1
|
Slater BJ, Collings A, Dirks R, Gould JC, Qureshi AP, Juza R, Rodríguez-Luna MR, Wunker C, Kohn GP, Kothari S, Carslon E, Worrell S, Abou-Setta AM, Ansari MT, Athanasiadis DI, Daly S, Dimou F, Haskins IN, Hong J, Krishnan K, Lidor A, Litle V, Low D, Petrick A, Soriano IS, Thosani N, Tyberg A, Velanovich V, Vilallonga R, Marks JM. Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:781-806. [PMID: 36529851 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09817-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD. METHODS Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m2) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss. CONCLUSION Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany J Slater
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4062, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Amelia Collings
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rebecca Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jon C Gould
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Alia P Qureshi
- Division of General & GI Surgery, Foregut Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ryan Juza
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - María Rita Rodríguez-Luna
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) and ICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Ivy N Haskins
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| | - Julie Hong
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Queens, Queens, USA
| | | | - Anne Lidor
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Virginia Litle
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Donald Low
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Petrick
- Department of General Surgery, Geisinger School of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Ian S Soriano
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- McGovern Medical School, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tampa General, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Endocrine, Metabolic and Bariatric Unit, General Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Center of Excellence for the EAC-BC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jeffrey M Marks
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang W, Chen G, Dong C, Zhu S, Pan J, Liu Z, Li M, Yu C, Shen Z. The safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic cardial constriction in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:878-883. [PMID: 35196940 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2039285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common digestive disorders, which seriously affects the quality of life and brings a heavy burden to the medical care. Peroral endoscopic cardial constriction (PECC) can narrow the cardia through mucosal ligation to alleviate acid reflux symptoms. This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of PECC. METHODS This was a retrospective case series including patients diagnosed with GERD and undergoing PECC from September 2019 to July 2021. GERD-Q questionnaire and GERD-QOL questionnaire were applied to evaluate the symptom severity and the impact of life because of GERD. RESULTS A total of 16 patients were included in our study. The mean GERD-Q score was 10.94 ± 2.11 before PECC, while 5.38 ± 3.90 after PECC. The mean GERD-QOL score was 43.60 ± 16.94 before PECC, while 73.65 ± 22.08 after PECC. 62.5% of patients were satisfied with the symptom control and no serious complications were reported in our study. CONCLUSIONS PECC is an efficient and safe minimally invasive endoscopic intervention for GERD. It can significantly improve GERD-related symptoms and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxi Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Guangwu Chen
- Center of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Caijuan Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Shefeng Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Jiaqi Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhaoxue Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Meng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Chaohui Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhe Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Friedman AJ, Elseth AJ, Brockmeyer JR. Proton Pump Inhibitors, Associated Complications, and Alternative Therapies: A Shifting Risk Benefit Ratio. Am Surg 2021; 88:20-27. [PMID: 33560890 DOI: 10.1177/0003134821991988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our goal was to compile the most recent and accurate data on the side effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). We also compared the efficacy of PPI to the efficacy of different surgical options for acid reflux control. BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors are the primary therapy for chronic control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but newer studies demonstrate deleterious side effects. Collating this information and contrasting it with surgical therapy for GERD provides evidence for possible practice changes in treatment. METHODS A literature search utilizing PubMed was performed evaluating for PPI and anti-reflux surgery (ARS), focusing on articles that reflected information regarding the usage and efficacy of symptom control of both PPI and ARS. Search terms included "ARS, fundoplication, MSA, acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, meta-analysis, PPI, H2 blocker, cardiovascular risk, and gut dysbiosis." We evaluated 271 articles by title, abstract, and data for relevance and included 70. RESULTS Long-term control of GERD with PPI may have a greater than expected side effect profile than initially thought. Surgical options may provide greater symptom control than PPI without the side effects of long-term medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS Anti-reflux control can be safely achieved with either PPI or surgical options; however, the long-term side effects noted in the review such as increased risk of cardiovascular events, renal disease, and gut dysbiosis may suggest surgical anti-reflux control as a better long-term option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Friedman
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| | - Anna J Elseth
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| | - Joel R Brockmeyer
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:4459-4468. [PMID: 32959180 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07951-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting more than 50% of Americans. The development of GERD may be associated with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). The impact of esophageal motility on outcomes post laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), including quality of life (QOL), remains to be defined. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare QOL outcomes following LARS among patients with and without ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). METHODS This is a single-institution, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LARS, from January 2012 to July 2019, for treatment of GERD at our institution. Patients undergoing revisional surgery were excluded. Patients with normal peristalsis (non-IEM) were distinguished from those with IEM, defined using the Chicago classification, on manometric studies. Four validated QOL surveys were used to assess outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Health-Related QOL (LPR-HRQL), and Swallowing Disorders (SWAL) survey. RESULTS 203 patients with complete manometric data were identified (75.4% female) and divided into two groups, IEM (n = 44) and non-IEM (n = 159). IEM and Non-IEM groups were parallel in age (58.1 ± 15.3 vs. 62.2 ± 12 years, p = 0.062), body mass index (27.4 ± 4.1 vs. 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2, p = 0.288), distribution of comorbid disease, sex, and ASA scores. The groups differed in manometry findings and Johnson-DeMeester score (IEM: 38.6 vs. Non-IEM: 24.0, p = 0.023). Patients in both groups underwent similar rates of Nissen fundoplication (IEM: 84.1% vs. Non-IEM: 93.7%, p = 0.061) with greater improvements in dysphagia (IEM: 27.4% vs. 44.2%) in Non-IEM group but comparable benefit in reflux reduction (IEM: 80.6% vs. 72.4%) in both groups at follow-up. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes. Satisfaction rates with LARS were similar between groups (IEM: 80% vs. non-IEM: 77.9%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with ineffective esophageal motility derive significant benefits in perioperative and QOL outcomes after LARS. Nevertheless, as anticipated, their baseline dysmotility may reduce the degree of improvement in dysphagia rates post-surgery compared to patients with normal motility. Furthermore, the presence of preoperative IEM should not be a contraindication for complete fundoplication. Key to optimal outcomes after LARS is careful patient selection based on objective perioperative data, including manometry evaluation, with the purpose of tailoring surgery to provide effective reflux control and improved esophageal clearance.
Collapse
|