Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis

Outcomes from a new modified single needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure and cut off for pediatric inguinal hernia

Inguinal hernia is a prevalent surgical condition in pediatric patients. Despite the efficacy of current treatment modalities, a certain recurrence rate still persists. Hence, our objective in this study is to introduce an innovative surgical technique designed to minimize surgical complications. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 809 pediatric cases that underwent laparoscopic repair with our innovative technique for inguinal hernia from June 2020 to June 2022. Demographic information, perioperative details, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were thoroughly assessed. All surgeries were conducted laparoscopically under general anesthesia. The procedure commenced by encircling the hernia sac with two sutures under laparoscopic guidance. Subsequently, the sac was exteriorized from the body using the two sutures, followed by ligation and excision of the hernia sac. The research findings demonstrate that the duration of unilateral and bilateral procedures was recorded as 15.9 ± 4.8 and 21.7 ± 3.9 min, respectively. Incision infection occurred in 7 patients (0.87%), and Male Complicated Inguinal Hernia (MCIH) was observed in 2 patients (0.23%). Notably, there were no occurrences of iatrogenic cryptorchidism, testicular atrophy, or recurrence (0%) during the follow-up period. In conclusion, our novel modification shows a notable reduction in postoperative recurrence rates and alleviates the impact of the procedure on the positioning of the testis or uterus. This modified technique is both safe and valuable, thus warranting broader adoption and promotion.

Causes of recurrence of paediatric inguinal hernia after single-port laparoscopic closure

PURPOSE

This paper explores the causes of paediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) recurrence after single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC).

METHOD

From January 2015 to December 2020, the clinical data of 3480 children with PIHs who underwent SPLPEC were retrospectively reviewed, including 644 children who underwent SPLPEC with a homemade single-hook hernia needle from January 2015 to December 2016 and 2836 children who underwent the SPLPEC with a double-hook hernia needle and hydrodissection from January 2017 to December 2020. There were 39 recurrences (including communicating hydrocele) during the 2-5 years of follow-up. The findings of redo-laparoscopy were recorded and correlated with the revised video of the first operation to analyse the causes of recurrence.

RESULT

Thirty-three males and 6 females experienced recurrence, and 8 patients had a unilateral communicating hydrocele. The median time to recurrence was 7.1 months (0-38). There were 20 cases (3.11%) in the single-hook group and 19 cases (0.67%) in the double-hook group. Based on laparoscopic findings, recurrence most probably resulted from multiple factors, including uneven tension of the ligation (10 cases), missing part of the peritoneum (14 cases), loose ligation (8 cases), broken knot (5 cases), and knot reaction (2 cases). All children who underwent repeat SPLPEC were cured by double ligations or reinforcement with medial umbilical ligament.

CONCLUSION

The main cause of recurrence is improper ligation. Tension-free and complete PIH ligation are critical to the success of surgery, which requires avoiding the peritoneum skip area and the subcutaneous and muscular tissues. Redo-laparoscopic surgery was suitable for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH). For giant hernias, direct ligation of the internal ring incorporating the medial umbilical ligament (DIRIM) may be needed.

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Repair in Boys with Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem in boys. Open hernia repair surgery (OH) has been traditionally used to treat this condition, but it leads to complications, such as testicular complications. Laparoscopic hernia repair by using the extraperitoneal method (LHE) is performed through the percutaneous insertion of sutures and extracorporeal closure of patent vaginalis processus; thus, injury to spermatic cord structures is avoided. However, a meta-analysis comparing LHE and OH is lacking.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the retrieved studies was performed, and a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size. The primary outcome was testicular complications, including ascending testis, hydrocele, and testicular atrophy. The secondary outcomes were surgical metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), ipsilateral hernia recurrence, and operation time.

RESULTS

In total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 non-RCTs involving 17,555 boys were included. The incidence of ascending testis (risk ratio [RR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.78; p = 0.008) and MCIH (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.43; p = 0.0002) was significantly lower in LHE than in OH. The incidence of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and ipsilateral hernia recurrence did not differ between LHE and OH.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OH, LHE led to fewer or equivalent testicular complications without increasing ipsilateral hernia recurrence. Moreover, MCIH incidence was lower in LHE than in OH. Hence, LHE could be a feasible choice with less invasiveness for inguinal hernia repair in boys.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, LEVEL III.

Risks and benefits of pediatric inguinal hernia repair: Conventional open repair vs laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure

INTRODUCTION

Considerable debate exists regarding the benefits of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) over conventional open repair (OR). We assessed the outcomes and feasibility of LPEC compared to OR for pediatric inguinal hernia (IH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 570 children who underwent LPEC or OR. Parents decided the operative method after obtaining informed consent. Patient characteristics, operative time, complications and contralateral metachronous IH (CMIH) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 329 children underwent LPEC and 241 underwent OR. There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrence or testicular ascent between the LPEC and OR groups (0.3% vs 0.4%, P = 0.825, 0.3% vs 0.8%, P = 0.391, respectively). No testicular atrophy was recognized in either group. One patient with postoperative chronic inguinal pain was recognized in each group. There was no surgical site infection (SSI) in the OR group; however, the LPEC group more frequently demonstrated umbilical port site (UPS)-related complications, such as incisional hernia, minor deformity, granuloma formation, cellulitis and superficial SSI. Ten (4.1%) developed CMIH in OR; in contrast, no case of CMIH was experienced after LPEC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, both LPEC and OR are feasible in the management of pediatric IH, because of their high success rates and low risk of complications. LPEC could be the superior procedure with respect to the prevention of CMIH. However, to maximize the merits of LPEC over OR, it is important to reduce UPS-related complications in LPEC. A longer follow-up is needed to assess male fertility in patients who receive LPEC.

Risk factors for metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for unilateral inguinal hernia in children

PURPOSES

We use the laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) method as the standard procedure for pediatric inguinal hernia. Despite judging there to be no contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV) at the time of the first LPEC, we experienced five cases in which metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCH) developed, so we report the characteristics, including the predictors.

METHODS

For pediatric inguinal hernia, the LPEC method was used in 1277 cases from 2005 to 2019 in our department. Of these, 374 patients underwent unilateral LPEC, and we compared the 5 patients with MCH onset and the 369 without MCH onset. The items to be examined were the gender, age, presence of a low birth weight, initial-onset side, and contralateral internal inguinal ring classification.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the gender, age, initial-onset side, or contralateral internal inguinal ring classification between the two groups. Low-birth-weight infants were significantly more common among those with MCH than among those without MCH.

CONCLUSIONS

The only predictor of a contralateral onset after LPEC for pediatric inguinal hernia was a low birth weight. Therefore, for the above-mentioned unilateral LPEC cases, the possibility of a contralateral onset after LPEC due to acquired factors rather than congenital factors should be considered.

Laparoscopic Hernia Repair with the Extraperitoneal Approach versus Open Hernia Repair in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair with the extraperitoneal approach in pediatric inguinal hernias.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation in pediatric surgical practice. Although open hernia repair (OHR) is a well-established procedure with good outcomes, studies have reported acceptable or even better outcomes of laparoscopic hernia repair with the extraperitoneal approach (LHRE). However, a meta-analysis comparing LHRE with OHR is lacking.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies (prospective or retrospective). Outcomes were metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), hernia recurrence, surgical site infection, operation time, and hospitalization length. A meta-analysis was performed, and risk ratios (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and 21 comparative studies involving 24,479 patients were included. Lower MCIH incidence (RR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.17; p < 0.00001) and a trend of shorter operation time (WMD: -11.90 min, 95% CI: -16.63 to -7.44; p < 0.00001) were found in the LHRE group. No significant differences in ipsilateral recurrence hernias, surgical site infection, and length of hospitalization were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LHRE presented lower MCIH incidence and shorter operation times, with no increase in hernia recurrence, surgical site infection, or length of hospitalization. As more surgeons are increasingly becoming familiar with LHRE, LHRE would be a feasible and effective choice for pediatric inguinal hernia repair.

Inguinal hernia repair in inpatient children: a nationwide analysis of German administrative data

Background

Contrary to adult inguinal hernia surgery, large-scale investigations using registries or administrative data are missing in paediatric surgery. We aimed to fill this gap by analysing German administrative hospital data to describe the current reality of inpatient hernia surgery in children.

Methods

We analysed aggregated data files bought from the German federals statistics office on hospital reimbursement data separately for principal diagnoses of inguinal hernia in children and for herniotomies in inpatients. Developments over time were assessed via regression and differences between groups with nonparametric comparisons.

Results

Principal diagnoses of hernias were decreasing over time with the exception of male bilateral and female bilateral incarcerated hernias in the first year of life which increased. The vast majority of operations were conducted via the open approach and laparoscopy was increasingly only used for females older than 1 year of age. Recurrent hernia repair was scarce. Rates of inguinal hernia repair were higher in both sexes the younger the patient was, but were also decreasing in all age groups despite a population growth since 2012. The amount of inguinal hernia repairs by paediatric surgeons compared to adult surgeons increased by 1.5% per year.

Conclusions

Our results corroborate previous findings of age and sex distribution. It demonstrates that inpatient hernia repair is primarily open surgery with herniorrhaphy and that recurrences seem to be rare. We observed decreasing rates of hernia repairs over time and as this has been described before in England, future studies should try to elucidate this development.

Level of evidence

III.