1
|
Maskal SM, Ellis RC, Mali O, Lau B, Messer N, Zheng X, Miller BT, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, Rosen MJ, Beffa LRA. Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2019-2026. [PMID: 38424284 PMCID: PMC10978620 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) placement for small to medium-sized hernias has garnered negative attention due to perceived long-term risk of mesh-related complications. However, sparse data exists supporting such claims after minimally invasive (MIS) IPOM repairs and most is hindered by the lack of long-term follow-up. We sought to report long-term outcomes and mesh-related complications of MIS IPOM ventral hernia repairs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Adult patients who underwent MIS IPOM ventral hernia repair at our institution were identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database from October 2013 to October 2020. Outcomes included hernia recurrence and mesh-related complications or reoperations up to 6 years postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 325 patients were identified. The majority (97.2%) of cases were elective, non-recurrent (74.5%), and CDC class I (99.4%). Mean hernia width was 4.16 ± 3.86 cm. Median follow-up was 3.6 (IQR 2.8-5) years. Surgeon-entered or patient-reported follow-up was available for 253 (77.8%) patients at 3 years or greater postoperatively. One patient experienced an early small bowel obstruction and was reoperated on within 30 days. Two-hundred forty-five radiographic examinations were available up to 6 years postoperatively. Twenty-seven patients had hernia recurrence on radiographic examination up to 6 years postoperatively. During long-term follow-up, two mesh-related complications required reoperations: mesh removed for chronic pain and mesh removal at the time of colon surgery for perforated cancer. Sixteen additional patients required reoperation within 6 years for the following reasons: hernia recurrence (n = 5), unrelated intraabdominal pathology (n = 9), obstructed port site hernia (n = 1), and adhesive bowel obstruction unrelated to the prosthesis (n = 1). The rate of reoperation due to intraperitoneal mesh complications was 0.62% (2/325) with up to 6 year follow-up. CONCLUSION Intraperitoneal mesh for repair of small to medium-sized hernias has an extremely low rate of long-term mesh-related complications. It remains a safe and durable option for hernia surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Maskal
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Ryan C Ellis
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Ouen Mali
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Braden Lau
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nir Messer
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | | | - Benjamin T Miller
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Clayton C Petro
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Ajita S Prabhu
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Michael J Rosen
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Lucas R A Beffa
- Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 E 100th St, Desk A-100, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang X, Shao X, Cheng T, Li J. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 2024; 28:385-400. [PMID: 38319440 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite advancements in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (sIPOM), recurrence remains a common postoperative complication. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of defect closure (IPOM-plus) versus non-closure in ventral and incisional hernia repair. The aim is to determine which technique yields better outcomes in terms of reducing recurrence and complication rates. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception until October 1, 2022, to identify all online English publications that compared the outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without fascia closure. RESULTS Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eleven cohort studies involving 1585 patients met the inclusion criteria. The IPOM-plus technique was found to reduce the recurrence of hernias (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p < 0.01), seroma (OR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.32, 0.71], p < 0.01), and mesh bulging (OR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.42], p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.29, 0.65], p < 0.0001), type of article (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.35, 0.76], p = 0.0008 < 0.01), geographical location (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.36, 0.82], p = 0.004 < 0.01), follow-up time (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34, 0.73], p = 0.0004 < 0.01) had a significant influence on the postoperative recurrence of the IPOM-plus technique. CONCLUSION The IPOM-plus technique has been shown to greatly reduce the occurrence of recurrence, seroma, and mesh bulging. Overall, the IPOM-plus technique is considered a safe and effective procedure. However, additional randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to further evaluate the IPOM-plus technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Huang
- School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - X Shao
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - T Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - J Li
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirkpatrick AW, Coccolini F, Tolonen M, Minor S, Catena F, Celotti A, Gois E, Perrone G, Novelli G, Garulli G, Ioannidis O, Sugrue M, De Simone B, Tartaglia D, Lampella H, Ferreira F, Ansaloni L, Parry NG, Colak E, Podda M, Noceroni L, Vallicelli C, Rezende-Netos J, Ball CG, McKee J, Moore EE, Mather J. Are Surgeons Going to Be Left Holding the Bag? Incisional Hernia Repair and Intra-Peritoneal Non-Absorbable Mesh Implant Complications. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1005. [PMID: 38398318 PMCID: PMC10889414 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Ventral incisional hernias are common indications for elective repair and frequently complicated by recurrence. Surgical meshes, which may be synthetic, bio-synthetic, or biological, decrease recurrence and, resultingly, their use has become standard. While most patients are greatly benefited, mesh represents a permanently implanted foreign body. Mesh may be implanted within the intra-peritoneal, preperitoneal, retrorectus, inlay, or onlay anatomic positions. Meshes may be associated with complications that may be early or late and range from minor to severe. Long-term complications with intra-peritoneal synthetic mesh (IPSM) in apposition to the viscera are particularly at risk for adhesions and potential enteric fistula formation. The overall rate of such complications is difficult to appreciate due to poor long-term follow-up data, although it behooves surgeons to understand these risks as they are the ones who implant these devices. All surgeons need to be aware that meshes are commercial devices that are delivered into their operating room without scientific evidence of efficacy or even safety due to the unique regulatory practices that distinguish medical devices from medications. Thus, surgeons must continue to advocate for more stringent oversight and improved scientific evaluation to serve our patients properly and protect the patient-surgeon relationship as the only rationale long-term strategy to avoid ongoing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- Regional Trauma Services, Department of Surgery, Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions (TMUSMI) Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T3H 3W8, Canada
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Emergency Surgery Department, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Samual Minor
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada;
| | - Fausto Catena
- Head Emergency and General Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (F.C.); (C.V.)
| | | | - Emanuel Gois
- Department of Surgery, Londrina State University, Londrina 86038-350, Brazil;
| | - Gennaro Perrone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma University Hospital, 43125 Parma, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Novelli
- Chiurgia Generale e d’Urgenza, Osepedale Buffalini Hospital, 47521 Cesna, Italy;
| | | | - Orestis Ioannidis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital “George Papanikolaou”, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital, F92 AE81 Donegal, Ireland;
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Unit of Emergency Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, 91560 Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France;
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- Emergency and General Surgery Unit, New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Hanna Lampella
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, 00100 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Fernando Ferreira
- GI Surgery and Complex Abdominal Wall Unit, Hospital CUF Porto, Faculty of Medicine of the Oporto University, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Neil G. Parry
- Department of Surgery and Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada;
| | - Elif Colak
- Samsun Training and Research Hospital, University of Samsun, 55000 Samsun, Turkey;
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Luigi Noceroni
- Hospital Infermi Rimini, 47923 Rimini, Italy; (G.G.); (L.N.)
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Head Emergency and General Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (F.C.); (C.V.)
| | - Joao Rezende-Netos
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, General Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada;
| | - Chad G. Ball
- Acute Care, and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Regional Trauma Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; (C.G.B.); (J.M.)
| | - Jessica McKee
- TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions (TMUSMI) Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T3H 3W8, Canada
| | - Ernest E. Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, CO 80204, USA;
| | - Jack Mather
- Acute Care, and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Regional Trauma Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; (C.G.B.); (J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|