Using a standardized intra-operative endoflip protocol during fundoplication to identify factors that affect distensibility

Gas and Bloat in Female Patients after Antireflux Procedures: Analysis of 934 Cases

BACKGROUND

Antireflux procedures (ARPs) are effective treatments for GERD. However, variation in objective and patient-reported outcomes persists. Limited evidence and anecdotal experience suggest that patient sex may play a role. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes after ARPs between male and female patients.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single institution. All patients who underwent an ARP for GERD were included. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes data (GERD health-related quality of life [HRQL] and reflux symptom index), and radiographic hernia recurrence were collected and stratified by sex. Univariable and multivariable logistic and mixed-effects linear regression were used to control for confounding effects.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2022, 934 patients (291 men and 643 women) underwent an ARP. Reflux symptom index, GERD-HRQL, and gas and bloat scores improved uniformly for both sexes, though female patients were more likely to have higher gas and bloat scores 1 year postprocedure (mean ± SD 1.7 ± 1.4 vs 1.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.03) and higher GERD-HRQL scores 2 years postprocedure (6.3 ± 8.1 vs 4.7 ± 6.8, p = 0.04). Higher gas and bloat scores in women persisted on regression controlling for confounders. Hernia recurrence rate was low (85 patients, 9%) and was similar for both sexes. A final intraprocedural distensibility index 3 mm 2 /mmHg or more was significantly associated with a 7 times higher rate of recurrence (95% CI 1.62 to 31.22, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients of either sex experience symptom improvement and low rate of recurrence after ARPs, women are more likely to endorse gas and bloat compared with men. Final distensibility index 3 mm 2 /mmHg or more carries a high risk of recurrence. These results may augment how physicians prognosticate during consultation and tailor their treatment in patients with GERD.

Target distensibility index on impedance planimetry during fundoplication by choice of wrap and choice of bougie

INTRODUCTION

Impedance planimetry (FLIP) provides objective feedback to optimize fundoplication outcomes. Ideal FLIP ranges for differing wraps and bougies have not yet been established. We report FLIP measurements during fundoplication grouped by choice of wrap and bougie with associated outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective gastroesophageal database was performed for all Nissen or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative FLIP using an 8-cm catheter, 30-mL and/or 40-mL fill and/or 16-cm catheter, 60-mL fill. Surgeons used no bougie, the FLIP balloon as bougie, or a hard bougie. Outcomes included perioperative data, Reflux Symptom Index, GERD-HRQL, Dysphagia scores, need for dilation, postoperative EGD findings, and hernia recurrence. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2022, 333 patients underwent fundoplication and intraoperative FLIP. Procedures included Toupet with hard bougie (TFHB, N = 147), Toupet with FLIP bougie (TFFB, N = 69), Toupet without bougie (TFNB, N = 78), Nissen with hard bougie (NFHB, n = 20), or Nissen with FLIP bougie (NFFB, N = 19). FLIP measurements at 30-mL/40-mL fills varied significantly between groups, notably distensibility index at crural closure (CCDI) and post-fundoplication (FDI). No significant differences in FLIP measurements were seen between those who developed poor postoperative outcomes and those who did not, including when grouping by choice of wrap and bougie. At a 40-mL fill, abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg or FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative FLIP measurements vary by fundoplication and bougie choice. A CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) should be sought in abnormal motility patients, regardless of wrap or bougie, to avoid postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) also developed zero postoperative dysphagia. FDI > 6.2 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) was seen in all postoperative hernia recurrences.

Use of endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe in investigating paediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders

Investigating gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders relies on diagnostic tools to assess muscular contractions, peristalsis propagation and the integrity and coordination of various sphincters. Manometries are the gold standard to study the GI motor function but it is increasingly acknowledged that manometries do not provide a complete picture in relation to sphincters competencies and muscle fibrosis. Endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) an emerging technology, uses impedance planimetry to measure hollow organs cross sectional area, distensibility and compliance. It has been successfully used as a complementary tool in the assessment of the upper and lower oesophageal sphincters, oesophageal body, the pylorus and the anal canal. In this article, we aim to review the uses of EndoFLIP as a tool to investigate GI motility disorders with a special focus on paediatric practice. The majority of EndoFLIP studies were conducted in adult patients but the uptake of the technology in paediatrics is increasing. EndoFLIP can provide a useful complementary data to the existing GI motility investigation in both children and adults.

Experience with Impedance Planimetry for Surgical Foregut Disease in 1,097 Cases

BACKGROUND

The geometry and compliance of gastrointestinal sphincters may be assessed by impedance planimetry using a functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). We describe our institutional foregut surgeon experience using FLIP in 1,097 cases, highlighting instances where FLIP changed operative decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of an IRB-approved prospective quality database was performed. This included operative and endoscopic suite foregut procedures using FLIP between February 2013 and May 2022.

RESULTS

During the study period, FLIP was used a total of 1,097 times in 919 unique patients by 2 foregut surgeons. Intraoperative FLIP was used during 573 antireflux procedures and 272 endoscopic myotomies. FLIP was also used during 252 endoscopic suite procedures. For those undergoing preoperative workup of GERD, starting in 2021, esophageal panometry was performed in addition to standard FLIP measurements at the lower esophageal sphincter. In 77 cases, intraoperative FLIP changed operative decision making. During antireflux procedures, changes included adding or removing crural sutures, adjusting a fundoplication tightness, choice of full vs partial wrap, and magnetic sphincter augmentation sizing. For endoscopic procedures, changes included aborting peroral endoscopic myotomy or Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy, performing a myotomy when preoperative diagnosis was unclear, or performing additional myotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

FLIP is a useful tool for assessing the upper esophageal sphincter, lower esophageal sphincter, pylorus, and secondary esophageal peristalsis that can be used in a wide variety of clinical situations within a foregut surgeon's practice. It can also function as an adjunct in intraoperative decision making.

Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) and Ideal Distensibility Ranges for Optimal Outcomes after Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that impedance planimetry-based functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) measurements are associated with patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. We hypothesize that Nissen and Toupet fundoplications have different ideal FLIP profiles, such as distensibility.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients who had FLIP measurements during fundoplications between 2013 and 2021 were included. Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, and dysphagia score were collected for up to 2 years postoperatively. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare FLIP measurements vs outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients (171 Toupet, 79 Nissen) were analyzed. Distensibility ranges were categorized as tight, ideal, or loose. The ideal distensibility index range of Toupet patients with the 30- and 40-mL balloon fills were 2.6 to 3.7 mm2/mmHg. This range was associated with less dysphagia at 1 year compared with the tight group (p = 0.02). For Nissen patients, the 30- and 40-mL ideal threshold was a distensibility index of ≥2.2 mm2/mmHg. Patients with distensibility exceeding this threshold had a better quality of life than the tight group, reporting better Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (p = 0.02) and lower dysphagia scores (p = 0.01) at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Impedance planimetry revealed different ideal distensibility ranges after Toupet and Nissen fundoplications that are associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, suggesting that intraoperative FLIP has the potential to tailor fundoplication.

Quantifying physiologic parameters of the gastroesophageal junction during re-operative anti-reflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia re-approximation during index anti-reflux surgery (ARS) contributes approximately 80% of overall change in distensibility index (DI) and, potentially, compliance of the gastroesophageal (GEJ), while sphincter augmentation contributes approximately 20%. Whether this is seen in re-operative ARS is unclear. We quantify the physiologic parameters of the GEJ at each step of robotic re-operative ARS and compare these to index ARS.

METHODS

Robotic ARS with hiatal hernia repair was performed on 195 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™, of which 26 previously had ARS. Intra-operative GEJ measurements, including cross-sectional area (CSA), pressure, DI, and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected pre-repair, post-diaphragmatic re-approximation, post-mesh placement, and post-lower-esophageal sphincter (LES) augmentation.

RESULTS

Both cohorts were similar by sex and BMI and underwent similar procedures. The re-operative cohort was older (60.6 ± 15.3 vs. 52.7 ± 16.2 years, p = 0.03), had more frequent pre-operative dysphagia (69.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.01) and esophageal dysmotility on barium swallow (75.0% vs. 35.0%, p < 0.001) but lower rates of hiatal hernia on endoscopy (30.8% vs. 68.7%, p < 0.001) compared to index procedures. Among the re-operative cohort, the CSA decreased by 34 (IQR - 80, - 15) mm2 and DI 1.1 (IQR - 2.4, - 0.6) mm2/mmHg (both p < 0.001). Pressure increased by 11.2 (IQR 4.7, 14.9) mmHg and HPZ by 1.5 (1,2) cm (both p < 0.001). These changes were similar to those seen in index ARS. Diaphragmatic re-approximation contributed to a greater percentage of overall change to the GEJ than did the augmentation procedure, with 72% of the change in DI occurring during hiatal closure, similar to that seen during index ARS.

CONCLUSIONS

During re-operative ARS, dynamic intra-operative monitoring can quantify the effects of each operative step on GEJ physiologic parameters. Diaphragmatic re-approximation appears to have a greater effect on GEJ physiology than does LES-sphincter augmentation during both index and re-operative ARS.

Outcomes after anti-reflux procedures: Nissen, Toupet, magnetic sphincter augmentation or anti-reflux mucosectomy?

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment options of gastroesophageal reflux disease have changed significantly in the last 50 years. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) and Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMs) are gaining traction but there is a paucity of literature comparing these novel options to Toupet fundoplication and gold standard Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database, evaluating patients undergoing Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative variables including Reflux symptom index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 649 patients underwent anti-reflux surgery. Patients who underwent Nissen or Toupet were younger than those undergoing MSA or ARMs (65 ± 12 and 67 ± 14 years vs 56 ± 14 and 56 ± 18 years, P < 0.01). Average operative time for Nissen was 127 ± 40 min which was similar to a Toupet at 122 ± 32 min. These durations were significantly longer than for MSA, averaging 79 ± 29, and ARMs, at a mean 35 ± 3 min (all P < 0.001). Length of stay was significantly different among all four groups with Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs patients staying a median of 31, 24, 7, and 3 h post operatively, respectively (all P < 0.001). Complications and re-admissions were similarly low among all groups. Despite minor differences in RSI and GERD-HRQL scores at isolated follow-up time points, quality of life scores seems to be similar overall at up to 5 years follow-up. Gas bloat and dysphagia did not differ among groups at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel anti-reflux surgery options provide similar GERD-related quality of life compared to traditional full or partial fundoplications with the added benefit of shorter operative time and faster recovery.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) use during laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease is well described. However, there is a lack of data on FLIP measurements during magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). This study aims to report our institutional experience in performing FLIP during MSA and to compare these measurements to those obtained during Nissen and Toupet fundoplication.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients who underwent MSA or LF and had FLIP measurements between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. FLIP measurements at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were recorded without pneumoperitoneum at 40 mL balloon fill after hernia reduction, cruroplasty, and MSA or fundoplication. Reflux symptom index (RSI), GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score were collected up to 2 years. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ² tests, with statistical significance of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent MSA and 100 patients underwent LF (66% Toupet, 34% Nissen). Type III hiatal hernia was present in 3.7% of MSA patients versus over 50% for fundoplication patients. Minimum diameter, cross-sectional area, and distensibility index (DI) were lower after MSA device placement compared to Nissen or Toupet fundoplication (p < 0.05). Postoperative follow-up showed no differences in RSI, GERD-HRQL, and dysphagia score between MSA and Nissen fundoplication (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative impedance planimetry provided objective information regarding the geometry of the GEJ during MSA. The ring of magnetic beads restores the anti-reflux barrier and transiently opens with food bolus and belching. The magnetic force of the beads may explain why the DI after MSA is lower yet postoperative quality of life is no different than Nissen fundoplication.

Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip™) Shows That Length of Narrowing After Fundoplication Does Not Impact Dysphagia

INTRODUCTION

A short floppy fundoplication has been the surgical dogma to prevent dysphagia and gas-bloat after laparoscopic fundoplication while adequately addressing gastroesophageal reflux disease. The literature on the ideal length of narrowing (LON) of the gastroesophageal junction after fundoplication is sparse. The functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) can be used during anti-reflux surgery to produce a visual representation of the LON. We hypothesize that a longer LON provides relief of GERD symptoms, however worse dysphagia and gas-bloat.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Prospectively collected data was analyzed. Patients with FLIP measurements during laparoscopic fundoplication between August 2018 and December 2020 were included. FLIP measurements at the gastroesophageal junction were recorded without pneumoperitoneum at 40-mL balloon fill after fundoplication. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), gas-bloat score, and Dysphagia Score were collected. Comparisons were made using Spearman correlation coefficients (r) and two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication (26% Nissen, 74% Toupet) and had FLIP measurements. Mean LON in this cohort was 2.7 ± 0.8 cm and mean DI was 3.5 ± 1.3 mm²/mmHg. LON is inversely associated with RSI (r =  - 0.29, p = 0.04) and gas-bloat (r =  - 0.30, p = 0.04). There was no association with Dysphagia Score. Patients with a LON of 2.5-4.5 cm and DI of 2.5-3.6 mm²/mmHg after fundoplication reported lower RSI (p = 0.03) and GERD-HRQL (p = 0.04) compared to patients outside of these ranges. There were no significant differences in patient-reported dysphagia or gas-bloat scores at 1 year between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Impedance planimetry provides objective real-time measurements and images during anti-reflux surgery, which allows surgeons to measure the length of narrowing after fundoplication. A LON of 2.5-4.5 cm and DI of 2.5-3.6 mm²/mmHg after fundoplication led to better postoperative quality of life at 1 year without an increase in postoperative dysphagia or gas-bloat.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery

PURPOSE

The functional lumen imaging probe provides objective measurements of the gastroesophageal junction during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. There is a lack of data on how functional lumen imaging probe measurements change at follow-up. We aim to describe our institutional experience in performing functional lumen imaging probe during postoperative endoscopy after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried. Patients who had postoperative endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe measurements between March 2018 and June 2021 were assessed at different time points from their index laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery using paired t test. Standardized quality of life questionnaires were collected for up to 2 years. Group comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication) had postoperative functional lumen imaging probe. Thirty-two intraoperative functional lumen imaging probe values were compared with their postoperative functional lumen imaging probe. Fundoplication values did not differ. Postoperative functional lumen imaging probe distensibility index for magnetic sphincter augmentation patients was decreased (P = .04). Functional lumen imaging probe measurements for all postoperative endoscopies showed that magnetic sphincter augmentation had the lowest distensibility index (P < .01). Dysphagia as a reason for endoscopy had a decrease in distensibility index (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Functional lumen imaging probe measurements after fundoplication persist at long-term follow up while patients may have a tighter gastroesophageal junction after magnetic sphincter augmentation. Functional lumen imaging probe has the potential to assess the success or failure after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and optimize patient outcomes.

A novel EndoFLIP marker during hiatal hernia repair is associated with short-term postoperative dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) provides an objective measure of the distensibility index (DI) during different parts of hiatal hernia repair. However, the absolute DI measure above a cut-off after creating a barrier alone has not shown a relationship to dysphagia after surgery. We wanted to determine if the change in DI with volume change is associated with dysphagia.

METHODS

We included patients who had hiatal hernia repair with EndoFLIP values, including two values taken at the end of the surgical case with different volumes of fluid in the balloon (30 mL and 40 mL). We compared the absolute and change in DI during hiatal hernia repair and performed an analysis to determine if there was a correlation with short-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of the patients underwent Toupet fundoplication (n = 56, 54%), followed by magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX, n = 28, 27%) and Nissen fundoplication (n = 19, 18%). There was a significant reduction in the DI from the initial DI taken after mobilization of the hiatus (3 mm²/mmHg) and after the creation of the barrier (1.4 mm²/mmHg, p < 0.001). A minority of patients had a decrease or no change in the DI with an increase in balloon volume increased from 30 to 40 mL (n = 37, 36%). Overall, after 1 month, there was a significant decrease in the GERD-HRQL score from 23 to 4 (p < 0.001) and bloat score from 3 to 2 (p = 0.003) with a non-significant decrease in the dysphagia score from 1 to 0 (p = 0.11). Patients who had a decreased or unchanged DI with an increase in the balloon volume from 30 to 40 mL had a significant decrease in their dysphagia score by 2 points (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The decreased or unchanged DI with an increase in the balloon volume on EndoFLIP is associated with a significant reduction in dysphagia after surgery. The decrease in DI denotes the esophagus's ability to create higher pressure relative to the change in the cross-sectional area with a larger bolus across the gastroesophageal junction. This measure may be a new marker that can predict short-term outcomes in patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair.