1
|
Johnson G, Singh H, Helewa RM, Sibley KM, Reynolds KA, El-Kefraoui C, Doupe MB. Gastroenterologist and surgeon perceptions of recommendations for optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13157. [PMID: 38849393 PMCID: PMC11161634 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
National consensus recommendations have recently been developed to standardize colorectal tumour localization and documentation during colonoscopy. In this qualitative semi-structured interview study, we identified and contrast the perceived barriers and facilitators to using these new recommendations according to gastroenterologists and surgeons in a large central Canadian city. Interviews were analyzed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) through directed content analysis. Solutions were categorized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Eleven gastroenterologists and ten surgeons participated. Both specialty groups felt that the new recommendations were clearly written, adequately addressed current care practice tensions, and offered a relative advantage versus existing practices. The new recommendations appeared appropriately complex, applicable to most participants, and could be trialed and adapted prior to full implementation. Major barriers included a lack of relevant external or internal organizational incentives, non-existing formal feedback processes, and a lack of individual familiarity with the evidence behind some recommendations. With application of the ERIC framework, common barriers could be addressed through accessing new funding, altering incentive structures, changing record systems, educational interventions, identifying champions, promoting adaptability, and employing audit/feedback processes. Future research is needed to test strategies for feasibility and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
- Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, and CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Ramzi M Helewa
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Kathryn M Sibley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Kristin A Reynolds
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, AE101-820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada
| | - Malcolm B Doupe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holden JR, Johnson G, Hochman D, Hyun E, Helewa RM. Early Surveillance Endoscopy Should Be Performed Selectively After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Rectal Lesions. Cureus 2024; 16:e60554. [PMID: 38887330 PMCID: PMC11181246 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Local recurrence (LR) rates after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) are unclear, and the utility of early postoperative surveillance for low-risk lesions is unknown. This study aimed to define LR after TEM for benign polyps and invasive adenocarcinoma, describe risk factors for LR, and evaluate the utility of early surveillance endoscopy. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at two hospitals in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Adult patients who underwent TEM between 2009 and 2020 were evaluated for inclusion. The primary outcome was the rate of LR on surveillance endoscopy. Other outcomes included risk factors for LR and diagnostic yield of surveillance endoscopy. Results Among 357 patients who underwent TEM for benign polyps, LR was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.8-15.2) at three years. Positive margin was correlated with LR on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 8.01, 95% CI 2.78-23.08). TEM defect closure was associated with lower LR on multivariate analysis (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.59). Among 124 patients who underwent TEM for rectal adenocarcinoma, LR was 15.0% (95% CI 6.0-24.0) at three years. The first surveillance endoscopy had a 1.4% yield for low-risk patients (benign lesion, negative margins, and closed TEM defect) and 6.9% for all others. Conclusions LR at three years after TEM was 10.5% for benign polyps and 15.0% for adenocarcinomas. Early surveillance endoscopy can be considered low yield in some patients after TEM, which can be informative for shared decision-making regarding whether to proceed with early endoscopy in a low-risk subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Eric Hyun
- Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CAN
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson GGRJ, Vergis A, Singh H, Park J, Warriach A, Helewa RM. Recommendations for Optimal Endoscopic Localization of Colorectal Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus of National Experts. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1118-1131. [PMID: 36538707 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the standard of care for diagnosis and evaluation of colorectal cancers before surgery. However, varied practices and heterogenous documentation affects communication between endoscopists and operating surgeons, hampering surgical planning. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop recommendations for the use of standardized localization and reporting practices for colorectal lesions identified during lower GI endoscopy. DESIGN A systematic review of existing endoscopy guidelines and thorough narrative review of the overall endoscopy literature were performed to identify existing practices recommended globally. SETTING An online Delphi process was used to establish consensus recommendations based on a literature review. PATIENTS Colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists from across Canada who had previously demonstrated leadership in endoscopy, managed large endoscopy programs, produced high-impact publications in the field of endoscopy, or participated in the development of endoscopy guidelines were selected to participate. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were colorectal lesion localization and documentation practice recommendations important to planning surgical or advanced endoscopic excisions. RESULTS A total of 129 of 197 statements achieved consensus after 3 rounds of voting by 23 experts from across Canada. There was more than 90% participation in each round. Recommendations varied according to lesion location in the cecum, colon, or rectum and whether the referral was planned for surgical or advanced endoscopic resection. Recommendations were provided for appropriate documentation, indications, location, and method of tattoo placement, in addition to photograph and real-time 3-dimensional scope configuration device use. LIMITATIONS Because of a paucity of evidence, recommendations are based primarily on expert opinion. There may be bias, as all representatives were based in Canada. CONCLUSIONS Best practices to optimize endoscopic lesion localization and communication are not addressed in previous guidelines. This consensus involving national experts in colorectal surgery and gastroenterology provides a framework for efficient and effective colorectal lesion localization. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C71 . RECOMENDACIONES PARA LA LOCALIZACIN ENDOSCPICA PTIMA DE LAS NEOPLASIAS COLORRECTALES UN CONSENSO DELPHI DE EXPERTOS NACIONALES ANTECEDENTES:La colonoscopia es el estándar de atención para el diagnóstico y la evaluación de los cánceres colorrectales antes de la cirugía. Sin embargo, las prácticas variadas y la documentación heterogénea afectan la comunicación entre los endoscopistas y los cirujanos operadores, lo que dificulta la planificación quirúrgica.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo desarrollar recomendaciones para el uso de prácticas estandarizadas de localización y notificación de lesiones colorrectales identificadas en la endoscopia gastrointestinal inferior.DISEÑO:Se realizó una revisión sistemática de las pautas de endoscopia existentes y una revisión narrativa exhaustiva de la literatura general sobre endoscopia para identificar las prácticas existentes recomendadas a nivel mundial. Se utilizó un proceso Delphi en línea para establecer recomendaciones de consenso basadas en la revisión de la literatura.PARTICIPANTES:Se seleccionaron para participar cirujanos colorrectales y gastroenterólogos de todo Canadá que previamente habían demostrado liderazgo en endoscopia, manejado grandes programas de endoscopia, producido publicaciones de alto impacto en el campo de la endoscopia o que habían participado en el desarrollo de pautas de endoscopia.RESULTADOS:Localización de lesiones colorrectales y recomendaciones prácticas de documentación importantes para planificar escisiones quirúrgicas o endoscópicas avanzadas.RESULTADOS:129 de 197 declaraciones lograron consenso después de tres rondas de votación de 23 expertos de todo Canadá. Hubo >90% de participación en cada ronda. Las recomendaciones variaron según la ubicación de la lesión en el ciego, colon o recto, y si se planificó la derivación para resección quirúrgica o endoscópica avanzada. Se proporcionaron recomendaciones para la documentación adecuada, las indicaciones, la ubicación y el método de colocación del tatuaje, además de la fotografía y el uso del dispositivo de configuración del alcance 3D en tiempo real.LIMITACIONES:Debido a la escasez de evidencia, las recomendaciones se basan principalmente en la opinión de expertos. Puede haber sesgo, ya que los representantes tenían su sede en Canadá.CONCLUSIONES:Las mejores prácticas para optimizar la localización y comunicación de lesiones endoscópicas no se abordan en las guías anteriores. Este consenso que involucra a expertos nacionales en cirugía colorrectal y gastroenterología proporciona un marco para la localización eficiente y efectiva de lesiones colorrectales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C71 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett G R J Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Clinician Investigator Program, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ashley Vergis
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jason Park
- Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ahmed Warriach
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ramzi M Helewa
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
El-Kefraoui C, Johnson G, Singh H, Helewa RM. Optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms: a comparison of rural versus urban documentation practices. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:115. [PMID: 36978191 PMCID: PMC10052793 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-02987-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing colorectal neoplasms. However, colonoscopy is often repeated preoperatively due to non-standard documentation and inconsistent practices by index endoscopists. Repeat endoscopies result in treatment delays and can increase risks of complications. National consensus recommendations were recently developed for optimal endoscopic colorectal lesion localization. We aimed to assess baseline colonoscopy practice differences from the new recommendations with a focus on geographical variability in report quality between urban and rural referral sites. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal neoplasms at a single institution in Winnipeg between 2007-2020. We compared endoscopy report quality to the national recommendations with charts stratified by endoscopy location. Our primary outcomes were overall report documentation completeness and use of recommended practices. RESULTS One hundred ninety-four patients were included (97 rural, 97 urban). The mean overall compliance with the recommendations for urban endoscopies was marginally better compared to rural endoscopies (50% vs. 48%, p = 0.04). Sixty-eight percent of the reports complied with tattoo indications (72% urban; 63% rural, p = 0.16). On average, reports included 29% of recommended tattoo information (30% urban; 28% rural, p = 0.25) and demonstrated 74% appropriate tattoo technique (70% urban; 81% rural, p = 0.10). Twenty-one percent of reports included photographs of lesions in accordance with the national recommendations (28% urban; 13% rural, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopists frequently omit recommended practices for optimal colorectal lesion localization. Rural reports miss more recommended information compared to urban reports. Future research is needed to facilitate province-wide high-quality endoscopy reporting for patients regardless of endoscopy location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3023-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - Garrett Johnson
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3023-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
- Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Ramzi M Helewa
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3023-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen MZ, Devan Nair H, Saboo A, Lee SCL, Gu X, Auckloo SMA, Tamang S, Chen SJ, Lowe RW, Strugnell N. A single centre audit: repeat pre-operative colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2571-2576. [PMID: 35642258 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat colonoscopy may be required for tumour localisation. The aim of the study is to explore the clinical settings it was used and benchmark the quality of initial colonoscopy against standardized guidelines for tumour localisation, tattooing and colonoscopy reporting amongst clinicians. METHODS A retrospective study from 2016 to 2021 has been performed on patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resections at the Northern Hospital. Patient demographics, colonoscopic and operative details were retrieved from the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) Registry database and hospital medical records. PRIMARY OUTCOMES changes in operative approach and delays to operation. SECONDARY OUTCOMES reasons for a repeat colonoscopy and complications from repeat colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 339 patients were included in this study. 94 (28.6%) underwent a repeat colonoscopy. Re-scoping rate was 29.6% for surgeons, and 26.2% for non-operating endoscopists. Surgeons had a 5.9% localisation error rate, and non-operating endoscopist 6.95% (p = 0.673). Surgeons did not have a lower rate of repeat colonoscopy (p = 0.462). Repeat endoscopy was associated with a longer time to definitive operation (p < 0.001). No complications were associated with a repeat colonoscopy. CONCLUSION There was no difference in localisation error rates or repeat colonoscopy amongst surgeons (29.6%) and non-operating endoscopists (26.2%) (p = 0.462). This could be explained by the standardized endoscopy training in Australia governed by a common training board. Lack of tattooing at index colonoscopy and inadequate documentation often led to a repeat endoscopy, which was associated with a longer time to definitive operation. Standardized guidelines in tattooing of lesions and colonoscopy reporting should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Zhiyun Chen
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hareshdeva Devan Nair
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Apoorva Saboo
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon Chih Lin Lee
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Xinchen Gu
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sandeep Tamang
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sally Jiasi Chen
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ryan William Lowe
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Strugnell
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|