Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study

Impact of 3D Endovision System on Learning Process of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Groin Hernia

Background: Laparo-endoscopic hernia surgery is recommended by various international bodies. However, its uptake by general surgeon is low. We aim to assess the impact of Three Dimensional (3D) endovision system in learning laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of groin hernia and transferability of skills acquired from 3D to the Two Dimensional (2D) environment. Methodology: Senior resident doctor with no previous experience in laparoscopic hernia surgery did 20 consecutive cases of TAPP repair using 3D endovision system followed by another five cases of TAPP repair using 2D endovision system. Total operating time, operating time during different phases of hernia surgery, faculty take over time, path length of needle holder, and scissors were recorded. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) and split group analysis were done to assess the learning process. Trainee's operating time was compared with that of experts' from previously published study of the same group. Data were compared between last block of five cases done using 3D system and cases done using 2D system for skill transferability. Results: CUSUM method provided inflection points of total operating time, hernia dissection and mesh placement at 9th case, and peritoneal suturing at 11th case in learning TAPP hernia. After 10th case, trainee's operating time was within the middle 50 percentage of experts operating time. Total operating time in last block of cases done under 3D vision and that of 2D endovision comparable, although peritoneal closure was significantly longer in 2D vision (P = .074, .2, .145, .001). Conclusion: Reduction on operating time appears after ninth case of TAPP hernia repair using the 3D endovision system. The skills acquired under 3D endovision system are transferable to perform the procedure under 2D endovision system, albeit incompletely. Use of 3D technology may facilitate adaptation of TAPP hernia repair by young surgeons.

Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study

Three-dimensional high-definition (3D HD) and ultra-high-definition (4 K HD) endovision systems are rapidly adopted in academic setting. However, transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from these systems to two-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is not known. Forty stereo-enabled surgical residents were randomized into two groups. They performed three standardized surgical tasks, Task 1(Peg transfer), Task 2(Precision touch on uneven surface) and Task 3(Surgical knotting on rubber tube) for 15 repetitions using either 3D HD or 4 K HD. Both groups then performed the same tasks using 2D HD for 5 repetitions. Their performances were evaluated for execution time (speed) and error scores (safety). The residents in 3D HD group performed all three tasks significantly faster than residents in 4 K HD group with comparable error scores. The time taken to complete the tasks on 2D HD were comparable between residents trained in 3D HD and 4 K HD in two out of three tasks (p = 0.027, P = 0.115, p = 0.368 in task 1, 2 and 3 respectively). However, in two out of three tasks, residents trained on 3D HD committed significantly more errors than residents trained on 4 K HD (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 in task 1 and task 2 respectively). Skill acquired on 4 K HD seems transferable to 2D HD environment. Participants trained in 3D HD made more errors while performing the tasks in 2D HD. It may be prudent to offer additional training on 2D HD to residents trained on 3D HD for safer laparoscopic surgical practice.

Surgeon Preference and Clinical Outcome of 3D Vision Compared to 2D Vision in Laparoscopic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Objective

To assess the added value of 3-dimensional (3D) vision, including high definition (HD) technology, in laparoscopic surgery in terms of surgeon preference and clinical outcome.

Background

The use of 3D vision in laparoscopic surgery has been suggested to improve surgical performance. However, the added value of 3D vision remains unclear as a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 3D vision including HD technology in laparoscopic surgery is currently lacking.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with a literature search up to May 2023 using PubMed and Embase (PROSPERO, CRD42021290426). We included RCTs comparing 3D versus 2-dimensional (2D) vision in laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was operative time. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model to estimate the pooled effect size expressed in standard mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The level of evidence and quality was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

Overall, 25 RCTs with 3003 patients were included. Operative time was reduced by 3D vision (-8.0%; SMD, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.06; P = 0.007; n = 3003; 24 studies; I 2 = 75%) compared to 2D vision. This benefit was mostly seen in bariatric surgery (-16.3%; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.21; P = 0.006; 2 studies; n = 58; I 2 = 0%) and general surgery (-6.7%; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.01; P = 0.036; 9 studies; n = 1056; I 2 = 41%). Blood loss was nonsignificantly reduced by 3D vision (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.68 to 0.017; P = 0.060; n = 1830; I 2 = 92%). No differences in the rates of morbidity (14.9% vs 13.5%, P = 0.644), mortality (0% vs 0%), conversion (0.8% vs 0.9%, P = 0.898), and hospital stay (9.6 vs 10.5 days, P = 0.078) were found between 3D and 2D vision. In 15 RCTs that reported on surgeon preference, 13 (87%) reported that the majority of surgeons favored 3D vision.

Conclusions

Across 25 RCTs, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated shorter operative time with 3D vision in laparoscopic surgery, without differences in other outcomes. The majority of surgeons participating in the RCTs reported in favor of 3D vision.

Which video technology brings the higher cognitive burden and motion sickness in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K? a propensity score study

BACKGROUND

Technological development has offered laparoscopic colorectal surgeons new video systems to improve depth perception and perform difficult task in limited space. The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive burden and motion sickness for surgeons during 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K laparoscopic colorectal procedures and to report post-operative data with the different video systems employed.

METHODS

Patients were assigned to either 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K video and two questionnaires (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-SSQ- and NASA Task Load Index -TLX) were used during elective laparoscopic colorectal resections (October 2020-August 2022) from two operating surgeons. Short-term results of the operations performed with the three different video systems were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 113 consecutive patients were included: 41 (36%) in the 3D Group (A), 46 (41%) in the 3D-4 K Group and 26 (23%) in the 2D-4 K Group (C). Weighted and adjusted regression models showed no significant difference in cognitive load amongst the surgeons in the three groups of video systems when using the NASA-TLX. An increased risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain in the 3D-4 K group compared with 2D-4 K group (OR = 3.5; p = 0.0057 and OR = 2.8; p = 0.0096, respectively) was observed. Further, slight/moderate difficulty focusing was lower in both 3D and 3D-4 K groups compared with 2D-4 K group (OR = 0.4; p = 0.0124 and OR = 0.5; p = 0.0341, respectively), and higher in the 3D-4 K group compared with 3D group (OR = 2.6; p = 0.0124). Patient population characteristics, operative time, post-operative staging, complication rate and length of stay were similar in the three groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

3D and 3D-4 K systems, when compared with 2D-4 K video technology, have a higher risk for slight/moderate general discomfort and eyestrain, but show lower difficulty focusing. Short post-operative outcomes do not differ, whichever imaging system is used.

An optimal thoracoscopic segmentectomy approach: Combined ultra-high-definition 4K endovision systems with "no-waiting" technique in S8-9 complex segmentectomy

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy might be an alternative to lobectomy for small size lung cancer. Precise identification of the pulmonary intersegmental plane was needed for an optimal segmentectomy. Recently, (1) the ultra-high-definition 4K systems had claimed to overcome the lack of depth perception by secondary visual cues; (2) the no-waiting procedure was induced as an alternative and optimized method for identifying the plane. It was unclear whether combined ultra-high-definition 4K endovision systems with "no-waiting" technique in thoracoscopic segmentectomy could achieve an excellent result. A 68-year-old female patient was admitted into our hospital for occasional pulmonary nodule during her routine physical examination. The nodule is located between S8 and S9 segment, and was suspected to be an early-stage lung cancer. She underwent a thoracoscopic S89 complex segmentectomy using ultra-high-definition 4K endovision systems and "no-waiting" surgical technique. The intersegmental plane was clearly detected and easily treated by the endoscopic linear cutting staplers. The patient recovered well and was discharged without complications. Combining ultra-high-definition 4K endovision systems with "no-waiting" technique seems to be an optimal thoracoscopic segmentectomy approach for the management of lung cancers.

Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The technology in the field of laparoscopy is rapidly evolving and is primarily focussed on increasing the quality of image and depth perception in the form of 4K and three-dimensional (3D) technology. There has been no conclusion yet regarding the better technology.

Methods

A systematic search was performed independently by two authors across MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Embase using the PRISMA guidelines. All randomised control trials comparing 3D and 4K technologies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects statistics for time taken for different tasks across the studies.

Results

The search strategy revealed a total of 1835 articles, out of which nine studies were included. Three studies showed no superiority of 3D over 4K, while the remaining six did. Meta-analysis for the time taken for peg transfer favoured 3D over 4K (overall effect: Z = 2.12; P = 0.03). Forest plots for time taken for suturing (Z = 1.3; P = 0.19) and knot tying (Z = 1.7; P = 0.09) also favoured 3D over 4K; the results however were statistically insignificant. Path length was reported by two studies and was found to be lesser in the 3D group. Two studies measured the workload by NASA/Surg-TLX score, which was lower in the 3D group. Visual side effects were found to be higher in the 3D group.

Conclusion

3D technology is likely to result in a shorter operative time and better efficiency of movement as compared to the 4K technology by the virtue of its better depth perception.

Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review

Laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over open surgery. At the same time, it is not without its risks. In this review, we discuss steps that could enhance the safety of laparoscopic surgery. Some of the important safety considerations are ruling out pregnancy in women of the childbearing age group; advanced discussion with the patient regarding unexpected intraoperative situations, and ensuring appropriate equipment is available. Important perioperative safety considerations include thromboprophylaxis; antibiotic prophylaxis; patient allergies; proper positioning of the patient, stack, and monitor(s); patient appropriate pneumoperitoneum; ergonomic port placement; use of lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure; use of additional five-millimetre (mm) ports as needed; safe use of energy devices and laparoscopic staplers; low threshold for a second opinion; backing out if unsafe to proceed; avoiding hand-over in the middle of the procedure; ensuring all planned procedures have been performed; inclusion of laparoscopic retrieval bags and specimens in the operating count; avoiding 10-15 mm ports for placement of drains; appropriate port closures; and use of long-acting local anaesthetic agents for analgesia. Important postoperative considerations include adequate analgesia; early ambulation; careful attention to early warning scores; and appropriate discharge advice.

Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study

Laparoscopic surgery provides well-known benefits, but it has technological limitations. Depth perception is particularly crucial, with three-dimensional (3D) imaging being superior to two-dimensional (2D) HD imaging. However, with the introduction of 4K resolution monitors, 2D rendering is capable of providing higher-quality visuals. Therefore, this study aimed to compare 3D HD and 2D 4K imaging using a pelvitrainer model. Eight experts and 32 medical students were performing the same four standardized tasks using 2D 4K and 3D HD imaging systems. Task completion time and the number of errors made were recorded. The Wilcoxon test and mixed-effects models were used to analyze the results. Students were significantly faster in all four tasks when using the 3D HD perspective. The median difference ranged from 18 s in task 3 (P < 0.003) up to 177.5 s in task 4 (P < 0.001). With the exception of task 4, students demonstrated significantly fewer errors in all tasks involving 3D HD imaging. The experts’ results confirmed these findings, as they were also faster in all four tasks using 3D HD, which was significant for task 1 (P < 0.001) and task 4 (P < 0.006). The expert group also achieved better movement accuracy using the 3D HD system, with fewer mistakes made in all four tasks, which was significant in task 4 (P < 0.001). Participants in both groups achieved better results with the 3D HD imaging system than with the 2D 4K system. The 3D HD image system should be used when available. Trial registration: this trial is registered at research registry under the identifier researchregistry6852.