Three-months duration of fully-covered metal stent for refractory dominant extra-hepatic biliary stricture among primary sclerosing cholangitis patients: efficacy and safety

History of the Interventional Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopy

With the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and linear endoscopic ultrasound, interventional pancreaticobiliary (PB) endoscopy has had an enormous impact in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases. Continuous efforts to improve various devices and techniques have revolutionized these treatment modalities as viable alternatives to surgery. In recent years, trends toward combining endoscopic techniques with other modalities, such as laparoscopic and radiological interventions, for complex PB diseases have emerged using a multidisciplinary approach. Ongoing research and clinical experience will lead to refinements in interventional PB endoscopic techniques and subsequently improve outcomes and reduce complication rates.

[Primary sclerosing cholangitis-Diagnosis and treatment 2024]

The etiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains unclear, which explains in part the lack of a causal treatment. The differential diagnostic distinction from the even rarer immunoglobulin 4 (IgG4)-associated cholangitis (IAC) is becoming increasingly more successful. Advances in the understanding of different clinical courses, improvements in noninvasive diagnostics through modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the introduction of liver elastography have led to the development of improved prognostic models. The evidence for recommendations on medicinal (e.g., ursodeoxycholic acid) or endoscopic treatment (e.g., balloon dilatation and/or stent insertion) for PSC is still low. In contrast, the long-term results of liver transplantation in PSC patients are constantly improving. Due to the lack of highly sensitive and specific screening methods the early recognition of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) as the most important complication is rarely successful. The continuous improvement of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and direct cholangioscopy in combination with molecular biological and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses of bile duct tissue samples are promising for refined diagnostics. Due to the significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer, an annual colonoscopy is recommended in the presence of inflammatory bowel disease. Improvement of the early diagnostics of PSC and successful testing of new treatment strategies raise hope for a continuous improvement in the medical support of these complex patients.

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Background and study aims  Dominant strictures (DS) occur in up to 60 % of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Data regarding the long-term effects of stenting vs. dilation remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare the two treatment modalities in terms of transplantation-free survival. Patients and methods  This single-center, retrospective study examined patients with PSC and DS treated endoscopically with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Patients were divided into two cohorts: 1) those who received dilation alone; and 2) those who received both dilation and stenting. The primary outcome was transplantation-free survival, defined as time after index ERCP to liver transplantation. Results  In all, 169 patients (54 in dilation cohort, 115 in stenting cohort) were included. The stenting cohort had a significantly higher Mayo PSC Risk Score (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2) and presented with cholangitis more frequently (22.6 % vs. 1.9 %). During a follow-up period of 1198 person-years, 69 (40.8 %) patients received transplantation at a mean of 3.4 (± 2.9) years. There was no difference in transplantation rate in the stenting cohort [68 (95 % CI 5.2-8.8) per 100 person-years] compared to the dilation cohort [3.7 (95 % CI 2.1-6.0) per 100 person-years] and no difference in risk for transplantation (dilation cohort adjusted hazards ratio 0.67, 95 % CI 0.33-1.32). Conclusions  Despite a higher Mayo Risk Score in the stenting group, there was no difference in transplantation-free survival between patients managed with stenting vs. dilation alone. Stenting, therefore, may offer benefit in patients with advanced PSC and DS.