1
|
Beppu N, Ito K, Otani M, Imada A, Matsubara T, Song J, Kimura K, Kataoka K, Kuwahara R, Horio Y, Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Ikeda M. Feasibility of transperineal minimal invasive surgery when performing sacrectomy for advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:80. [PMID: 38971941 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive transabdominal surgery (MIS) with transperineal minimal invasive surgery (tpMIS) for sacrectomy in advanced primary and recurrent pelvic malignancies. METHODS Using a prospectively collected database, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical, surgical, and pathological outcomes of MIS with tpMIS for sacrectomies. Surgery was performed between February 2019 and May 2023. The median follow-up period was 27 months (5-46 months). RESULTS Fifteen consecutive patients were included in this analysis. The diagnoses were as follows: recurrent rectal cancer, n = 11 (73%); primary rectal cancer, n = 3 (20%); and recurrent ovarian cancer, n = 1 (7%). Seven patients (47%) underwent pelvic exenteration with sacrectomy, six patients (40%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) with sacrectomy, and two patients (13%) underwent tumor resection with sacrectomy. The median intraoperative blood loss was 235 ml (range 45-1320 ml). The postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a) were graded as follows: 3a, n = 6 (40%); 3b, n = 1 (7%); and ≥ 4, n = 0 (0%). Pathological examinations demonstrated that R0 was achieved in 13 patients (87%). During the follow-up period, two patients (13%) developed local re-recurrence due to recurrent cancer. The remaining 13 patients (87%) had no local disease. Fourteen patients (93%) survived. CONCLUSIONS Although the patient cohort in this study is heterogeneous, MIS with tpMIS was associated with a very small amount of blood loss, a low incidence of severe postoperative complications, and an acceptable R0 resection rate. Further studies are needed to clarify the long-term oncological feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Beppu
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
| | - K Ito
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - M Otani
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - A Imada
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - T Matsubara
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - J Song
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - K Kimura
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - K Kataoka
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| | - R Kuwahara
- Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Y Horio
- Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - M Uchino
- Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - H Ikeuchi
- Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - M Ikeda
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-tyo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sylla P, Sands D, Ricardo A, Bonaccorso A, Polydorides A, Berho M, Marks J, Maykel J, Alavi K, Zaghiyan K, Whiteford M, Mclemore E, Chadi S, Shawki SF, Steele S, Pigazzi A, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Moshier E, Wexner SD. Multicenter phase II trial of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: preliminary results. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9483-9508. [PMID: 37700015 PMCID: PMC10709232 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10266-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal TME (taTME) combines abdominal and transanal dissection to facilitate sphincter preservation in patients with low rectal tumors. Few phase II/III trials report long-term oncologic and functional results. We report early results from a North American prospective multicenter phase II trial of taTME (NCT03144765). METHODS 100 patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma located ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge (AV) were enrolled across 11 centers. Primary and secondary endpoints were TME quality, pathologic outcomes, 30-day and 90-day outcomes, and stoma closure rate. Univariable regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for incomplete TME and anastomotic complications. RESULTS Between September 2017 and April 2022, 70 males and 30 females with median age of 58 (IQR 49-62) years and BMI 27.8 (IQR 23.9-31.8) kg/m2 underwent 2-team taTME for tumors located a median 5.8 (IQR 4.5-7.0) cm from the AV. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was completed in 69%. Intersphincteric resection was performed in 36% and all patients were diverted. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8% including 3 organ injuries, 2 abdominal and 1 transanal conversion. The 30-day and 90-day morbidity rates were 49% (Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 in 28.6%) and 56% (CD ≥ 3 in 30.4% including 1 mortality), respectively. Anastomotic complications were reported in 18% including 10% diagnosed within 30 days. Higher anastomotic risk was noted among males (p = 0.05). At a median follow-up of 5 (IQR 3.1-7.4) months, 98% of stomas were closed. TME grade was complete or near complete in 90%, with positive margins in 2 cases (3%). Risk factors for incomplete TME were ASA ≥ 3 (p = 0.01), increased time between NRT and surgery (p = 0.03), and higher operative blood loss (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION When performed at expert centers, 2-team taTME in patients with low rectal tumors is safe with low conversion rates and high stoma closure rate. Mid-term results will further evaluate oncologic and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Dana Sands
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Mariana Berho
- Executive Administration Florida, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Whiteford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgical Division, The Oregon Clinic, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sami Chadi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sherief F Shawki
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Scott Steele
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Albert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sylla P, Berho M, Sands D, Ricardo A, Bonaccorso A, Moshier E, Hain E, Letchinger R, Marks J, Whiteford M, Mclemore E, Maykel J, Alavi K, Zaghiyan K, Chadi S, Shawki SF, Steele S, Pigazzi A, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Polydorides A, Wexner S. Discordance in Total Mesorectal Excision Specimen Grading in a Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Rectal Cancer Trial: Are We Overestimating the Quality of Our Resections? Ann Surg 2023; 278:452-463. [PMID: 37450694 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the results of a rigorous quality control (QC) process in the grading of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimens during a multicenter prospective phase 2 trial of transanal TME. BACKGROUND Grading of TME specimens is based on the macroscopic assessment of the mesorectum and standardized through synoptic pathology reporting. TME grade is a strong predictor of outcomes with incomplete (IC) TME associated with increased rates of local recurrence relative to complete or near complete (NC) TME. Although TME grade serves as an endpoint in most rectal cancer trials, in protocols incorporating centralized review of TME specimens for quality assurance, discordance in grading and the management thereof has not been previously described. METHODS A phase 2 prospective transanal TME trial was conducted from 2017 to 2022 across 11 North American centers with TME quality as the primary study endpoint. QC measures included (1) training of site pathologists in TME protocols, (2) blinded grading of de-identified TME specimen photographs by central pathologists, and (3) reconciliation of major discordance before trial reporting. Cohen Kappa statistic was used to assess agreement in grading. RESULTS Overall agreement in grading of 100 TME specimens between site and central reviewer was rated as fair, (κ = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.10-0.61; P < 0.0001). Concordance was noted in 54%, with minor and major discordance in 32% and 14% of cases, respectively. Upon reconciliation, 13/14 (93%) major discordances were resolved. Pre versus postreconciliation rates of complete or NC and IC TME are 77%/16% and 7% versus 69%/21% and 10%. Reconciliation resulted in a major upgrade (IC-NC; N = 1) or major downgrade (NC/C-IC, N = 4) in 5 cases overall (5%). CONCLUSIONS A 14% rate of major discordance was observed in TME grading between the site and central reviewers. The resolution resulted in a major change in final TME grade in 5% of cases, which suggests that reported rates or TME completeness are likely overestimated in trials. QC through a central review of TME photographs and reconciliation of major discordances is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Mariana Berho
- Executive Administration Florida, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Dana Sands
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Elisabeth Hain
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Riva Letchinger
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA
| | - Mark Whiteford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgical Division, the Oregon Clinic Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sami Chadi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Scott Steele
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Albert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL
| | | | | | - Steven Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takemasa I, Hamabe A, Miyo M, Akizuki E, Okuya K. Essential updates 2020/2021: Advancing precision medicine for comprehensive rectal cancer treatment. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 7:198-215. [PMID: 36998300 PMCID: PMC10043777 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
In the paradigm shift related to rectal cancer treatment, we have to understand a variety of new emerging topics to provide appropriate treatment for individual patients as precision medicine. However, information on surgery, genomic medicine, and pharmacotherapy is highly specialized and subdivided, creating a barrier to achieving thorough knowledge. In this review, we summarize the perspective for rectal cancer treatment and management from the current standard-of-care to the latest findings to help optimize treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Atsushi Hamabe
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
| | - Masaaki Miyo
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Emi Akizuki
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| | - Koichi Okuya
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and ScienceSapporo Medical UniversitySapporoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071827. [PMID: 35407434 PMCID: PMC8999956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent times, robot-assisted surgery has been prominently gaining pace to minimize overall postsurgical complications with minimal traumatization, due to technical advancements in telerobotics and ergonomics. The aim of this review is to explore the efficiency of robot-assisted systems for executing breast surgeries, including microsurgeries, direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforators-based surgery, latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction, and nipple-sparing mastectomy. Robot-assisted surgery systems are efficient due to 3D-based visualization, dexterity, and range of motion while executing breast surgery. The review describes the comparative efficiency of robot-assisted surgery in relation to conventional or open surgery, in terms of clinical outcomes, morbidity rates, and overall postsurgical complication rates. Potential cost-effective barriers and technical skills were also delineated as the major limitations associated with these systems in the clinical sector. Furthermore, instrument articulation of robot-assisted surgical systems (for example, da Vinci systems) can enable high accuracy and precision surgery due to its promising ability to mitigate tremors at the time of surgery, and shortened learning curve, making it more beneficial than other open surgery procedures.
Collapse
|
6
|
Burghgraef TA, Hol JC, Rutgers ML, Crolla RMPH, van Geloven AAW, Hompes R, Leijtens JWA, Polat F, Pronk A, Smits AB, Tuynman JB, Verdaasdonk EGG, Verheijen PM, Sietses C, Consten ECJ. Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Versus Transanal Low Anterior Resection: 3-Year Oncologic Results for a Population-Based Cohort in Experienced Centers. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1910-1920. [PMID: 34608557 PMCID: PMC8810464 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10805-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision are the minimally invasive techniques used most for rectal cancer surgery. Because data regarding oncologic results are lacking, this study aimed to compare these three techniques while taking the learning curve into account. METHODS This retrospective population-based study cohort included all patients between 2015 and 2017 who underwent a low anterior resection at 11 dedicated centers that had completed the learning curve of the specific technique. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) during a 3-year follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year local recurrence rate. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox-regression. RESULTS The 617 patients enrolled in the study included 252 who underwent a laparoscopic resection, 205 who underwent a robot-assisted resection, and 160 who underwent a transanal low anterior resection. The oncologic outcomes were equal between the three techniques. The 3-year OS rate was 90% for laparoscopic resection, 90.4% for robot-assisted resection, and 87.6% for transanal low anterior resection. The 3-year DFS rate was 77.8% for laparoscopic resection, 75.8% for robot-assisted resection, and 78.8% for transanal low anterior resection. The 3-year local recurrence rate was in 6.1% for laparoscopic resection, 6.4% for robot-assisted resection, and 5.7% for transanal procedures. Cox-regression did not show a significant difference between the techniques while taking confounders into account. CONCLUSION The oncologic results during the 3-year follow-up were good and comparable between laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal technique at experienced centers. These techniques can be performed safely in experienced hands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J C Hol
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M L Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - R Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W A Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - F Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E G G Verdaasdonk
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - P M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - C Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11090900. [PMID: 34575677 PMCID: PMC8472541 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is a complex and challenging procedure due to technical and anatomical issues which could impair postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes, especially in a defined subgroup of patients. The results from recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery are still conflicting and trans-anal bottom-up approaches have recently been developed. Robotic surgery represents the latest consistent innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery that may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy thanks to an enhanced dexterity, especially in deep narrow operative fields such as the pelvis. Results from population-based multicenter studies have shown the potential advantages of robotic surgery when compared to its laparoscopic counterpart in terms of reduced conversions, complication rates and length of stay. Costs, often advocated as one of the main drawbacks of robotic surgery, should be thoroughly evaluated including both the direct and indirect costs, with the latter having the potential of counterbalancing the excess of expenditure directly related to the purchase and maintenance of robotic equipment. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required to better delineate the advantages of the robotic platform, especially in the subset of most complex and technically challenging patients from both an anatomical and oncological standpoint.
Collapse
|