1
|
Capurso G, Rizzo GEM, Coluccio C, Crinò SF, Cucchetti A, Facciorusso A, Hassan C, Amato A, Auriemma F, Bertani H, Binda C, Cipolletta F, Forti E, Fugazza A, Lisotti A, Maida M, Sinagra E, Sbrancia M, Spadaccini M, Tacelli M, Vanella G, Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. The i-EUS consensus on the management of pancreatic fluid collections - Part 1. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00840-5. [PMID: 39048418 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), including pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), are common complications of pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery. Historically, the treatment of these conditions has relied on surgical and radiological approaches; however, it has later shifted toward an endoscopy-based approach. With the development of dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures have become the standard approach for PFC drainage. However, there is still limited consensus on several aspects of the multidisciplinary management of PFCs. The interventional endoscopy and ultrasound (i-EUS) group is an Italian network of clinicians and scientists with special interest in biliopancreatic interventional endoscopy, especially interventional EUS. This manuscript describes the first part of the results of a consensus conference organized by i-EUS with the aim of providing evidence-based guidance on aspects such as indications for treating PFCs, the timing of intervention, and different technical strategies for managing patients with PFCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatico/Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy; Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, ASST Lecco, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Helga Bertani
- Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Fabio Cipolletta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL NA1 Centro, Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology Unit, Umberto I Hospital - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology & Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhatia H, Vermani S, Gupta P, Farook S, Kumar A, Johnson J, Shah J, Singh A, Jearth V, Samanta J, Mandavdhare H, Sharma V, Sinha SK, Dutta U, Kocchar R. Impact of the Timing of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage following Endoscopic Drainage on Outcomes in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2024; 34:441-448. [PMID: 38912235 PMCID: PMC11188745 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The role of dual-modality drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) is established. However, there are no data on the association of clinical outcomes with the timing of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD). We investigated the impact of the timing of PCD following endoscopic drainage of WON on clinical outcomes in AP. Materials and Methods This retrospective study comprised consecutive patients with necrotizing AP who underwent endoscopic cystogastrostomy (CG) of WON followed by PCD between September 2018 and March 2023. Based on endoscopic CG to PCD interval, patients were divided into groups (≤ and >3 days, ≤ and >1 week, ≤ and >10 days, and ≤ and >2 weeks). Baseline characteristics and indications of CG and PCD were recorded. Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, including length of hospitalization, length of intensive care unit stay, need for surgical necrosectomy, and death during hospitalization. Results Thirty patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 35.5 ± 12.7 years) were evaluated. The mean CG to PCD interval was 11.2 ± 7.5 days. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and indications of CG and PCD between the groups. The mean pain to CG interval was not significantly different between the groups. Endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in a significantly greater proportion of patients undergoing CG after 10 days ( p = 0.003) and after 2 weeks ( p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in the complications and clinical outcomes between the groups. Conclusion The timing of PCD following endoscopic CG does not affect clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsimran Bhatia
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sanya Vermani
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pankaj Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shameema Farook
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Joseph Johnson
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anupam Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vaneet Jearth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Harshal Mandavdhare
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vishal Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Saroj K. Sinha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Usha Dutta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rakesh Kocchar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma Y, Ong F, Hew S, Swan M, Devonshire D, Croagh D. Repetitive endoscopic drainage as initial intervention is safe and effective for early treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:881-887. [PMID: 38174638 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While endoscopic step-up approach with delayed drainage (more than 28 days from diagnosis) was shown to produce the best outcomes in the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), we assessed our single centre experience of early versus delayed endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrotic collections. METHODS Patients who underwent endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrotic collections between 2011 and 2022 under Monash Health were identified. They were excluded if below 18 years old or their follow up data were missing. The included patients' medical records, pathology results, and imaging findings were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were included. 31.58% required percutaneous drainage and 15% received either endoscopic or surgical necrosectomy. The disease related mortality was 8.47% and the average length of stay (LOS) was 70.92 days. No significant difference was shown in disease-related mortality (10.5% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.697) or LOS (75.35 vs. 68.7, P = 0.644) between early and delayed drainage cohorts, but patients who received early drainage have higher qSOFA score on the day of drainage (2 vs. 0, P = 0.004). DISCUSSION Repetitive endoscopic drainage with selective percutaneous drainage is effective in the management of pancreatic necrotic collections. Early drainage should be considered in patients who developed severe sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ma
- Department of Upper GI and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Felicia Ong
- Department of Upper GI and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Hew
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Swan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Devonshire
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Croagh
- Department of Upper GI and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bharath PN, Rana SS. Early Endoscopic Interventions for Pancreatic Necrosis: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:1571-1582. [PMID: 38528209 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08347-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic transmural drainage is usually performed for symptomatic well-encapsulated walled-off necrosis (WON) that usually develops in the delayed phase (> 4 weeks after disease onset) of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Endoscopic drainage is usually not advocated in the early (< 4 weeks after disease onset) stage of illness because of the risk of complications due to an incompletely formed encapsulating wall and poor demarcation of viable from necrotic tissue. However, emerging data from expert tertiary care centres over the last few years shows that the early endoscopic transluminal drainage approach is effective and safe. The development of lumen-apposing metal stents and better accessories for endoscopic necrosectomy has fuelled the expansion of indications of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis. However, early endoscopic drainage is associated with higher rates of adverse events; therefore, careful patient selection is paramount. This article will review the current indications, techniques and outcomes of early endoscopic transluminal drainage in pancreatic necrotic collections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pardhu Neelam Bharath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guo FJ, Zhang ZF. Can delayed endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off collection be replaced by early drainage? Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:267-268. [PMID: 37455058 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fu-Jia Guo
- The First Clinical College, Dalian Medical University
| | - Zhi-Feng Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Niu CG, Zhang J, Zhu KW, Liu HL, Ashraf MF, Okolo PI. Comparison of early and late intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2023; 24:321-331. [PMID: 37409681 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Postponed open necrosectomy or minimally invasive intervention has become the treatment option for necrotizing pancreatitis. Nevertheless, several studies point to the safety and efficacy of early intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of acute necrotizing pancreatitis between early and late intervention. METHODS Literature search was performed in multiple databases for articles that compared the safety and clinical outcomes of early (<4 weeks from the onset of pancreatitis) versus late intervention (≥4 weeks from the onset of pancreatitis) for necrotizing pancreatitis published up to August 31, 2022. The meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratio (OR) of mortality rate and procedure-related complications. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis. For open necrosectomy intervention, the overall pooled OR of mortality rate with the late intervention compared with early intervention was 7.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33-21.60; I2 = 54%; P = 0.0006). For minimally invasive intervention, the overall pooled OR of mortality rate with the late intervention compared with early intervention was 1.56 (95% CI 1.11-2.20; I2 = 0%; P = 0.01). The overall pooled OR of pancreatic fistula with the late minimally invasive intervention compared with early intervention was 2.49 (95% CI 1.75-3.52; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION These results showed the benefit of late interventions in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis in both minimally invasive procedures and open necrosectomy. Late intervention is preferred in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Gu Niu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jing Zhang
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Kai Wen Zhu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Hong Li Liu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alzerwi N. Surgical management of acute pancreatitis: Historical perspectives, challenges, and current management approaches. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:307-322. [PMID: 37032793 PMCID: PMC10080605 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a serious condition presenting catastrophic consequences. In severe AP, the mortality rate is high, and some patients initially diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AP can progress to a life-threatening severe state. Treatment of AP has evolved over the years. Drainage was the first surgical procedure performed for AP; however, later, surgical approaches were replaced by more conservative approaches due to the availability of advanced medical care and improved understanding of the course of AP. Currently, surgery is used to manage several complications of AP, such as pseudocysts, pancreatic fistulas, and biliary tract obstruction. Patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatment or have complications are typically considered for surgical intervention. This review focuses on the surgical approaches (endoscopic, percutaneous, and open) that have been established in recent studies to treat this acute condition and summarizes the common management guidelines for AP, discussing the relevant indications, significance, and complications. It is evident that despite their reduced involvement, surgeons lead the multidisciplinary care of patients with AP; however, given the gaps in existing knowledge, more research is required to standardize surgical protocols for AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Alzerwi
- Department of Surgery, Majmaah University, Riyadh 11952, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zeng Y, Yang J, Zhang JW. Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:1888-1902. [PMID: 36998953 PMCID: PMC10044952 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i9.1888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) represents a severe condition in patients with acute pancreatitis. Invasive interventions are recommended in symptomatic INP. Growing evidence has suggested interventional strategies of INP evolving from traditional surgery to minimally invasive step-up endoscopic procedures. However, there is still no standardized protocol for endoscopic interventions. Recently, various studies have been published about the endoscopic management of INP. This article reviews published articles and guidelines to present the progress and challenges of endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy in INP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zeng
- Department of Psychology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Jun-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| |
Collapse
|