Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

An Objective Evaluation of Intraoperative and Postoperative Pain in Infants Undergoing Open Inguinal Herniotomy and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Using the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE™) Monitor

PURPOSE

The heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) monitor is an objective, non-invasive tool for the assessment of pain in children under 2 years of age. The aim of this study was to objectively compare pain in infants undergoing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery using the NIPE monitor.

METHOD

This prospective observational study included neonates and infants (<2 years of age) undergoing elective open inguinal herniotomy and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anaesthesia with a caudal block. The NIPE monitor was connected to the electrocardiogram monitor with continuous monitoring performed intraoperatively, and postoperatively in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit. The NIPE index was recorded at different intraoperative steps. The median NIPE index (NIPEm) was calculated for the entire procedure and postoperative period. The NIPE index ranges from 0 to 100; lower values indicate greater levels of pain, values < 50 indicate severe pain. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 40 infants recruited: 27 underwent open herniotomy and 13 underwent laparoscopic repair. Intraoperatively, NIPEm was found to be significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (59.00 vs. 77.00, p = 0.0018). Postoperatively, NIPEm was also found to be significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (49.00 vs. 57.50, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to objectively demonstrate that laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is more painful intraoperatively and leads to greater levels of pain in the early postoperative period compared to open inguinal herniotomy. This difference might explained by painful stimuli in anatomical areas not covered by the caudal block.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment Study/Prospective Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Modifications of surgical techniques in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal ring for childhood inguinal hernia to achieve zero recurrence and zero subcutaneous stitch granuloma

PURPOSE

To present our technical modifications of single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) of the internal inguinal ring (IIR) for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH).

METHODS

The prospectively collected data of all children diagnosed with PIH undergoing SILPEC at our center from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed and divided into two groups for result comparison: Group A: before and Group B: after the implementation of full modifications. Our modifications included using a nonabsorbable monofilament suture, creating a peritoneal thermal injury at the internal inguinal ring (IIR), employing a cannula to ensure the suture at the IIR ligates only the peritoneum, and double ligation of the IIR in selected cases.

RESULTS

1755 patients in group A and in group B (1 month to 14 years old) were enrolled. There were no significant differences regarding baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. At a median follow-up of 40 months, the rate of recurrent CIH and subcutaneous stitch granuloma (SSG) was 2.3% and 1.5% in group A vs. 0% and 0% in group B (p < 0.001). There were no hydroceles, no ascended or atrophic testis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our SILPEC technical modifications can achieve zero recurrence and zero SSG for PIH.

Laparoscopic vs. laparoscopically assisted pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review

This systematic review aims to compare the two major principles of laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: totally laparoscopic repairs (LR) and laparoscopically assisted repairs (LAR), to find out the optimal approach for pediatric patients. A systematic literature search was performed via Pubmed, Embase MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases on all studies published in the last 20 years reporting outcomes on these principles including recurrences, complications, and operative time. Prospective studies for either principle or retrospective comparative studies were considered eligible. Fischer's exact and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis with p value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Twenty-one studies, including two thousand one hundred and ninety-six patients (LR: 1008), of ages ranging from 9 days to 18 years-old and a male to female ratio of 2.55:1, met our inclusion criteria. Follow-up period varied from 3 months to 8 years. Recurrence rates were similar between the two categories (LR: 1.68% vs. LAR: 1.59%, p > 0.05). As regards post-operative complications, transient hydrocele development was higher in laparoscopic repairs (LAR: 1.01% vs. LR: 3.17% p < 0.005) while wound healing problems were more frequent in laparoscopically assisted repairs (LAR: 1.17% vs. LR: 0.30%, p = 0.019). Mean operative time was lower in laparoscopically assisted repairs both in unilateral (LAR: 21.49 ± 13.51 vs. LR: 29.73 ± 11.05, p = 0.131) and bilateral cases (LAR: 28.01 ± 15.08 vs. LR: 39.48 ± 16.35, p = 0.101) but without statistically significant difference. Both principles are equally effective and safe as their recurrence and overall complications rates are equivalent. Transient hydrocele occurs more often in laparoscopic repairs while wound healing problems are associated mostly with laparoscopically assisted repairs.

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Repair in Boys with Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem in boys. Open hernia repair surgery (OH) has been traditionally used to treat this condition, but it leads to complications, such as testicular complications. Laparoscopic hernia repair by using the extraperitoneal method (LHE) is performed through the percutaneous insertion of sutures and extracorporeal closure of patent vaginalis processus; thus, injury to spermatic cord structures is avoided. However, a meta-analysis comparing LHE and OH is lacking.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the retrieved studies was performed, and a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size. The primary outcome was testicular complications, including ascending testis, hydrocele, and testicular atrophy. The secondary outcomes were surgical metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), ipsilateral hernia recurrence, and operation time.

RESULTS

In total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 non-RCTs involving 17,555 boys were included. The incidence of ascending testis (risk ratio [RR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.78; p = 0.008) and MCIH (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.43; p = 0.0002) was significantly lower in LHE than in OH. The incidence of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and ipsilateral hernia recurrence did not differ between LHE and OH.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OH, LHE led to fewer or equivalent testicular complications without increasing ipsilateral hernia recurrence. Moreover, MCIH incidence was lower in LHE than in OH. Hence, LHE could be a feasible choice with less invasiveness for inguinal hernia repair in boys.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, LEVEL III.

Reduction of recurrence by peritoneal thermal injury in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring for inguinal hernia in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of peritoneal thermal injury (PTI) in the reduction of recurrence incidence in laparoscopic percutaneous extra-peritoneal closure of internal ring (LPEC) for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) in children.

METHODS

Medical records of patients undergoing LPEC for PIH at our center were reviewed and divided into 2 groups: Group A (period from June 2017 to December 2017)-without PTI and Group B (period from January 2018 to December 2018) with PTI. The surgical technique and the type of suture used for LPEC were the same for both groups. The outcomes of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

277 patients with 283 IHs in group A were compared to 376 patients with 389 IHs in group B. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, uni- or bilateral hernia. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, there was no hydrocele, suture granuloma, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchidism in both groups. The recurrence rate in group A was 6.4%, significantly higher than 1.8% in group B (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that PTI in LPEC for PIH is safe and associated with a significant reduction of recurrence incidence.

Review and Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on the Management of Pediatric Inguinal Hernias: A Descriptive Study

INTRODUCTION

Research quality in pediatric surgery has been challenged by multiple factors, including the low incidence of some congenital pathologies and rare event rates. With the rapid increase of pediatric surgical literature, there is a need for systematic reviews to synthesize evidence. It is important to assess the quality of these systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, using inguinal hernia repair as an index diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of interventions on inguinal hernia in the pediatric population. The quality reporting was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tools.

RESULTS

Of 1449 unique reports, 21 studies were included (15 meta-analyses and six systematic reviews). Median percent reported items for PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 were 72.2% and 70.5%, respectively. The least reported items in PRISMA were protocol registration (27.6%), synthesis of results (13.0%), and a risk of bias across studies (20.6%). For AMSTAR 2, the least reported items were reporting of source of funding (14.3%), appropriate methods for statistical combination of results (25.0%), and pre-establishment of protocol (28.6%). All critical items were completely or partially fulfilled in 5/21 (23.8%) of the studies and completely absent in 1/21 (4.8%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study highlight relatively good reporting quality, yet a poor methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in the pediatric surgery literature on inguinal hernia management.

Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in infants: an initial experience

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common operation performed in children. In Australia, open repair (OR) continues to be the preferred method of treatment in infants, despite laparoscopic repair (LR) gaining popularity amongst some international centres. Our aim was to analyse initial outcomes with LR at our paediatric centre.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients <1 year of age who received LR or OR between January 2017 and July 2021 at our institution. Data were retrieved from both electronic and scanned medical records. Data were analysed using an unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test or simple linear regression. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 376 patients were identified: LR was performed in 73 patients, and OR in 303 patients. Bilateral repair was more common amongst patients receiving LR: 56.2% versus 21.5%, P = 0.0001, treating either a symptomatic hernia or an intra-operative contralateral inguinal defect (70%). All LR patients received general anaesthetic, compared to 82.8% of patients in the OR group, P = 0.0001. There were no recurrences following LR and 3 with OR (P = 1.0). The metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia rate following OR was 10% (21/206). There was no significant difference in other complications, including wound infection, haematoma, testicular atrophy, and hydrocele formation.

CONCLUSION

In our population OR was performed more often than LR. Operative complication rates were equivalent between OR and LR groups. However, infants that underwent OR were significantly more likely to develop a MCIH.

Should the processus vaginalis sac be opened or closed in pediatric herniotomy? A two-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations in children. To improve outcome, several techniques are used. However, it has not been established if the open or the closed hernia sac preparation technique is superior in (premature) neonates and older children.

METHODS

Retrospective study including all cases of inguinal hernia repair in children at two large centers. Demographic data and outcome parameters including procedure time and intra as well as postoperative complications were evaluated. To compare open vs. closed hernia sack preparation, cases with secondary open preparation were excluded and propensity score matching was performed. Regression analysis was used to determine factors affecting operative time and recurrence rate.

RESULTS

In total 2476 cases of inguinal hernia repair were identified. After exclusion of direct hernias as well as revision cases, 2257 cases were analyzed. Overall mean operative time was 25.8 min. Intraoperative complications occurred in 0.1% and. postoperative complications occurred in 3.0% of all cases, the most frequent postoperative complication being recurrence (1.7%). Closed preparation technique resulted in significantly faster procedure time and lower recurrence rates in premature neonates and older children compared to the open hernia sac preparation technique. Operative technique, prematurity, gender and training of the surgeon are highly associated with operative time, whereas operative technique is the main factor affecting recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that closed hernia sack preparation is superior to open regarding speed and recurrence. This was true for premature neonates, neonates and older children. All other outcome parameters including intra- and postoperative complications were similar. Thus, we recommend to use the closed preparation technique whenever possible.

Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair, Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Last 10-Year Evidence

Aim: Since the first description of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH), a lot of studies have compared outcomes between LH and open herniorrhaphy (OH) with inconsistent results. We designed this study to assess outcomes between both techniques now that pediatric surgeons have enough confidence with it. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the last 10 years. Results: Twenty-seven articles reporting on 91,653 patients (26,920 LH and 64,733 OH) were included. No significant differences were found in overall operative time (OT) (P = .07). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly shorter OT for LH in unilateral (-8.87 minutes, P = .03) and bilateral hernias (-16.86 minutes, P = .004), but longer in unilateral hernias in females (+7.47 minutes, P = .006). Recurrence rate was similar (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, P = .66). Less complications were reported in LH (OR 0.51, P = .03). Contralateral patent processus vaginalis average rate was 39.61% and its closure reported a significant decrease of contralateral metachronous hernia (OR 0.11, P < .00001). Conclusion: Although OH is still considered the gold standard by some authors, LH has proven to be not only as safe as OH but also to have additional advantages that should make pediatric surgeons implement it in their daily practice and not in selected cases alone.

Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic and Open Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair

Aim: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia (IH) repair is an alternative to open surgery. A potential advantage of laparoscopic repair is prevention of contralateral metachronous hernia although some studies report higher recurrence rate. We aim to determine the cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic IH repair taking into account metachronous and recurrence rates. Methods: Retrospective single-center study of children (<5 years) undergoing elective open or laparoscopic repair for a unilateral IH between February 2018 and October 2019. Ten cases in each of four groups were included (open day case, open overnight, laparoscopic day case, and laparoscopic overnight). Cases incurring a higher cost due to comorbidities or additional procedure were excluded. Patient-level information and costing system data were obtained from the hospital finance. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) procedural cost was compared for open and laparoscopic procedures. A financial model was created factoring metachronous and recurrent rates. Results: Cost of open day case repair was £1866.24 (SD: 311.15) compared with £2210.13 (SD: 391.36) for day case laparoscopic repair. For overnight repair, cost of open was £2442.82 (SD: 497.05) compared with £2585.35 (SD: 384.66) for laparoscopic. On calculating the cost-effectiveness point using the difference in metachronous and recurrence rate between the two procedures, laparoscopic is more cost-effective than open day case repair at 18.43%. For overnight repair, the difference rate is 5.84%. Conclusion: Our data suggest that based on metachronous and recurrence rates in the current literature, laparoscopic IH repair is more cost-effective than open repair for cases requiring overnight stay, whereas for day case procedures open IH repair is more cost-effective.

Risks and benefits of pediatric inguinal hernia repair: Conventional open repair vs laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure

INTRODUCTION

Considerable debate exists regarding the benefits of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) over conventional open repair (OR). We assessed the outcomes and feasibility of LPEC compared to OR for pediatric inguinal hernia (IH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 570 children who underwent LPEC or OR. Parents decided the operative method after obtaining informed consent. Patient characteristics, operative time, complications and contralateral metachronous IH (CMIH) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 329 children underwent LPEC and 241 underwent OR. There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence or testicular ascent between the LPEC and OR groups (0.3% vs 0.4%, P = 0.825, 0.3% vs 0.8%, P = 0.391, respectively). No testicular atrophy was recognized in either group. One patient with postoperative chronic inguinal pain was recognized in each group. There was no surgical site infection (SSI) in the OR group; however, the LPEC group more frequently demonstrated umbilical port site (UPS)-related complications, such as incisional hernia, minor deformity, granuloma formation, cellulitis and superficial SSI. Ten (4.1%) developed CMIH in OR; in contrast, no case of CMIH was experienced after LPEC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, both LPEC and OR are feasible in the management of pediatric IH, because of their high success rates and low risk of complications. LPEC could be the superior procedure with respect to the prevention of CMIH. However, to maximize the merits of LPEC over OR, it is important to reduce UPS-related complications in LPEC. A longer follow-up is needed to assess male fertility in patients who receive LPEC.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure of Internal Ring for Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Single Center Experience with 104 Cases

Introduction: The aim of this report is to present our technique and outcomes of single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring (SILPEC) for incarcerated inguinal hernia (IIH) in children. Patients and Methods: The medical records of all children undergoing emergency SILPEC for IIH after unsuccessful attempted manual reduction between June 2016 and September 2020 at our center were reviewed. For SILPEC, two trocars 3.5-6 mm were placed through a single umbilical incision. A 17G epidural needle and a small wire-lasso were used for extraperitoneal closure of the internal ring. Results: From a total of 2904 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia (IH) undergoing SILPEC, 104 patients (3.6%) had IIH. There were 84 boys and 20 girls with a median age of 18.5 months (ranged 1 month to 11 years). At the time of surgery under general anesthesia IIH was found to be spontaneously reduced in 26.9%; the hernia contents were bowel in 52.9%, great omentum in 13.5%, and ovary in 6.7% of the patients. All hernias were successfully reduced without additional ports or conversion to open surgery. Patent contralateral processus vaginalis (PCPV) was detected intraoperatively in 44.2% of the cases. The median operative time was 24 minutes for unilateral and 30 minutes for bilateral procedures. The median postoperative stay was 1 day. At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no case of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchism. The postoperative cosmesis was excellent as all patients were virtually scarless. Recurrence occurred in 1.9% with no significant difference (P = .669) compared to the 1.4% recurrence rate of the 2800 patients with ordinary IH undergoing elective SILPEC during the same study period. Conclusions: SILPEC for IIH in children is feasible, safe, with excellent postoperative cosmesis, and no significant difference in hernia recurrence between emergency SILPEC for IIH and elective SILPEC for ordinary IH.

Long-term absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring for inguinal hernia in children

AIM

To compare the results of using long-term absorbable (LTAS) versus non-absorbable suture (NAS) in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring (LPEC) for indirect inguinal hernia (IH) in children METHODS: Prospectively collected data from children undergoing LPEC for IH at our center were retrospectively reviewed to compare group A repaired with NAS (2.0 monofilament polypropylene or braided polytetrafluoroethilene) to group B repaired with LTAS 2.0 polydioxanone.

RESULTS

481 patients with 499 IHs in group A were compared to 277 patients with 283 IHs in group B. There were no significant differences in terms of age, bodyweight and laterality of IH between the two groups. At a median follow up period of 30 months, the incidence of suture knot reaction (SKR) and hernia recurrence were 3.1% and 1.0% in group A vs. 0% and 6.4% in group B with p = 0.002 and p<0.001, respectively. Monofilament NAS was associated with a low rate of both recurrence and SKR.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC repair for pediatric IH using LTAS is associated with no SKR but a higher recurrence rate compared to NAS. Monofilament NAS such as Prolene could be a good choice in LPEC because of its low rate of both recurrence and SKR.

Prosthetic meshes for hernia repair: State of art, classification, biomaterials, antimicrobial approaches, and fabrication methods

Worldwide, hernia repair represents one of the most frequent surgical procedures encompassing a global market valued at several billion dollars. This type of surgery usually requires the implantation of a mesh that needs the appropriate chemical, physical and biological properties for the type of repair. This review thus presents a description of the types of hernias, current hernia repair methods, and the state of the art of prosthetic meshes for hernia repair providing the most important meshes used in clinical practice by surgeons working in this area classified according to their biological or chemical nature, morphology and whether bioabsorbable or not. We emphasise the importance of surgical site infection in herniatology, how to deal with this microbial problem, and we go further into the future research lines on the production of advanced antimicrobial meshes to improve hernia repair and prevent microbial infections, including multidrug-resistant strains. A great deal of progress has been made in this biomedical field in the last decade. However, we are still far from an ideal antimicrobial mesh that can also provide excellent integration to the abdominal wall, mechanical performance, low visceral adhesion and minimal inflammatory or foreign body reactions, among many other problems.

Single-incision approach for bilateral inguinal hernia repair in children: A retrospective study

To introduce the use of a new surgical approach named single-incision bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (SBIH) in pediatric surgical population.This was a STROBE-compliant retrospective cohort study using data from 101 patients who had undergone bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy in our institution. Children with bilateral inguinal hernias without contraindications for surgery, ranging in age from 6 months to 12 years, were included. Fifty-six children with bilateral inguinal hernias underwent SBIH (SBIH group) and 45 patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (LBIH) (LBIH group). Differences in operative time, postoperative pain, recurrence, and complications between the 2 groups were analyzed. Patient satisfaction with cosmetic result was also investigated using questionnaires.There were no statistically significant differences in operative time (P = .2257), postoperative pain (P = .0607), recurrence (P = .8756), and complications (P = .7467) between the 2 groups. Interestingly, the operation time of girls in SBIH group was significantly shorter than that of the boys in this group (P < .0001), but also shorter than that of girls in LBIH group (P = .0038). Postoperative pain for boys was lower in SBIH group than in the LBIH group (P = .0340). No ascending testis, testicular atrophy, and hydrocele occurred in either group. According to the questionnaire, both procedures had equally high levels of satisfaction for cosmetic results (P = .7531).Initial results show that SBIH for pediatric patients, regardless of gender, is a safe and feasible procedure compared with LBIH with an equally low recurrence rate, few complication, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes.