1
|
van Lieshout AS, Smits LJH, Sijmons JML, van Dieren S, van Oostendorp SE, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Short-term outcomes after primary total mesorectal excision (TME) versus local excision followed by completion TME for early rectal cancer: population-based propensity-matched study. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae103. [PMID: 39235090 PMCID: PMC11375580 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening programmes have led to a shift towards early-stage colorectal cancer, which, in selected cases, can be treated using local excision. However, local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision (two-stage approach) may be associated with less favourable outcomes than primary total mesorectal excision (one-stage approach). The aim of this population study was to determine the distribution of treatment strategies for early rectal cancer in the Netherlands and to compare the short-term outcomes of primary total mesorectal excision with those of local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision. METHODS Short-term data for patients with cT1-2 N0xM0 rectal cancer who underwent local excision only, primary total mesorectal excision, or local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision between 2012 and 2020 in the Netherlands were collected from the Dutch Colorectal Audit. Patients were categorized according to treatment groups and logistic regressions were performed after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the end-ostomy rate. RESULTS From 2015 to 2020, the proportion for the two-stage approach increased from 22.3% to 43.9%. After matching, 1062 patients were included. The end-ostomy rate was 16.8% for the primary total mesorectal excision group versus 29.6% for the local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision group (P < 0.001). The primary total mesorectal excision group had a higher re-intervention rate than the local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision group (16.7% versus 11.8%; P = 0.048). No differences were observed with regard to complications, conversion, diverting ostomies, radical resections, readmissions, and death. CONCLUSION This study shows that, over time, cT1-2 rectal cancer has increasingly been treated using the two-stage approach. However, local excision followed by completion total mesorectal excision seems to be associated with an elevated end-ostomy rate. It is important that clinicians and patients are aware of this risk during shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel S van Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne J H Smits
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie M L Sijmons
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith HG, Schlesinger NH, Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A. Current treatment of pT1 rectal cancers in Denmark: A retrospective national cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1175-1183. [PMID: 38807258 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
AIM Organ preservation strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly common. In appropriately selected patients, local excision (LE) of pT1 cancers can reduce morbidity without compromising cancer-related outcomes. However, determining the need for completion surgery after LE can be challenging, and it is unknown if prior LE compromises subsequent total mesorectal excision (TME). The aim of this study is to describe the current management of patients with pT1 rectal cancers. METHOD This is a retrospective national cohort study of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, including patients with newly diagnosed pT1 cancers between 2016 and 2020. Patients were stratified according to treatment into LE alone, completion TME after LE or upfront TME. The treatment and outcomes of these groups were compared. RESULTS A total of 1056 patients were included. Initial LE was performed in 715 patients (67.7%), of whom 194 underwent completion TME (27.1%). The remaining 341 patients underwent upfront TME (32.3%). Patients undergoing LE alone were more likely to be male with low rectal cancers and greater comorbidity. No differences in specimen quality or perioperative outcomes were noted between patients undergoing completion or upfront TME. Eighty-five patients (15.9%) had lymph node metastases (LNM). Pathological risk factors poorly discriminated between patients with and without LNM, with similar rates seen in patients with zero (14.1%), one (12.0%) or two (14.4%) risk factors. CONCLUSION LE is a key component of the treatment of pT1 rectal cancer and does not appear to affect the outcomes of completion TME. Patient selection for completion TME remains a major challenge, with current stratification methods appearing to be inadequate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Smith
- Abdominalcenter K, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nis H Schlesinger
- Abdominalcenter K, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter-Martin Krarup
- Abdominalcenter K, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li J, Wen L, Ma Y, Zhang G, Wang P, Huang C, Yao X. Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database. Updates Surg 2024; 76:975-988. [PMID: 38704811 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Age significantly affects the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after radical excision (RE), and local excision (LE) is an alternative surgical procedure to RE. To compare the survival prognosis in different age groups of LE versus RE for rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by LE or RE from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the SEER database. The primary outcomes are 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 11,170 patients were eventually included, and there were 490 patients in LE and RE groups, respectively, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The 5-year OS and CSS after LE were significantly better in < 50 years and 50-66 years groups than in > 66 years group (5-year OS: 95.70% vs 88.40% vs 67.00%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 95.70% vs 96.30% vs 82.60%, P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found for the differences in 5-year OS and CSS between LE and RE in < 50, 50-66, and > 66 years group (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age > 66 years, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated (Grade III/IV), and tumor size 3 to 5 cm was independent risk factors for 5-year OS after LE; age > 66 years, perineural invasion, and tumor size 3 to 5 cm were the 5-year CSS independent risk factors for after LE. We found that the survival prognosis of younger rectal cancer patients treated with LE was significantly better than older (> 66 years) patients, and the survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients in the three age groups was similar between LE and RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghui Li
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Liang Wen
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yongli Ma
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guosheng Zhang
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Chengzhi Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Xueqing Yao
- Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
- Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dang H, Verhoeven DA, Boonstra JJ, van Leerdam ME. Management after non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101895. [PMID: 38522888 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Since the introduction of population-based screening, increasing numbers of T1 rectal cancers are detected and removed by local endoscopic resection. Patients can be cured with endoscopic resection alone, but there is a possibility of residual tumor cells remaining after the initial resection. These can be located intraluminally at the resection site or extraluminally in the form of (lymph node) metastases. To decrease the risk of residual cells progressing towards more advanced disease, additional treatment is usually needed. However, with the currently available risk stratification models, it remains challenging to determine who should and should not be further treated after non-curative endoscopic resection. In this review, the different management strategies for patients with non-curatively treated T1 rectal cancers are discussed, along with the available evidence for each strategy and relevant considerations for clinical decision making. Furthermore, we provide practical guidance on the management and surveillance following non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan A Verhoeven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kimura CMS, Kawaguti FS, Horvat N, Nahas CSR, Marques CFS, Pinto RA, de Rezende DT, Segatelli V, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Junior UR, Maluf-Filho F, Nahas SC. Magnifying chromoendoscopy is a reliable method in the selection of rectal neoplasms for local excision. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1047-1056. [PMID: 36906661 PMCID: PMC11181310 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02773-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adequate staging of early rectal neoplasms is essential for organ-preserving treatments, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) frequently overestimates the stage of those lesions. We aimed to compare the ability of magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI to select patients with early rectal neoplasms for local excision. METHODS This retrospective study in a tertiary Western cancer center included consecutive patients evaluated by magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI who underwent en bloc resection of nonpedunculated sessile polyps larger than 20 mm, laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) [Formula: see text] 20 mm, or depressed-type lesions of any size (Paris 0-IIc). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of magnifying chromoendoscopy and MRI to determine which lesions were amenable to local excision (i.e., [Formula: see text] T1sm1) were calculated. RESULTS Specificity of magnifying chromoendoscopy was 97.3% (95% CI 92.2-99.4), and accuracy was 92.7% (95% CI 86.7-96.6) for predicting invasion deeper than T1sm1 (not amenable to local excision). MRI had lower specificity (60.5%, 95% CI 43.4-76.0) and lower accuracy (58.3%, 95% CI 43.2-72.4). Magnifying chromoendoscopy incorrectly predicted invasion depth in 10.7% of the cases in which the MRI was correct, while magnifying chromoendoscopy provided a correct diagnosis in 90% of the cases in which the MRI was incorrect (p = 0.001). Overstaging occurred in 33.3% of the cases in which magnifying chromoendoscopy was incorrect and 75% of the cases in which MRI was incorrect. CONCLUSION Magnifying chromoendoscopy is reliable for predicting invasion depth in early rectal neoplasms and selecting patients for local excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M S Kimura
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - F S Kawaguti
- Division of Endoscopy, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 251, 2nd Floor, São Paulo, Zip Code 01246-000, Brazil.
| | - N Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C S R Nahas
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - C F S Marques
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R A Pinto
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - D T de Rezende
- Division of Endoscopy, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 251, 2nd Floor, São Paulo, Zip Code 01246-000, Brazil
| | - V Segatelli
- Division of Pathology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A V Safatle-Ribeiro
- Division of Endoscopy, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 251, 2nd Floor, São Paulo, Zip Code 01246-000, Brazil
| | - U R Junior
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - F Maluf-Filho
- Division of Endoscopy, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 251, 2nd Floor, São Paulo, Zip Code 01246-000, Brazil
| | - S C Nahas
- Divisoin of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dekkers N, Dang H, Vork K, Langers AMJ, van der Kraan J, Westerterp M, Peeters KCMJ, Holman FA, Koch AD, de Graaf W, Didden P, Moons LMG, Doornebosch PG, Hardwick JCH, Boonstra JJ. Outcome of Completion Surgery after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4490. [PMID: 37760458 PMCID: PMC10526268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
T1 colorectal cancers (T1CRC) are increasingly being treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). After ESD of a T1CRC, completion surgery is indicated in a subgroup of patients. Currently, the influence of ESD on surgical morbidity and mortality is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare 90-day morbidity and mortality of completion surgery after ESD to primary surgery. The completion surgery group consisted of suspected T1CRC patients from a multicenter prospective ESD database (2014-2020). The primary surgery group consisted of pT1CRC patients from a nationwide surgical registry (2017-2019). Patients with rectal or sigmoidal cancers were selected. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Propensity score adjustment was used to correct for confounders. In total, 411 patients were included: 54 in the completion surgery group (39 pT1, 15 pT2) and 357 in the primary surgery group with pT1CRC. Adverse event rate was 24.1% after completion surgery and 21.3% after primary surgery. After completion surgery 90-day mortality did not occur, though one patient died in the primary surgery group. After propensity score adjustment, lymph node yield did not differ significantly between the groups. Among other morbidity-related outcomes, stoma rate (OR 1.298 95%-CI 0.587-2.872, p = 0.519) and adverse event rate (OR 1.162; 95%-CI 0.570-2.370, p = 0.679) also did not differ significantly. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients undergoing rectal surgery. In this subgroup (37 completion and 136 primary surgery), these morbidity outcomes also did not differ significantly. In conclusion, this study suggests that ESD does not compromise morbidity or 90-day mortality of completion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Dekkers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Katinka Vork
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Alexandra M. J. Langers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Jolein van der Kraan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Marinke Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fabian A. Holman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D. Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilmar de Graaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal G. Doornebosch
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, 2906 ZC Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - James C. H. Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (J.J.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burghgraef TA, Rutgers ML, Leijtens JWA, Tuyman JB, Consten ECJ, Hompes R. Completion Total Mesorectal Excision: A Case-Matched Comparison With Primary Resection. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e327. [PMID: 37746593 PMCID: PMC10513327 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative and oncological results of completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) versus primary total mesorectal excision (pTME). Background Early-stage rectal cancer can be treated by local excision alone, which is associated with less surgical morbidity and improved functional outcomes compared with radical surgery. When high-risk histological features are present, cTME is indicated, with possible worse clinical and oncological outcomes compared to pTME. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all patients that underwent TME surgery for rectal cancer performed in 11 centers in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2017. After case-matching, we compared cTME with pTME. The primary outcome was major postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included the rate of restorative procedures and 3-year oncological outcomes. Results In total 1069 patients were included, of which 35 underwent cTME. After matching (1:2 ratio), 29 cTME and 58 pTME were analyzed. No differences were found for major morbidity (27.6% vs 19.0%; P = 0.28) and abdominoperineal excision rate (31.0% vs 32.8%; P = 0.85) between cTME and pTME, respectively. Local recurrence (3.4% vs 8.6%; P = 0.43), systemic recurrence (3.4% vs 12.1%; P = 0.25), overall survival (93.1% vs 94.8%; P = 0.71), and disease-free survival (89.7% vs 81.0%; P = 0.43) were comparable between cTME and pTME. Conclusions cTME is not associated with higher major morbidity, whereas the abdominoperineal excision rate and 3-year oncological outcomes are similar compared to pTME. Local excision as a diagnostic tool followed by completion surgery for early rectal cancer does not compromise outcomes and should still be considered as the treatment of early-stage rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs A. Burghgraef
- From the Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke L. Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jurriaan B. Tuyman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C. J. Consten
- From the Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bao QR, Ferrari S, Capelli G, Ruffolo C, Scarpa M, Agnes A, Chiloiro G, Palazzari E, Urso EDL, Pucciarelli S, Spolverato G. Rectal Sparing Approaches after Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Local Excision and Watch and Wait. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020465. [PMID: 36672414 PMCID: PMC9856629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Local Excision (LE) or Watch and Wait (WW) for patients with complete clinical response or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) were proposed to avoid morbidity and impairment of quality of life after rectal resection. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature, and to compare rectal-sparing approaches, in terms of rectum-preservation rate, local control, and distant recurrences. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of studies published until July 2022 (PROSPERO, registration CRD42022341480), and the quality of evidence was assessed using a GRADE approach. Seven retrospective studies and one prospective trial were included. In six studies, patients were treated with standard long-course nCRT, and in two with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT). Overall, there were 213 and 188 patients in WW and LE group, respectively, and no difference was found between WW and LE when considering rectum-preservation rate (OR 0.80 95%CI 0.31-2.01, p = 0.63), local disease (OR 1.60 95%CI 0.75-3.42, p = 0.22), locoregional failure (OR 0.85 95%CI 0.20-3.66, p = 0.83) and distant recurrence (OR 0.76 95%CI 0.37-1.55, p = 0.45). Studies directly comparing WW and LE are still lacking, even though no differences between WW and LE in terms of rectum-preservation, local control, and distant recurrences have been found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quoc Riccardo Bao
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Stefania Ferrari
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Capelli
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, ASST Bergamo Est, 24068 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Cesare Ruffolo
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Scarpa
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Amedea Agnes
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli—IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO)—IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Damiano Luca Urso
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- General Surgery 3, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
MRI-based radiomics to predict neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicenter study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:175-182. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
10
|
Zhang M, Zhang Y, Jing H, Zhao L, Xu M, Xu H, Zhu S, Zhang X. Prognosis of Patients Over 60 Years Old With Early Rectal Cancer Undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery – A Single-Center Experience. Front Oncol 2022; 12:888739. [PMID: 35774121 PMCID: PMC9239430 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AimTransanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is widely performed in early rectal cancer. This technique offers greater organ preservation and decreases the risk of subsequent surgery. However, postoperative local recurrence and distant metastasis remain challenges for patients with high-risk pathological factors. This single-center study reports the prognosis of early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old after TEM.MethodsThe data of the patients over 60 years old who underwent local anal resection were collected retrospectively. Moreover, the 5-year follow-up data were analyzed to determine the 5-year DFS and OS.Results47 early rectal cancer patients over 60 years old underwent TEM. There were 27 patients with high-risk factors and 20 patients without high-risk factors. Two patients underwent radical surgery after TEM and ten patients received adjuvant treatment. Local recurrence occurred in 7 patients, of which 4 underwent salvage surgery. The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 75.6%, which was lower in the high-risk patients group (69.6%) than in the non-high-risk patients group (83.3%) (P>0.05). The 5-year OS was 90.2%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (high-risk patients 87.0%, non-high-risk patients 94.4%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between people over and under 70 years old.ConclusionSome high-risk factor patients over 60 years old do not have inferior 5-year DFS and OS to the non-high-risk patients. TEM is an option for old patients with high surgical risks. Even if postoperative pathology revealed high-risk factors, timely surgical treatment after local recurrence would be beneficial to improve the 5-year DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingqing Zhang
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
- The Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center of Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongdan Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
| | - Haoren Jing
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
| | - Lizhong Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
| | - Mingyue Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
| | - Siwei Zhu
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
- The Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center of Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Siwei Zhu, ; Xipeng Zhang,
| | - Xipeng Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Office, Tianjin Institute of Coloproctology, Tianjin, China
- The Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center of Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Siwei Zhu, ; Xipeng Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wyatt JNR, Powell SG, Altaf K, Barrow HE, Alfred JS, Ahmed S. Completion Total Mesorectal Excision After Transanal Local Excision of Early Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:628-640. [PMID: 35143429 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Completion total mesorectal excision is recommended when local excision of early rectal cancers demonstrates high-risk histopathological features. Concerns regarding the quality of completion resections and the impact on oncological safety remain unanswered. OBJECTIVE This study aims to summarize and analyze the outcomes associated with completion surgery and undertake a comparative analysis with primary rectal resections. DATA SOURCES Data sources included PubMed, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases up to April 2021. STUDY SELECTION All studies reporting any outcome of completion surgery after transanal local excision of an early rectal cancer were selected. Case reports, studies of benign lesions, and studies using flexible endoscopic techniques were not included. INTERVENTION The intervention was completion total mesorectal excision after transanal local excision of early rectal cancers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures included histopathological and long-term oncological outcomes of completion total mesorectal excision. Secondary outcome measures included short-term perioperative outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-three studies including 646 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 8 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Patients undergoing completion surgery have longer operative times (standardized mean difference, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; p = 0.0002) and higher intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.01-0.5; p = 0.04) compared with primary resections, but perioperative morbidity is comparable (risk ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98-1.62; p = 0.08). Completion surgery is associated with higher rates of incomplete mesorectal specimens (risk ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.41-6.62; p = 0.005) and lower lymph node yields (standardized mean difference, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.47 to 0.06; p = 0.01). Comparative analysis on long-term outcomes is limited, but no evidence of inferior recurrence or survival rates is found. LIMITATIONS Only small retrospective cohort and case-control studies are published on this topic, with considerable heterogeneity limiting the effectiveness of meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS This review provides the strongest evidence to date that completion surgery is associated with an inferior histopathological grade of the mesorectum and finds insufficient long-term results to satisfy concerns regarding oncological safety. International collaborative research is required to demonstrate noninferiority. REGISTRATION NO CRD42021245101.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James N R Wyatt
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Simon G Powell
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Kiran Altaf
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah E Barrow
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua S Alfred
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Shakil Ahmed
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smits LJH, van Lieshout AS, Grüter AAJ, Horsthuis K, Tuynman JB. Multidisciplinary management of early rectal cancer - The role of surgical local excision in current and future clinical practice. Surg Oncol 2021; 40:101687. [PMID: 34875460 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of bowel cancer screening programs has led to a rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer. The combination of increased incidence and the growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options has led to an amplified importance of local excision techniques in treatment strategies for early rectal cancer. In addition, developments in new technologies of single-port surgery have popularized surgical techniques. Although local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary and awareness of the oncological robustness is warranted to enable shared decision-making. This review illustrates the position of surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and reflects on its role in current and future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne J H Smits
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Annabel S van Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Serra-Aracil X, Montes N, Mora-Lopez L, Serracant A, Pericay C, Rebasa P, Navarro-Soto S. Preoperative Diagnostic Uncertainty in T2-T3 Rectal Adenomas and T1-T2 Adenocarcinomas and a Therapeutic Dilemma: Transanal Endoscopic Surgery, or Total Mesorectal Excision? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153685. [PMID: 34359589 PMCID: PMC8345169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endorectal ultrasound and rectal magnetic resonance are sometimes unable to differentiate between stages T2 and T3 in rectal adenomas that are possible adenocarcinomas, or between stages T1 and T2 in rectal adenocarcinomas. These cases of diagnostic uncertainty raise a therapeutic dilemma: transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) or total mesorectal excision (TME)? METHODS An observational study of a cohort of 803 patients who underwent TES from 2004 to 2021. Patients operated on for adenoma (group I) and low-grade T1 adenocarcinoma (group II) were included. The variables related to uncertain diagnosis, and to the definitive pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma stage higher than T1, were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 638 patients were included. Group I comprised 529 patients, 113 (21.4%) with uncertain diagnosis. Seventeen (15%) eventually had a pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma higher than T1. However, the variable diagnostic uncertainty was a risk factor for adenocarcinoma above T1 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7). Group II included 109 patients, eight with uncertain diagnosis (7.3%). Two patients presented a definitive pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma above T1. CONCLUSIONS On the strength of these data, we recommend TES as the initial indication in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Multicenter studies with larger samples for both groups should now be performed to further assess this strategy of initiating treatment with TES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Serra-Aracil
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Noemi Montes
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
| | - Laura Mora-Lopez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
| | - Anna Serracant
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
| | - Carles Pericay
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain;
| | - Pere Rebasa
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
| | - Salvador Navarro-Soto
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Ap. Digestivo, Departament de Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Tauli I3PT, Parc Tauli Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (N.M.); (L.M.-L.); (A.S.); (P.R.); (S.N.-S.)
| |
Collapse
|