Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations

The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration after prior gastrectomy

The increased incidence of gallstones can be linked to previous gastrectomy (PG). However, the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography after gastrectomy has significantly reduced. In such cases, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) may be an alternative. In this study, LTCBDE was evaluated for its safety and feasibility in patients with PG. We retrospectively evaluated 300 patients who underwent LTCBDE between January 2015 and June 2023. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to their PG status: PG group and No-PG group. The perioperative data from the 2 groups were compared. The operation time in the PG group was longer than that in the No-PG group (184.69 ± 20.28 minutes vs 152.19 ± 26.37 minutes, P < .01). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (61.19 ± 41.65 mL vs 50.83 ± 30.47 mL, P = .087), postoperative hospital stay (6.36 ± 1.94 days vs 5.94 ± 1.36 days, P = .125), total complication rate (18.6 % vs 14.1 %, P = .382), stone clearance rate (93.2 % vs 96.3 %, P = .303), stone recurrence rate (3.4 % vs 1.7 %, P = .395), and conversion rate (6.8 % vs 7.0 %, P = .941) between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred in either groups. A history of gastrectomy may not affect the feasibility and safety of LTCBDE, because its perioperative results are comparable to those of patients with a history of No-gastrectomy.

Surgical strategies for challenging common bile duct stones in the endoscopic era: A comprehensive review of current evidence

While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the primary treatment modality for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or choledocholithiasis due to advancements in instruments, surgical intervention, known as common bile duct exploration (CBDE), is still necessary in cases of difficult CBDS, failed endoscopic treatment, or altered anatomy. Recent evidence also supports CBDE in patients requesting single-step cholecystectomy and bile duct stone removal with comparable outcomes. This review elucidates relevant clinical anatomy, selection indications, and outcomes to enhance surgical understanding. The selection between trans-cystic (TC) vs trans-choledochal (TD) approaches is described, along with stone removal techniques and ductal closure. Detailed surgical techniques and strategies for both the TC and TD approaches, including instrument selection, is also provided. Additionally, this review comprehensively addresses operation-specific complications such as bile leakage, stricture, and entrapment, and focuses on preventive measures and treatment strategies. This review aims to optimize the management of CBDS through laparoscopic CBDE, with the goal of improving patient outcomes and minimizing risks.

Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence navigation technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for complex hepatolithiasis

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical application of the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation technique in bile duct identification during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for complex hepatolithiasis.

METHODS

Eighty patients with complex hepatolithiasis were admitted to our department between January 2022 and June 2023 and randomly divided into control and observation groups. The control group underwent conventional LCBDE, while the observation group underwent LCBDE guided by ICG fluorescence.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, the observation group had shorter operation and search times for the common bile duct (CBD), as well as reduced intraoperative blood loss and fewer complications, such as conversion to laparotomy and various injuries (gastroduodenal, colon, pancreatic, and vascular) than the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, the observation group had lower rates of postoperative bile leakage, abdominal infection, postoperative hemorrhage, and residual stone than the control group. Additionally, the observation group demonstrated significantly shorter times for resuming flatus, removal of the abdominal drainage tube, and hospitalization than the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICG fluorescence navigation technology effectively visualizes the bile duct, improves its identification rate, shortens the operation time, prevents biliary tract injury, and reduces the occurrence of complications.

A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration: benefits to clinical practice, training and research

BACKGROUND

A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon's experience.

METHODS

A cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations.

RESULTS

78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB.

CONCLUSION

Difficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration following prior gastrectomy: surgical safety and feasibility

PURPOSE

Previous gastrectomy (PG) can lead to an increased incidence of biliary stones. However, the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after gastrectomy remains low. In such cases, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) may be an alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LCBDE for patients who underwent PG.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with a history of LCBDE was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to their PG status, and their perioperative data were compared.

RESULTS

The outcomes of 27 patients with a history of gastrectomy were compared with those of 155 without a history of gastrectomy who underwent LCBDE. PG patients experienced longer hospitalization times (P = 0.006), more postoperative bleeding (p = 0.021), a lower incidence of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (P < 0.001), and a higher incidence of T-tube application (p = 0.002) than those without gastrectomy. However, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss volume, operation time, bile leakage status, pancreatitis status, stone clearance rate, readmission rate, or recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LCBDE following gastrectomy may require laborious perioperative management, a history of gastrectomy might not influence the feasibility or safety of LCBDE, as its perioperative outcomes are comparable to those in patients without a history of gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic surgery for gallstones or common bile duct stones: A stably safe and feasible surgical strategy for patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery

Backgrounds/Aims

A history of upper abdominal surgery has been identified as a relative contraindication for laparoscopy. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with and without previous upper abdominal surgery.

Methods

In total, 131 patients with previous upper abdominal surgery and 64 without upper abdominal surgery underwent LC or LCBDE between September 2017 and September 2021 at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. Patients with previous upper abdominal surgery were divided into four groups: group A included patients with previous right upper abdominal surgery who underwent LC (n = 17), group B included patients with previous other upper abdominal surgery who underwent LC (n = 66), group C included patients with previous right upper abdominal surgery who underwent LCBDE (n = 30), and group D included patients with previous other upper abdominal surgery who underwent LCBDE (n = 18). Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The preoperative liver function indexes showed no significant difference between the observation and control groups. For patients who underwent LC, groups A and B had more abdominal adhesions than the control group. One case was converted to open surgery in each of groups A and B. There was no statistical difference in operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and drainage volume. For patients who underwent LCBDE, groups C and D had more estimated blood loss than the control group (group C, 41.33 ± 50.84 vs. 18.97 ± 13.12 ml, p = 0.026; group D, 66.11 ± 87.46 vs. 18.97 ± 13.12 ml, p = 0.036). Compared with the control group, group C exhibited longer operative time (173.87 ± 60.91 vs. 138.38 ± 57.38 min, p = 0.025), higher drainage volume (296.83 ± 282.97 vs. 150.83 ± 127.04 ml, p = 0.015), and longer postoperative hospital stay (7.97 ± 3.68 vs. 6.17 ± 1.63 days, p = 0.021). There was no mortality in all groups.

Conclusions

LC or LCBDE is a safe and feasible procedure for experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform on patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.

Surgical outcome of benign cases with pelvic adhesions undergoing robotic total hysterectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic total hysterectomies have been considered contraindicated for patients with intra-abdominal adherences, but the evidence for this is not strong, and we hypothesized that the procedure can be of benefit even in these cases. In our research, we analyzed how the severity of pelvic adhesions affects robotic total hysterectomy, and by comparing different types of adhesions, we can further identify the outcomes differences in between, which may aid in future surgical decision making.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). All 410 patients with uterine myoma or adenomyosis undergoing robotic total hysterectomies between 2011 and 2016 using the da Vinci Si system by the same surgeon in Taipei Medical University Hospital were included in the study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, blood loss, docking time, operation time, time to perform uterine artery ligation (UAL), pain score, hospital stay, complication rate, and laparotomy conversion rate were analyzed between benign cases with or without pelvic adhesions undergoing robotic total hysterectomy. Furthermore, in our subgroups analysis, we have divided the patients with adhesion into different groups according to the severity of adhesion. The abdomen and pelvic cavity was divided into nine sections, and the outcomes of different adhesion condition were compared. We found that patients with adhesions had increased docking time and operation time, but other differences between groups were not statistically significant. The results of the adhesion group showed no significant increases in blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Only significantly longer surgical time compared with the normal group was noted.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that robotic total hysterectomies with UAL are effective and safe for patients with benign gynecologic conditions, and the surgical method should be considered even for patients with adhesion risks.

Factors Influencing Suture Difficulty of T-tube Fixation and Closure in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

BACKGROUND

Suture under the laparoscopy was considered as one of the most difficult and time-consuming tasks in laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration. Difficult suturing can lead to prolonged suturing time and decreased suturing quality. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with the difficulty of T-tube suture following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who experienced successful laparoscopic CBD exploration with T-tube drainage were collected. Perioperative outcomes and short-term and long-term complications were recorded. Associations of the average suture time per stitch with preoperative demographic data and laboratory tests in patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 cases (46 males and 60 females) were included in this study. The average suture time per stitch was between 3 and 7.5 minutes with a median of 4.5 minutes (4, 5). There were no biliary leakage and other T-tube-related complications in all patients during follow-up. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that biliary tract reoperation (r=0.384, P<0.0001) and a higher body mass index (r=0.486, P<0.0001) were positively correlated with the average suture time per stitch, while there was no association between the average suture time per stitch and other preoperative demographic data and preoperative blood parameters, including CBD diameter, age, sex, operative time, preoperative white cell count, alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified 2 preoperative variables (biliary tract reoperation and a higher body mass index) that were positively associated with the suture difficulty under laparoscopy. An adequately powered prospective multicentre study is needed to validate our findings.

Differences in Outcome and Comparison of Stress and Immune Status in Patients with Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones after Biliary Tract Surgery Choosing Three Procedures (ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE) for Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of choosing ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE for the treatment of patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary tract surgery.

METHOD

115 patients with recurrent common bile duct stones after biliary surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to the procedure, 36 patients in the ERCP group, 38 patients in the OCBDE group, and 41 patients in the LCBDE group, and compared the efficacy, stress status, and immune status of the three groups.

RESULT

The stone removal rates were 91.67%, 97.37%, and 97.56% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05). There were statistical differences between the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups in terms of operative time, postoperative recovery time of exhaustion, recovery time of defecation, recovery time of feeding, and hospitalization time (P < 0.05). The postoperative complication rates were 8.33%, 10.53%, and 7.32% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The recurrence rates within 1 year after surgery were 2.78%, 7.89%, and 2.44% in the ERCP, OCBDE, and LCBDE groups, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ERCP has short operative time, short hospital stay, and rapid postoperative recovery. LCBDE has mild trauma, and OCBDE has a wide range of application. Each of the three procedures has its own advantages and shortcomings, and the most appropriate procedure should be selected on the basis of comprehensive evaluation.

Years of experience is more effective in defining experts in the gaze analysis of laparoscopic suturing task than task duration

In this study, the relationship between gaze patterns, task duration, and years of experience, which are commonly used to define and evaluate expert surgeons in laparoscopic surgery, was identified. Ten surgeons with 1-28 years of experience and six inexperienced students were included. Subjects used forceps to repeat the task of suturing a suture pad. Each subject wore an eye-marking recorder, and gaze points were recorded and analyzed. No significant relationship between task duration and gaze pattern was observed. However, there was a significant relationship between a surgeon's years of experience and the percentage of time spent gazing at the forceps. Subjects with more years of experience operated without looking at the forceps and fixed their gaze on the operational target. Therefore, when analyzing laparoscopic gazing patterns, it may be more appropriate to define an "expert" based on the years of experience rather than task duration.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated pancreatic cancer: A case report

Introduction and importance

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is often found incidentally during examination for other diseases. In addition to the risk of malignant transformation, patients with IPMN are at risk of developing pancreatic cancer. We report a case of pancreatic tail cancer that developed separately from a preexisting IPMN after minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction and was resected successfully by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old man underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer. He had undergone surgery for ascending colon cancer 20 years ago. At that time, IPMN was confirmed in the pancreatic body by a preoperative examination. Computed tomography was regularly performed for postoperative work-up and follow-up of the IPMN, and a solid lesion with cystic components was detected in the pancreatic tail 9 months after the operation. On detailed examination, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma concomitant with IPMN, accompanied by a retention cyst, was considered. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was successfully performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathological diagnosis of the lesion in the pancreatic tail was of an invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (ypT3ypN0yM0 ypStageIIA).

Clinical discussion

If an IPMN is detected during preoperative examination for malignancies of other organs, careful follow-up is necessary due to the high risk of pancreatic cancer development. Furthermore, initial operation with minimally invasive surgery may reduce adhesion and facilitate subsequent surgeries.

Conclusion

We have provided evidence that supports the importance of a careful follow-up of IPMNs, even if they are low risk.

•

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is found incidentally.

•

A pre-existing neoplasm led to pancreatic tail cancer in one patient.

•

Due to careful follow-up of the neoplasm, the secondary cancer was detected rapidly.

•

It was resected successfully by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

•

Careful follow is necessary if this neoplasm is detected.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with a history of prior biliary surgery: a comparative study with an open approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is increasingly being used to treat choledocholithiasis. However, few studies have examined the treatment of recurrent common bile duct stones (CBDS) in patients with a history of prior biliary surgery. The current research aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open common bile duct exploration in patients with a history of prior biliary surgery.

METHODS

Between March 2010 and August 2019, 162 patients with recurrent CBDS after prior biliary surgery who underwent surgical management in our institution were enrolled in this study. The demographic, intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Among these 162 patients, 72 underwent laparoscopic approach (LCBDE group), and 90 underwent open surgery (open common bile duct exploration group). The LCBDE group was associated with significantly lower overall complication rate, incision infection rate and blood loss compared to open common bile duct exploration group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach significantly reduced the length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05). However, the operative time, stone clearance rate, and stone recurrence rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The conversion rate of the laparoscopic approach was 6.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

LCBDE is superior to open procedure in terms of blood loss, hospital stay, overall complication and incision infection in patients with a history of prior biliary surgery, and it should be considered as a safe and effective treatment if it is performed by an experienced surgeon.