Modified (Bai-Jiang style) vagus nerve-preserving versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a randomized clinical trial

Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization Versus Endoscopic Varices Ligation Plus Laparoscopic Splenectomy in the Treatment of Portal Hypertension

Background/Aims: To compare laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) plus laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in treating esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) caused by portal hypertension (PH). Methods: Between January 2015 and May 2022, 87 patients with PH caused by hepatitis B cirrhosis were included in the retrospective study (34 in LSED versus 53 in EVL + LS). Results: The clinical features of both groups were well-matched (P > .05). The EVL+LS group was associated with shorter operation time, lower operative blood loss, faster gastrointestinal (GI) recovery, lower C-reactive protein levels, and shorter hospital stays after operation (P < .05). Operative morbidity was more significant in the LSED group (19 55.9% versus 18 33.9%) (P < .05). On postoperative days 1 and 3, albumin levels were remarkably lower (P < .05) in the LSED group. The mean follow-up was 24.3 months for LSED and 26.5 for EVL+LS. Hematological parameters, hepatic functional status, hepatic hemodynamics, and endoscopy indicated a substantial improvement in both groups (P < .05), but no significant difference was identified (P > .05). There was no discernible difference in the incidence of GI bleeding between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusion: EVL+LS is a safer, simpler, and more minimally invasive treatment of EGVB secondary to PH.

The decreased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhotic portal hypertension patients after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection

BACKGROUND

Posthepatitic cirrhosis is one of the leading risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide, among which hepatitis B cirrhosis is the dominant one. This study explored whether laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) can reduce the risk of HCC among patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhotic portal hypertension (CPH).

METHODS

A total of 383 patients with HBV-related CPH diagnosed as gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and secondary hypersplenism were identified in our hepatobiliary pancreatic center between April 2012 and April 2022, and conducted an 11-year retrospective follow-up. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to correct for potential confounders, weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, and logistic regression to estimate survival and risk differences.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment method: LSD (n = 230) and endoscopic therapy (ET; n = 153) groups. Whether it was processed through IPTW or not, LSD group showed a higher survival benefit than ET group according to Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < 0.001). The incidence density of HCC was higher in the ET group compared to LSD group at the end of follow-up [32.1/1000 vs 8.0/1000 person-years; Rate ratio: 3.998, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.928-8.293]. Additionally, in logistic regression analyses weighted by IPTW, LSD was an independent protective predictor of HCC incidence compared to ET (odds ratio 0.516, 95% CI 0.343-0.776; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Considering the ability of LSD to improve postoperative survival and prevent HCC in HBV-related CPH patients with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and secondary hypersplenism, it is worth promoting in the context of the shortage of liver donors.

Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912

BACKGROUND

Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications.

CONCLUSION

Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approach of Bai-Jiang-style vagus nerve-preserving splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection

Robotic surgery has been widely accepted in many kinds of surgical procedures. Little is known about clinical effects of robotic-assisted splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (RSD) for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and secondary hypersplenism owing to cirrhotic portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether RSD is feasible and safe for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension and whether RSD is superior to laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD). We retrospectively investigated the clinical effects of 50 patients with cirrhosis who underwent vagus nerve-preserving RSD (n = 20) and LSD (n = 30) between September 2020 and October 2021. We compared patients' demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative variables. RSD and LSD were successful in all patients. Operative time did not differ significantly between the RSD group and LSD group (151.15 ± 21.78 min vs. 144.50 ± 24.30 min, P > 0.05), but intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the RSD group (61.00 ± 34.93 mL vs. 105.00 ± 68.77 mL, P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found regarding intraoperative allogeneic transfusion rate, visual analog scale pain score on the postoperative first day, time to first oral intake, initial passage of flatus, initial off-bed activity, postoperative hospital stay, and overall perioperative complication rate (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, RSD is not only a technically feasible and safe procedure but it was associated with less blood loss than LSD for cirrhotic portal hypertension with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and secondary hypersplenism. Registered at researchregistery.com: trial registration number is researchregistry7244, date of registration October 10, 2021, registered retrospectively.

Clinical effects of cluster technology optimization and innovations on laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a single-center retrospective study with 500 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

In Asia, laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) has been widely regarded as a preferential treatment modality for cirrhotic portal hypertension (PH). However, LSD involves high surgical risk, technical challenges, and many potential postoperative complications. Technology optimization and innovation in LSD aiming to solve to these difficulties has scarcely been reported. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect of our cluster technology optimization and innovation on LSD for PH.

METHODS

From February 2012 to January 2020, 500 patients with cirrhosis who had esophagogastric variceal bleeding and hypersplenism underwent LSD in our department. According to different operation periods, patients were divided into the early-, intermediate-, and late-period groups. We collected information regarding clinical characteristics of all patients as well as their preoperative and postoperative follow-up data.

RESULTS

Compared with the early-period group, operation time and postoperative hospital stay were all significantly different and gradually declined from the intermediate- and late-period groups, respectively (all P &lt; 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss of these three groups was gradually decreased, with significant differences (P &lt; 0.05). The incidences of delayed gastric emptying and diarrhea in the late-period group were all significantly lower than those in the early- and intermediate-period groups, respectively (all P &lt; 0.05). Compared with the early-period group, the incidence of variceal re-bleeding was significantly lower in the intermediate- and late-period groups (all P &lt; 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our cluster technology optimization and innovation of LSD not only contributed to faster recovery and fewer complications but also enhanced surgical safety for patients. It is worth promoting this approach among patients with EVB and hypersplenism secondary to cirrhotic PH.

Vagus Nerve-Preserving Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection with Versus Without Intraoperative Endoscopic Variceal Ligation: a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding is the most common lethal factor for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. We firstly developed a laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) with intraoperative endoscopic variceal ligation (LSDL) technique. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether LSDL is feasible and safe and whether LSDL can effectively prevent esophagogastric variceal re-bleeding (EVR), as compared with single LSD.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled single-center study, 88 patients with cirrhosis who had esophagogastric variceal bleeding and hypersplenism were randomly assigned to receive either LSD (n = 44) or LSDL (n = 44) between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary outcome was EVR.

RESULTS

No patients withdrew from the study. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, time to first flatus and off-bed activity, or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Compared with that in the LSD group, operation time was significantly longer in the LSDL group (138.5 ± 19.4 min vs. 150.3 ± 19.0 min, P < 0.05); however, LSDL was associated with a significantly decreased EVR rate at 1-year follow-up (8/44 vs. 1/44, P < 0.05). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression revealed that LSDL was a significant independent protective factor against EVR in comparison with LSD (relative risk: 0.105, 95% confidence interval 0.012-0.877; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Our newly developed LSDL procedure is not only technically feasible and safe; it also contributed to lowering the EVR risk more so than single LSD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We registered our research at https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ . The name of research registered is "Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection with Intraoperative Endoscopic Variceal Ligation." The trial registration identifier at clinicaltrials.gov is NCT04244487.