those with complicated diverticulitis, minimally invasive surgery is known to be technically challenging due to inflamed tissue, distorted pelvic anatomy, and obliterated tissue planes, resulting in high conversion rates. We aim to illustrate the stepwise approach and modifications required to successful complete the robotic Natural-orifice IntraCorporeal anastomosis with transrectal specimen Extraction (NICE) procedure in this cohort. Methods Consecutive, elective, unselected patients presenting with complicated diverticulitis defined as fistula, abscess and stricture underwent the NICE procedure over a 24-month period. Demographic and intraoperative data were collected, and video recordings were reviewed and edited on encrypted server. Results A total of 60 patients (50% female) underwent the NICE procedure for complicated diverticulitis with a mean age of 58.9 years and mean BMI of 30.7 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 231.6 min. All cases (100%) were achieved with intracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapling device. All but one patient (98.3%) had successful transrectal extraction of the specimen. Forty-four (73%) of the specimens required a specimen-thinning maneuver to successfully extract the specimen and there were no conversions. We identified seven key technical modifications and considerations to facilitate successful completion of the procedure which are illustrated, including early release of the disease, mesentery-sparing dissection, dual instrument control of the mesenteric vasculature, release of the rectal reflection, use of NICE back table, specimen-thinning maneuver, and closure of the rectal cuff. Conclusion We present a stepwise approach with key modifications to successfully achieve totally robotic intracorporeal resection for those presenting with complicated diverticulitis. This approach may help overcome the technical challenges and provide a foundation for reproducible results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08350-z.
Collapse
|
13
|
Formisano G, Giuliani G, Salaj A, Salvischiani L, Ferraro L, Luca MD, Bianchi PP. Robotic elective colectomy for diverticular disease: short-term outcomes of 80 patients. Int J Med Robot 2020; 17:e2204. [PMID: 33185931 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the robotic approach on the minimally invasive elective treatment of diverticular disease. METHODS Data from patients who underwent elective robotic colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2015 to February 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Intraoperative and 30-day postoperative outcomes were the variables assessed. RESULTS A total of 80 patients (71% with prior complicated diverticulitis) met the inclusion criteria. Mean operative time was 241 min, one intraoperative complication (1.2%) was observed, the conversion rate was 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 6.4 days and overall 30-day complication rate was 22.5%. Fourteen patients (17.5%) had minor complications, while major postoperative complications occurred in four patients (5%). Anastomotic leak rate was 3.9% and the 30-day readmission rate was 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS Robotic colectomy for diverticular disease has proven to be feasible and safe, with low intraoperative complications, conversion, and anastomotic leak rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Formisano
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Adelona Salaj
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Martina De Luca
- Department of Surgery, Andosilla Hospital AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bilgin IA, Bas M, Benlice C, Esen E, Ozben V, Aytac E, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T. Totally laparoscopic and totally robotic surgery in patients with left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:e2068. [PMID: 31875352 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Introduction of the da Vinci Xi system has facilitated the use of robotics in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, data on the outcomes of robotic surgery for the treatment of colonic diverticulitis have remained scarce. METHODS Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and perioperative outcomes of the patients undergoing totally robotic with the da Vinci Xi system or laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colonic diverticulitis (LCD) were compared. RESULTS Laparoscopic and robotic groups included 22 and 20 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, and postoperative complications. There were three conversions in the laparoscopy group and no conversion in the robotic group (P = 0.23). Conversion to open surgery was associated with postoperative morbidity (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Robotic surgery is an applicable alternative for the treatment of LCD. Robotic approach may potentially lower the risk of operative morbidity by reducing the requirement of conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Ahmet Bilgin
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Bas
- Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cigdem Benlice
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eren Esen
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Volkan Ozben
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Erman Aytac
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bilgi Baca
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ismail Hamzaoglu
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tayfun Karahasanoglu
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ogino T, Mizushima T, Matsuda C, Mori M, Doki Y. Essential updates 2018/2019: Colorectal (benign): Recent updates (2018-2019) in the surgical treatment of benign colorectal diseases. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:30-38. [PMID: 32021956 PMCID: PMC6992682 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This review outlines current topics on the surgical treatment of benign colorectal diseases, with a focus on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and diverticulitis. Treatment options for IBD and diverticulitis have evolved in the last few years as a result of medical advances in technology and new clinical trials. Therefore, treatment options and strategies need to be updated to provide optimal care for patients. The purpose of this review is to elucidate recent global trends and update the surgical treatment strategy for IBD and diverticulitis based on literature published in the past 2 years. Prevalence of IBD, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, has increased over the last few decades. During this period, many new medical therapies were introduced for the treatment of IBD, including biological therapy, immunomodulators, and leukocyte apheresis therapy. As a result, new surgical strategies for IBD are required. In order to improve surgical outcomes in IBD patients, the influence of preoperative treatment on postoperative complications needs to be considered. The incidence of diverticulitis is also increasing with lifestyle changes and increasing numbers of older people. For diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis, surgery is the gold standard. Elective surgery after conservative treatment of diverticulitis is also an option because of high recurrence rates. With an increase in diverticulitis, systematic strategies are essential for an appropriate approach to diverticulitis, taking into account various factors, including the patient's background.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Ogino
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
- Department of Therapeutics for Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesGraduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Chu Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Department of Surgery and ScienceGraduate School of Medical SciencesKyusyu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee JL, Alsaleem HA, Kim JC. Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives. Ann Surg Treat Res 2019; 98:31-43. [PMID: 31909048 PMCID: PMC6940430 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.1.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose As robotic surgery is increasingly performed in patients with colorectal diseases, understanding proper port placement for robotic colorectal surgery is necessary. This review summarizes current port placement during robotic surgery for colorectal diseases and provides future perspective on port placements. Methods PubMed were searched from January 2009 to December 2018 using a combination of the search terms “robotic” [MeSH], “colon” [MeSH], “rectum” [MeSH], “colorectal” [MeSH], and “colorectal surgery” [MeSH]. Studies related to port placement were identified and included in the current study if they used the da Vinci S, Si, or Xi robotic system and if they described port placement. Results This review included 77 studies including a total of 3,145 operations. Fifty studies described port placement for left-sided and mesorectal excision; 17, 3, and 7 studies assessed port placement for right-sided colectomy, rectopexy, transanal surgery, respectively; and one study assessed surgery with reduced port placement. Recent literatures show that the single-docking technique included mobilization of the second and third robotic arms for the different parts without movement of patient cart and similar to previous dual or triple-docking technique. Besides, use of the da Vinci Xi system allowed a more simplified port configuration. Conclusion Robot-assisted colorectal surgery can be efficiently achieved with successful port placement without movement of patient cart dependent on the type of surgery and the robotic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Lyul Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hassan A Alsaleem
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Cheon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beltzer C, Knoerzer L, Bachmann R, Axt S, Dippel H, Schmidt R. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection for Diverticular Disease: A Single-Center Experience of 106 Cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:1451-1455. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Beltzer
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lisa Knoerzer
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Robert Bachmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Axt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hartmut Dippel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Roland Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|