1
|
Ansari J, Bapaye H, Shah J, Raina H, Gandhi A, Bapaye J, B R A, Pagadapelli AA, Bapaye A. Clinical audit of endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection performed for complex lateral spreading colorectal tumors from a region non-endemic for colorectal cancer. Indian J Gastroenterol 2024:10.1007/s12664-024-01631-0. [PMID: 39102130 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01631-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection is currently the treatment of choice for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) can achieve higher enbloc resection and R0 resection, albeit at a slightly higher risk of complications. Given scarce data on ESD from India, we performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with colorectal ESD (CR-ESD) to know its clinical efficacy and complications as well as to assess the learning curve of CR-ESD in non-endemic-areas. METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained datasheet performed. All patients with large (>2cm), complex or recurrent colorectal LST who underwent ESD at our center between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. Various baseline lesion-related parameters, procedure-related parameters, enbloc resection (ER) rates, R0 margins and adverse event rates were retrieved. CUSUM analysis was performed to calculate the minimum required procedures to achieve competency in CR-ESD. RESULTS Total 149 patients were included in the study; mean patient age was 61.36±18.21 years. Most patients had lesions in rectum (n=102; 68.5%) followed by sigmoid colon (n=25; 16.8%). The mean lesion size was 46.62 ± 25.46 mm and the mean procedure duration for ESD was 219.30 ± 150.05 min. ER was achieved in 94.6% of lesions. R0 resection was achieved in 132 patients (88.6%). Overall, six (4%) adverse events were noted, of which one required surgical intervention. As many as 105 patients (70.5%) had adenomatous lesions on histology. Seventy-four patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy, of which three had a recurrence of adenomatous lesions and five had post-resection stricture requiring endoscopic dilation. CUSUM curve analysis calculated the learning curve for ESD was 47 resections for ER and 55 for the occurrence of AEs, with a composite CUSUM at 47 procedures. CONCLUSION CR-ESD even in non-endemic area is associated with high en bloc resection rates, R0 resection rates and acceptable complication profile. Approximately 50 cases of CR-ESD are required to achieve competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaseem Ansari
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India
| | - Harsh Bapaye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College, Pune, 411 001, India
| | - Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India
| | - Hameed Raina
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India
| | - Ashish Gandhi
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India
| | - Jay Bapaye
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Tech Carillon School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Ajay B R
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India
| | - Arun Arora Pagadapelli
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India
| | - Amol Bapaye
- Shivanand Desai Center for Digestive Disorders, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Erandwane, Pune, 411 004, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schlottmann F. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A major challenge for the west. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1965-1968. [PMID: 39087132 PMCID: PMC11287708 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.1965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Two main endoscopic resective techniques exist for early GC (EGC): Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). ESD has been widely embraced in the last decade because it allows radical en bloc resections and is associated with better outcomes, as compared to EMR. However, the lack of training opportunities and flat learning curve due to low volume of EGC cases represent major obstacles to obtain proficiency on ESD in the West. As this procedure is highly efficient for the treatment of EGC, dedicated training programs with a stepwise approach and updated guidelines for ESD embracement are needed in Western countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1640-C1118AAT, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sferrazza S, Maida M, Calabrese G, Fiorentino A, Vieceli F, Facciorusso A, Fuccio L, Maselli R, Repici A, Di Mitri R. Effectiveness and safety of newly introduced endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center: a real-life study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:00042737-990000000-00390. [PMID: 39012649 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for the resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions, providing high rates of 'en bloc' and R0 resection. East-West differences in ESD quality indicators have been reported. This study aims to assess feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ESD for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions in a Western cohort. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing ESD at one Italian endoscopic referral center from September 2018 to March 2020 were included in this prospective study. Primary outcomes were technical success, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS In total 111 patients (111 lesions) undergoing ESD were included. Anatomic site of the lesions was rectum in 56.8%, colon in 13.5%, stomach in 24.3%, and esophagus in 5.4% of cases, respectively. For upper GI procedures, technical success was 100%, and R0 and curative resection rates were 84.8% and 78.8%, respectively. For colorectal procedures, technical success was 98.7%, R0 and curative resection rates were 88.5% and 84.6%, respectively. Major AEs were reported in 12 cases (10.8%). CONCLUSION The introduction of ESD in a Tertiary Center is feasible, effective, and safe, and should be taken into consideration for the treatment of superficial GI lesions requiring 'en bloc' resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Departiment, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna, Italy
| | - Giulio Calabrese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Departiment, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Fiorentino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Sant'Ottone Frangipane Hospital, Ariano Irpino (AV), Italy
| | - Filippo Vieceli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Endoscopy Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Departiment, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chiba H, Ohata K, Ashikari K, Tachikawa J, Okada N, Hayashi A, Ebisawa Y, Kobayashi M, Arimoto J, Kuwabara H, Nakaoka M. Effectiveness of Strategy-Focused Training in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Observational Study. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:2370-2380. [PMID: 38662160 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08430-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal ESD, an advanced minimally invasive treatment, presents technical challenges, with globally varying training methods. We analyzed the learning curve of ESD training, emphasizing preoperative strategies, notably gravity traction, to guide ESD instructors and trainee programs. METHOD This retrospective study included 881 cases guided by an experienced supervisor. Six trainees received "strategy-focused" instruction. To evaluate the number of ESD experiences in steps, the following phases were classified based on ESD experiences of each trainees: Phase 0 (0-50 ESD), Phase 1 (51-100 ESD), Phase 2 (101-150 ESD), and Phase 3 (151-200 ESD). Lesion background, outcomes, and safety were compared across phases. Factors contributing to technical difficulty in early (Phase 0 and 1) and late phases (Phase 2 and 3) were identified, along with the utility of traction ESD with device assistance. RESULT Treatment outcomes were favorable, with 99.8% and 94.7% en bloc resection and curative resection rates, respectively. Approximately 90% self-completion rate could be achieved after experiencing about 50 cases (92.7% in Phase 1), signifying proficiency growth despite increased case difficulty. In early phases, factors such as left-sided colon, LST-NG morphology, and severe fibrosis pose challenges. In late phases, LST-NG morphology, mild and severe fibrosis remained significant. Traction-assisted ESD, utilized in 3% of cases, comprised planned (1.1%) and rescue (1.9%) methods. Planned traction aided specific lesions, while rescue traction was common in the right colon. CONCLUSION "Strategy-focused" ESD training consistently yields successful outcomes, effectively adapting to varying difficulty factors in different proficient stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
| | - Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan
| | - Keiichi Ashikari
- Ashikari Endoscopy Clinic, 1-12-13 Kamiooka Higashi, Konan-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 233-0001, Japan
| | - Jun Tachikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, 1-19-1 Minamihara, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, 254-0065, Japan
| | - Naoya Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, 3211 Kozukue-cho, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 222-0036, Japan
| | - Akimichi Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Yu Ebisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Mikio Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Jun Arimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kuwabara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Michiko Nakaoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1 Chuo, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Löfdahl P, Edebo A, Wolving M, Bratlie SO. Endoscopic Resections for Barrett's Neoplasia: A Long-Term, Single-Center Follow-Up Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1074. [PMID: 39064503 PMCID: PMC11278854 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both well-established and effective treatments for dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus (BE). This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes associated with these procedures in treating Barrett's neoplasia. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 95 patients, either EMR (n = 67) or ESD (n = 28), treated for Barrett's neoplasia at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2004 and 2019. The primary outcome was the complete (en-bloc) R0 resection rate. Secondary outcomes included the curative resection rate, additional endoscopic resections, adverse events, and overall survival. Results: The complete R0 resection rate was 62.5% for ESD compared to 16% for EMR (p < 0.001). The curative resection rate for ESD was 54% versus 16% for EMR (p < 0.001). During the follow-up, 22 out of 50 patients in the EMR group required additional endoscopic resections (AERs) compared to 3 out of 21 patients in the ESD group (p = 0.028). There were few adverse events associated with both EMR and ESD. In both the stratified Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (Log-rank test, Chi-square = 2.190, df = 1, p = 0.139) and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio of 0.988; 95% CI: 0.459 to 2.127; p = 0.975), the treatment group (EMR vs. ESD) did not significantly impact the survival outcomes. Conclusions: Both EMR and ESD are effective and safe treatments for BE neoplasia with few adverse events. ESD resulted in higher curative resection rates with fewer AERs, indicating its potential as a primary treatment modality. However, the survival analysis showed no difference between the methods, highlighting their comparable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Löfdahl
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden (S.O.B.)
| | - Anders Edebo
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden (S.O.B.)
| | - Mats Wolving
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 46 Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Svein Olav Bratlie
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden (S.O.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Swiridoff N, Ziachehabi A, Wewalka F, Spaun G, Alibegovic V, Schöfl R. Retrospective Analysis of Rectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection at Ordensklinikum Linz and Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3530. [PMID: 38930059 PMCID: PMC11205019 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for the removal of neoplastic benign and early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we analyse the success and safety of rectal ESD at Linz hospitals, focusing on a specific endoscopist. Additionally, we examine whether there is a learning curve regarding success parameters. Methods: This retrospective study included all 102 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of the rectum by a defined endoscopist at Ordensklinikum Hospital and Kepler University Hospital between December 2010 and May 2021. With the collected data, a descriptive statistic was carried out and regression analyses were performed. Results: The en bloc resection rate was 78.4% and the rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue was 55.6%. The average procedure time was 179 min and the complication rate was 7.8%. In total, 26.4% of cases showed carcinoma; in 25.9% of these cases, an oncologically curative resection was achieved with ESD. Follow-up data were available for 61.1% of cases, with recurrence being diagnosed in 3.6% of cases. A learning curve was observed regarding the rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue and the procedure time, but not regarding the en bloc resection rate. Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a safe method for the removal of large rectal adenomas and early carcinomas. The en bloc resection rate of the analysed procedures is within the range of comparable European studies. The rate of lesions removed in healthy tissue is below the R0 resection rate of the comparative literature; however, a learning curve could be observed in this parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaj Swiridoff
- Interne IV (Gastroenterology), Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria (R.S.)
| | - Alexander Ziachehabi
- Clinic for Internal Medicine 2—Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nephrology, Rheumatology, Kepler University Hospital, 4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Friedrich Wewalka
- Interne IV (Gastroenterology), Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria (R.S.)
| | - Georg Spaun
- General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Vedat Alibegovic
- Pathology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Rainer Schöfl
- Interne IV (Gastroenterology), Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 Linz, Austria (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T, Rösch T, Lépilliez V, Chaussade S, Rivory J, Legros R, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Rostain F, Barret M, Albouys J, Belle A, Labrunie A, Preux PM, Lepetit H, Dahan M, Ponchon T, Crépin S, Marais L, Magne J, Pioche M. Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:29-38. [PMID: 38079634 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection of adenomas prevents colorectal cancer, but the optimal technique for larger lesions is controversial. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has a low adverse event (AE) rate but a variable recurrence rate necessitating early follow-up. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can reduce recurrence but may increase AEs. OBJECTIVE To compare ESD and EMR for large colonic adenomas. DESIGN Participant-masked, parallel-group, superiority, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03962868). SETTING Multicenter study involving 6 French referral centers from November 2019 to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS Patients with large (≥25 mm) benign colonic lesions referred for resection. INTERVENTION The patients were randomly assigned by computer 1:1 (stratification by lesion location and center) to ESD or EMR. MEASUREMENTS The primary end point was 6-month local recurrence (neoplastic tissue on endoscopic assessment and scar biopsy). The secondary end points were technical failure, en bloc R0 resection, and cumulative AEs. RESULTS In total, 360 patients were randomly assigned to ESD (n = 178) or EMR (n = 182). In the primary analysis set (n = 318 lesions in 318 patients), recurrence occurred after 1 of 161 ESDs (0.6%) and 8 of 157 EMRs (5.1%) (relative risk, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96]). No recurrence occurred in R0-resected cases (90%) after ESD. The AEs occurred more often after ESD than EMR (35.6% vs. 24.5%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.0 to 2.0]). LIMITATION Procedures were performed under general anesthesia during hospitalization in accordance with the French health system. CONCLUSION Compared with EMR, ESD reduces the 6-month recurrence rate, obviating the need for systematic early follow-up colonoscopy at the cost of more AEs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE French Ministry of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Jacques
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France (M.S., J.-B.C.)
| | | | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (T.R.)
| | - Vincent Lépilliez
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (V.L., S.L.)
| | | | - Jérôme Rivory
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Romain Legros
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | | | - Sarah Leblanc
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (V.L., S.L.)
| | - Florian Rostain
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (S.C., M.B., A.B.)
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Arthur Belle
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (S.C., M.B., A.B.)
| | - Anaïs Labrunie
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Pierre-Marie Preux
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Hugo Lepetit
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Martin Dahan
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Sabrina Crépin
- Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie et Pharmacovigilfance-Unité de Vigilance des Essais Cliniques, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (S.C.)
| | - Loïc Marais
- Direction de la Recherche et de l'Innovation, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (L.M.)
| | - Julien Magne
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steinbrück I, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL, Oyama T, Pohl J, von Hahn T, Schmidt A, Allgaier HP. Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Unsupervised Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection During the Initial Learning Curve with Prevalence-Based Indication. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3614-3624. [PMID: 37421512 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08026-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For an adequate educational strategy of ESD in non-Asian settings with prevalence-based indication it is essential to define adequate lesions, suitable for the beginner without on-site expert-supervision. AIMS We analyzed possible predictors for outcome parameters of effectiveness and safety during the initial learning curve. METHODS The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480), performed between 2007 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals, were enrolled. Uni-/multivariable regression analysis was done with sex, age, pretreated lesion, lesion size, organ, and organ-based localization as possible independent predictors for en bloc resection (EBR), complication, and resection speed. RESULTS Rates of EBR, complication, and resection speed were 84.5%, 14.2%, and 6.20 (± 4.45) cm2/h. Independent predictors for EBR were pretreated lesion (OR 0.27 [0.13-0.57], p < 0.001) and non-colonic ESD (OR 2.29 [1.26-4.17] (rectum)/5.72 [2.36-13.89] (stomach)/7.80 [2.60-23.42] (esophagus), p < 0.001), for complication pretreated lesion (OR 3.04 [1.46-6.34], p < 0.001) and lesion size (OR 1.02 [1.004-1.04], p = 0.012) and for resection speed pretreated lesion (RC - 3.10 [- 4.39 to - 1.81], p < 0.001), lesion size (RC 0.13 [0.11-0.16], p < 0.001) and male patient (RC - 1.11 [- 1.85 to - 0.37], p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the incidence of technically unsuccessful resections in esophageal (1/84), gastric (3/113), rectal (7/181), and colonic (3/101) ESDs (p = 0.76). Technical failure was mainly caused by complication and fibrosis/pretreatment. CONCLUSION During the initial learning curve of an unsupervised ESD program with prevalence-based indication, pretreated lesions and colonic ESDs should be avoided. In contrast, lesion size and organ-based localizations have less predictive value for the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Berlin, Fanningerstraße 32, 10365, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic teaching Hospital of University of Bonn, Prinz-Albert-Straße 40, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, Saku, Nagano, 3850051, Japan
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|