Laparoscopic-guided distal loco-regional anesthetic infiltration technique in TAPP inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review

INTRODUCTION

Throughout its history, there have been significant advances in pain control of inguinal hernia repairs. One of the most recent developments is locoregional pain blocks. There is a multitude of literature available on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks.

OBJECTIVES

This paper seeks to provide a thorough and systematic literature review on the role of TAP blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature using predetermined medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: "(TAP block)" AND "(Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair)".

RESULTS

A total of 166 publications were identified, from which 18 publications were included in the final review after eligibility criteria were applied.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies conclude that TAP blocks performed in the setting of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair improve post-operative pain and mobility, decrease opiate analgesic usage, and are superior in pain control compared to other modalities of regional anesthesia. Thus, to improve post-operative outcomes and patient satisfaction, TAP blocks should be heavily considered for routine use in surgical practice for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Opioid prescribing practices and patient-requested refill patterns following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

Excessive post-operative opioid prescribing has led to efforts to match prescriptions with patient need after surgery. We investigated opioid prescribing practices, rate of patient-requested opioid refills, and associated factors after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR).

METHODS

LIHRs at a single institution from 3/2019 to 3/2021 were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative for demographics, perioperative details, and patient-reported opioid usage. Opioid prescriptions at discharge and opioid refills were extracted from the medical record. Univariate and multivariable regression were used to identify factors associated with opioid refills within 30-days of surgery.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety LIHR patients were analyzed. The median number of opioid tablets prescribed was 12 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-15], and 4% requested a refill. On univariate analysis, patients who requested refills were younger [55 years (IQR 37-61) vs. 62 years (IQR 36.8-61), p = 0.012], more likely to have undergone transabdominal preperitoneal repair (75% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001), have a scrotal component (30% vs. 11%, p = 0.022), and have permanent tacks used (80% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.014). There was a 12% increase in the odds of opioid refill for every 1 tablet of oxycodone prescribed at discharge (95% CI for OR 1.04-1.21, p = 0.003) after controlling for age and surgery type. Patient-reported opioid use was available for 289 (59%) patients. Post-operatively, 67% of patients used ≤ 4 opioid tablets, and 87% used no more than 10 opioid tablets.

CONCLUSION

Most patients use fewer opioid tablets than prescribed. Requests for opioid refills are rare following LIHR (4%) and associated with higher opioid prescribing.

Regional block anesthesia for adult patients with inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common surgical technique performed under regional block anesthesia (RBA). Although previous clinical trials have explored the effectiveness and safety of RBA for IHR, no systematic review has investigated its effectiveness and safety in adult patients with IHR.

METHODS

This systematic review searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wangfang, and VIP) from their inception to July 1, 2022. We included all potential randomized controlled trials that focused on the effects and safety of RBA in adult patients with IHR. Outcomes included operative time, total rescue analgesics, numerical rating scale at 24 hours, occurrence rate of nausea and vomiting, and occurrence rate of urinary retention (ORUCR).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials, involving 347 patients with IHR, were included in this study. Meta-analysis results showed that no significant differences were identified on operative time (MD = -0.20; fixed 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.87, 3.47; P = .92; I² = 0%), total rescue analgesics (MD = -8.90; fixed 95% CI, -20.36, 2.56; P = .13; I² = 28%), and occurrence rate of nausea and vomiting (MD = 0.39; fixed 95% CI, 0.13, 1.16; P = .09; I² = 0%) between 2 types of anesthesias. However, significant differences were detected in the numerical rating scale at 24 hours (MD = -1.53; random 95% CI, -2.35, -0.71; P < .001; I² = 75%) and ORUCR (MD = 0.20; fixed 95% CI, 0.05, 0.80; P = .02; I² = 0%) between the 2 management groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated that IHR patients with RBA benefit more from post-surgery pain relief at 24h and a decrease in the ORUCR than those with CSA.