Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robot-assisted procedures: a retrospective study

Whole-Course Intraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Choledochal Cyst Excision with a Hidden Incision in Children Under 1 Year Old

Background: Whole-course intraperitoneal robot-assisted choledochal cyst resection in children under 1 year of age is controversial due to its technical challenges. Current Pfannenstiel incision is widely used in adults for its cosmetic effects but is rarely used in children. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center study to assess the feasibility, safety, and cosmesis of whole-course intraperitoneal robot-assisted choledochal cyst resection with Pfannenstiel incision in children under 1 year of age. Results: Ten patients were treated with our surgical protocol, and there was no conversion to laparotomy. The average total operation time was 223 minutes. The average duration of anesthesia was 260.2 minutes. The average docking time between the robot arm and Trocar was 17.5 minutes. The average intraoperative blood loss was 16 mL. No postoperative complications occurred in the 10 patients. The mean time to start drinking water after surgery was 2.4 days. The mean postoperative drainage tube removal time was 2.6 days. The average length of stay was 8.5 days. The scar assessment scale total scores of the 2 observers were (6.8 ± 1.23) and (7.4 ± 1.84), respectively. For every patient, there are only four abdominal surgery scars of which 75% of scars were hidden by underpants and 25% of scars were not covered. Conclusion: It is feasible and safe to perform whole-courses intraperitoneal robot-assisted choledochal cyst resection with Pfannenstiel incision in children under 1 year old. It also has a hidden incision effect and is worthy of promotion.

Non-stapled, total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A safe and effective procedure for radical pediatric choledochal cyst excision

Background

Laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery has become the main pediatric minimal invasive surgery for a choledochal cyst (CDC). However, the Roux-en-Y jejunal limb was created extracorporeally in most reports and intracorporeally in a few reports using an endoscopic stapler.

Objectives/methods

To investigate the safety and feasibility of non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the radical treatment of congenital choledochal cysts (CDC). Between January 2019 and February 2023, 40 patients diagnosed with CDC underwent non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction (non-stapled totally laparoscopic radical treatment, NTLR), 40 patients underwent conventional reconstruction (conventional laparoscopic radical treatment, CLR) included as control. Their clinical data such as intraoperative blood loss, proportion of transit laparotomy, length of operation, postoperative fasting times, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed.

Conclusion

non-stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction is feasible and safe in total laparoscopic radical treatment of CDC. It may have the following advantages: rapid recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, short hospitalization, no age limit on the patient and no additional hospitalization costs, which is worthy of promotion and application.

Analysing Factors Prolonging Hospital Stay After Excision of Choledochal Cyst-A Pathway Towards Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate factors affecting length of stay (LOS) after choledochal cyst resection in paediatric patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on patients operated between 2004 and 2021. Associations between clinical factors and LOS were evaluated by bivariate analysis, multiple regression, and equivalence test.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included. Twenty-four underwent hepaticoduodenostomy as biliary reconstruction. Five suffered from major complications. The median (25th-75th percentile) operation time was 279 (182-378) min. Median LOS, time to enteral feeding, and time to abdominal drain removal were 8(6-10), 2(1-3), and 5(4-7) days, respectively. Seven factors were found significantly associated with a shorter LOS in bivariate analysis and were included in multiple regression. It revealed that early abdominal drain removal (p < 0.001), early enteral feeding (p = 0.042), and the absence of major complications (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter LOS. Equivalence test suggested that age and preoperative cholangitis had no practical effect on LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Early enteral feeding, early drain removal, and avoidance of major complications are associated with a shorter LOS.

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cyst in children with aberrant hepatic ducts: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this current study was to compare the safety and effectiveness between robotic and laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients suffered from choledochal cysts associated with aberrant hepatic duct.

METHODS

Patients suffered from choledochal cysts associated with aberrant hepatic duct who were treated with laparoscopic or robotic procedures between January 2009 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into laparoscopic and robotic group according to different surgical methods. The data collected included the demographic information, imaging information, operative details and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included in the analysis consisting of 14 cases in laparoscopic group and 8 cases in robotic group. The male to female ratio was 1:6.33. The median age of the patients was 40.00 months with a mean weight of 16.99 kg. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. The operation and anesthesia time were significantly longer in the laparoscopic procedures group (238.14 ± 17.24 min, 265.93 ± 19.51 min, respectively) than robotic procedures group (208.00 ± 9.24 min, 230.13 ± 12.87 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). The time to take water and hospital stay were longer in laparoscopic group (3.33 ± 0.44 days, 8.92 ± 0.52 days, respectively) than robotic group (3.01 ± 0.22 days, 7.88 ± 1.13 days, respectively) (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in total complications between the two groups (p = 0.912).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery can achieve the same results as laparoscopic surgery in the management of patients suffered from choledochal cysts associated with aberrant hepatic duct, at the same time reducing the difficulty of operation and recovering faster.

Early and Long-term Complications of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy in Infants and Children

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy still lacks wide acceptance in infants and children. We developed the service and report the largest single institution experience of complications over a period of 11 years.

METHODS

Between March 2006 and May 2017, consecutive infants and children who underwent robotic assisted laparoscopy under the care of two laparoscopic surgeons were studied. Data for patients, surgeons, year of surgery, operation, and timing, nature, grades of complications were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 601 robotic procedures (45 different types) were carried out in 539 patients. Of these 31 (5.8%) were converted, none for operative complications. These and another 4 with complicated co-morbidity were excluded, leaving 504 patients for further analysis. There were 60 (11.9%) complications in 57 (11.3%) patients. Mean (SD) age was 7.7 years -/+5.1 with the youngest being 4 weeks. Concomitant or bilateral robotic and non-robotic procedures took place in 8.1% and 13.3% of patients respectively. Significant medical co-morbidity and abdominal scarring were present in 29% and 14.9% of patients respectively. Complications occurred in theatre 1.6%, hospital 5.6%, 28 days 1.2%, and late 3.6%. Mean follow up was 7.6 years -/+ 3.1 SD. Over-all postoperative complication rate was 10.3%: CD grade I 6.5% (33), II 0.6% (3), and IIIa/b 3.2% (16) which included 1.4% (7) re-do surgery. Most (11/16) grade III occurred late. There were no bleeding, grade IV or V complications, surgical mortality, or technology related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications are low even during the learning phase and while developing the new technique. Most complications occurred early and were minor. Most high-grade complications presented late.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

2B.

Total versus conventional robotic-assisted cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies in children with choledochal cysts: a case-control study

The current study's primary aim is to compare the safety and effectiveness between total and conventional robot-assisted cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies in children with choledochal cysts (CCs). Patients suffering from CCs treated with either total or conventional robot-assisted procedures (TRAS or CRAS) between December 2019 and February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Data collected included the characteristics, operative and postoperative details. The risk factors for conversion of TRAS to CRAS were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. There were 50 patients who underwent TRAS and CRAS, respectively, and 19 patients were transferred to CRAS. The operation time in the TRAS group was significantly higher than that of the CRAS group, while the time to taking water and hospital stay were significantly shorter (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in complications between the groups (p = 0.325). The risk factors for conversion of TRAS to CRAS were age ≥ 48 months, thickness of abdominal wall (TAW) ≥ 1.3 cm and upper abdominal length (UAL) ≥ 9.5 cm. Both TRAS and CRAS are safe and feasible. Performing TRAS is recommended for patients whose age ≥ 48 months, TAW ≥ 1.3 cm and UAL ≥ 9.5 cm, while for others, it is recommended to perform CRAS.

Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection of pediatric choledochal cyst

BACKGROUND

Untreated pediatric choledochal cyst (CC) is associated with complications including cholangitis, pancreatitis, and risk of malignancy. Therefore, CC is typically treated by surgical excision with biliary reconstruction. Both open and laparoscopic (lap) surgical approaches are regularly used, but outcomes have not been compared on a national level.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify pediatric patients (age 0-21 years, excluding newborns) with choledochal cyst from 2016 to 2018 based on ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified by operative approach (open vs. lap). Demographics, operative management, and complications were compared using standard statistical tests. Results were weighted for national estimates.

RESULTS

Choledochal cyst excision was performed in 577 children (75% female) via lap (28%) and open (72%) surgical approaches. Patients undergoing an open resection experienced longer index hospital length of stay (LOS), higher total cost, and more complications. Anastomotic technique differed by approach, with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) more often utilized with open cases (86% vs. 29%) and hepaticoduodenostomy (HD) more common with laparoscopic procedures (71% vs. 15%), both p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in post-operative cholangitis or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although utilized less frequently than an open approach, laparoscopic choledochal cyst resection is safe in pediatric patients and is associated with shorter LOS, lower costs, and fewer complications. HD anastomosis is more commonly performed during laparoscopic procedures, whereas RYHJ more commonly used with the open approach. While HD is associated with more short-term gastrointestinal dysfunction than RYHJ, the latter is more commonly associated with sepsis, wound infection, and respiratory dysfunction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective Comparative Study.

Influencing factors of parental selections of minimally invasive procedure in children's abdominal surgery: a cross-sectional study in China

The purpose of our study was to explore the influencing factors of parental selections of minimally invasive procedure including laparoscopic or robotic methods in children's abdominal surgery. The questionnaire survey was conducted among the parents of patients who received abdominal laparoscopic or robotic surgery in our hospital from December 2020 to June 2022. The contents included basic information of the patients and parents, parental educational background, monthly income, insurance details and the parental considerations. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were applied for the influencing factors analysis. Six categories of diseases involving choledochal cyst (198 cases), spleen related diseases (31 cases), hirschsprung disease (40 cases), inguinal hernia (330 cases), adrenal tumor (15 cases) and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (73 cases) were included in this study. After univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis accomplished, we discovered that college degree or above (OR = 0.545, P < 0.001), monthly income > 5000 RMB (OR = 0.761, P < 0.001) and involving reconstruction during operation (OR = 0.842, P < 0.001) were the influencing factors for parental selections of robotic surgery. In children's abdominal surgery, parents with college degree or above, monthly income > 5000 RMB and considering the need for reconstruction during operation are more inclined to choose the robotic surgery.

Comparison of perioperative surgical outcomes following total robotic and total laparoscopic Roux-en Y hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in paediatric population: a preliminary report from a tertiary referral centre

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of data regarding the comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for the treatment of paediatric choledochal cysts. Thus, our primary objective was a comparison of early complications namely post-operative bleeding, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction and the need for reoperation in both techniques. Our secondary objectives included a comparison of the mean time for surgery and HJ, conversion of procedure to open, intraoperative blood loss, late complications like cholangitis, stricture and post-operative outcomes like time to start oral feeds and length of post-operative stay.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis of all children who underwent laparoscopic and robotic choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y HJ from 2008 to 2021 was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were classified into Group R (robotic HJ), n = 20 and Group L (laparoscopic HJ), n = 70. Post-operative complications were comparable amongst groups R and L (2 vs 6; p = 1 and 1 vs 2, p = 0.53, respectively). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in group R (54.8 ± 13.5 ml vs 64.1 ± 17.3 ml; p = 0.0280). The mean time to complete HJ was significantly less in group R (58 ± 12 min vs 71 ± 11 min; p < 0.001) while the mean time to complete surgery was significantly more in Group R (284 ± 14 min vs 195 ± 18 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary research report suggests overall comparable early complications in both groups.

Factors predicting surgical difficulties in congenital biliary dilatation in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

The effects of disease classification and the patient's preoperative condition on the difficulty of performing a laparotomy for pediatric congenital biliary dilatation (CBD) have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively analyzed 46 pediatric CBD laparotomies performed at the study center between March 2010 and December 2021 and predictors of operative time. The patients were separated into a short operative time group (SOT) (≤ 360 min, n = 27) and a long operative time group (LOT) (> 360 min, n = 19).

RESULTS

The preoperative AST and ALT values were higher, and the bile duct anastomosis diameter was larger, in the LOT. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the maximum cyst diameter, preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, AST, ALT, AMY, and bile duct anastomosis diameter correlated positively with operative time. Multivariate analysis identified the maximal cyst diameter, preoperative AST, and bile duct anastomosis diameter as significant factors affecting surgical time. Postoperatively, intrapancreatic stones and paralytic ileus were observed in one patient each in the SOT, and mild bile leakage was observed in one patient in the LOT.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum cyst diameter, preoperative AST, and bile duct anastomosis diameter have the potential to predict the difficulty of performing a pediatric CBD laparotomy.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most commonly, cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction are the optimal treatment for choledochal cysts (CC). Robotic surgery (RS) is being conducted with increasing frequency to treat CC. It is unclear whether RS can overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and improve the prognosis of patients. In terms of efficacy, evidence concerning which minimally invasive surgery is preferred is, however, sparse. Our objective is to further compare the efficacy of RS and LS in children with CC and draw a useful clinical conclusion.

METHODS

Studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from a series of databases, consisting of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and their reference list of articles up to May 2022. Eligible articles comprised at least five objects that were younger than 18 years of age and the language was limited to English. Two authors independently evaluated selected studies and extracted data for analysis.

RESULTS

Forty studies were selected for analysis, with thirty-six reporting data on LS and eight containing data on RS. The pooled conversion rate and pooled postoperative complication rate of RS were lower than those of LS, but none of them was statistically significant. Moreover, comparisons of the following detailed postoperative complication rates were not statistically significant, such as intestinal obstruction or ileus, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic or bile leakage, and anastomotic stenosis. However, the intraoperative blood loss and the postoperative hospital stay in RS group were significantly lower than those in LS group.

CONCLUSIONS

RS is a safe and feasible option for children with CC. Further studies with more cases, long-term efficacy and health economics analysis are needed to confirm whether RS is more advantageous.

Robotic-assisted choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is being increasingly used in pediatric choledochal cysts (CCs), but is most commonly performed in older children and adolescents. The outcomes in young infants remain to be explored. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in infants aged ≤ 1 year with an older cohort.

METHODS

From July 2015 to January 2020, a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the RAS in patients with CCs at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups (group A ≤ 1 year old and group B > 1 year old). Demographics, intraoperative details, complications, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included in the study (28 patients in group A and 51patients in group B). The median age of patients at the surgery in group A was 4.9 months (IQR: 3.1-9.1), compared with 46.8 months (IQR: 28.5-86.5) in group B. Three patients in group A were neonates. No conversion to open surgery was required. No significant differences were found between the two groups including sex, Todani type, or diameter of the cysts. The diameter of the common hepatic duct was smaller in group A (6.0 ± 1.7 vs. 9.0 ± 3.0 mm; p < 0.001). Group A had the longer hepaticojejunostomy time [51(44-58) vs. 42(38-53) min; p = 0.013], while Group B had the longer cyst excision time [43(41-59) vs. 50(43-60) min; p = 0.005]. However, their total operative time and console time were similar. There were no statistical differences in length of hospital stay and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted cyst resection and hepaticojejunostomy are feasible and safe in infants ≤ 1 year old. Age cannot be considered an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery in patients with CCs.

Efficacy of robot-assisted hepaticojejunostomy and laparoscopic-assisted hepaticojejunostomy in pediatric congenital choledochal dilatation: a system review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The efficacy of robot-assisted hepaticojejunostomy (RAHJ) and laparoscopic-assisted hepaticojejunostomy (LAHJ) in children with congenital choledochal dilatation has been a topic of much debate and controversy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of RAHJ and LAHJ in pediatric congenital choledochal dilatation.

METHOD

The review program has been prospectively registered (PROSPEROID: CRD42022306868). We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CBM, VIP, Web of Science, CNKI databases, and Wanfang databases from March 2021. The Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model were used to figure out the hazard ratio (95% CI).

RESULTS

Ten studies evaluated eight hundred and sixty-nine subjects (three hundred and thirty-two in the robotic group and five hundred and thirty-seven in the laparoscopic group), meeting all inclusion criteria. Compared with the laparoscopic group, robotic group demonstrated fewer postoperative complications [p = 0.0009; OR = 0.34 (95% CI, 0.18-0.64); I² = 3%], shorter postoperative hospital stay [p < 00,001; MD = - 2.05 (95% CI, - 2.40-1.70); I² = 0%], and less intraoperative bleeding [p = 0.008; MD = - 10.80 (95% CI, - 18.80-2.81); I² = 99%]. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups [p = 0.10; MD = 24.53 (95% CI, - 5.11-54.17); I² = 99%]. The same situation happened in short-term complication outcomes [p = 0.06; RR = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.19-1.04); I² = 0%]. However, children in the RAHJ group had significantly lower levels of long-term complications [p = 0.04; OR = 0.41 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96); I² = 0%]. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the RAHJ group [p < 0.00001; OR = 27,113.86 (95% CI, 26,307.24-27,920.48); I² = 0%]. For overall complications, subgroup analysis of literature published after 2020 and of literature with high quality scores showed a significant decrease in the RAHJ group.

CONCLUSION

In children with congenital choledochal dilatation, RAHJ is associated with reduced intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Robotic surgery has a bright future in the treatment of pediatric common hepatic duct cysts and deserves to be promoted and popularized.

Postoperative anastomotic stricture following excision of choledochal cyst: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative anastomotic stricture (PAS) is a well-known complication after correcting choledochal cyst (CC). Although the exact cause of PAS is unknown, various risk factors, such as Todani classification type IV-A, hepaticoduodenostomy, and narrow anastomosis have been reported to be associated with PAS. As far as we know, there is no report with a cumulative analysis of such risk factors of PAS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk factors of PAS following surgical correction of CC in children.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for relevant articles was performed in four databases using the combinations of the following terms "Congenital biliary dilatation", "Congenital choledochal cyst", "Choledochal cyst", "Stenosis", "Stricture", and "Complication" for studies published between 1973 and 2022. The relevant cohorts of PAS were systematically searched for clinical presentation and outcomes.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 795 reports. Seventy studies met the defined inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 206 patients with PAS. There is no prospective study in this search. The incidence of PAS was 2.1%. The proportion of Todani classification of the patient with PAS was higher in type IV-A with significant difference (2.0% in type I and 10.1% in type IV-A (p = 0.001)). Fourteen studies reported a comparison between hepaticojejunostomy and hepaticoduodenostomy. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.36). Four studies reported the diameter of the anastomosis at the primary surgery. The mean diameter was 12.5 mm. Nine studies reported a comparison between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. Pooled odds ratio of PAS did not show a statistical difference (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that close careful follow-up is important in the patients with type IV-A of CC who underwent excision surgery, considering the possibility of PAS.

The Role of Laparoscopic Treatment of Choledochal Malformation in Europe: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

 Numerous studies from Asian countries, including large collectives, have reported excellent results after laparoscopic resection of choledochal malformation (CM). However, the role of laparoscopic CM resection is still controversial outside Asia. We aimed to analyze the outcome of laparoscopic CM resection in our institution and to compare our outcome with the data reported in the literature.

METHODS

 All patients who underwent laparoscopic CM resection in our pediatric surgical department from 2002 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed for surgical details and postoperative complications, which were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. A systematic literature search identified all reports on over 10 cases of laparoscopic pediatric CM resection and surgical details, follow-up, and complication rates were extracted.

RESULTS

 Fifty-seven patients (72% female) with a mean age of 3.6 + 4.1 years underwent laparoscopic CM resection in our department. Conversion rate was 30%. Total complication rate was 28%. The rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or more) was 16% and included stricture of the biliodigestive or enteric anastomosis (n = 4), adhesive ileus (n = 3), portal vein thrombosis (n = 1), and recurrent cholangitis with consecutive liver transplantation (n = 1). With increasing experience, complication rates decreased. The majority of publications on laparoscopic CM resections originated from Asia (n = 36) and reported on low complication rates. In contrast, publications originating from non-Asian countries (n = 5) reported on higher complications following laparoscopic CM resection.

CONCLUSION

 Our data indicate that laparoscopic CM resection can be safely performed. The learning curve in combination with the low incidence calls for a centralization of patients who undergo laparoscopic CM resection. There seems to be a discrepancy on complications rates reported from Asian and non-Asian countries following laparoscopic CM resection.

Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies in patients with perforated choledochal cysts: a single-center retrospective study

Perforated choledochal cysts is usually treated by open approach through a one- or two-stage procedure. Laparoscopic procedures are gradually being used more commonly with advancements in minimally invasive technology, while the level of difficulty and conversion rate are still high due to adhesions and deranged anatomy. Robot-assisted choledochal cyst excisions have been proposed as another minimally invasive procedure that is thought to improve operability and precision compared with laparoscopic surgery. However, there is still a lack about the use of robotic assistance for bilio-enteric reconstruction in pediatric patients with perforated choledochal cyst excisions. The aim of this current study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted procedures in pediatric perforated choledochal cyst excisions. Patients suffering from perforated choledochal cysts and treated with surgical procedures including open, laparoscopic, and robotic procedures between January 2009 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Robotic cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies were mainly used to a one-stage procedure (the pseudocyst formation or intra-mural perforation) or in stage 2 of two-stage procedures (complete perforation). Data collection included patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications. There were a total of 64 patients suffering from perforated choledochal cysts were treated at our institution. Thirty-one cases of cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies were completed by open procedures. Twenty-two cases of cyst excisions and hepaticojejunostomies were completed by laparoscopic procedures and 11 cases were completed by robotic procedures. The operating times were significantly longer in the laparoscopic procedures group (214.32 ± 51.33 min) than found with either the open procedures group (130.55 ± 10.51 min) or the robot-assisted procedures group (188.82 ± 16.55 min) (p < 0.001). The time to oral intake, total complication, and hospital stay were similar among all three groups (3.53 ± 0.28 days vs 3.47 ± 0.30 days vs 3.46 ± 0.29 days, 19.35% vs 27.27% vs 18.18%, 11.48 ± 1.29 days vs 11.95 ± 2.75 days vs 11.55 ± 2.38 days, respectively) (p > 0.05). The number of biliary complications was higher in the laparoscopic procedures group (18.18%) than in both the open procedures and robot-assisted procedures groups (0.00%) (p = 0.016). Robotic-assisted cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy procedures in patients with perforated choledochal cysts are both safe and feasible. What is more, they can achieve the same results as open procedures and also reduce the level of difficulty of operations and bring fewer biliary complications compared with laparoscopic procedures.

Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review

As an innovative minimally invasive surgical technology, robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has greatly improved the accuracy and safety of surgery through the advantages of three-dimensional magnification, tremor filtering, precision and flexibility, and has been carried out by an increasing number of surgeries. In recent years, robots have been gradually applied to children, bringing new ideas and challenges to pediatric surgeons. This review will describe the advantages and limitations of robotic surgery in children, summarize its application in pediatric surgery, and provide an outlook. It is believed that clinicians should actively carry out RAS under the premise of rigorously ensuring surgical indications and strive to improve the efficacy of surgical treatment for children.

Outcomes and comparations of pediatric surgery about choledochal cyst with robot-assisted procedures, laparoscopic procedures, and open procedures: A meta-analysis

Background

Choledochal cysts (CC) are rare disorders characterized by congenital biliary dilatation of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and always relate to pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Robot-assisted surgery has been able to complete almost all pediatric endoscopic surgery nowadays. But evidence of the post-operative outcomes of robotic-assisted operation is limited, comparing with the laparoscopic operation and traditional open operation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the advantages and deficiencies about robotic-assisted operation for CC.

Methods

A meta-analysis of retrospective studies published in PUBMED, MEDLINE, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). No date limit was used, with the last search on April 30, 2022. No publication restrictions or study design filters were applied.

Results

Nine retrospective cohort studies with 1,395 patients [366 in the robotic-assisted operation group (RG), 532 in the laparoscopic operation group (LG) and 497 in the open operation group (OG)] were enrolled in our study. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the RG had significant longer operative time [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.59, 95% CI = (0.02, 3.16), P < 0.05], less blood loss [SMD = -1.52, 95% CI = (-2.71, -0.32), P < 0.05], shorter enteral feeding time [SMD = -0.83, 95% CI = (-1.22, -0.44), P < 0.001], shorter time to stay in the hospital [SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = (-1.23, -0.38), P < 0.001], fewer post-operative complications [Relative risk (RR) =1.09, 95% CI = (1.04, 1.13), P < 0.001] but higher expenses [SMD = 8.58, 95% CI = (5.27, 11.89), P < 0.001] than LG. While a significant older age [SMD = 0.46, 95% CI = (0.26, 0.66), P < 0.001], longer operative time [SMD = 3.96, 95% CI = (2.38, 5.55), P < 0.001] and shorter time to stay in the hospital [SMD = -0.93, 95% CI = (-1.62, -0.25), P < 0.05] than OG.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted procedure are both safe and minimal invasive operational strategies. Robotic-assisted procedure may slowly surpass and has a trend to replace laparoscopy for its advantages. More experiences in robotic-assisted operation should be accumulated for the unexpected complexities, so as to be more stable in the younger age of children.

Clinical efficacy and safety of robot assisted surgery for choledochal cysts excisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and therapeutic effect of Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) for choledochal cysts (CCs) excisions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM were searched from database inception to 1 May 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to conduct quality assessments, and RevMan (Version 5.4) was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 9 studies, involving 623 patients, were analyzed. RAS compared with LAS was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter time to start solid diets, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups, but the total costs were higher in RAS. Our subgroup analysis showed that RAS had significant advantages over LAS in the child group: minor bleeding, shorter length of hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence indicates that the RAS system has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, minor tissue damage, quick recovery, and sound healing in treating choledochal cyst, which proves that the RAS is safely feasible. Especially in children, RAS tends to be a better choice.

Conversions in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

New technology attracts necessary concerns regarding safety and effectiveness, including the risk and circumstances of conversions. This study analyses our 11-year experience of conversions from a dedicated pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery service.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were evaluated from a prospective database for the period March 2006 to May 2017. Descriptive and quantitative data for conversions were analysed. Variables were investigated including year of surgery, patient age, operation type, surgeon, and experience.

RESULTS

A total of 539 children underwent 601 procedures. There were 45 different types of procedures. Mean (± SD) age was 7.0 ± 5.2 years, and youngest 4 weeks old. There were 31 conversions (5.8%). Conversion rates were significantly higher in younger children, with rates of 10.0%, 6.1% and 4.2% for age groups 0-2, 2-6, and 6-18 years respectively (p = 0.01). There was a significant difference in conversion rates amongst procedures (p<0.001). Intravesical (9/26, 34.6%), liver cyst (2/8, 25.0%) and choledochal cyst (8/60, 13.3%) procedures were the highest. The most frequent reason for conversion was anesthetic related issues caused by dilated intestine and/or inadequate muscle relaxation (16/31, 52%). Three conversions were attributable to mechanical failures, none attributed to intraoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion rates are low even in the learning phase and comparable favourably to conventional laparoscopy, supporting the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted technology for advanced laparoscopy in children. The importance of optimization of surgical conditions cannot be overemphasised.

Minimally invasive hepatopancreatic and biliary surgery in children: a large centre experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hepatopancreatic and biliary (HPB) diseases has been widely used in adults, while in children, its application is limited due to its complexity. Herein, we report the experience of MIS for paediatric HPB diseases and literature review.

METHODS

All children (≤18 years-old) undergoing major HPB operations by MIS during January 2017-June 2020 in our institution were prospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

Out of 139 children operated on for HPB diseases with MIS, 26 (18.7%) patients (age: 11 (1-17) years-old; weight: 41.9 (10.7-75.5) kg) underwent major HPB surgery, including 11 pancreatic resections and 15 liver resections, all performed by a full-laparoscopic-technique. Four (15.3%) surgeries were electively converted to an open-technique for safer operative management. None required a blood transfusion. The median hospital admission was 6 days. Post-operatively, all patients had early mobilization and good recovery. Two (7.7%) patients experienced post-operative complications requiring radiological intervention. Oncological radical resection (R0) was achieved in all tumours, and after 2 years, all children were free of tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

MIS for HPB surgery is safe and feasible in children, with less surgical trauma, short hospital-stay and better aesthetic results. An adequate learning curve in specialized centres is essential for good outcomes.

Comparison of outcomes and safety of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cysts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Minimally invasive cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies include laparoscopic and robotic-assisted operations. The current systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy between the 2 groups.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wiley, Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials was performed from May 1995 to December 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative complications, and the secondary outcomes were operative details and postoperative outcomes.

Results

The meta-analysis enrolled 6 reports including 484 patients (307 in the laparoscopic group and 177 in the robotic-assisted group). The laparoscopic group was associated with lower expenses (MD = −3851.60$, 95% CI = −4031.84 to −3671.36$, P < 0.00001). No significant difference was found in short-term complications (RR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.74 to 3.23, P = 0.24), long-term complications (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.63 to 3.10, P = 0.41), total complications (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.59 to 3.94, P = 0.38), operative time (MD = −28.75 min, 95% CI = −77.13 to 19.64 min, P = 0.24), blood loss (MD = 2.28 ml, 95% CI = −13.51 to 18.06 ml, P = 0.78) or hospital stays (MD = 0.89 days, 95% CI = −0.13 to 1.91 days, P = 0.09). In subgroup analysis, the laparoscopic operation had shorter operative time (MD = −4.45 min, P = 0.009), and less blood loss (MD = −63.18 ml, P = 0.01) in adult patients.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy have comparable postoperative outcomes.

•

Comparison the efficacy of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted operation.

•

Reviewing the robotic-assisted operation for choledochal cysts.

•

The advantages and disadvantages of two methods.

Controversies in Choledochal Malformation in Children: An International Survey among Pediatric Hepatobiliary Surgeons and Gastroenterologists

BACKGROUND

While congenital choledochal malformation (CCM) is relatively well known within the pediatric surgical and pediatric gastroenterological communities, many controversies and questions remain.

METHODS

In this paper, we will discuss the results of an international Delphi survey among members of the European Reference Network RARE-LIVER and of the faculty of the Biliary Atresia and Related Diseases (BARD) network to identify the most common practices as well as controversies regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of this still enigmatic disease.

RESULTS

Twenty-two individual respondents completed the survey. While there seems to be agreement on the definitions of CCM, preoperative workup, surgical approach and follow-up still vary considerably. The mainstay of treatment remains the removal of the entire extrahepatic biliary tract, clearance of debris both proximally and distally, followed by reconstruction with (according to 86% of respondents) a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Nonetheless, both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted resections are gaining ground with the suggestion that this might be facilitated by concentration of care and resources in specialized centers. However, long-term outcomes are still lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

As even post-surgical CCM has to be considered as having premalignant potential, follow-up should be well-organized and continued into adulthood. This seems to be lacking in many centers. International cooperation for both benchmarking and research is paramount to improving care for this rare disease.

Da vinci robotic-assisted treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of da Vinci robot and laparoscopy in treating pediatric choledochal cysts.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from forty-two children diagnosed with choledochal cysts in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021. Twenty children underwent da Vinci robotic surgery, and the others underwent traditional laparoscopy. We compared differences in general information and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences between the two surgical groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, weight, type, maximum cyst diameter, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) value, postoperative complication rate, and postoperative pain score between the two surgical groups (P > 0.05). The average age of the robot-assisted group was 3.62 ± 0.71 years old (range = 1-12 years). There were nineteen cases of Todani type I, one patients of other types, and the maximum cyst diameter was 35.45 ± 9.32 mm (range = 12-56 mm). In the laparoscopic group, the average age was 3.08 ± 0.82 years old (range = 3-10 years). Twenty-one patients had Todani type I, and one had other types. The maximum cyst diameter was 31.94 ± 8.64 mm (range = 10-82 mm). The robot-assisted group had better abdominal drainage, postoperative CRP value, fasting time, and discharge time than the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with laparoscopy, the da Vinci system has the advantages of less tissue damage, faster recovery, and better healing in the treatment of children with congenital choledochal cysts. With technological advancements and an increased number of experienced surgeons, robotic surgery may become a new trend in surgery.

Laparoscopic surgery versus robot-assisted surgery for choledochal cyst excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this following study is to systematically review and analyze the published data comparing laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted surgery for choledochal cyst excisions through the metrics of operative time, length of hospital stay and postoperative outcome. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases were combed through and data was retrieved from the timespan between January 1995 and October 2021. The primary measures included operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Making use of random-effects models, we pooled the odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Six studies comprising a total 484 patients who had undergone either laparoscopic surgery [307 (63.43%) patients] or robot-assisted surgery [177 (36.57%) patients] were included in this analysis. Three of the articles involved adults while the other three involved children. All of the studies were published after 2018 and were retrospective case-control studies. Patients undergoing robotic surgery had a shorter hospital stay (MD, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.35; p < 0.00001) and a longer operative time (MD, -57.52; 95% CI, -67.17 to -47.87; p < 0.00001). And there was no significant discrepancy in complications between the two groups. Compared to laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery is associated with a shorter hospital stay, scores highly in terms of both safety and feasibility, however it also results in a longer operative time. And the two procedures have the same short- and long-term results.

Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure

OBJECTIVE

We introduce the trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the new method and traditional laparoscopy-assisted procedure.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 51 children diagnosed with choledochal cysts and received surgery from June 2019 to December 2020 at our department. About 24 patients who underwent the robot-assisted procedure were selected as the R group, and 27 patients who underwent the laparoscope-assisted procedure were selected as the L group. We compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

RESULT

No significant differences were found in demographic information between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median total operative time, median port/trocar installation time, and median wound suture time of the R group were a little longer than the L group (217.63 ± 5.90 vs. 199.37 ± 5.13 min; 30.71 ± 3.18 vs. 6.11 ± 1.15 min; 30.79 ± 1.82 vs. 20.40 ± 3.12 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, the R group had shorter choledochal cyst excision time and mean hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis time than the L group (52.04 ± 2.74 vs. 59.26 ± 3.23 min; 52.42 ± 2.72 vs. 60.63 ± 3.30 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean extracorporeal Roux-y jejunojejunostomy time of two groups has no remarkable difference (P > 0.05). The R group also had less mean volume of blood loss (7.04 ± 1.16 vs. 29.04 ± 18.21 mL; P < 0.001). The R group had a shorter indwelling time of gastric tube, anal exhaust time, water feeding time, solids feeding time, and hospital stay time than the L group (P < 0.05). The R group had a lower early complication rate than the L group (4.2 vs. 29.63%; P = 0.026). No statistical differences were identified between the two groups in late or any single complication (0.00 vs. 11.11%; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A resection of the choledochal cyst and a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy can be performed much more precisely by single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery. Patients can achieve rapid recovery, and the umbilical incision is more concealed and beautiful. Combing the experience of single-site surgery with robot-assisted surgery, the operators can implement the technique in children safely and feasibly.

Clinical characteristics of patients with malignancy and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with choledochal cyst

Purpose

There are few reports of postoperative long-term malignant risk or postoperative sequelae after surgery for choledochal cysts (CCs). This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with malignancy and the long-term results of operated CC.

Methods

The patients who underwent surgical treatments for CC between 2003 and 2020 at Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. Clinicopathologic factors and pre-/postoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed.

Results

Of the 153 patients, Todani classification Ic (36.6%), C-P type (43.8%) anomalous pancreaticobiliary duct union were the most common type respectively. Fourteen patients (9.2%) had biliary tract cancer and a comparison of patients with and without malignancy showed that the diameter of cyst was significantly lower in malignant patients and malignancy was observed to be significantly higher in P-C type. The incidence of long-term complications was 9.8%, and the median time interval was 30 months. The 2 most common complications were cholangitis and stricture (60.0%). There was one case of new cancer near the intrapancreatic remnant bile duct.

Conclusion

Of the resected CCs, 9.2% had a combined malignancy on the biliary tracts. Long-term complications such as cholangitis, anastomotic stricture, and new cancers may occur. Therefore, continuous surveillance is required.

Changes in outcomes and operative trends with pediatric robot-assisted resection of choledochal cyst

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to report our experience with a robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts (CCs) in pediatric patients, especially focusing on changes in outcomes and operative trends.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all 158 patients under 18 years of age who underwent robot-assisted resection of CC in a single tertiary center between July 2008 and January 2021. Patients were divided into the first period (P1, July 2008-March 2016; N = 79) and second period (P2, April 2016-January 2021; N = 79) with equal number of participants. The patients of P2 were compared with those of P1 to assess clinical outcomes with operative details. Operative characteristics and postoperative prognosis were compared for each group.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 383.6 min for the P2 group and 462.6 min for the P1 group (p < 0.001). The mean estimated blood loss was 28 mL in the P2 group and 63 mL in the P1 group (p = 0.025). The rate of emergency department visit after the operation was lower in the P2 group (3.8% vs. 13.9%, respectively, p = 0.047). The two groups showed no significant differences in the rate of late postoperative complications and reoperations.

CONCLUSION

With the increase in the center's experience, robot-assisted resection of CC can be safely adopted and feasible, especially for pediatric patients.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment Study, Level III.

[Comparative analysis of the bile duct reconstruction methods in children with choledochal malformation]

OBJECTIVE

To compare various methods of bile duct reconstruction in children with choledochal malformation (CM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 99 children with CM over 10-year period. Mini-laparotomy (ML), laparoscopy (LS) and laparotomy (LT) were used. We performed radical CM resection and bile duct reconstruction using Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) and hepaticoduodenostomy (HD). Surgery time, short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

ML was performed in 39 patients, LS - 51 patients, LT - 9 patients. In case of LS, hospital-stay was significantly lower after intracorporeal RYHJ formation compared to extracorporeal technique (p=0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test). Intracorporeal RYHJ requires more time (p=0.0003). Intestinal passage recovered 3 times faster in the ML RYHJ group compared to the LS RYHJ group (p=0.016, Mann-Whitney U-test). ML RYHJ was followed by significantly less duration of postoperative narcotic anesthesia compared to LS HD (3 vs. 4 days, p=0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test). In our study, ML RYHJ has an advantage over LS RYHJ regarding long-term outcomes. HD resulted higher incidence of severe postoperative pancreatitis (p=0.033) that required surgical correction (LT, p=0.043).

CONCLUSION

ML RYHJ has some advantages over other methods of bile duct reconstruction. Therefore, we can currently recommend this method as a preferable one.

[Efficiency of minilaparotomy in the treatment of choledochal malformation in children]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an effectiveness of minilaparotomy in the treatment of choledochal malformation (CM) in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included children with CM who underwent surgery from January 2010 to May 2020. All patients were divided into 3 groups depending on surgical approach: minilaparotomy (ML), laparoscopy (LS) and laparotomy (LT). We analyzed surgery time, early postoperative outcomes and cosmetic results.

RESULTS

There were 99 patients with CM for 10 years. ML was performed in 39 patients, LS - in 51 patients, and LT - in 9 patients. Significantly (p-value <0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn paired comparison test, p<0.05) less surgery time was observed in ML group. According to Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, we found a significant prevalence of complications in the LS group (p - 0.018, Kruskal-Wallis test). Moreover, LS was characterized by insignificant (p>0.05) predominance of the most severe complications requiring multiple redo surgeries.

CONCLUSION

Currently, open surgery is a "gold standard" in the treatment of children with CM. LS is not preferred in children with CM. ML ensures favorable early outcomes in children with CM.