Impact of perforator sparing on anterior component separation outcomes in open abdominal wall reconstruction

Comparison of Medical Research Abstracts Written by Surgical Trainees and Senior Surgeons or Generated by Large Language Models

Importance

Artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated academia, especially OpenAI Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model. However, little has been reported on its use in medical research.

Objective

To assess a chatbot's capability to generate and grade medical research abstracts.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional study, ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 (referred to as chatbot 1 and chatbot 2) were coached to generate 10 abstracts by providing background literature, prompts, analyzed data for each topic, and 10 previously presented, unassociated abstracts to serve as models. The study was conducted between August 2023 and February 2024 (including data analysis).

Exposure

Abstract versions utilizing the same topic and data were written by a surgical trainee or a senior physician or generated by chatbot 1 and chatbot 2 for comparison. The 10 training abstracts were written by 8 surgical residents or fellows, edited by the same senior surgeon, at a high-volume hospital in the Southeastern US with an emphasis on outcomes-based research. Abstract comparison was then based on 10 abstracts written by 5 surgical trainees within the first 6 months of their research year, edited by the same senior author.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome measurements were the abstract grades using 10- and 20-point scales and ranks (first to fourth). Abstract versions by chatbot 1, chatbot 2, junior residents, and the senior author were compared and judged by blinded surgeon-reviewers as well as both chatbot models. Five academic attending surgeons from Denmark, the UK, and the US, with extensive experience in surgical organizations, research, and abstract evaluation served as reviewers.

Results

Surgeon-reviewers were unable to differentiate between abstract versions. Each reviewer ranked an AI-generated version first at least once. Abstracts demonstrated no difference in their median (IQR) 10-point scores (resident, 7.0 [6.0-8.0]; senior author, 7.0 [6.0-8.0]; chatbot 1, 7.0 [6.0-8.0]; chatbot 2, 7.0 [6.0-8.0]; P = .61), 20-point scores (resident, 14.0 [12.0-7.0]; senior author, 15.0 [13.0-17.0]; chatbot 1, 14.0 [12.0-16.0]; chatbot 2, 14.0 [13.0-16.0]; P = .50), or rank (resident, 3.0 [1.0-4.0]; senior author, 2.0 [1.0-4.0]; chatbot 1, 3.0 [2.0-4.0]; chatbot 2, 2.0 [1.0-3.0]; P = .14). The abstract grades given by chatbot 1 were comparable to the surgeon-reviewers' grades. However, chatbot 2 graded more favorably than the surgeon-reviewers and chatbot 1. Median (IQR) chatbot 2-reviewer grades were higher than surgeon-reviewer grades of all 4 abstract versions (resident, 14.0 [12.0-17.0] vs 16.9 [16.0-17.5]; P = .02; senior author, 15.0 [13.0-17.0] vs 17.0 [16.5-18.0]; P = .03; chatbot 1, 14.0 [12.0-16.0] vs 17.8 [17.5-18.5]; P = .002; chatbot 2, 14.0 [13.0-16.0] vs 16.8 [14.5-18.0]; P = .04). When comparing the grades of the 2 chatbots, chatbot 2 gave higher median (IQR) grades for abstracts than chatbot 1 (resident, 14.0 [13.0-15.0] vs 16.9 [16.0-17.5]; P = .003; senior author, 13.5 [13.0-15.5] vs 17.0 [16.5-18.0]; P = .004; chatbot 1, 14.5 [13.0-15.0] vs 17.8 [17.5-18.5]; P = .003; chatbot 2, 14.0 [13.0-15.0] vs 16.8 [14.5-18.0]; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, trained chatbots generated convincing medical abstracts, undifferentiable from resident or senior author drafts. Chatbot 1 graded abstracts similarly to surgeon-reviewers, while chatbot 2 was less stringent. These findings may assist surgeon-scientists in successfully implementing AI in medical research.

The carolinas crossover, a preperitoneal crossover for enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair (VHR): a novel technique

PURPOSE

To present a novel technique of preperitoneal cross-over for eTEP VHR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic eTEP with mesh utilizing a preperitoneal cross over technique were identified using a single-institution hernia database. This novel technique involves minimally invasive access to the retro-rectus space on one side with midline cross over into the preperitoneal space on the contralateral side. Baseline demographics of the patients were obtained, and intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Nine VHR patients underwent robotic eTEP with mesh using a preperitoneal crossover technique. Five patients were male, mean age was 53 ± 18.4 years, and mean BMI was 32.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2. Two patients were diabetic and 2 were previous smokers. Two of the hernias were recurrent. The average hernia defect was 96.9 ± 45.5 cm2 and the average mesh size was 593.3 ± 168.2 cm2. Four patients underwent a unilateral TAR, while five patients did not require any component separation. All cases were CDC Class 1 wounds. All patients met discharge criteria on post-operative day 1. There was one post-operative wound occurrence which was a seroma. There were no infectious complications and no hernia recurrences. The average follow up was 1.4 ± 1.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Preperitoneal cross-over during eTEP ventral hernia technique is a safe technique that allows placement of a large extra-peritoneal mesh. Early patient outcomes are favorable. Larger sample size and follow-up are needed to truly assess postoperative outcomes.

Anterior versus posterior component separation technique for advanced abdominal wall reconstruction: a proposed algorithm

OBJECTIVE

The precise indications for employing the anterior component separation technique (ACST) and the Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) remain uncertain, despite the undeniable value of both techniques. The aim of this study was to analyze the anterior fascial closure rate, postoperative wound morbidity, and hernia recurrence rate for both procedures according to the algorithm used for complex AWR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out. Patients undergoing AWR for midline incisional hernias using either open or endoscopic ACST (E-ACST) or TAR between March 2013 and August 2022 were included. Patients with lateral hernia components were excluded. The surgical technique was depending on the pre- and intraoperative findings regarding hernia width and on the estimated traction to achieve anterior fascial closure (see algorithm). Initially, intermediate hernia defects ranging from approximately 10-14 cm in width were repaired using E-ACST. However, as the study advanced, TAR became the preferred method for addressing these types of defects. Open ACST was consistently employed for defects wider than 14-15 cm throughout the entire study duration. Outcomes of interest were anterior fascial closure, surgical site occurrences, and hernia recurrence rate. Follow-up was performed at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients underwent AWR with CST: 63 patients (52.9%) were included in the ACST group and 56 patients (47.1%) in the TAR group. No significant differences were observed in patient and hernia characteristics. The use of botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) was more frequently used in the ACST group (BTA 19.0%, PPP 15.9% versus BTA 5.4%, PPP 1.8% for TAR patients). Anterior fascial closure was achieved in 95.2% of the ACST group and 98.2% of the TAR group (p = 0.369). The TAR group demonstrated a significantly lower SSO rate at one month (44.3% versus 14.3%, p < 0.001) and required fewer procedural interventions (SSO-PI) (31.1% versus 8.9%, p = 0.003). The recurrence rate at one year was low and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (ACST 1.8% vs TAR 4.5%, p = 0.422).

CONCLUSION

Following a proposed algorithm, the anterior fascial closure rate was high and similar for both techniques. As postoperative wound morbidity is significantly increased after ACST, our findings support recommending TAR for defects up to 14 cm in width, while favoring open ACST for larger defects.

Age is just a number: The role of advanced age in predicting complications following ventral hernia repair with component separation

BACKGROUND

While advanced age is often considered a risk factor for complications following abdominal surgery, its impact on outcomes after complex open ventral hernia repair (VHR) with component separation technique (CST) remains unclear.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of patients who VHR with CST from November 2008 to January 2022 was performed and cohorts were stratified by presence of advanced age (≥60 years).

RESULTS

Of 219 patients who underwent VHR with CST, 114 patients (52.1 ​%) were aged ≥60 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated BMI to be an independent predictor for any complication (OR 1.1, p ​= ​0.002) and COPD was positively associated with seroma development (OR 20.1, p ​= ​0.012). Advanced age did not independently predict postoperative outcomes, including hernia recurrence (OR 0.8, p ​= ​0.766).

CONCLUSIONS

VHR with CST is generally safe to perform in patients of advanced age. Every patient's comorbidity profile should be thoroughly assessed preoperatively for risk stratification regardless of age.

Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Open Perforator-Preserving Anterior Component Separation for Ventral Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

 Abdominal wall reconstruction is challenging for surgeons and may be life altering for patients. There are scant high-quality studies on patient-reported outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction. We assess long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes of perforator-preserving open anterior component separation (OPP-ACS) following large ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of patients with large ventral hernia defects who underwent OPP-ACS performed by the authors (B.A.S., M.J.T.) was conducted between 2015 and 2019. Demographics, surgical history, operative details, outcomes, and complications were extracted. A validated questionnaire, Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), was used to assess postoperative quality of life.

RESULTS

 Twenty-two patients (12 males and 10 females) with a mean age and BMI of 60.9 ± 10 years and 28.9 ± 4.8 kg/m2, respectively, were included. Mean follow-up was 28.5 ± 16.3 months. All had prior abdominal surgery; 15 (68%) for abdominopelvic malignancy, 3 (14%) for previous failed hernia repair, and 8 (36%) had history of abdominopelvic radiation. Overall, 16 (73%) hernias were in the midline, 4 (18%) in the right lower quadrant, 1 (4.5%) in the right upper quadrant, and 1 (4.5%) in the left lower quadrant. Mean hernia defect surface area was 145 ± 112 cm2. A total of 9 patients (40.9%) underwent bilateral component separation, whereas 13 (59.1%) had unilateral. Bioprosthetic mesh was used in all patients as underlay. Mean mesh size and thickness were 545.6 ± 207.7 cm2 and 3.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. One patient presented with a minor wound dehiscence, and two presented with seromas not requiring aspiration/evacuation. One patient had hernia recurrence 22 months after surgery. One patient was readmitted for partial small bowel obstruction and one required wound revision. A total of 14 (65%) patients responded to the CCS questionnaire. At 12 months, mean score for all 23 items was 0.29 ± 0.21 (0.08-0.62), which corresponds to absence or minimal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

 The OPP-ACS is a safe surgical option for large, complex ventral hernias. Our cases showed minimal complication rate and hernia recurrence, and our patients reported significant improvement in life quality.

Preservation of deep epigastric perforators during anterior component separation technique (ACST) results in equivalent wound complications compared to transversus abdominis release (TAR)

PURPOSE

The use of component separation results in myofascial release and increased rates of fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction(AWR). These complex dissections have been associated with increased rates of wound complications with anterior component separation having the greatest wound morbidity. The aim of this paper was to compare the wound complication rate between perforator sparing anterior component separation(PS-ACST) and transversus abdominus release(TAR).

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospective, single institution hernia center database who underwent PS-ACST and TAR from 2015 to 2021. The primary outcome was wound complication rate. Standard statistical methods were used, univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients met criteria, 39 had PS-ACST and 133 had TAR performed. The PS-ACST and TAR groups were similar in terms of diabetes (15.4% vs 28.6%, p = 0.097), but the PS-ACST group had a greater percentage of smokers (46.2% vs 14.3%, p < 0.001). The PS-ACST group had a larger hernia defect size (375.2 ± 156.7 vs 234.4 ± 126.9cm2, p < 0.001) and more patients who underwent preoperative Botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections (43.6% vs 6.0%, p < 0.001). The overall wound complication rate was not significantly different (23.1% vs 36.1%, p = 0.129) nor was the mesh infection rate (0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.438). Using logistic regression, none of the factors that were significantly different in the univariate analysis were associated with wound complication rate (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PS-ACST and TAR are comparable in terms of wound complication rates. PS-ACST can be used for large hernia defects and promote fascial closure with low overall wound morbidity and perioperative complications.

Open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: Prospective observational study of quality improvement outcomes over 18 years and 1,842 patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe progressive evidence-based changes in perioperative management of open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair and subsequent surgical outcomes and to analyze factors that affect recurrence and wound complications.

METHODS

Prospective, tertiary hernia center data (2004-2021) were examined for patients undergoing midline open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair with mesh. "Early" (2004-2012) and "Recent" (2013-2021) groups were based on surgery date.

RESULTS

Comparison of Early (n = 675) versus Recent (n = 1,167) groups showed that Recent patients were, on average, older (56.9 ± 12.6 vs 58.7 ± 12.1 years; P < .001) with a lower body mass index (33.5 ± 8.3 vs 32.0 ± 6.8 kg/m²; P = .003) and a higher number of comorbidities (3.6 ± 2.2 vs 5.2 ± 2.6; P < .001). Recent patients had higher proportions of prior failed ventral hernia repair (46.5% vs 60.8%; P < .001), larger hernia defects (199.7 ± 232.8 vs 214.4 ± 170.5 cm²; P < .001), more Center for Disease Control class 3 or 4 wounds (11.3% vs 18.6%; P < .001), and more component separations (22.5% vs 45.7%; P < .001). Hernia recurrence decreased over time (7.1% vs 2.4%; P < .001), as did wound complication rates (26.7% vs 13.2%; P < .001). Comparing respective multivariable analyses (Early versus Recent), wound complications were associated with panniculectomy (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.9 [1.9-4.5], P < .001 vs 2.1 [1.4-3.3], P < .01), contaminated wounds (2.1 [1.1-3.7], P = .02 vs 1.8 [1.1-3.1], P = .02), anterior component separation technique (1.8 [1.1-2.9], P = .02 vs 3.2[1.9-5.3], P < .01), and operative time (per minute: 1.01 [1.008-1.015], P < .01 vs 1.004 [1.001-1.007], P < .01). Diabetes (2.6 [1.7-4.0], P < .01) and tobacco (1.8 [1.1-2.9], P = .02) were only significant in the early group. In both groups, recurrence was associated with wound complication (8.9 [4.1-20.1], P < .01 vs 3.4 [1.3-8.2]. P < .01) and recurrent hernias (4.9 [2.3-11.5], P < .01 vs 2.1 [1.1-4.2], P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Despite significant increased patient complexity over time, detecting and implementing best practices as determined by recurring data analysis of a center's outcomes has significantly improved patient care results.

Observational study of complex abdominal wall reconstruction using porcine dermal matrix: How have outcomes changed over 14 years?

BACKGROUND

Our center has adopted many evidence-based practices to improve outcomes for complex abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix. This study analyzed outcomes over time using porcine dermal matrix in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

METHODS

Prospective, tertiary hernia center data was examined for patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix. Early (2008-2014) and Recent (2015-2021) cohorts were defined by dividing the study interval in half. Multivariable analyses of wound complications and recurrence were performed.

RESULTS

Comparing 117 Early vs 245 Recent patients, both groups had high rates of previously repaired hernias (76.1% vs 67.4%; P = .110), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention class 3 or 4 wounds (76.0% vs 66.6%; P = .002), and very large hernia defects (320 ± 317 vs 282 ± 164 cm²; P = .640). Recent patients had higher rates of preoperative botulinum injection (0% vs 21.2%; P < .001), posterior component separation (15.4% vs 35.5%; P < .001), and delayed primary closure (23.1% vs 38.8%; P < .001), but lower rates of concurrent panniculectomy (32.3% vs 27.8%; P = .027) and similar anterior component separation (29.1% vs 18.2%; P = .060). Most mesh was placed preperitoneal (74.4% vs 93.3%; P < .001). Recent patients had less inlay (9.4% vs 2.1%; P < .01) and other mesh locations as fascial closure rate increased (88.0% vs 95.5%; P < .001). Over time, there was a decrease in wound complications (42.1% vs 14.3%; P < .001), length of stay (median [interquartile range]:8 [6-13] vs 7 [6-9]; P = .003), and 30-day readmissions (32.7% vs 10.3%; P < .001). Hernia recurrence decreased (10.3% vs 3.7%; P = .016) with mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 3.2 and 1.7 ± 1.7 years, respectively. Respective multivariable models(odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) demonstrated an increased risk of wound complications with diabetes (2.65, 1.16-5.98; P = .020), panniculectomy (2.63, 1.21-5.73; P = .014), and anterior component separation (5.1, 1.98-12.9; P < .001), with recurrence risk increased by wound complication (3.8, 1.4-2-7.62; P = .032).

CONCLUSION

Porcine dermal matrix in complex abdominal wall reconstruction performs well with low recurrence rates. Internal assessment and implementation of evidence-based practices improved outcomes such as length of stay, wound complications, and recurrence rate.

Preoperative botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection versus component separation techniques (CST) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): A propensity-scored matched study

BACKGROUND

Complete fascial closure significantly reduces recurrence rates and wound complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. While component separation techniques have clear effectiveness in closing large abdominal wall defects, preoperative botulinum toxin A has emerged as an adjunct to aid in fascial closure. Few data exist comparing preoperative botulinum toxin A to component separation techniques, and the aim was to do so in a matched study.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center, hernia-specific database was queried, and a 3:1 propensity-matched study of patients undergoing open abdominal wall reconstruction from 2016 to 2021 with botulinum toxin A versus component separation techniques was performed based on body mass index, defect width, hernia volume, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound classification. Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Matched patients included 105 component separation techniques and 35 botulinum toxin A. There was no difference in tobacco use, diabetes, or body mass index (all P > .5). Hernia defects and volume were large for both the component separation techniques and botulinum toxin A groups (mean size: component separation techniques 286.2 ± 179.9 cm² vs botulinum toxin A 289.7 ± 162.4 cm²; P = .73) (mean volume: 1,498.3 + 2,043.4 cm³ vs 2,914.7 + 6,539.4 cm³; P = .35). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound classifications were equivalent (CDC3 and 4%-39.1% vs 40.0%; P = .97). Component separation techniques were more frequently performed in European Hernia Society M1 hernias (21% vs 2.9%; P = .01). The botulinum toxin A group had fewer surgical site occurrences (32.4% vs 11.4%; P = .02) and surgical site infections (11.7% vs 0%; P = .04). In multivariate analysis, botulinum toxin A was associated with lower rates of surgical site occurrences (odds ratio = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [1.4-34.4]). There was no difference in fascial closure (90.5% vs 100%; P = .11) or recurrence (12.4% vs 2.9%; P = .10) with follow-up (22.8 + 29.7 vs 9.8 + 12.7 months; P = .13).

CONCLUSION

In a matched study comparing patients with botulinum toxin A versus component separation techniques, there was no difference in fascial closure rates or in hernia recurrence between the 2 groups. Preoperative botulinum toxin A can achieve similar outcomes as component separation techniques, while decreasing the frequency of surgical site occurrences.

State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure

Open ventral hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative optimization are important to ensure high-quality outcomes and prevent hernia recurrence. Preoperative adjuncts such as the injection of botulinum toxin and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum are proven to help achieve fascial closure in patients with hernia defects and/or loss of domain. Operatively, component separation techniques are performed on complex hernias in order to medialize the rectus fascia and achieve a tension-free closure. Other important principles of hernia repair include complete reduction of the hernia sac, wide mesh overlap, and techniques to control seroma and other wound complications. In the setting of contamination, a delayed primary closure of the skin and subcutaneous tissues should be considered to minimize the chance of postoperative wound complications. Ultimately, the aim for hernia surgeons is to mitigate complications and provide a durable repair while improving patient quality of life.

Nationwide increase in component separation without concomitant rise in readmissions: A nationwide readmissions database analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of component separation technique (CST) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) increases the rate of primary musculofascial closure but can be associated with increased wound complications, which may require readmission. This study examines 3-year trends in readmissions for patients undergoing AWR with or without CST.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients undergoing elective AWR from 2016-2018. CST, demographic characteristics, and 90-day complications and readmissions were determined. CST versus non-CST readmissions were compared, including matched subgroups. Standard statistics and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

Over the 3-year period, 94,784 patients underwent AWR. There was an annual increase in the prevalence of CST: 4.0% in 2016; 6.1% in 2017; 6.7% in 2018 (P < .01), which is a 67.5% upsurge during that time. Most cases (82.3%) occurred at urban teaching hospitals, which had more comorbid patients (P < .01). The yearly 90-day readmission rate did not change: 16.0%, 18.2%, and 16.9% (P = .26). Readmissions were higher for CST patients than non-CST patients (17.1% vs 15.7%), but not in the matched subgroup (17.0% vs 16.4%; P = .41). Most commonly, readmissions were for infection (28.3%); 14.3% of readmitted patients underwent reoperation. Smoking, morbid obesity, diabetes, chronic lung disease, urban-teaching hospital status, and increased length of stay increased the chance of readmission (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

From 2016 to 2018, the use of CST increased 67.5% nationwide without an increase in readmissions. As we look toward clinical targets to reduce risk of readmission, modifiable health conditions, such as smoking, morbid obesity, and diabetes should be targeted during the prehabilitation process.

Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) in large and other complex ventral hernias: a single-surgeon experience

PURPOSE

Over the last years, great advances in the repair of abdominal wall hernias have dramatically improved patients' outcomes. Especially for large and other complex ventral hernias, the application of component separation techniques has been a landmark in their successful management. The aim of this study is to present our experience with the posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) in patients with these demanding ventral hernias.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent elective ventral hernia repair with TAR between January 2016 and December 2019 was performed. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients with large and other complex ventral hernias were included in the final analysis. More than 80% of patients had one or more comorbidities. Of all patients, 116 (92.8%) had a history of previous abdominal surgery, 27 (21.6%) had a history of SSI and nine (7.2%) had active fistulas. Postoperatively, SSOs were presented in 11 patients (8.8%), including three cases of SSI. Neither mesh infection occurred, nor mesh excision required. With a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, only one recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

With a wound complication rate of less than 9% and a recurrence rate of less than 1%, our results show that TAR is a reliable, safe and effective technique for the repair of massive and other complex ventral hernias. The combination of knowledge of the abdominal wall anatomy at a proficient level, proper training, and adoption of a strict prehabilitation program are considered prerequisites for the successful management of such demanding hernias.

A Variation of the Components’ Separation Technique that Preserves the Semilunaris for Treatment of Abdominal Wall Deformities

The variation of the components’ separation technique, which uses the anterior rectus sheath and the release of the oblique muscles, proved to be effective in tension reduction. This paper aimed to present the initial experience using a variation that preserves semilunaris through the incision of the lateral aspect of the rectus sheath. All of the 12 patients presented an abdominal wall defect that included incisional hernia, peritoneostomy, lateral implantation of the rectus muscle, and defect secondary to TRAM flap. The separation was done in the following stages: stage 1—anterior rectus sheath and stage 2—external oblique muscles. From the 12 patients, three presented early complications: seroma (n = 2) and epitheliolysis (n = 1). There were no recurrences or other late complications (48 months follow-up period). The separation of the anterior rectus sheath, and incision in the lateral recess to undermine the oblique muscles, allowed the treatment of abdominal wall defects, without late complications.

A Novel Abdominal Decompression Technique to Treat Compartment Syndrome After Burn Injury

BACKGROUND

Prevalence of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is estimated to be 4%-17% in severely burned patients. Although decompressive laparotomy can be lifesaving for ACS patients, severe complications are associated with this technique, especially in burn populations. This study outlines a new technique of releasing intraabdominal pressure without resorting to decompressive laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten fresh tissue cadavers were studied; none of whom had had prior abdominal surgery. Using Veress needles, abdomens were insufflated to 30 mm Hg and subsequently connected to arterial pressure transducers. Two techniques were then used to incise fascia. First, large skin flaps were raised from a midline incision (n = 5). Second, small 2 cm cutdowns at the proximal and distal extent of midaxillary, subcostal, and inguinal incisional sites were made, followed by tunneling a subfascial plane using an aortic clamp with fascial incisions made through the grooves of a tunneled vein stripper (n = 5). Pressures were recorded in the sequence of incisions mentioned previously.

RESULTS

The open midline flap technique decreased abdominal pressure from a mean pressure of 30 ± 1.8 mm Hg to 6.9 ± 5.0 mm Hg (P < 0.01). The minimally invasive technique decreased intraabdominal pressure from 30 ± 0.9 to 5.8 ± 5.2 mm Hg (P < 0.01). This technique significantly reduced intraabdominal pressure via extraperitoneal component separation and fascial release at the midaxillary, subxiphoid, and inguinal regions.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique offers the benefit of reducing the morbidity, mortality, and complications associated with an open abdomen, which may be beneficial in the burn injury population.

Recurrent incisional hernia repairs at a tertiary hernia center: Are outcomes really inferior to initial repairs?

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ventral hernia repairs are reported to have higher recurrence and complication rates than initial ventral hernia repairs. This is the largest analysis of outcomes for initial versus recurrent open ventral hernia repairs reported in the literature.

METHODS

A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing open ventral hernia repairs with complete fascial closure and synthetic mesh placement.

RESULTS

A total of 1,694 open ventral hernia repairs patients were identified, including 896 (52.9%) initial ventral hernia repairs and 798 (47.1%)recurrent ventral hernia repairs. Recurrent ventral hernia repair patients were more complex: older (P = .003), higher body mass index (P < .001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < .001), incidence of diabetics (P = .003), comorbidities (P < .001), and larger hernia defects (133.3 ± 171.9 vs 220.2 ± 210.0; P < .001). Recurrent ventral hernia repairs also had longer operative times (161.6 ± 82.4 vs 188.2 ± 68.9 minutes; P < .001), increased use of preoperative botulinum toxin A injection (4.3% vs 10.1%; P = .01), components separation (19.2% vs 39.5%; P < .001), and panniculectomy (20.3% vs 35.8%; P < .001). The overall hernia recurrence rate was 4.4% at a mean follow-up of 36.6 ± 45.5 months. Between the initial ventral hernia repairs and recurrent ventral hernia repairs, the hernia recurrence rates were equivalent (4.2% vs 4.7%, P = .63). Rates of wound infection, seromas, hematomas, mesh infections, and wound related reoperations (P > .05) were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

At a tertiary hernia center, despite higher-risk patients, larger hernia defects, and increased components separation in recurrent ventral hernia repairs, early recurrence rates, wound complications, and reoperations are similar to initial ventral hernia repairs.