1
|
Hanna NM, Kumar SS, Collings AT, Pandya YK, Kurtz J, Kooragayala K, Barber MW, Paranyak M, Kurian M, Chiu J, Abou-Setta A, Ansari MT, Slater BJ, Kohn GP, Daly S. Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2917-2938. [PMID: 38630179 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10816-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. RESULTS We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nader M Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.
| | - Sunjay S Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amelia T Collings
- Hiram C. Polk, Jr Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Yagnik K Pandya
- Department of Surgery, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - James Kurtz
- Department of Surgery, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Meghan W Barber
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mykola Paranyak
- Department of General Surgery, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Marina Kurian
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Abou-Setta
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | | | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Upper GI Surgical Group, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu DS, Allan Z, Wong DJ, Goh SK, Stevens S, Aly A, Bright T, Watson DI. Pre-existing hiatal mesh increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery: A retrospective multicenter study. Surgery 2023; 174:549-557. [PMID: 37369605 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revisional antireflux surgery, including hiatus hernia repair, is increasingly common. Mesh-augmented hiatal closure at the time of index operation is controversial but commonly performed. Although a meta-analysis of randomized data has demonstrated no additional benefit of routine mesh placement, it is unclear whether this practice results in harm, particularly at the time of revisional antireflux surgery. We determined whether pre-existing mesh at the hiatus increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery. METHODS Analysis of prospectively-maintained databases of all elective revisional antireflux surgery cases in 36 hospitals across Australia took place over 10 years. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with and without prior hiatal mesh were compared. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to validate primary findings. RESULTS A total of 346 revisional cases (35 with pre-existing mesh) were analyzed. The 2 groups had comparable baseline characteristics. In total, 77 (22.2%) patients had 148 intraoperative adverse events. Pre-existing mesh was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative complications (48.6% vs 22.5%, odds ratio 3.25, 95% confidence interval 1.63-6.38, P = .002), secondary to bleeding, and lacerations to pleura, lung, and liver. Overall, 63 (18.2%) patients developed postoperative complications. Pre-existing mesh was associated with increased postoperative morbidity (37.1% vs 16.1%, odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.50-6.43, P = .005), particularly due to bleeding and respiratory complications. Importantly, pre-existing mesh independently predicted the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Prior hiatal mesh significantly increases morbidity during and after revisional antireflux surgery. Given that revisional surgery is increasingly being performed, our findings discourage routine mesh use during primary antireflux surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Liu
- Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Zexi Allan
- Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Darren J Wong
- General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Su Kah Goh
- Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sean Stevens
- Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ahmad Aly
- Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Bright
- Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| | - David I Watson
- Oesophagogastric Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aiolfi A, Sozzi A, Bona D. Comment to: Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach. Authors' reply. Hernia 2023; 27:717-718. [PMID: 36947310 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02777-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Aiolfi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso N.173, Zip Code, 20151, Milan, Italy.
| | - A Sozzi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso N.173, Zip Code, 20151, Milan, Italy
| | - D Bona
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso N.173, Zip Code, 20151, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
SAAD AR, VELANOVICH V. LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: ARE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? MESH HERNIOPLASTY. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA : ABCD = BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY 2023; 35:e1710. [PMID: 36629688 PMCID: PMC9831632 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Hiatal hernias are at high risk of recurrence. Mesh reinforcement after primary approximation of the hiatal crura has been advocated to reduce this risk of recurrence, analogous to mesh repair of abdominal wall hernias. However, the results of such repairs have been mixed, at best. In addition, repairs using some type of mesh have led to significant complications, such as erosion and esophageal stricture. At present, there is no consensus as to (1) whether mesh should be used, (2) indications for use, (3) the type of mesh, and (4) in what configuration. This lack of consensus is likely secondary to the notion that recurrence occurs at the site of crural approximation. We have explored the theory that many, if not most, "recurrences" occur in the anterior and left lateral aspects of the hiatus, normally where the mesh is not placed. We theorized that "recurrence" actually represents progression of the hernia, rather than a true recurrence. This has led to our development of a new mesh configuration to enhance the tensile strength of the hiatus and counteract continued stresses from intra-abdominal pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adham Raja SAAD
- University of South Florida, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine – Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Vic VELANOVICH
- University of South Florida, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine – Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cheng F, Liang H, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Gao X, Tan L, He H. Tension-free hiatal hernia repair with biological mesh: A real-world experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e31782. [PMID: 36397386 PMCID: PMC9666108 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and esophagoplasty are the standards for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH) repair. Biologically derived mesh is also associated with reduced recurrence. This study attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of a biological mesh in the 4K laparoscopic repair of HH. This retrospective study reviewed patients with a severe GERD complicated with HH from August 2019 to August 2020. All patients underwent the HH repair using a biological mesh under a 4K laparoscope accompanying Nissen fundoplication. Up to 16 months postoperatively, GERD-health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scale, radiologic studies on HH recurrence, and symptoms were recorded. The mean surgical time and postoperative hospital stay were 70.9 ± 8.72 min, 4.8 ± 0.76 days, respectively. The postoperative symptom relief rate was 96.5%, and no recurrence exhibited during follow-up. Dysphagia occurred in 10 (9.43%) patients. There were no intraoperative vagus nerve injury or postoperative complications, mesh infection, and reoperation for mesh. The tension-free repair of HH with the biological mesh is an option for clinical use, with effectiveness and few short-term complications being reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahui Cheng
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hongyan Liang
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hui Zeng
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xiao Gao
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lipeng Tan
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hengzheng He
- Department of Mini-Invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province (The Second People’s Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, Hunan, China
- * Correspondence: Hengzheng He, Department of Mini-invastsurgery, Brain Hospital of Hunan Province, 427, third segment, Furong Zhong Road, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Colonisation by Fibroblasts and Antimicrobial Properties of Surgical Meshes Coated with Bacterial Cellulose. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23094835. [PMID: 35563224 PMCID: PMC9105287 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hernia repairs are the most common abdominal wall elective procedures performed by general surgeons. Hernia-related postoperative infective complications occur with 10% frequency. To counteract the risk of infection emergence, the development of effective, biocompatible and antimicrobial mesh adjuvants is required. Therefore, the aim of our in vitro investigation was to evaluate the suitability of bacterial cellulose (BC) polymer coupled with gentamicin (GM) antibiotic as an absorbent layer of surgical mesh. Our research included the assessment of GM-BC-modified meshes’ cytotoxicity against fibroblasts ATCC CCL-1 and a 60-day duration cell colonisation measurement. The obtained results showed no cytotoxic effect of modified meshes. The quantified fibroblast cells levels resembled a bimodal distribution depending on the time of culturing and the type of mesh applied. The measured GM minimal inhibitory concentration was 0.47 µg/mL. Results obtained in the modified disc-diffusion method showed that GM-BC-modified meshes inhibited bacterial growth more effectively than non-coated meshes. The results of our study indicate that BC-modified hernia meshes, fortified with appropriate antimicrobial, may be applied as effective implants in hernia surgery, preventing risk of infection occurrence and providing a high level of biocompatibility with regard to fibroblast cells.
Collapse
|
7
|
Idrissi A, Mouni O, Bouziane M, Fadil A, Sair K. Intraesophageal Migration of a Paraesophageal Hernia Mesh: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e24339. [PMID: 35607570 PMCID: PMC9123389 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
8
|
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Sozzi A, Lombardo F, Lanzaro A, Panizzo V, Bonitta G, Mendogni P, Bruni PG, Campanelli G, Bona D. Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST ® mesh: a single-institution experience. Hernia 2022; 26:279-286. [PMID: 34716832 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02528-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hernia recurrence after laparoscopic repair is a perplexing problem. In an effort to reduce anatomical and clinical recurrences, different type of meshes have been used to bolster the esophageal hiatus. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess safety, medium-term efficacy, and quality of life improvement after laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia reinforced with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix-ST®). METHODS Observational single-center retrospective single-arm cohort study (November 2015-February 2021). We included all adult patients (> 18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST® mesh and Toupet fundoplication. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were included. The median postoperative stay was 3.2 days (range 2-9) and the postoperative complication rate was 11.7%. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range 1-53). No mesh-related complications were detected. Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in six patients (8.8%). The recurrence-free probability at 34 months was 0.89 (95% CI 0.807-0.988) while at 60 months was 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.97). Hernia recurrences were mostly observed between 21 and 36 months after the operation. None of the patients required surgical revision and all were managed with PPI. Postoperative dysphagia requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation occurred in 2.9% of patients. Compared to baseline, both the GERD-HRQL (15.2 ± 6.2 vs. 3.2 ± 3.1; p = 0.026) and all SF-36 items were significantly improved (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic crura augmentation with Phasix-ST® mesh combined with a Toupet fundoplication is safe and seems effective in the medium-term follow-up. Phasix-ST® crural reinforcement resulted in low hernia recurrence rate with a sustained symptoms and quality of life improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aiolfi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Cavalli
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - A Sozzi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - F Lombardo
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - A Lanzaro
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - V Panizzo
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - G Bonitta
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mendogni
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| | - P G Bruni
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - G Campanelli
- Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - D Bona
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Angeramo CA, Schlottmann F. Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: To Mesh or not to Mesh. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2022; 275:67-72. [PMID: 33843796 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare outcomes after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) with mesh or primary repair alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA High recurrence rates after LPEHR have been reported. Whether the use of mesh improves outcomes remains elusive. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LPEHR with mesh repair versus suture repair alone. Early (≤6 months) and late (>6 months) recurrence rates were used as primary endpoints to assess efficacy. Intraoperative complications, overall morbidity, and reoperation rates were used as secondary endpoints to assess safety. A meta-analysis was conducted using relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the analyzed outcomes. RESULTS Seven RCTs comparing mesh (n = 383) versus suture only (n = 352) repair were included for analysis. Patients undergoing LPEHR with mesh reinforcement had similar early (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.26-2.07, P = 0.46) and late (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.27-2.08, P = 0.48) recurrence rates as those with primary repair. Similar recurrence rates were also found when stratifying the analysis by the type of mesh utilized (absorbable and nonabsorbable). Intraoperative complications (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.33-3.28, P = 0.92) and reoperation rates (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.29-1.92, P = 0.45) were also similar in both groups. Overall morbidity, however, was higher after mesh repair with nonabsorbable mesh (RR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.24-1.71, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing LPEHR have similar early and late recurrence rates with either mesh reinforcement or suture only repair, regardless of the type of mesh utilized. Overall morbidity, however, seems to be higher in patients repaired with nonabsorbable mesh.
Collapse
|
10
|
A Systematic Review Examining the Experimental Methodology Behind In Vivo Testing of Hiatus Hernia and Diaphragmatic Hernia Mesh. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:684-692. [PMID: 34935102 PMCID: PMC8927034 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05227-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mesh implants are regularly used to help repair both hiatus hernias (HH) and diaphragmatic hernias (DH). In vivo studies are used to test not only mesh safety, but increasingly comparative efficacy. Our work examines the field of in vivo mesh testing for HH and DH models to establish current practices and standards. METHOD This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. Medline and Embase databases were searched for relevant in vivo studies. Forty-four articles were identified and underwent abstract review, where 22 were excluded. Four further studies were excluded after full-text review-leaving 18 to undergo data extraction. RESULTS Of 18 studies identified, 9 used an in vivo HH model and 9 a DH model. Five studies undertook mechanical testing on tissue samples-all uniaxial in nature. Testing strip widths ranged from 1-20 mm (median 3 mm). Testing speeds varied from 1.5-60 mm/minute. Upon histology, the most commonly assessed structural and cellular factors were neovascularisation and macrophages respectively (n = 9 each). Structural analysis was mostly qualitative, where cellular analysis was equally likely to be quantitative. Eleven studies assessed adhesion formation, of which 8 used one of four scoring systems. Eight studies measured mesh shrinkage. DISCUSSION In vivo studies assessing mesh for HH and DH repair are uncommon. Within this relatively young field, we encourage surgical and materials testing institutions to discuss its standardisation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yin V, Pagteilan J, Atay SM, David EA, Kim AW, Wightman SC. Esophagectomy for Permanent Mesh Migration after Transthoracic Hiatal Hernia Repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 114:e89-e91. [PMID: 34914935 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
A 76-year-old woman with distant history of right diaphragmatic hernia repair with permanent mesh and subsequent laparotomy for mesh migration re-presents with pneumonia. On initial presentation, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography noted a contained esophageal perforation with residual permanent mesh. Although the patient initially deferred esophagectomy, a right lower lobe lung abscess developed necessitating mesh resection and an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. We present the first case of mesh migration and erosion through esophagus and the right lower lobe of the lung. Permanent mesh should not be used during hiatal hernia repairs due to complications such as mesh erosion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Yin
- Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - John Pagteilan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Scott M Atay
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth A David
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anthony W Kim
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sean C Wightman
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuvendjiska J, Höppner J. [Mesh Implantation in Anti-Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery - Contra Statement]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:200-203. [PMID: 33851382 DOI: 10.1055/a-1403-3558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and of hiatal hernias, the high rate of recurrence of hiatal hernias is a central problem. Against this background, various, primarily alloplastic, meshes are used to augment suture closure on the esophageal hiatus. Very different results have been reported in the past and the use of meshes in hiatus reconstruction is controversial. In addition to the frequency of recurrences, reports about complications of mesh augmentation are in the foreground. On the basis of several prospective randomised double-blinded comparative studies and meta-analyses (class Ia and Ib evidence), the current data do not show any advantages of mesh-augmented hiatoplasty for the prevention of recurrence of hiatal hernia. At the same time, there exist reports of more long-term postoperative complications, especially dysphagia, after use of meshes for augmentation of hiatus reconstruction. Therefore, routine use of mesh augmentation for hiatus reconstruction is currently not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmina Kuvendjiska
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Jens Höppner
- Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Köckerling F, Zarras K, Adolf D, Kraft B, Jacob D, Weyhe D, Schug-Pass C. What Is the Reality of Hiatal Hernia Management?-A Registry Analysis. Front Surg 2020; 7:584196. [PMID: 33195390 PMCID: PMC7642514 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: To date, the guidelines for surgical repair of hiatal hernias do not contain any clear recommendations on the hiatoplasty technique with regard to the use of a mesh or to the type of fundoplication (Nissen vs. Toupet). This present 10-years analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry aims to investigate these questions. Methods: Data on 17,328 elective hiatal hernia repairs were entered into the Herniamed Registry between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2019. 96.4% of all repairs were completed by laparoscopic technique. One-year follow-up was available for 11,280 of 13,859 (81.4%) patients operated during the years 2010–2018. The explorative Fisher's exact test was used for statistical calculation of significant differences with an alpha = 5%. Since the annual number of cases in the Herniamed Registry in the years 2010–2012 was still relatively low, to identify significant differences the years 2013 and 2019 were compared. Results: The use of mesh hiatoplasty for axial and recurrent hiatal hernias remained stable over the years from 2013 to 2019 at 20 and 45%, respectively. In the same period the use of mesh hiatoplasty for paraesophageal hiatal hernia slightly, but significantly, increased from 33.0 to 38.9%. The proportion of Nissen and Toupet fundoplications for axial hiatal hernia repair dropped from 90.2% in 2013 to 74.0% in 2019 in favor of “other techniques” at 20.9%. For the paraesophageal hiatal hernias (types II–IV) the proportion of Nissen and Toupet fundoplications was 68.1% in 2013 and 66.0% in 2019. The paraesophageal hiatal hernia repairs included a proportion of gastropexy procedures of 21.7% in 2013 and 18.7% in 2019. The recurrent hiatal hernia repairs also included a proportion of gastropexies 12.8% in 2013 and 15.1% in 2019, Nissen and Toupet fundoplications of 72.7 and 62.7%, respectively, and “other techniques” of 14.5 and 22.2%, respectively. No changes were seen in the postoperative complication and recurrence rates. Conclusion: Clear trends are seen in hiatal hernia repair. The use of meshes has only slightly increased in paraesophageal hiatal hernia repairs. The use of alternative techniques has resulted in a reduction in the use of the “classic” Nissen and Toupet fundoplication surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Zarras
- Department of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncological Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Kraft
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Diakonie Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Dietmar Jacob
- Chirurgisch-Orthopädischer PraxisVerbund (COPV)-Hernia Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Weyhe
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christine Schug-Pass
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|