1
|
Guidetti C, Müller PC, Magistri P, Jonas JP, Odorizzi R, Kron P, Guerrini G, Oberkofler CE, Di Sandro S, Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, Di Benedetto F. Full robotic versus open ALPPS: a bi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3448-3454. [PMID: 38698258 PMCID: PMC11133099 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10804-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primarily unresectable liver tumors, ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) may offer curative two-stage hepatectomy trough a fast and extensive hypertrophy. However, concerns have been raised about the invasiveness of the procedure. Full robotic ALPPS has the potential to reduce the postoperative morbidity trough a less invasive access. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of open and full robotic ALPPS. METHODS The bicentric study included open ALPPS cases from the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and robotic ALPPS cases from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy from 01/2015 to 07/2022. Main outcomes were intraoperative parameters and overall complications. RESULTS Open and full robotic ALPPS were performed in 36 and 7 cases. Robotic ALPPS was associated with less blood loss after both stages (418 ± 237 ml vs. 319 ± 197 ml; P = 0.04 and 631 ± 354 ml vs. 258 ± 53 ml; P = 0.01) as well as a higher rate of interstage discharge (86% vs. 37%; P = 0.02). OT was longer with robotic ALPPS after both stages (371 ± 70 min vs. 449 ± 81 min; P = 0.01 and 282 ± 87 min vs. 373 ± 90 min; P = 0.02). After ALPPS stage 2, there was no difference for overall complications (86% vs. 86%; P = 1.00) and major complications (43% vs. 39%; P = 0.86). The total length of hospital stay was similar (23 ± 17 days vs. 26 ± 13; P = 0.56). CONCLUSION Robotic ALPPS was safely implemented and showed potential for improved perioperative outcomes compared to open ALPPS in an experienced robotic center. The robotic approach might bring the perioperative risk profile of ALPPS closer to interventional techniques of portal vein embolization/liver venous deprivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Philip C Müller
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Jan Philipp Jonas
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Philipp Kron
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gianpiero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Vivévis - Clinic Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magistri P, Guidetti C, Catellani B, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic ALPPS for primary and metastatic liver tumours: short-term outcomes versus open approach. Updates Surg 2024; 76:435-445. [PMID: 38326663 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is one of the strategies available for patients initially unresectable. High risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality limited its application and diffusion. We aimed to analyse short-term outcomes of robotic ALPPS versus open approach, to assess safety and reproducibility of this technique. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia on patients that underwent ALPPS between January 2015 and September 2022 was conducted. The main aim of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic approach, either full robotic or only first-stage robotic, compared to a control group of patients who underwent open ALPPS in the same Institution. 23 patients were included. Nine patients received a full open ALPPS (O-ALPPS), 7 received a full robotic ALPPS (R-ALPPS), and 7 underwent a robotic approach for stage 1, followed by an open approach for stage 2 (R + O-ALPPS). PHLF grade B-C after stage 1 was 0% in all groups, rising to 58% in the R + O-ALPPS group after stage 2 and remaining 0% in the R-ALPPS group. 86% of R-ALPPS cases were discharged from the hospital between stages 1 and 2, and median total in-hospital stay and ICU stay favoured full robotic approach as well. This contemporary study represents the largest series of robotic ALPPS, showing potential advantages from full robotic ALPPS over open approach, resulting in reduced hospital stay and complications and lower incidence of 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arend J, Franz M, Rose A, March C, Rahimli M, Perrakis A, Lorenz E, Croner R. Robotic Complete ALPPS (rALPPS)-First German Experiences. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1070. [PMID: 38473426 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ALPPS leads to fast and effective liver hypertrophy. This enables the resection of extended tumors. Conventional ALPPS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. MILS reduces morbidity and the robot adds technical features that make complex procedures safe. MATERIAL AND METHODS The MD-MILS was screened for patients who underwent rALPPS. Demographic and perioperative data were evaluated retrospectively. Ninety days postoperative morbidity was scored according to the CD classification. The findings were compared with the literature. RESULTS Since November 2021, five patients have been identified. The mean age and BMI of the patients were 50.0 years and 22.7 kg/m2. In four cases, patients suffered from colorectal liver metastases and, in one case, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Prior to the first operation, the mean liver volume of the residual left liver was 380.9 mL with a FLR-BWR of 0.677%. Prior to the second operation, the mean volume of the residual liver was 529.8 mL with a FLR-BWR of 0.947%. This was an increase of 41.9% of the residual liver volume. The first and second operations were carried out within 17.8 days. The mean time of the first and second operations was 341.2 min and 440.6 min. The mean hospital stay was 27.2 days. Histopathology showed the largest tumor size of 39 mm in diameter with a mean amount of 4.7 tumors. The mean tumor-free margin was 12.3 mm. One complication CD > 3a occurred. No patient died during the 90-day follow up. CONCLUSION In the first German series, we demonstrated that rALPPS can be carried out safely with reduced morbidity and mortality in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Arend
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mareike Franz
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rose
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christine March
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mirhasan Rahimli
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Aristotelis Perrakis
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Eric Lorenz
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
John N, Montorfano L, Nagarajan A, Simpfendorfer CH, Wexner SD, Amin P, Roy M. Liver Venous Deprivation for Rapid Liver Hypertrophy Before Major Hepatectomy: A Case Report. Am Surg 2023; 89:4944-4948. [PMID: 38050321 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221135787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is an emerging, minimally invasive strategy to induce rapid liver hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) before a major hepatectomy. LVD (aka "double vein embolization") entails same-session percutaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic veins of the planned liver resection. This report discusses LVD's utilization and technical challenges in managing a 49-year-old male with recurrent multifocal colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The patient initially underwent neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy followed by a simultaneous laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy and liver surgery (microwave ablation of segment V and wedge resections of segment one and IVb), followed by completion of chemotherapy. The patient had an R0 resection with clear colon and liver surgical margins. Nine months after the initial surgery, the patient had a rise in tumor markers, and surveillance imaging demonstrated recurrence of liver metastases in segments I and V. LVD was performed by interventional radiology, which led to a 28% increase in FLR (segments II, III, and IV); initially measuring 464 cm3 before LVD and measuring 594 cm3 on post-procedure day 21. The patient underwent right hemi-hepatectomy and caudate resection on post-procedure day 29. The patient did not have any complications and was discharged on postoperative day 6. The patient remains disease-free with no evidence of recurrence at 12 months follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan John
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Lisandro Montorfano
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Arun Nagarajan
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Conrad H Simpfendorfer
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Parag Amin
- Department of Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Mayank Roy
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vargas PA, Dar N, de Souza Martins Fernandes E, Goldaracena N. Surgical approach to achieve R0 resections in primary and metastatic liver tumors: a literature review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:1949-1963. [PMID: 37720424 PMCID: PMC10502561 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Primary and metastatic liver tumors are a significant cause of mortality worldwide. Regardless of the etiology of the tumor, macro- and microscopically clear margins (R0) while preserving adequate function of the remaining organ are the main goals after liver resections. However, technically challenging procedures are required to achieve R0 resection. Currently, there is no consensus of which should be the ideal minimal safety margin for liver tumor resections, with contrasting reports in regards of safety, tumor recurrence and overall outcomes following R0. Therefore, we aim to review current worldwide surgical practices to achieve R0 resections for primary and metastatic liver tumors in challenging surgical techniques and their reported outcomes. Methods PubMed database, Google Scholar, and OVID Medline were searched for peer-reviewed original articles related to surgical techniques performed to achieve R0 resections in the setting of primary and/or metastatic liver tumors. An up-to-date review of English-language articles published between 2015 to July 2022 was performed. Key Content and Findings Primary and metastatic liver tumors can be effectively treated using hepatic resection. Current literature highlights that tumors involving major vascular structures are not uncommon. Surgical advances have allowed for vascular control techniques, as well as vascular resections to be performed in a feasible and safe manner to achieve R0 resections. Complex resections combining surgical techniques can be performed in certain population after a detailed evaluation. Liver transplantation (LT) have been used with varying degrees of success for treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), non-resectable CRLM and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Conclusions Safety and feasibility of R0 resections have been reported for multiple techniques. Technical complexity should not be a limitation to achieve or pursue R0 tumor resection. However, there has to be a balance between patient risk/benefit in attempting R0 resections. Adequate training of surgeons on implementation of complex techniques, as well as transplant oncology techniques applied to hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery represents as a promising path to improve short and long-term outcomes for liver-related oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola A. Vargas
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Nakul Dar
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Wakabayashi G, Han HS, Palanivelu C, Boggi U, Hackert T, Kim HJ, Wang XY, Hu MG, Choi GH, Panaro F, He J, Efanov M, Yin XY, Croner RS, Fong YM, Zhu JY, Wu Z, Sun CD, Lee JH, Marino MV, Ganpati IS, Zhu P, Wang ZZ, Yang KH, Fan J, Chen XP, Lau WY. International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4815-4830. [PMID: 37701136 PMCID: PMC10494765 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts' opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic, Robotic & Laparoscopic Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia 25100, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-0075, Japan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- GEM Hospital & Research Centre, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore 641045, India
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20251, Germany
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu 42415, South Korea
| | - Xiao-Ying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ming-Gen Hu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery/Division of Robotic and HBP Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital-School of Medicine, Montpellier 34090, France
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow 111123, Russia
| | - Xiao-Yu Yin
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - Yu-Man Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Ji-Ye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Chuan-Dong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan 682, South Korea
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, F. Tappeiner Hospital, Merano 39012, Italy
| | - Iyer Shridhar Ganpati
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore 189969, Singapore
| | - Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zi-Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Senior Department of Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Serenari M, Ratti F, Guglielmo N, Zanello M, Mocchegiani F, Lenzi J, Colledan M, Mazzaferro V, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Cescon M, Di Benedetto F, Massani M, Grazi G, Valle RD, Vivarelli M, Ettorre GM, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4. [PMID: 36976422 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2012, Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has encountered several modifications of its original technique. The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the trend of ALPPS in Italy over a 10-year period. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors affecting the risk of morbidity/mortality/post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS Data of patients submitted to ALPPS between 2012 and 2021 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry and evaluation of time trends was performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2021, a total of 268 ALPPS were performed within 17 centers. The number of ALPPS divided by the total number of liver resections performed by each center slightly declined (APC = - 2.0%, p = 0.111). Minimally invasive (MI) approach significantly increased over the years (APC = + 49.5%, p = 0.002). According to multivariable analysis, MI completion of stage 1 was protective against 90-day mortality (OR = 0.05, p = 0.040) as well as enrollment within high-volume centers for liver surgery (OR = 0.32, p = 0.009). Use of interstage hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and biliary tumors were independent predictors of PHLF. CONCLUSIONS This national study showed that use of ALPPS only slightly declined over the years with an increased use of MI techniques, leading to lower 90-day mortality. PHLF still remains an open issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Guglielmo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2 - Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gianluca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cioffi L, Belli G, Izzo F, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Russo G, Patrone R, Granata V, Belli A. Minimally Invasive ALPPS Procedure: A Review of Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061700. [PMID: 36980586 PMCID: PMC10046857 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) represents a recent strategy to improve resectability of extensive hepatic malignancies. Recent surgical advances, such as the application of technical variants and use of a mini-invasive approach (MI-ALPPS), have been proposed to improve clinical outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality. Methods: A total of 119 MI-ALPPS cases from 6 series were identified and discussed to evaluate the feasibility of the procedure and short-term clinical outcomes. Results: Hepatocellular carcinoma were widely the most common indication for MI-ALPPS. The median estimated blood loss was 260 mL during Stage 1 and 1625 mL in Stage 2. The median length of the procedures was 230 min in Stage 1 and 184 in Stage 2. The median increase ratio of future liver remnant volume was 87.8%. The median major morbidity was 8.14% in Stage 1 and 23.39 in Stage 2. The mortality rate was 0.6%. Conclusions: MI-ALPPS appears to be a feasible and safe procedure, with potentially better short-term outcomes in terms of blood loss, morbidity, and mortality rate if compared with those of open series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Cioffi
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-81-18775110
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Corrado Fantini
- Department of General Surgery, Pellegrini Hospital, 80134 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of General Surgery, Pellegrini Hospital, 80134 Naples, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The influence of procedural volume on short-term outcomes for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy-a cohort study and a learning curve analysis. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8. [PMID: 36890417 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09941-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies (RPD) are reported, however, questions remain on the number of procedures needed for gaining technical proficiency in RPD. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of procedure volume on short-term RPD outcomes and assess the learning curve effect. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive RPD cases was undertaken. Non-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to identify the procedure volume threshold, following which before-threshold and after-threshold outcomes were compared. RESULTS Since May 2017, 60 patients had undergone an RPD at our institution. The median operative time was 360 min (IQR 302.25-442 min). CUSUM analysis of operative time identified 21 cases as proficiency threshold, indicated by curve inflexion. Median operative time was significantly shorter after the threshold of 21 cases (470 vs 320 min, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between before- and after-threshold groups in major Clavien-Dindo complications (23.8 vs 25.6%, p = 0.876). CONCLUSIONS A decrease in operative time after 21 RPD cases suggests a threshold of technical proficiency potentially associated with an initial adjustment to new instrumentation, port placement and standardisation of operative step sequence. RPD can be safely performed by surgeons with prior laparoscopic surgery experience.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Q, Wang A, Li Z, Sparrelid E, Brismar TB. Impact of sarcopenia on the future liver remnant growth after portal vein embolization and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1064785. [PMID: 36505848 PMCID: PMC9730229 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1064785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The impact of sarcopenia on the future liver remnant (FLR) growth after portal vein occlusion, including portal vein embolization (PVE) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has gained increasing interest. This systematic review aimed to explore whether sarcopenia was associated with insufficient FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to 05 July 2022. Studies evaluating the influence of sarcopenia on FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1 in patients with liver cancer were included. A predefined table was used to extract information including the study and patient characteristics, sarcopenia measurement, FLR growth, post-treatment complications and post-hepatectomy liver failure, resection rate. Research quality was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Five studies consisting of 609 patients were included in this study, with a sample size ranging from 42 to 306 (median: 90) patients. Only one study was multicenter research. The incidence of sarcopenia differed from 40% to 67% (median: 63%). Skeletal muscle index based on pretreatment computed tomography was the commonly used parameter for sarcopenia evaluation. All included studies showed that sarcopenia impaired the FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1. However, the association between sarcopenia and post-treatment complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure, and resection rate remains unclear. All studies showed moderate-to-high quality. Conclusions Sarcopenia seems to be prevalent in patients undergoing PVE/ALPPS and may be a risk factor for impaired liver growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1 according to currently limited evidence. Systematic review registration https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202280038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Wang
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anrong Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China,Department of Interventional Therapy, People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Zhen Li,
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torkel B. Brismar
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Montorfano L, Hutchins S, Bordes SJ, Simpfendorfer CH, Roy M. Synchronous Two-Stage Hepatectomy With Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation in Addition to Low Anterior Resection for Metastatic Rectal Cancer. Cureus 2022; 14:e21381. [PMID: 35198293 PMCID: PMC8853701 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for a staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure is an excellent treatment strategy for patients with advanced primary or metastatic liver cancer and small liver remnants. This report discusses the surgical management of a 51-year-old male who was diagnosed with stage IV rectal cancer with multiple heterogeneous hypoenhancing solid masses seen in both lobes of the liver consistent with metastatic disease. He completed six cycles of preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy with Avastin. Follow-up imaging demonstrated a good response. A combined low anterior resection and two-stage hepatectomy with ALPPS were discussed with the patient who agreed to proceed with the plan. He underwent a combined open low anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis in addition to the first stage of ALPPS. The patient tolerated the procedure well, and the immediate postoperative period was uncomplicated. Volumetric assessment of the left hepatic lobe on postoperative day seven demonstrated 26.7% of the original liver volume. The decision was made to take the patient back to the operating room on postoperative day nine for completion of the ALPPS, which entailed a total right hepatectomy. He tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on postoperative day 16. No complications from the surgical procedure were reported on subsequent follow-up visits.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang Q, Ji Y, Brismar TB, Chen S, Li C, Jiang J, Mu W, Zhang L, Sparrelid E, Ma K. Sequential Portal Vein Embolization and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Future Liver Remnant Growth: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to ALPPS Stage-1 in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Surg 2021; 8:741352. [PMID: 34660682 PMCID: PMC8515047 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.741352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of sequential portal vein embolization (PVE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (PVE+RFA) as a minimally invasive variant for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) stage-1 in treatment of cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: For HCC patients with insufficient FLR, right-sided PVE was first performed, followed by percutaneous RFA to the tumor as a means to trigger FLR growth. When the FLR reached a safe level (at least 40%) and the blood biochemistry tests were in good condition, the hepatectomy was performed. FLR dynamic changes and serum biochemical tests were evaluated. Postoperative complications, mortality, intraoperative data and long-term oncological outcome were also recorded. Results: Seven patients underwent PVE+RFA for FLR growth between March 2016 and December 2019. The median baseline of FLR was 353 ml (28%), which increased to 539 (44%) ml after 8 (7–18) days of this strategy (p < 0.05). The increase of FLR ranged from 40% to 140% (median 47%). Five patients completed hepatectomy. The median interval between PVE+RFA and hepatectomy was 19 (15–27) days. No major morbidity ≥ III of Clavien-Dindo classification or in-hospital mortality occurred. One patient who did not proceed to surgery died within 90 days after discharge. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 3–50) months, five patients were alive. Conclusion: Sequential PVE+RFA is a feasible and effective strategy for FLR growth prior to extended hepatectomy and may provide a minimally invasive alternative for ALPPS stage-1 for treatment of patients with cirrhosis-related HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Wang
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yujun Ji
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Torkel B Brismar
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shu Chen
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Changfeng Li
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiayun Jiang
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Mu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kuansheng Ma
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu JG, Wang J, Sun W, Zhang JJ, Wang YJ, Shu GM, Lou C, Du Z. ALPPS in the treatment of liver cancer with insufficient future liver remnant. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2021; 20:400-402. [PMID: 33952408 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Guo Liu
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Jin-Juan Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Yi-Jun Wang
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China.
| | - Gui-Ming Shu
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Cheng Lou
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Zhi Du
- Department of Surgery, Third Central Hospital of Tianjin (Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University), Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin 300170, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China; Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin 300170, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Serenari M, Ratti F, Zanello M, Guglielmo N, Mocchegiani F, Di Benedetto F, Nardo B, Mazzaferro V, Cillo U, Massani M, Colledan M, Dalla Valle R, Cescon M, Vivarelli M, Colasanti M, Ettorre GM, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Minimally Invasive Stage 1 to Protect Against the Risk of Liver Failure: Results from the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Series of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Italian Registry. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:1082-1089. [PMID: 32907480 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been described to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but burdened, in its pioneering phase, by high morbidity and mortality. With the advent of minimally invasive (MI) techniques in liver surgery, surgical complications, including posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), have been dramatically reduced. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of MI- versus open-ALPPS for HCC, with specific focus on PHLF. Methods: Data of patients submitted to ALPPS for HCC between 2012 and 2020 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry. Patients receiving an MI Stage 1 (MI-ALPPS) constituted the study group, whereas the patients who received an open Stage 1 (open-ALPPS) constituted the control group. Results: Sixty-six patients were enrolled from 12 Italian centers. Stage 1 of ALPPS was performed in 14 patients using an MI approach (21.2%). MI-ALPPS patients were discharged after Stage 1 at a significantly higher rate compared with open-ALPPS (78.6% versus 9.6%, P < .001). After Stage 2, major morbidity after MI-ALPPS was 8.3% compared with 28.6% reported after open-ALPPS. Mortality was nil after MI-ALPPS. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in MI-ALPPS (12 days versus 22 days, P < .001). Univariate logistic regression analysis (Firth method) found that both MI-ALPPS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.05, P = .040) and partial parenchymal transection (OR = 0.04, P = .027) were protective against PHLF. Conclusion: This national multicenter study showed that a less invasive approach to ALPPS first stage was associated with a lower overall risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Guglielmo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Bruno Nardo
- Department of Surgery, UOC Chirurgia Generale "Falcone," Cosenza, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Division of HPB, General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Unit of Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Colasanti
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wei Chieh AK, Chan A, Rotellar F, Kim KH. Laparoscopic major liver resections: Current standards. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:169-177. [PMID: 32652295 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection was slow to be adopted in the surgical arena at the beginning as there were major barriers including the fear of gas embolism, risk of excessive blood loss from the inability to control bleeding vessels effectively, suboptimal surgical instruments to perform major liver resection and the concerns about oncological safety of the procedure. However, it has come a long way since the early 1990s when the first successful laparoscopic liver resection was performed, spurring liver surgeons worldwide to start exploring the roles of laparoscopy in major liver resections. Till date, more than 9000 cases have been reported in the literature and the numbers continue to soar as the hepatobiliary surgical communities quickly learn and apply this technique in performing major liver resection. Large bodies of evidence are available in the literature showing that laparoscopic major liver resection can confer improved short-term outcomes in terms of lesser operative morbidities, lesser operative blood loss, lesser post-operative pain and faster recovery with shorter length of hospitalization. On the other hand, there is no compromise in the long-term and oncological outcomes in terms of comparable R0 resection rate and survival rates of this approach. Many innovations in laparoscopic major hepatectomies for complex operations have also been reported. In this article, we highlight the journey of laparoscopic major hepatectomies, summarize the technical advancement and lessons learnt as well as review the current standards of outcomes for this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Kow Wei Chieh
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Albert Chan
- State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, Division of Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, General and Digestive Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center and Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, Pratschke J. Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:725-735. [PMID: 32607841 PMCID: PMC7471173 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive techniques have increasingly found their way into liver surgery in recent years. A multitude of mostly retrospective analyses suggests several advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery. Due to the speed and variety of simultaneous technical and strategic developments, it is difficult to maintain an overview of the current status and perspectives in laparoscopic liver surgery. Purpose This review highlights up-to-date aspects in laparoscopic liver surgery. We discuss established indications with regard to their development over time as well as continuing limitations of applied techniques. We give an assessment based on the current literature and according to our own center experiences, not least with regard to a highly topical cost discussion. Conclusions While in the beginning mainly benign tumors were laparoscopically operated on, liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma are now among the most frequent indications. Technical limitations remain and should be evaluated with the overall aim not to endanger quality standards in open surgery. Financial aspects cannot be neglected with the necessity of cost-covering reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|