1
|
Masunaga T, Kato M, Sasaki M, Iwata K, Miyazaki K, Kubosawa Y, Mizutani M, Takatori Y, Matsuura N, Nakayama A, Takabayashi K, Yahagi N. Effectiveness of water pressure method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by novice endoscopists. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E641-E648. [PMID: 37502676 PMCID: PMC10370489 DOI: 10.1055/a-2102-7578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains challenging for novice endoscopists. Not only the underwater conditions but also active use of water pressure with the water pressure method (WPM) can help widen the submucosal layer. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of WPM in colorectal ESD, especially for novice endoscopists. Methods This study was ex vivo and enrolled three novices. Each endoscopist performed conventional ESD (C-ESD) and ESD with WPM (WPM-ESD) 10 times on an excised bovine rectum. The treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Median procedure time was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group than in the C-ESD group (54 minutes, interquartile range [IQR] 42-67 vs. 45 minutes, IQR 34-55, P = 0.035). Although no significant difference in the activation time of electrical surgical unit (ESU) during the procedure was noted, the interval time during the procedure at which the ESU was not activated was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group (52 minutes, IQR 40-65 vs. 42 minutes, IQR 32-52, P = 0.030) than in the C-ESD group. Moreover, the time required for the endoscope to enter the submucosa was significantly shorter in the WPM-ESD group than in the C-ESD group (8.0 minutes, IQR 6.0-10 vs. 5.0 minutes, IQR 3.0-6.0, P < 0.001). Conclusions The present study reveals that the WPM method significantly shortens the procedure times for novices in colorectal ESD, especially the interval time, which refers to the time spent creating the field of view, and the time required for the endoscope to enter the submucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teppei Masunaga
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiko Kato
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoki Sasaki
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Iwata
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kurato Miyazaki
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoko Kubosawa
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mari Mizutani
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusaku Takatori
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Matsuura
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nakayama
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaoru Takabayashi
- Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keating E, Leyden J, O'Connor DB, Lahiff C. Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:338-353. [PMID: 37274555 PMCID: PMC10236981 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
A review of the development of the key performance metrics of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), learning from the experience of the establishment of widespread colonoscopy quality measurements. Potential future performance markers for both colonoscopy and EMR are also evaluated to ensure continued high quality performance is maintained with a focus service framework and predictors of patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Keating
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Jan Leyden
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Donal B O'Connor
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Conor Lahiff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bak MTJ, Albéniz E, East JE, Coelho-Prabhu N, Suzuki N, Saito Y, Matsumoto T, Banerjee R, Kaminski MF, Kiesslich R, Coron E, de Vries AC, van der Woude CJ, Bisschops R, Hart AL, Itzkowitz SH, Pioche M, Moons LMG, Oldenburg B. Endoscopic management of patients with high-risk colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia: a Delphi study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:767-779.e6. [PMID: 36509111 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection of visible and endoscopically resectable colorectal colitis-associated neoplasia (CAN) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, patients with high-risk CAN (HR-CAN) are often not amenable to conventional resection techniques, and a consensus approach for the endoscopic management of these lesions is presently lacking. This Delphi study aims to reach consensus among experts on the endoscopic management of these lesions. METHODS A 3-round modified Delphi process was conducted to reach consensus among worldwide IBD and/or endoscopy experts (n = 18) from 3 continents. Consensus was considered if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Quality of evidence was assessed by the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration group. RESULTS Consensus was reached on all statements (n = 14). Experts agreed on a definition for CAN and HR-CAN. Consensus was reached on the examination of the colon with enhanced endoscopic imaging before resection, the endoscopic resectability of an HR-CAN lesion, and endoscopic assessment and standard report of CAN lesions. In addition, experts agreed on type of resections of HR-CAN (< 20 mm, >20 mm, with or without good lifting), endoscopic success (technical success and outcomes), histologic assessment, and follow-up in HR-CAN. CONCLUSIONS This is the first step in developing international consensus-based recommendations for endoscopic management of CAN and HR-CAN. Although the quality of available evidence was considered low, consensus was reached on several aspects of the management of CAN and HR-CAN. The present work and proposed standardization might benefit future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel T J Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Healthcare, London, UK
| | | | - Noriko Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsumoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
| | - Rupa Banerjee
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ralf Kiesslich
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Helios Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Steven H Itzkowitz
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mönkemüller K, Vargo JJ. Are We Ready to Embrace Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as the Organ-Sparing, Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgical Procedure of Choice for Large Colorectal Adenomas and Early Cancers? Gastroenterology 2022; 163:1168-1170. [PMID: 36067819 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Mönkemüller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Helios Frankenwaldklinik, Kronach, Germany; Division of Endoscopy, Ameos Klinikum Teaching University, Halberstadt, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; Clínica de Gastroenterología "Prof. Carolina Olano Gossweiler", Universidad de La República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
| | - John J Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ohata K, Kobayashi N, Sakai E, Takeuchi Y, Chino A, Takamaru H, Kodashima S, Hotta K, Harada K, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Murakami T, Tsuji S, Abe T, Katagiri A, Hori S, Michida T, Suzuki T, Fukuzawa M, Kiriyama S, Fukase K, Murakami Y, Ishikawa H, Saito Y. Long-term Outcomes After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Trial From Japan. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:1423-1434.e2. [PMID: 35810779 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To determine the long-term outcomes after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we conducted a large, multicenter, prospective cohort trial with a 5-year observation period. METHODS Between February 2013 and January 2015, we consecutively enrolled 1740 patients with 1814 colorectal epithelial neoplasms ≥20 mm who underwent ESD. Patients with noncurative resection (non-CR) lesions underwent additional radical surgery, as needed. After the initial treatment, intensive 5-year follow-up with planned multiple colonoscopies was conducted to identify metastatic and/or local recurrences. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates. The rates of local recurrence and metachronous invasive cancer were evaluated as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates were 93.6%, 99.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. Patients with CR lesions had no metastatic occurrence, and patients with non-CR lesions had 4 metastatic occurrences. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly higher in patients with CR lesions than in those with non-CR lesions (P > .001 and P = .009, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in only 8 lesions (0.5%), which were successfully resected by subsequent endoscopic treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that piecemeal resection (hazard ratio, 8.19; 95% CI, 1.47-45.7; P = .02) and margin-positive resection (hazard ratio, 8.06; 95% CI, 1.76-37.0; P = .007) were significant independent predictors of local recurrence after colorectal ESD. Fifteen metachronous invasive cancers (1.0%) were identified during surveillance colonoscopy, most of which required surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS A favorable long-term prognosis indicates that ESD can be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000010136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nozomu Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akiko Chino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Kodashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Keita Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Takashi Abe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takarazuka Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Hanwa Sumiyoshi General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Katagiri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Hori
- Department of Endoscopy, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan; Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine, Japan Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan
| | - Tomoki Michida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuto Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kazutoshi Fukase
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Yamagata Prefectural Kahoku Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|