Cost-effective, reliable laparoscopic hernia repair: a report on 500 consecutive repairs

Cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic surgery is a successful treatment option offering significant advantages to patients compared with open ventral hernia repair. A cost-benefit analysis was performed to compare the clinical results and economic costs of the open and laparoscopic techniques for anterior abdominal wall hernia repair, in order to determine the more efficient procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 140 patients with primary and incisional hernia, and analyzed clinical data, morbidity, costs of surgery and hospital stay costs.

RESULTS

The cost of disposable surgical supplies was higher with laparoscopic repair but reduced the average length of stay (P<.001) and patient morbidity (P<.001). The total cost of the laparoscopic procedure was, therefore, less than initially estimated, yielding a savings of 1,260€ per patient (2,865€ vs. 4,125€).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is associated with a reduced complication rate, a lower average length of stay and with lower total costs. Laparoscopic repair can save 1.260€ for each patient, and so this procedure should be considered a cost-effective approach.

Cost-effective laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair: the Portsmouth technique

NICE (UK) has not recommended unilateral primary laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair because of its expense. A two-port technique without balloon inflator or routine tacking was developed, which helped reduce costs to just Pounds 35 more than day-case open hernia repair. Over a 6-month period, 40 patients underwent 60 TEP repairs with a 6-month follow up. Zero degree laparoscope (10 mm) and blunt graspers (5 mm) created the pre-peritoneal space, identified landmarks and completed the dissection. Trimmed 15 x 15 cm mesh was placed over each defect. Operating times for unilateral and bilateral hernias for consultants and supervised trainees were 30*, 42.5* and 40*, 55* min (*: Median) respectively. Verbal rating pain scores at 24 and 72 h were 1* (0-3) and 0* (0-2) respectively. Patients returned to activity, driving and work in 5*, 7* and 14* days respectively. Cost of laparoscopic hernia repair was calculated at Pounds 105. A two-port laparoscopic hernia repair can be performed effectively and safely, in reasonable time and at a low cost. These data support the use of this technique in primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Groin Hernia Repair by Laparoscopic Techniques: Current Status and Controversies

Laparoscopic hernia repair remains controversial, and its position in current hernia surgery remains in flux. In this article we attempt to put the laparoscopic approach in perspective by describing the rationale for its development. We summarize studies comparing it with open repairs, including recent publications, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews; and we then contrast the data with recent findings of the United States Veterans Affairs Cooperative study 456. We discuss the current and future status of the laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair and present an update of our own laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal technique without mesh fixation. From 1994 to 2004 we performed 314 hernia repairs on 224 patients with no intraoperative complications, no conversions to an open procedure, and no mortality. Thirty (14%) minor postoperative complications occurred. There were three herniated lipomas (preperitoneal fat) but no true peritoneal reherniations. We evaluate critical points of laparoscopic hernia repair including extensive preperitoneal dissection, mesh configuration, size and fixation, cost reduction, and the learning curve.

Early Experience with Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in a District General National Health Services Hospital

The introduction of laparoscopic hernia repair into the National Health Services (NHS) gave us an opportunity to study the feasibility and practicality of carrying out this modern hernia repair technique in a district general NHS hospital. The laparoscopic tension-free transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) method of hernia repair, as we do it, is cost-effective and efficacious. Most patients can be treated as day cases. We discovered incidental hernias in 18.8% of patients, which were treated simultaneously. A low recurrence rate (0.17%) with low morbidity makes it an attractive method for routine treatment of groin hernias in the NHS.

Economic evaluation of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphies: the effect of cost-containment measures and internal hospital policy decisions on costs and charges

BACKGROUND

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repairs of inguinal hernias, despite having a favorable clinical outcome are often criticized due to higher costs and charges associated with this approach. We, therefore, present a comparison of direct costs and charges between TEP and open tension-free (OPN) repairs, emphasizing the effect of cost-containment measures on the part of surgeons and the hospital's charging (rate-setting) policies on these measurements.

METHODS

Itemized direct costs, charges, and reimbursements were determined for 41 TEP and 44 OPN unilateral repairs done between January 1997 and December 1999. Multiple sensitivity analyses were done to evaluate the effect of cost-containment measures and the hospital's rate-setting policies on the differences in costs and charges between the two procedures. The hospital's profits were expressed as profit-cost ratios.

RESULTS

The mean direct cost for a TEP repair was $128.58 more than the OPN repair ($795.07[+/-65] vs 666.49 [+/-52]). However, mean charges and hospital reimbursement were $2,139.80 and $1,679.87, respectively, more for the TEP repairs. The profit-cost ratio was significantly higher in the TEP group (2.85:1 vs 1.07:1, P<.001). We found that 79.8% of the difference in direct costs vs 29% of the difference in charges between the two procedures was sensitive to cost-containment measures. Forty-five percent of the difference in charges was due to the hospital's nonuniform rate-setting policies. Long-term follow-up (38 months) showed no recurrence for either procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct cost of TEP repairs with the minimal use of disposable instruments in a high-volume center is comparable to the OPN repair. However, due to differences in the hospital's charging policies, TEP repair would appear to be an expensive alternative from the payer's point of view.