Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: does timing affect failure to rescue?

Early Detection and Monitoring of Anastomotic Leaks via Naked Eye-Readable, Non-Electronic Macromolecular Network Sensors

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the leaking of non-sterile gastrointestinal contents into a patient's abdominal cavity. AL is one of the most dreaded complications following gastrointestinal surgery, with mortality rates reaching up to 27%. The current diagnostic methods for anastomotic leaks are limited in sensitivity and specificity. Since the timing of detection directly impacts patient outcomes, developing new, fast, and simple methods for early leak detection is crucial. Here, a naked eye-readable, electronic-free macromolecular network drain fluid sensor is introduced for continuous monitoring and early detection of AL at the patient's bedside. The sensor array comprises three different macromolecular network sensing elements, each tailored for selectivity toward the three major digestive enzymes found in the drainage fluid during a developing AL. Upon digestion of the macromolecular network structure by the respective digestive enzymes, the sensor produces an optical shift discernible to the naked eye. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical applicability of these sensors are demonstrated using clinical samples from 32 patients, yielding a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 1.0. This work has the potential to significantly contribute to improved patient outcomes through continuous monitoring and early, low-cost, and reliable AL detection.

Mechanobiological considerations in colorectal stapling: Implications for technology development

Technological advancements in minimally invasive surgery have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. One such technology is surgical stapling, which has evolved into a key component of many operating rooms by facilitating ease and efficacy in resection and repair of diseased or otherwise compromised tissue. Despite such advancements, adverse post-operative outcomes such as anastomotic leak remain a persistent problem in surgical stapling and its correlates (i.e., hand-sewing), most notably in low colorectal or coloanal procedures. Many factors may drive anastomotic leaks, including tissue perfusion, microbiome composition, and patient factors such as pre-existing disease. Surgical intervention induces complex acute and chronic changes to the mechanical environment of the tissue; however, roles of mechanical forces in post-operative healing remain poorly characterized. It is well known that cells sense and respond to their local mechanical environment and that dysfunction of this "mechanosensing" phenomenon contributes to a myriad of diseases. Mechanosensing has been investigated in wound healing contexts such as dermal incisional and excisional wounds and development of pressure ulcers; however, reports investigating roles of mechanical forces in adverse post-operative gastrointestinal wound healing are lacking. To understand this relationship well, it is critical to understand: 1) the intraoperative material responses of tissue to surgical intervention, and 2) the post-operative mechanobiological response of the tissue to surgically imposed forces. In this review, we summarize the state of the field in each of these contexts while highlighting areas of opportunity for discovery and innovation which can positively impact patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery.

Development of a warning score for early detection of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Hype or hope?

BACKGROUND

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL), a severe postoperative complication, is associated with high morbidity, hospital readmission, and overall healthcare costs. Early detection of CAL remains a challenge in clinical practice. However, some decision models have been developed to increase the diagnostic accuracy of this event.

AIM

To develop a score based on easily accessible variables to detect CAL early.

METHODS

Based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method, a predictive classification system was developed [Early ColoRectAL Leakage (E-CRALL) score] from a prospective observational, single center cohort, carried out in a colorectal division from a non-academic hospital. The score performance and CAL threshold from postoperative day (POD) 3 to POD5 were estimated. Based on a precise analytical decision model, the standard clinical practice was compared with the E-CRALL adoption on POD3, POD4, or POD5. A cost-minimization analysis was conducted, on the assumption that all alternatives delivered similar health-related effects.

RESULTS

In this study, 396 patients who underwent colorectal resection surgery with anastomosis, and 6.3% (n = 25) developed CAL. Most of the patients who developed CAL (n = 23; 92%) were diagnosed during the first hospital admission, with a median time of diagnosis of 9.0 ± 6.8 d. From POD3 to POD5, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the E-CRALL score was 0.82, 0.84, and 0.95, respectively. On POD5, if a threshold of 8.29 was chosen, 87.4% of anastomotic failures were identified with E-CRALL adoption. Additionally, score usage could anticipate CAL diagnosis in an average of 5.2 d and 4.1 d, if used on POD3 and POD5, respectively. Regardless of score adoption, episode comprehensive costs were markedly greater (up to four times) in patients who developed CAL in comparison with patients who did not develop CAL. Nonetheless, the use of the E-CRALL warning score was associated with cost savings of €421442.20, with most (92.9%) of the savings from patients who did not develop CAL.

CONCLUSION

The E-CRALL score is an accessible tool to predict CAL at an early timepoint. Additionally, E-CRALL can reduce overall healthcare costs, mainly in the reduction of hospital costs, independent of whether a patient developed CAL.

Cohesion Design-Led Tough Sealants with Controllably Dissolvable Properties

Leakage is a common complication of surgeries and injuries, causing pain and increasing the economic burden on patients. Although there are commercially available sealants for leakage prevention, few of them are entirely satisfactory due to disease transmission, high cost, and poor biocompatibility. In addition, none of them can be controllably removed for further healthcare. In this paper, by using cohesion design, a sealant based on amino-modified gelatin (AG) and bi-polyethylene glycol N-hydroxysuccinimide active ester (Bi-PEG-SS) was fabricated. To increase the bursting pressure, the cohesion strength was enhanced by increasing the cross-linking density of the sealant. To endow the sealant with controllably dissolvable properties, the smart succinic ester units were introduced into the cohesion network. Both the in vitro and in vivo experiments showed that this sealant processed high bursting pressure with efficient hemorrhage control. Moreover, no side effects were observed after 7 days of in vivo sealing, including little inflammation and fibrogenesis. These results, together with the easy availability of the raw materials, revealed that this sealant might be a promising alternative for leakage sealing.

Feasibility and advantages analyses of wedge resection without mesentery detached approach applied to closure of loop ileostomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and advantages of wedge resection plus transverse suture without mesentery detached approach applied to loop ileostomy closure by analyzing the surgical data and the incidence of postoperative complications of patients undergoing this procedure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the hospitalization data of patients who underwent ileostomy closure surgery and met the research standards from January 2017 to April 2021 in Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital; all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The perioperative data were statistically analyzed by grouping.

RESULTS

In total, 65 patients were enrolled in this study, with 12 in the wedge resection group, 35 in the stapler group, and 18 in the hand suture group. There was no significant difference in operation time between the wedge resection group and stapler group (P > 0.05), but both groups had shorter operation time than that in the hand suture group (P < 0.05). The postoperative exhaustion time of wedge resection group was earlier than that of the others, and cost of surgical consumables in the wedge resection group was significantly lower than that in the stapler group, all with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). By contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complication incidences among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The wedge resection plus transverse suture without mesentery detached approach is safe and easy for closure of loop ileostomy in selected patients, and the intestinal motility recovers rapidly postoperatively. It costs less surgical consumables, and is particularly suitable for the currently implemented Diagnosis-Related Groups payment method.

Early versus delayed defunctioning ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to answer whether early closure of defunctioning ileostomy may be suitable after low anterior resection.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, up to October 2021, for RCTs comparing early closure (EC ≤ 30 days) and delayed closure (DC ≥ 60 days) of defunctioning ileostomy. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous variables and the mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. The GRADE methodology was implemented for assessing Quality of Evidence (QoE). TSA was implemented to address the risk of random error associated with sparse data and/or multiple testing.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included for quantitative synthesis. 599 patients were allocated to either EC (n = 306) or DC (n = 293). EC was associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared to DC (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.93; P = 0.005; I² = 0%, QoE High), a lower incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89; P = 0.02; I² = 0%, QoE moderate), and a lower rate of stoma-related complications (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%, QoE moderate). The rate of minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.55 to 2.33; P = 0.74; I² = 0%, QoE low) and major LARS (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09; P = 0.16; I² = 0%, QoE low) did not differ between the two groups. TSA demonstrated inconclusive evidence with insufficient sample sizes to detect the observed effects.

CONCLUSION

EC may confer some advantages compared with a DC. However, TSA advocated a cautious interpretation of the results.

PROSPERO REGISTER ID

CRD42021276557.