Comparison of synchronous bilateral transperitoneal and posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: results of a multicenter study

Simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic cortical-sparing adrenalectomy for bilateral pheochromocytomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of synchronous bilateral laparoscopic or open cortical-sparing adrenalectomy (SB-LCSA or SB-OCSA) for bilateral pheochromocytomas (bPHEOs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2).

Methods

Altogether, 31 patients (54.8% were women) were diagnosed with MEN2-related bPHEOs, and 29 of them underwent varying specific adrenalectomies. We systematically analyzed and evaluated their clinical profiles, mutation types, tumor histopathological features, and follow-up records.

Results

All 31 patients with bPHEOs presented with RET-C634 (90.3%) and RET-M918T (9.7%) mutations, and the median age at initial presentation was 38 years (range, 23-78). bPHEOs were synchronous in 27 patients and metachronous in 4 (12.9%) patients. In total, 29 patients underwent initial cortical-sparing adrenalectomy (CSA) including 23 (79.3%) undergoing synchronous bilateral CSA (18 SB-LCSA and 5 SB-OCSA) and 6 (20.7%) undergoing metachronous CSA. SB-LCSA and synchronous surgery were associated with less bleeding volume and shorter length of hospital stay than SB-OCSA and metachronous surgery (all P's < 0.05). Corticosteroid replacement treatment was necessary for 14 patients (45.2%) after bilateral CSA. During a median follow-up period of 7 years (range, 1.8-23), three of these patients (10.3%) had a recurrent disease that required reoperation.

Conclusion

SB-LCSA is feasible for treating synchronous bPHEOs and should be recommended as a prioritized surgical approach.

Predicting surgical outcome in posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of a preoperative nomogram

BACKGROUND

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) has several advantages over transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TLA) regarding operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and recovery. However, it can be a technically challenging procedure. To improve patient selection for PRA, we developed a preoperative nomogram to predict operative time.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with tumors of ≤ 7 cm and a body mass index (BMI) of < 35 kg/m2 undergoing unilateral PRA between February 2011 and March 2020 were included in the study. The primary outcome was operative time as surrogate endpoint for surgical complexity. Using ten patient variables, an optimal prediction model was created, with a best subsets regression analysis to find the best one-variable up to the best seven-variable model.

RESULTS

In total 215 patients were included, with a mean age of 52 years and mean tumor size of 2.4 cm. After best subsets regression analysis, a four-variable nomogram was selected and calibrated. This model included sex, pheochromocytoma, BMI, and perinephric fat, which were all individually significant predictors. This model showed an ideal balance between predictive power and applicability, with an R2 of 38.6.

CONCLUSIONS

A four-variable nomogram was developed to predict operative time in PRA, which can aid the surgeon to preoperatively identify suitable patients for PRA. If the nomogram predicts longer operative time and therefore a more complex operation, TLA should be considered as an alternative approach since it provides a larger working space. Also, the nomogram can be used for training purposes to select patients with favorable characteristics when learning this surgical approach.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy (RLPA) for 20-40 mm nonfunctional adrenal tumors in the day surgery mode

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the outcome and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy in the treatment of nonfunctional unilateral adrenal tumors in the day surgery mode.

METHODS

Nineteen patients bearing nonfunctional unilateral 20-40 mm adrenal tumors were prospectively enrolled and underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy in the day surgery unit of our hospital between June 2021 and March 2022. All patients were diagnosed with non-functional adrenal tumors as outpatients before being admitted to the day surgery unit with their consent. Patient demographics and perioperative data were prospectively documented. The patients were followed up by telephone on day 1, 3 and 7 after discharge and followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

The patient's age was 50.5 ± 11.9 yr (range from 19.0 - 69.0). Seven patients were female. Twelve patients underwent surgery on the left side. The maximal diameter of tumor was 28.3 ± 5.7 mm (20.0 - 40.0 mm). Operation time was 72.1 ± 14.9 min (58.0 - 120.0 min). Mean blood loss was 64.7 ± 50.4 ml (30.0 - 200.0 ml). The gastrointestinal function recovery time was 9.7 ± 2.6 h (6.0 - 16.0 h). Retroperitoneal drainage was removed 24.8 ± 13.3 h (range 18.0 - 72.0) after surgery. Four patients were transferred to the general ward for postoperative management, while others were discharged within 24 hours after surgery. Length of hospital stay was 48.8 ± 13.1 h (38.0 - 85.0h). Hospitalization expense was 24168.4 ± 2910.3 RMB¥ (20844.3 - 34369.8 RMB¥). Postoperative pathology revealed 17 cortical adenoma, 1 pheochromocytoma and 1 lymphatic duct tumor.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy for nonfunctional unilateral adrenal tumors in the day surgery mode is safe when strict selection criteria and perioperative management protocol are followed, which has the potential to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce lower hospitalization costs.

Minimally Invasive Adrenal Surgery

Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the main treatment option for adrenal masses. Various studies have reported that laparoscopic adrenalectomy showed fewer postoperative complications and faster recovery than conventional open adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed through either the transperitoneal approach or the retroperitoneoscopic approach, which are widely used in most adrenal surgical procedures. Furthermore, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, organ-sparing adrenalectomy has recently emerged as a way to conserve functional adrenal gland tissue. According to recent data, organ-sparing adrenalectomy shows promising surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes including less intraoperative blood loss, maintenance of adrenal function, and low recurrence. Partial adrenalectomy was initially proposed for bilateral adrenal tumors in patients with hereditary disease to avoid chronic adrenal insufficiency. However, it has also gained popularity for the treatment of unilateral adrenal disease involving a small adrenal tumor because even patients with a unilateral adrenal gland may develop adrenal insufficiency in stressful situations. Therefore, partial adrenalectomy has become increasingly common to avoid lifelong steroid replacement and recurrence in most cases, especially in bilateral adrenal disease. This review article evaluates the current evidence on minimally invasive adrenalectomy and organ-preserving partial adrenalectomy.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide considered the gold standard technique. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches have proved their efficacy with excellent outcomes. Since the introduction of da Vinci System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), robotic surgery has made many steps forward gaining progressively more diffusion in the field of general and endocrine surgery. The robotic technique offers advantages to overcome some laparoscopic shortcomings (rigid instruments, loss of 3D vision, unstable camera). Indeed, the robotic system is provided of stereoscopic 3D-magnified vision, additional degree of freedom, tremor-filtering technology and a stable camera. Recently, several case series have demonstrated the feasibility and the safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy in high-volume centers with outcomes comparable to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Notwithstanding, the technical advantages of the robotic system have not yet demonstrated significant improvements in terms of outcomes to undermine laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Moreover, robotic adrenalectomy harbor inherits drawbacks, such as longer operative time and elevated costs, that limit its use. In particular, the high cost associated with the use of the robotic system is primarily related to the purchase and the maintenance of the unit, the high instruments cost and the longer operative time. Notably, these aspects make robotic adrenalectomy up to 2.3 times more costly than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This literature review summarizes the current available studies and provides an overview about the robotic scenario including applicability, technical details and surgical outcomes.

Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Two main minimal access adrenalectomy techniques are available: laparoscopic transperitoneal (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). This study aims to compare these approaches in an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled (RCT) and non-randomised comparative (NRT) trials.

METHODS

A systematic search of comparative LTA and PRA studies was performed. Standard demographic and surgical data were recorded. Outcome measures compared included: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to open, post-operative pain, time to oral intake and ambulation, early morbidity, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and mortality. Quality of RCTs and NRTs was assessed using Cochrane and ROBINS-I, respectively, and heterogeneity using the I² test. Dichotomous and continuous variables were compared using odds ratios and mean/standard difference. Studies were then combined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed- and random-effect models.

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 12 studies were included in the analysis: 3 RCTs and 9 NRTs. These reported a total of 775 patients: 341 (44%) PRA and 434 (56%) LTA. Demographics were similar except for tumour size which was smaller (by 0.78 cm) in PRA (p = 0.003). Significant differences in outcome were seen in EBL (18 mls less in PRA, p = 0.006), time to oral intake (3.4 h sooner in PRA p = 0.009) and HLOS (shorter in PRA by 0.84 day, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that while PRA tends to be performed for smaller tumours it allows for less EBL, earlier post-operative oral intake and shorter hospital stays. In appropriately selected patients, it represents an invaluable tool in the endocrine surgeon's armamentarium.