Long-term outcomes and quality of life assessment after posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR)

Component separation repair of incisional hernia: evolution of practice and review of long-term outcomes in a single center

PURPOSE

To review the long-term outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction using anterior and posterior component separation (CS) techniques in our center.

METHODS

This was a descriptive analytical study. Analysis of data from a prospectively collected database of patients who had undergone Component Separation (CS) repair of incisional hernias was performed. Two techniques were used. Anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (PCS/TAR). Follow-up was clinical review at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months with direct access telephone review thereafter. Long-term outcome data was obtained from electronic records and based on either clinical or CT assessment. Minimum physical follow-up was 6 months for all patients.

RESULTS

89 patients with large incisional hernias underwent CS repair. 29 patients had ACS while 60 underwent PCS/TAR. Mean follow-up was 60 months (range 6-140 months) in the ACS group and 20 months (range 6-72 months) in the PCS group. Twenty-five patients (28%) had simultaneous major procedures including 21 intestinal anastomoses. Twenty-six (29%) of patients had associated stomas. Twenty-seven (30.3%) of the patients had undergone previous hernia repairs. Seromas occurred in 24 (26.97%) patients. Wound infections were more common after ACS. There have been 10 (11.2%) recurrences to date.

CONCLUSION

Component separation repair techniques result in good long-term outcomes with acceptable complication rates. They can be performed simultaneously with gastrointestinal procedures with low morbidity. Appropriate patient selection and use of appropriate mesh are important.

Comparative Analysis of Ventral Hernia Repair and Transverse Abdominis Release With and Without Panniculectomy: A 4-Year Match-Pair Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Amid rising obesity, concurrent ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy procedures are increasing. Long-term outcomes of transverse abdominis release (TAR) combined with panniculectomy remain understudied. This study compares clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TAR, with or without panniculectomy.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review from 2016 to 2022 evaluated patients undergoing TAR with and without panniculectomy. Propensity-scored matching was based on age, body mass index, ASA, and ventral hernia working group. Patients with parastomal hernias were excluded. Patient/operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and QoL were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were identified (25 per group) with a median follow-up of 48.8 months (interquartile range, 43-69.7 months). The median age and body mass index were 57 years (47-64 years) and 31.8 kg/m2 (28-36 kg/m2), respectively. The average hernia defect size was 354.5 cm2 ± 188.5 cm2. There were no significant differences in hernia recurrence, emergency visits, readmissions, or reoperations between groups. However, ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy demonstrated a significant increase in delayed healing (44% vs 4%, P < 0.05) and seromas (24% vs 4%, P < 0.05). Postoperative QoL improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.005) across multiple domains, which continued throughout the 4-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in QoL among ventral hernia working group, wound class, surgical site occurrences, or surgical site occurrences requiring intervention (P > 0.05). Patients with concurrent panniculectomy demonstrated a significantly greater percentage change in overall scores and appearance scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy can be performed safely with low recurrence and complication rates at long-term follow-up. Despite increased short-term postoperative complications, patients have a significantly greater improvement in disease specific QoL.

A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.

Short-Term Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Assessment Following Rives-Stoppa and Transversus Abdominis Release Procedures of Open Ventral Hernia Repair

INTRODUCTION

Ventral hernia is one of the common surgical conditions that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life (QoL). Open ventral hernia repair using the Rives-Stoppa (RS) and Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) procedures has gained recognition for its effectiveness in achieving hernia repair and reducing the risk of further recurrence. However, limited research has been performed to explore the short-term outcomes and QoL assessment following these two surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to know the result after RS and TAR methods of hernia repair in terms of short-term recurrences, pain, postoperative complications, and QoL.

METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional study, which included 30 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The study group was subjected to posterior component separation (PCS)-TAR and RS repair as per surgical indication (RS if defect size 4-10cm; PCS-TAR if defect size >10cm and

RESULTS

Not a single recurrence was observed till POD 180 in either of the repair methods. The mean operative time for RS repair was 170.47 ± 15.08 minutes while for TAR repair was 188.8 ± 22.04 (p-value= 0.013). Surgical site infection (SSI) was reported in 14.28% of RS repair cases and 11.11% of TAR repair cases. Seroma formation was observed in 9.5% of RS repair cases. RS repair has less mean CCS score than TAR. The one-way ANOVA showed f-ratio=421.43 and p-value=0.00001 for RS repair while f-ratio= 298.05 and p-value=0 .00001 for TAR repair at POD seven, POD 30, and POD 90. Both RS and TAR repair markedly reduced mean scores in all three domains on POD 90.

CONCLUSION

Both RS and TAR had no recurrence in a short period of six months. The intraoperative time taken in TAR was less than in earlier studies. QoL improved postoperatively in both the repairs with RS repair having better QoL than TAR repair.

Collapse

Key Words

• carolina comfort scale
• quality of life
• recurrence
• rives-stoppa
• tar
• ventral hernia

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Rajiv Kumar General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Prem Prakash General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Seema R Sinha Biochemistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Nadeem Ahmad General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND
Kanchan S Baitha General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND

Collapse

Morphological alterations of the abdominal wall after open incisional hernia repair with endoscopic anterior and open posterior component separation

PURPOSE

Effects of component separation (CS) on abdominal wall morphology have only been investigated in smaller case series or cadavers. This study aimed to compare abdominal wall alterations following endoscopic anterior CS (EACS) or open transverse abdominis release (TAR).

METHODS

Computed tomography scans were evaluated in patients who had undergone open incisional hernia repair with EACS or TAR. Abdominal wall circumference, lateral abdominal wall muscle thickness, and displacement were compared with (1) preoperative images after bilateral CS and (2) the undivided side postoperatively after unilateral CS.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included. Fifty-five (52%) and 15 (14%) underwent bilateral and unilateral EACS, respectively. Five (5%) and 14 (13%) underwent bilateral and unilateral TAR, respectively. Sixteen (15%) underwent unilateral EACS and contralateral TAR. The external oblique and transverse abdominis muscles were significantly laterally displaced with a mean of 2.74 cm (95% CI 2.29-3.19 cm, P < 0.001) and 0.82 cm (0.07-1.57 cm, P = 0.032) after EACS and TAR, respectively. The combined thickness of the lateral muscles was significantly decreased after EACS (mean decrease 10.5% (5.8-15.6%, P < 0.001)) and insignificantly decreased after TAR (mean decrease 2.6% (- 4.8 to 9.5%, P = 0.50)). The abdominal wall circumference was unchanged after bilateral (mean reduction 0.90 cm (- 0.77 to 2.58 cm), P = 0.29) and unilateral CS (mean increase 0.03 cm (- 1.01 to 1.08 cm), P = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative changes in the lateral abdominal wall musculature were different following EACS and open TAR. Either technique seems not to compromise the overall integrity of the lateral abdominal wall.

Assessing Textbook Outcome After Implementation of Transversus Abdominis Release in a Regional Hospital

Background: The posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis release (TAR) was introduced in 2012 as an alternative to the classic anterior component separation technique (Ramirez). This study describes outcome and learning curve of TAR, five years after implementation of this new technique in a regional hospital in the Netherlands. Methods: A standardized work up protocol, based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was used to implement the TAR. The TAR technique as described by Novitsky was performed. After each 20 procedures, outcome parameters were evaluated and new quality measurements implemented. Primary outcome measure was Textbook Outcome, the rate of patients with an uneventful clinical postoperative course after TAR. Textbook Outcome is defined by a maximum of 7 days hospitalization without any complication (wound or systemic), reoperation or readmittance, within the first 90 postoperative days, and without a recurrence during follow up. The number of patients with a Textbook Outcome compared to the total number of consecutively performed TARs is depicted as the institutional learning curve. Secondary outcome measures were the details and incidences of the surgical site and systemic complications within 90 days, as well as long-term recurrences. Results: From 2016, sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent a TAR. Textbook Outcome was 35% and the institutional learning curve did not flatten after 69 procedures. Systemic complications occurred in 48%, wound complications in 41%, and recurrences in 4%. Separate analyses of three successive cohorts of each 20 TARs demonstrated that both Textbook Outcome (10%, 30% and 55%, respectively) and the rate of surgical site events (45%, 15%, and 10%) significantly (p < 0.05) improved with more experience. Conclusion: Implementation of the open transversus abdominis release demonstrated that outcome was positively correlated to an increasing number of TARs performed. TAR has a long learning curve, only partially determined by the technical aspects of the operation. Implementation of the TAR requires a solid plan. Building, and maintaining, an adequate setting for patients with complex ventral hernias is the real challenge and driving force to improve outcome.

How-I-do-it: minimally invasive repair of ileal conduit parastomal hernias

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion is an underestimated and undertreated condition with significant impact on quality of life. However, its surgical treatment is challenging and prone to complications and the optimal surgical treatment of this condition remains to be determined.

METHODS

In this article, we describe our surgical techniques in the minimally invasive treatment of ileal conduit parastomal hernia and present our preliminary results. In a retrospective single-center design, a prospectively maintained database was screened. Data from all patients undergoing surgical treatment for a parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion in our center were collected.

RESULTS

Between May 2016 and June 2020, 15 patients underwent minimally invasive repair of a parastomal hernia of an ileal conduit. Details on the surgical approach are provided, along with a flow chart to standardize the choice of surgical technique, depending on the presence of a concomitant midline incisional hernia and perioperative findings. The majority of patients were treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (10/15; 66.7%). Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. One-third of patients developed a postoperative urinary infection. Median follow-up was 366 days. One patient developed a local recurrence of her parastomal hernia on day 66 postoperatively, treated with intraperitoneal mesh.

CONCLUSION

The minimally invasive surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion poses specific perioperative challenges that require a broad surgical armamentarium and a tailored approach. Preliminary results confirm a significant morbidity after this type of surgery.

Does immunosuppression use increase perioperative wound morbidity in patients undergoing transversus abdominis release?

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis release is an effective procedure for complex ventral hernias. As wound complications contribute to hernia recurrences, mitigating risk factors is vitally important for hernia surgeons. Although immunosuppression can impair wound healing, it has inconsistently predicted wound occurrences, and its effect on wound morbidity after a transversus abdominis release is unknown.

METHODS

Patients undergoing either an elective open or robotic bilateral transversus abdominis release with permanent synthetic mesh were retrospectively stratified by perioperative immunosuppression and secondarily by procedure type (open versus robotic) and immunosuppression.

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were included for analysis. Overall, 63 (19.6%) patients were on chronic immunosuppression, with history of solid-organ transplant being the most common indication (43 patients). Patients stratified by perioperative immunosuppression were well-matched with similar defect size (P = .97), body mass index ≥30 (P = .32), diabetes (P = .09), history of surgical site infection (P = .53), surgical approach (P = .53), and tobacco use history (P = .33). No differences between cohorts were elicited for any wound event when stratified by immunosuppression use. Similarly, no differences were elicited when cohorts were further stratified also by procedure type.

CONCLUSION

Chronic immunosuppression is often viewed as a notable risk factor for wound occurrences after surgery. However, our data suggest immunosuppression may not significantly increase the risk of perioperative wound morbidity follow transversus abdominis release as previously predicted.

Longitudinal Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Transversus Abdominis Release for Complex Hernia Repair With a Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) enables medial myofascial flap advancement in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Here, we add to a growing body of literature on TAR by assessing longitudinal clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after complex ventral hernia repair (VHR) with TAR.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing VHR with TAR between 10/15/2015 and 1/15/2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients with parastomal hernias and <12 months of follow-up were excluded. Clinical outcomes and PROs were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included with a median age and body mass index of 60 and 30.8 kg/m², respectively. The average hernia defect was 384 cm² [IQR 205-471], and all patients had retromuscular mesh placed. The most common complications were delayed healing (19.6%) and seroma (14.3%). There were no cases of mesh infection or explantation. Previous hernia repair and concurrent panniculectomy were risk factors for developing complications (P < .05). One patient (1.8%) recurred at a median follow-up of 25.2 months [IQR 18.2-42.4]. Significant improvement in disease-specific PROs was maintained throughout the follow-up period (before to after P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Transversus abdominis release is a safe and efficacious technique to achieve fascial closure and retromuscular mesh in the repair of complex hernia defects.