1
|
Chavan R, Singla V, Sundaram S, Zanwar S, Shah C, Sud S, Singh P, Gandhi C, Bhatt P, Goel A, Rajput S. Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: A multicenter study from India (with video). Indian J Gastroenterol 2024:10.1007/s12664-024-01614-1. [PMID: 38902473 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01614-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and minimally invasive alternative for percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) in acute cholecystitis patients with high-surgical risk. Additionally, EUS-GBD serves as a rescue biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Despite its widespread application, data within the Indian context remains sparse. This study aims to report the outcomes of EUS-GBD through the first multi-center study from India. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EUS-GBD at six tertiary care centers of India from March 2022 to November 2023. EUS-GBD was performed by free hand or over-the-guidewire technique with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or large caliber metal stent (LCMS). The primary outcome was technical success (defined as successful deployment of stent between gallbladder and stomach/duodenal lumen). The secondary outcomes were clinical success (defined as resolution of symptoms of acute cholecystitis and more than > 50% reduction in bilirubin level within two weeks in distal biliary obstruction), adverse event rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate. RESULTS Total 29 patients (mean age 65.86 ± 12.91, 11 female) underwent EUS-GBD. The indication for EUS-GBD were acute cholecystitis (79.31%) and rescue biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (20.69%). LAMS was deployed in 92.86%, predominantly by free-hand technique (78.57%). Technical and clinical success rates were 96.55% and 82.75%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 27.59% patients, with severe adverse events (bile leak and bleeding) being uncommon (10%). Both 30-day mortality rate and 90-day reintervention rate were 13.79% in patients. Cholecysto-duodenal fistula facilitated cholecystoscopic intervention and stone removal in one patient and transgastric EUS-GBD did not hamper bilio-enteric anastomosis during Whipple surgery in two patients. CONCLUSION EUS-GBD is a safe and effective technique for managing acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients and for biliary drainage in cases with malignant distal biliary obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Chavan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Ansh Clinic, Maninagar, Ahmedabad, 380 008, India.
| | - Vikas Singla
- Center for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | | | - Chirag Shah
- Mission Gastro Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Sukrit Sud
- Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Pankaj Singh
- Center for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Chaiti Gandhi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Ansh Clinic, Maninagar, Ahmedabad, 380 008, India
| | - Pratin Bhatt
- Mission Gastro Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Akash Goel
- Center for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay Rajput
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Ansh Clinic, Maninagar, Ahmedabad, 380 008, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chon HK, Lee YC, Kim TH, Lee SO, Kim SH. Revolutionizing outcomes: endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using innovative electrocautery enhanced-lumen apposing metal stents for high-risk surgical patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12893. [PMID: 38839798 PMCID: PMC11153579 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63608-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
This study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 58 high-risk surgical patients with AC underwent EUS-GBD with the novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS. The technical success rate was 94.8% (55/58), with one case of duodenal perforation requiring surgery with complete stent migration and two of partial stent migration into the gallbladder. However, the clinical success rate was 100% (55/55). Recurrent AC occurred in 3.6% of the cases (2/55), managed with double pigtail plastic stents through the LAMS. Early AEs observed in 1.8% (1/55) due to stent obstruction. Late AEs occurred in 5.4% (3/55), including two cases of cholangitis and one of stent obstruction. For 33 patients followed over 6 months, LAMS maintenance was sustained in 30 cases. Two patients underwent double-pigtail plastic stent replacement after LAMS removal, and one underwent LAMS removal during surgery following tumor stage regression after chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma. The novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates in high-risk surgical patients with AC, maintaining effective gallbladder drainage with minimal AEs during long-term follow-up, thus highlighting its efficacy and safety in challenging patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Ku Chon
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Chae Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyeon Kim
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Ok Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Xiao WK, Li XJ, Dong HY. Evaluating effectiveness and safety of combined percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients: Meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1407-1419. [PMID: 38817274 PMCID: PMC11135318 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common disease in general surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is widely recognized as the "gold standard" surgical procedure for treating AC. For low-risk patients without complications, LC is the recommended treatment plan, but there is still controversy regarding the treatment strategy for moderate AC patients, which relies more on the surgeon's experience and the medical platform of the visiting unit. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder puncture drainage (PTGBD) can effectively alleviate gallbladder inflammation, reduce gallbladder wall edema and adhesion around the gallbladder, and create a "time window" for elective surgery. AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of LC or PTGBD combined with LC for treating AC patients, providing a theoretical basis for choosing reasonable surgical methods for AC patients. METHODS In this study, we conducted a clinical investigation regarding the combined use of PTGBD tubes for the treatment of gastric cancer patients with AC. We performed searches in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database. The search encompassed literature published from the inception of these databases to the present. Subsequently, relevant data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS A comprehensive analysis was conducted, encompassing 24 studies involving a total of 2564 patients. These patients were categorized into two groups: 1371 in the LC group and 1193 in the PTGBD + LC group. The outcomes of the meta-analysis revealed noteworthy disparities between the PTGBD + LC group and the LC group in multiple dimensions: (1) Operative time: Mean difference (MD) = 17.51, 95%CI: 9.53-25.49, P < 0.01; (2) Conversion to open surgery rate: Odds ratio (OR) = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.90-4.58, P < 0.01; (3) Intraoperative bleeding loss: MD = 32.27, 95%CI: 23.03-41.50, P < 0.01; (4) Postoperative hospital stay: MD = 1.44, 95%CI: 0.14-2.73, P = 0.03; (5) Overall postoperative complication rate: OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.45-2.43, P < 0.01; (6) Bile duct injury: OR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.30-3.64, P = 0.003; (7) Intra-abdominal hemorrhage: OR = 2.45, 95%CI: 1.06-5.64, P = 0.004; and (8) Wound infection: OR = 0. These findings consistently favored the PTGBD + LC group over the LC group. There were no significant differences in the total duration of hospitalization [MD = -1.85, 95%CI: -4.86-1.16, P = 0.23] or bile leakage [OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 0.81-2.18, P = 0.26] between the two groups. CONCLUSION The combination of PTGBD tubes with LC for AC treatment demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and enhanced safety, suggesting its broader application value in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Li
- Department of General Surgery, No. 942 Hospital of PLA, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| | - Wei-Ke Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, No. 942 Hospital of PLA, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Li
- Department of General Surgery, No. 942 Hospital of PLA, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| | - Hui-Yuan Dong
- Department of General Surgery, No. 942 Hospital of PLA, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coccolini F, Cucinotta E, Mingoli A, Zago M, Altieri G, Biloslavo A, Caronna R, Cengeli I, Cicuttin E, Cirocchi R, Cobuccio L, Costa G, Cozza V, Cremonini C, Del Vecchio G, Dinatale G, Fico V, Galatioto C, Kuriara H, Lacavalla D, La Greca A, Larghi A, Mariani D, Mirco P, Occhionorelli S, Parini D, Polistina F, Rimbas M, Sapienza P, Tartaglia D, Tropeano G, Venezia P, Venezia DF, Zaghi C, Chiarugi M. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines. Updates Surg 2024; 76:331-343. [PMID: 38153659 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01729-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Dealing with acute cholecystitis in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients is frequent during daily practice and requires complex management. Several procedures exist to postpone and/or prevent surgical intervention in those patients who temporarily or definitively cannot undergo surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, an expert panel from the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) discussed the different issues and statements in subsequent rounds. The final version of the statements was discussed during the annual meeting in Rome (September 2022). The present paper presents the definitive conclusions of the discussion. Fifteen statements based on the literature evidence were provided. The statements gave precise indications regarding the decisional process and the management of patients who cannot temporarily or definitively undergo cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients should be multidisciplinary. The different gallbladder drainage methods must be tailored according to each patient and based on the expertise of the hospital. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage is recommended as the first choice as a bridge to surgery or in severely physiologically deranged patients. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage (cholecystoduodenostomy and cholecystogastrostomy) is suggested as a second-line alternative especially as a definitive procedure for those patients not amenable to surgical management. Trans-papillary gallbladder drainage is the last option to be reserved only to those unfit for other techniques. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with percutaneous gallbladder drainage is suggested in all those patients recovering from the conditions that previously discouraged surgical intervention after at least 6 weeks from the gallbladder drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Eugenio Cucinotta
- General Surgery Department, Messina University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Andrea Mingoli
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- General Surgery Department, Lecco Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | - Gaia Altieri
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alan Biloslavo
- General Surgery Department, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Caronna
- General Surgery Department, Messina University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Ismail Cengeli
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- General Surgery Department, Perugia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luigi Cobuccio
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- General Surgery Department, Campus Biomedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Cozza
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Fico
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Hayato Kuriara
- Emergency Surgery Department, Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Lacavalla
- Emergency Surgery Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Antonio La Greca
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Mariani
- General Surgery Department, Legnano Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Paolo Mirco
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Dario Parini
- General Surgery Department, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paolo Sapienza
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tropeano
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Venezia
- General Surgery Department, Bari University Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Zaghi
- General Surgery Department, Vicenza Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Binda C, Anderloni A, Forti E, Fusaroli P, Macchiarelli R, Manno M, Fugazza A, Redaelli A, Aragona G, Lovera M, Togliani T, Armellini E, Amato A, Brancaccio ML, Badas R, Leone N, de Nucci G, Mangiavillano B, Sbrancia M, Pollino V, Lisotti A, Maida M, Sinagra E, Ventimiglia M, Repici A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: Results of a Nationwide Study with Long-Term Follow-Up. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:413. [PMID: 38396453 PMCID: PMC10887962 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has become one of the treatments of choice for acute cholecystitis (AC) in fragile patients, scant data are available on real-life settings and long-term outcomes. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective study including EUS-guided GBD using LAMS for AC in 19 Italian centers from June 2014 to July 2020. The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and the secondary outcomes were the rate of adverse events (AE) and long-term follow-up. RESULTS In total, 116 patients (48.3% female) were included, with a mean age of 82.7 ± 11 years. LAMS were placed, transgastric in 44.8% of cases, transduodenal in 53.3% and transjejunal in 1.7%, in patients with altered anatomy. Technical success was achieved in 94% and clinical success in 87.1% of cases. The mean follow-up was 309 days. AEs occurred in 12/116 pts (10.3%); 8/12 were intraprocedural, while 1 was classified as early (<15 days) and 3 as delayed (>15 days). According to the ASGE lexicon, two (16.7%) were mild, three (25%) were moderate, and seven (58.3%) were severe. No fatal AEs occurred. In subgroup analysis of 40 patients with a follow-up longer than one year, no recurrence of AC was observed. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GBD had high technical and clinical success rates, despite the non-negligible rate of AEs, thus representing an effective treatment option for fragile patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S., Policlinico San Matteo Viale, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Ca’ Granda Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Imola, Italy; (P.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Raffaele Macchiarelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, A.O.U.S. Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
| | - Mauro Manno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (A.R.)
| | | | - Giovanni Aragona
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy;
| | - Mauro Lovera
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25133 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital Borgo Trento, 37126 Verona, Italy;
| | - Elia Armellini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, 24060 Seriate, Italy;
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, 22100 Como, Italy;
| | | | - Roberta Badas
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, 09123 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Nicola Leone
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo, 10153 Turin, Italy;
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Italy;
| | | | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Valeria Pollino
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Michele Hospital, 09126 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Imola, Italy; (P.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna ‘Kore’, 94100 Enna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Contrada Pietrapollastra Pisciotto, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- Directorate General of Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Service, Italian Ministry of Health, 00153 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bazaga S, García-Alonso FJ, Aparicio Tormo JR, Martinez Moreno B, Sanchiz V, Gornals JB, Loras C, Terán Á, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Pedraza Sanz R, Súbtil JC, Pérez-Millan A, Uceda Porta F, Vila JJ, de la Serna-Higuera C, Couto-Worner I, Guarner-Argente C, Perez-Miranda M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with long-term lumen-apposing metal stent indwell: 1-year results from a prospective nationwide observational study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:360-368. [PMID: 37920889 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study aimed to determine safety and risk factors for adverse events (AEs) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with long-term indwell of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). METHODS This study is a multicenter prospective observational study on consecutive high surgical-risk patients requiring gallbladder drainage who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMS over 12 months. Centralized telephone follow-up interviews were conducted every 3 months for 1 year. Patients were censored at LAMS removal, cholecystectomy, or death. AE-free survival was determined using log-rank tests. Cumulative risks were estimated using life-table analysis. RESULTS Eighty-two patients were included (53.7% male, median [interquartile range] age of 84.6 [76.5-89.8] years, and 85.4% with acute cholecystitis). Technical success was achieved in 79 (96.3%), and clinical success in 73 (89%). No patient was lost to follow-up; 45 patients (54.9%) completed 1-year follow-up with in situ LAMS. Median (interquartile range) LAMS indwell time was 364 (47-367) days. Overall, 12 (14.6%) patients presented 14 AEs, including 5 (6.1%) recurrent biliary events (3 acute cholangitis, 1 mild acute pancreatitis, and 1 acute cholecystitis). Patients with pancreatobiliary malignancy had an increased risk of recurrent biliary events (33% vs 1.5%, P = 0.001). The overall 1-year cumulative risk of recurrent biliary events was 9.7% (4.1-21.8%). The 1-year risk of AEs and of severe AEs was 18.8% (11-31.2%) and 7.9% (3.3-18.2%), respectively. Pancreatobiliary malignancy was the single risk factor for recurrent biliary events; LAMS misdeployment was the strongest risk factor for AEs. CONCLUSIONS Long-term LAMS indwell does not increase the risk of delayed AEs following EUS-GBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Bazaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Joan B Gornals
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carme Loras
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Fundació per la Recerca Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Álvaro Terán
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José Carlos Súbtil
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juan J Vila
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos Guarner-Argente
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Masciangelo G, Cecinato P, Bacchilega I, Masetti M, Ferrari R, Zagari RM, Napoleon B, Sassatelli R, Fusaroli P, Lisotti A. Urgent ERCP performed with single-use duodenoscope (SUD) in patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis: Single-center prospective study. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E116-E122. [PMID: 38250162 PMCID: PMC10798844 DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-0826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims To assess the outcomes of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with a single-use duodenoscope (SUD) in patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis. Patients and methods Between 2021 and 2022 consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe cholangitis were prospectively enrolled to undergo urgent ERCP with SUD. Technical success was defined as the completion of the planned procedure with SUD. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors related to incidence of adverse events (AEs) and mortality. Results Thirty-five consecutive patients (15 female, age 81.4±6.7 years) were enrolled. Twelve (34.3%) had severe cholangitis; 26 (74.3%) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3. Twenty-eight patients (80.0%) had a naïve papilla. Biliary sphincterotomy and complete stone clearance were performed in 29 (82.9%) and 30 patients (85.7%), respectively; in three cases (8.6%), concomitant endoscopic ultrasound-gallbladder drainage was performed. Technical and clinical success rates were 100%. Thirty-day and 3-month mortality were 2.9% and 14.3%, respectively. One patient had mild post-ERCP pancreatitis and two had delayed bleeding. No patient or procedural variables were related to AEs. ASA score 4 and leucopenia were related to 3-month mortality; on multivariate analysis, leukopenia was the only variable independently related to 3-month mortality (odds ratio 12.8; 95% confidence interval 1.03-157.2; P =0.03). Conclusions The results of this "proof of concept" study suggest that SUD use could be considered safe and effective for urgent ERCP for acute cholangitis. This approach abolishes duodenoscope contamination from infected patients without impairing clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Igor Bacchilega
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Michele Masetti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Ferrari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | | | - Romano Sassatelli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bozic D, Ardalic Z, Mestrovic A, Bilandzic Ivisic J, Alicic D, Zaja I, Ivanovic T, Bozic I, Puljiz Z, Bratanic A. Assessment of Gallbladder Drainage Methods in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:5. [PMID: 38276039 PMCID: PMC10817550 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Gallbladder drainage is a treatment option in high-risk surgical patients with moderate or severe acute cholecystitis. It may be applied as a bridge to cholecystectomy or a definitive treatment option. Apart from the simple and widely accessible percutaneous cholecystostomy, new attractive techniques have emerged in the previous decade, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage. The aim of this paper is to present currently available drainage techniques in the treatment of AC; evaluate their technical and clinical effectiveness, advantages, possible adverse events, and patient outcomes; and illuminate the decision-making path when choosing among various treatment modalities for each patient, depending on their clinical characteristics and the accessibility of methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorotea Bozic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Zarko Ardalic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Antonio Mestrovic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Josipa Bilandzic Ivisic
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Sibenik-Knin County, Stjepana Radica 83, 22000 Sibenik, Croatia;
| | - Damir Alicic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
| | - Ivan Zaja
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
- University Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Rudjera Boskovica 35, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Ivanovic
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia;
| | - Ivona Bozic
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia;
| | - Zeljko Puljiz
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Andre Bratanic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000 Split, Croatia; (Z.A.); (A.M.); (D.A.); (I.Z.); (Z.P.); (A.B.)
- School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sagami R, Mizukami K, Sato T, Nishikiori H, Murakami K. Strategy Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage to Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage, Following Failed Emergent Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7034. [PMID: 38002649 PMCID: PMC10671954 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is recommended for patients with acute cholecystitis at high risk for surgery/percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has higher success and mortality rates than ETGBD. Optimal endoscopic drainage remains controversial. Patients with moderate/severe acute cholecystitis and high risk for surgery/PTGBD who underwent ETGBD were enrolled. In the new-ETGBD (N-ETGBD)/traditional-ETGBD (T-ETGBD) strategy, patients in whom the initial ETGBD failed underwent rescue-EUS-GBD in the same endoscopic session/rescue-PTGBD, respectively. Therapeutic outcomes were compared. Patients who could not undergo rescue-EUS-GBD/PTGBD owing to poor general conditions received conservative treatment. Technical success was defined as successful ETGBD or successful rescue-EUS-GBD/PTGBD. Forty-one/forty patients were enrolled in the N-ETGBD/T-ETGBD groups, respectively. The N-ETGBD group had a higher, though non-significant, technical success rate compared to the T-ETGBD group (97.6 vs. 90.0%, p = 0.157). The endoscopic technical success rate was significantly higher in the N-ETGBD than in the T-ETGBD group (97.6 vs. 82.5%, p = 0.023). The clinical success/adverse event rates were similar between both groups. The hospitalization duration was significantly shorter in the N-ETGBD than in the T-ETGBD group (6.6 ± 3.9 vs. 10.1 ± 6.4 days, p < 0.001). ETGBD with EUS-GBD as a rescue backup may be an ideal hybrid drainage for emergency endoscopic gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Sagami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, 1213 Oaza Ichi, Oita 870-1151, Japan; (R.S.); (T.S.); (H.N.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu 879-5593, Japan;
| | - Kazuhiro Mizukami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu 879-5593, Japan;
| | - Takao Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, 1213 Oaza Ichi, Oita 870-1151, Japan; (R.S.); (T.S.); (H.N.)
| | - Hidefumi Nishikiori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, 1213 Oaza Ichi, Oita 870-1151, Japan; (R.S.); (T.S.); (H.N.)
| | - Kazunari Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu 879-5593, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gantschnigg A, Singhartinger F, von Rahden B, Mühlbacher I, Koch OO, Emmanuel K, Holzinger J. Real-life Indications and Outcome of Electrocautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Metal Stents in a Tertiary Center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:527-532. [PMID: 37523520 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing stents (EC-LAMS) were originally designed for the drainage of the gallbladder, bile duct, and pancreas pseudocysts. Throughout the years, several off-label indications were established. This study aims to evaluate the indication, safety, efficacy, and outcome of all LAMS implanted in a single tertiary referral center. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2022, all patients undergoing LAMS placement in a single tertiary center were included. We present a detailed analysis of indications, success rates, and complications based on a retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained database. RESULTS A total of 86 stents were placed in 77 patients between April 2016 and April 2022. Indications were walled-off pancreatic necrosis (25.6%), bile duct obstructions (16.3%), acute cholecystitis (15.1%), pancreas pseudocysts (15.1%), postoperative collections (10.5%), postoperative pancreatic fistulas (9.3%), and gastro-gastrostomy/jejunostomy (8.1%) to enable to perform an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gastric bypass. Technical success was 97.7% (84 out of 86). A total of 10 (11.7%) adverse events were observed. In 3 patients (3.5%), severe complications occurred, which required acute surgery; one displacement was closed through clips. In 7 patients (8.2%), bleedings occurred during necrosectomy or from mucosal erosions at the stent side, respectively, that were treated with endoclips. CONCLUSIONS EC-LAMS are safe and show a high technical success rate in all indications. In everyday clinical practice, the main indications are hepato-pancreato-biliary, and therefore an hepato-pancreato-biliary-surgical department should have EC-LAMS in their armamentarium.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kurihara H, Binda C, Cimino MM, Manta R, Manfredi G, Anderloni A. Acute cholecystitis: Which flow-chart for the most appropriate management? Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1169-1177. [PMID: 36890051 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a very common disease in clinical practice. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the gold standard treatment for AC, however due to aging population, the increased prevalence of multiple comorbidities and the extensive use of anticoagulants, surgical procedures may be too risky when dealing with patients in emergency settings. In these subsets of patients, a mini-invasive management may be an effective option, both as a definitive treatment or as bridge-to-surgery. In this paper, several non-operative treatments are described and their benefits and drawbacks are highlighted. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) is one of the most common and widespread techniques. It is easy to perform and has a good cost/benefit ratio. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is a challenging procedure that is usually performed in high volume centers by expert endoscopists, and it has a specific indication for selected cases. EUS-guided drainage (EUS-GBD) is still not widely available, but it is an effective procedure that could have several advantages, especially in rate of reinterventions. All these treatment options should be considered together in a stepwise approach and addressed to patients after an accurate case-by-case evaluation in a multidisciplinary discussion. In this review, we provide a possible flowchart in order to optimize treatments, resource and provide to patients a tailored approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Matteo Maria Cimino
- Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Manta
- Endoscopic Unit, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, Perugia 06122, Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, ASST Maggiore Hospital Crema, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, Pavia 27100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koutlas NJ, Pawa S, Russell G, Pawa R. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: Beyond Cholecystitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111933. [PMID: 37296785 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an alternative to surgery for acute cholecystitis (AC) in poor operative candidates. However, the role of EUS-GBD in non-cholecystitis (NC) indications has not been well studied. We compared the clinical outcomes of EUS-GBD for AC and NC indications. Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD for all indications at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one patients underwent EUS-GBD during the study period. Thirty-nine (76%) patients had AC while 12 (24%) had NC indications. NC indications included malignant biliary obstruction (n = 8), symptomatic cholelithiasis (n = 1), gallstone pancreatitis (n = 1), choledocholithiasis (n = 1), and Mirizzi's syndrome (n = 1). Technical success was noted in 92% (36/39) for AC and 92% (11/12) for NC (p > 0.99). The clinical success rate was 94% and 100%, respectively (p > 0.99). There were four adverse events in the AC group and 3 in the NC group (p = 0.33). Procedure duration (median 43 vs. 45 min, p = 0.37), post-procedure length of stay (median 3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.97), and total gallbladder-related procedures (median 2 vs. 2, p = 0.59) were similar. EUS-GBD for NC indications is similarly safe and effective as EUS-GBD in AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Koutlas
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Greg Russell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Rishi Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A surprising culprit for delayed gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy: the double-pigtail stent. Clin J Gastroenterol 2022; 16:279-282. [PMID: 36538256 PMCID: PMC9763802 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-022-01749-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent has emerged as an accepted option for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery. While metal stents carry a risk of intra- and post-procedural bleeding, the coaxial placement of a double-pigtail stents through lumen-apposing metal stents has been proposed to lower the bleeding risk by preventing tissue abrasion against the stent flanges. We present a case of an 83 year-old male who had previously undergone uncomplicated endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy with this technique. Six months later, he presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a duodenal pressure ulcer from the coaxial 10-Fr double-pigtail stent originally employed to prevent such bleeding. The 10-Fr stent was replaced with two 7-Fr stents whose increased flexibility and distribution of pressure across multiple points of contact with the duodenal wall was theorized to reduce the likelihood of erosion or perforation. Following the procedure, the patient's clinical course improved significantly with complete resolution of his symptoms of choledocholithiasis and cholecystitis. While 10-Fr double-pigtail stents are generally preferred for this indication due to their stiffness that reduces out-migration, use of more flexible 7-Fr stents may be advisable in thin-walled structures such as the duodenum.
Collapse
|
14
|
Endoscopic ultrasound in the management of acute cholecystitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 60-61:101806. [PMID: 36577527 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2022.101806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is increasingly utilised for patients with acute cholecystitis who are high-risk candidates for surgery. The technique to perform EUS-GBD has evolved and matured over the last two decades since EUS-GBD was first described in 2007 using a nasobiliary catheter. Compared to percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD), EUS-GBD offers benefits of shorter hospitalisation stay and lesser procedural pain and need for reintervention. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated review of the equipment and techniques available for EUS-GBD, outcomes of the procedure and how it compares against endoscopic transpapillary drainage (ET-GBD), PT-GBD and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Controversies surrounding the procedure will also be discussed.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fabbri C, Binda C, Sbrancia M, Dajti E, Coluccio C, Ercolani G, Anderloni A, Cucchetti A. Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7974-7985. [PMID: 35652964 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09339-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been increasingly used in the treatment of gallbladder diseases. Aims of the study were to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis and meta-regression of features and outcomes of this procedure. METHODS MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane databases were searched for literature pertinent to transmural EUS-GBD up to May 2021. Random-effect meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression of potential modifiers of outcome measures considered were applied. Outcome measures were technical success rate, overall clinical success, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Twenty-seven articles were identified including 1004 patients enrolled between February 2009 and February 2020. Acute cholecystitis was present in 98.7% of cases. Pooled technical success was 98.0% (95% CI 96.3, 99.3; heterogeneity: 23.6%), the overall clinical success was 95.4% (95% CI 92.8, 97.5; heterogeneity: 35.3%), and procedure-related AEs occurred in 14.8% (95% CI 8.8, 21.8; heterogeneity: 82.4%), being stent malfunction/dislodgement the most frequent (3.5%). Procedural-related mortality was 1‰. Meta-regression showed that center experience proxied to > 10 cases/year increased the technical success rate (odds ratio [OR]: 2.84; 95% CI 1.06, 7.59) and the overall clinical success (OR: 3.52; 95% CI 1.33, 9.33). The use of anti-migrating devices also increased the overall clinical success (OR: 2.16; 95% CI 1.07, 4.36) while reducing procedure-related AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.14, 0.98). CONCLUSION Physicians' experience and anti-migrating devices are the main determinants of main clinical outcomes after EUS-GBD, suggesting that treatment in expert centers would optimize results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
- Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale Morgagni - Pierantoni, Via Carlo Forlanini, 34, 47121, Forlì, FC, Italy.
| | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Elton Dajti
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - Univeristy of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - Univeristy of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim TH, Chon HK. [Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage in Pancreatobiliary Diseases]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 79:203-209. [PMID: 35610550 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2022.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
EUS-guided drainage for gallbladder, bile duct, pancreatic duct, and peripancreatic fluid collection has been performed more frequently in the last decade. The development of dedicated stents and delivery systems for EUS-guided interventions have improved the efficacy and safety of these procedures. Furthermore, the introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents has reduced the complication significantly of endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic collections and gallbladder. Recent studies show that EUS-guided drainage of pancreaticobiliary ducts and peripancreatic fluid collection produces good results and low complication rates. This review describes the current position and role of interventional EUS for pancreatobiliary disease in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyeon Kim
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Division of Biliopancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Combined Endoscopic Stent-In-Stent Placement by Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Through Self-Expanding Metal Stents for Simultaneous Malignant Biliary and Duodenal Obstruction. ACG Case Rep J 2021; 8:e00704. [PMID: 34841002 PMCID: PMC8613338 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The palliation of simultaneous biliary and duodenal obstruction in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer is a clinically and technically challenging scenario. Endoscopic procedures are a valid alternative to surgical or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The availability of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have expanded therapeutic options. We describe a case in which biliary and duodenal obstructions were treated successfully with the combined use of SEMS and LAMS devices. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage with the use of new LAMS and a duodenal SEMS can be a valid option in expert hands as a palliative and minimally invasive treatment for gastric outlet and biliary obstruction.
Collapse
|
18
|
Di Mitri R, Mocciaro F, Amata M, Bonaccorso A, Conte E, Scrivo B, Scimeca D. Rescue gallbladder drainage in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: Could COVID-19 patients be best suited for the EUS-guided approach? Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:1014. [PMID: 34656274 PMCID: PMC8511648 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Filippo Mocciaro
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michele Amata
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ambra Bonaccorso
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Barbara Scrivo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniela Scimeca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2021; 57:medicina57101085. [PMID: 34684120 PMCID: PMC8539792 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57101085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decades, contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool for the diagnosis and differentiation of several gastrointestinal diseases. The key advantage of CH-EUS is that the influx and washout of contrast in the target lesion can be observed in real time, accurately depicting microvasculature. CH-EUS is established as an evidence-based technique complementary to B-mode EUS to differentiate solid appearing structures, to characterize mass lesions, and to improve the staging of gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary cancer. In the last few years, interest has increased in the use of CH-EUS in interventional procedures such as tissue acquisition, tumor ablation, biliary drainage, and the management of pancreatic fluid collections. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the available evidence and future expectations of CH-EUS in interventional EUS.
Collapse
|
20
|
EUS and ERCP in the Same Session for Biliary Stones: From Risk Stratification to Treatment Strategy in Different Clinical Conditions. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2021; 57:medicina57101019. [PMID: 34684056 PMCID: PMC8539296 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57101019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis, reaching a successful clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) in up to 90% of the cases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the best diagnostic accuracy for CBD stones, its sensitivity and specificity range being 89-94% and 94-95%, respectively. Traditionally seen as two separate entities, the two worlds of EUS and ERCP have recently come together under the new discipline of bilio-pancreatic endoscopy. Nevertheless, the complexity of both EUS and ERCP led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to identify quality in endoscopy as a top priority in its recent EUS and ERCP curriculum recommendations. The clinical benefits of performing EUS and ERCP in the same session are several, such as benefiting from real-time information from EUS, having one single sedation for both the diagnosis and the treatment of biliary stones, reducing the risk of cholangitis/acute pancreatitis while waiting for ERCP after the EUS diagnosis, and ultimately shortening the hospital stay and costs while preserving patients' outcomes. Potential candidates for the same session approach include patients at high risk for CBD stones, symptomatic individuals with status post-cholecystectomy, pregnant women, and those unfit for surgery. This narrative review discusses the main technical aspects and evidence from the literature about EUS and ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cominardi A, Tamanini G, Brighi N, Fusaroli P, Lisotti A. Conservative management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction syndrome-evidence based evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroentero-anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1086-1098. [PMID: 34616514 PMCID: PMC8465451 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by postprandial vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating and, in advanced cases, by weight loss secondary to inadequate oral intake. This clinical entity may be caused by mechanical obstruction, either benign or malignant, or by motility disorders. In this review we will focus on malignant GOO and on its endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided palliative treatment. The most frequent malignant causes of this syndrome are gastric and locally advanced pancreatic carcinomas; other causes include duodenal or ampullary neoplasms, gastric lymphomas, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathies and, more infrequently, gallbladder and bile duct cancers. Surgery represents the treatment of choice when radical and curative resection is potentially feasible; if the malignant cause is not likely to be completely resected, palliative treatments should be proposed. Palliative treatments for malignant GOO are primarily based on surgical gastro-jejunostomy and endoscopic placement of an enteral self-expanding metal stent. Both treatments are effective; however, endoscopic stent placement is less invasive and it is associated with good short-term results, while surgery provides longer-lasting effects with a lower frequency of reintervention. In the last few years, EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been proposed as palliative treatment for malignant GOO. This novel technique consists of the creation of an anastomosis between the gastric lumen and a small bowel loop distal to the malignant obstruction, through the deployment of a lumen-apposing metal stent under EUS-view. EUS-GE has the advantage of being as minimally invasive as enteral stent placement, and of guaranteeing long-term results similar to those of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cominardi
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| | - Giacomo Tamanini
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| | - Nicole Brighi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori “Dino Amadori” (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola 47014, FC, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Bologna 40121, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Department of Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola 40026, BO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Marocchi G, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic Techniques for Gallbladder Drainage: Never without My Endoscopic Ultrasound. Gut Liver 2021; 15:634-636. [PMID: 33935048 PMCID: PMC8283293 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Marocchi
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|