Incidence and risk factors for umbilical trocar site hernia after laparoscopic TAPP repair. A single high-volume center experience

The Original Rutherford Morison Incision: A Case Report

In recent years, the Rutherford Morison incision has become synonymous with renal transplant surgery. However, this incision was originally intended for access to the sigmoid colon and pelvis, particularly in the case of a midline previously scarred from operation. We present a case of a middle-aged female with a caecal tumour, requiring resection. Upon examination, this patient was found to have large concomitant diastasis of the recti. A right-sided Rutherford Morison incision was utilized in performing a right hemicolectomy. Although the advantages of a minimally invasive approach to colonic resections are well described, laparoscopy was not utilized in the case discussed. Due to the wide area of anterior abdominal wall laxity, herniation is likely to develop at both port placement and specimen delivery sites. A similar outcome would result from a midline incision. However, a paramedian is an acceptable alternative to a Rutherford Morison incision in a case like this, as it is known to have very low rates of post-operative incisional herniation. While in modern times, its use may have become repurposed, the Rutherford Morison incision is one which should be remembered and used in the surgeons' armamentarium to improve clinical outcomes when necessary.

Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is the new Da Vinci single port platform providing any benefit?

BACKGROUND

The utilization of the robot for inguinal hernia repairs has increased in the past years. The new Da Vinci Single Port (SP) system provides the benefits of single-incision procedures and might overcome the technical difficulties of previous single-incision techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the SP transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (SP-TAPP) and compare its outcomes to the robotic multiport technique (MP-TAPP).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients who underwent a robotic SP-TAPP and MP-TAPP between 2012 and 2022 was analyzed. Primary endpoints were same-day discharge, morbidity, and inguinal recurrence rates. Secondary endpoints included conversion, operative time, port-site incisional hernia, and chronic pain.

RESULTS

MP-TAPP and SP-TAPP were performed in 378 (81.3%) and 87 (18.7%) patients, respectively. Demographics were similar between groups. There were no conversions or intraoperative complications. Mean operative (MP-TAPP: 93.2 vs. SP-TAPP: 78.1 min, p = 0.003) and recovery time (MP-TAPP: 160.8 vs SP-TAPP: 112.6 min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the SP group. Same-day discharge rate was higher (MP-TAPP: 86.5% vs. SP-TAPP: 97.7%, p = 0.001) after SP-TAPP; 30-day morbidity, readmissions, and chronic pain rates were similar between groups. After a mean follow-up of 30.6 months for MP-TAPP and 13.3 months for SP-TAPP, inguinal hernia recurrence and port-site incisional rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic SP-TAPP is safe and feasible. When compared to MP-TAPP, it showed similar postoperative morbidity, higher same-day discharge rates, and a quicker postoperative recovery. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of the SP platform.

Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review

Background: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery is now common place, and each trocar site is a potential incisional hernia site. A number of factors increase the risk of trocar site hernia (TSH) at any given trocar site. The aim of this paper is to explore the literature and identify the patients and the trocar sites at risk, which may allow target prevention strategies to minimise TSH. Methods: A pub med literature review was undertaken using the MeSH terms of "trocar" OR "port-site" AND "hernia." No qualifying criteria were applied to this initial search. All abstracts were reviewed by the two authors to identify papers for full text review to inform this narrative review. Results: 961 abstracts were identified by the search. A reasonable quality systematic review was published in 2012, and 44 additional more recent publications were identified as informative. A number of patient factors, pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors were identified as possibly or likely increasing the risk of TSH. Their careful management alone and more likely in combination may help reduce the incidence of TSH. Conclusion: Clinically symptomatic TSH is uncommon, in relation to the many trocars inserted every day for "keyhole" surgery, although it is a not uncommon hernia to repair in general surgical practice. There are patients inherently at risk of TSH, especially at the umbilical location. It is likely, that a multi-factored approach to surgery, will have a cumulative effect at reducing the overall risk of TSH at any trocar site, including choice of trocar type and size, method of insertion, events during the operation, and decisions around the need for fascial closure and how this is performed following trocar removal.

Mind the gap - Small bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair - A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Inguinal hernia repair is a very frequent operation in general and visceral surgery worldwide. The laparo-endoscopic approaches such as TAPP have gained increasing acceptance among specialists and many consider them as standard of care due to perioperative safety and excellent postoperative results. Knowledge of specific complications after minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery, however, is important for the successful management of these patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein present the case of a 75-year-old female patient who electively underwent laparoscopic repair of combined inguinal and femoral hernia. During the postoperative course a small bowel obstruction occurred requiring emergency re-laparoscopy revealing a preperitoneal herniation of small bowel through a peritoneal defect.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Small bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation of small bowel through a peritoneal defect after laparoscopic hernia repair is extremely rare. In such cases, emergency laparoscopic revision is necessary to avoid bowel ischaemia. Adequate closure of the peritoneum during the primary procedure along with the necessary attention to detail seems mandatory to avoid preperitoneal herniation after TAPP.

CONCLUSION

Inadequate peritoneal closure after TAPP may lead to preperitoneal herniation of the small bowel leading to postoperative intestinal obstruction. All hernia surgeons should be aware of this rare, but potentially life-threatening complication and should close all peritoneal defects with greatest care and accuracy.