Laparoscopic creation of stomas

Complications associated with loop ileostomy: analysis of risk factors

BACKGROUND

Loop ileostomy is a common surgical procedure but is associated with complications such as outlet obstruction (OO), parastomal hernia (PH), and high-output stoma (HOS). This study aimed to identify risk factors for these complications, as well as their causal relationships.

METHODS

The study included 188 consecutive patients who underwent loop ileostomy between April 2016 and September 2021. Clinical factors and postoperative stoma-related complications (OO, HOS, and PH) were analyzed retrospectively. Stoma-related factors were evaluated using specific measurements from computed tomography (CT) scans. The incidence, clinical course, and risk factors for the stoma-related complications were investigated.

RESULTS

OO was diagnosed in 28 cases (15.7%), PH in 60 (32%), and HOS in 57 (31.8%). A small longitudinal stoma diameter at the rectus abdominis level on CT and a right-sided stoma were significantly associated with OO. Creation of an ileostomy for anastomotic leakage was independently associated with HOS. Higher body weight and a large longitudinal stoma diameter at the rectus abdominis level on CT were significantly associated with PH. There was a significant relationship between the occurrence of OO and HOS. However, the association between OO and PH was marginal.

CONCLUSION

This study identified key risk factors for OO, HOS, and PH as complications of loop ileostomy and their causal relationships. Our findings provide insights that may guide the prevention and management of complications related to loop ileostomy.

Postoperative complications of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer, and surgery is the most common treatment. Several surgical options are available, but each is associated with a range of potential complications. The timely and efficient identification of these complications is vital for effective clinical management of these patients in order to minimise their morbidity and mortality. This review aims to describe the range of commonly performed surgical treatments for colorectal surgery. In addition, frequent post-surgical complications are explored with investigative options explained and illustrated.

Risk factors for postoperative stoma outlet obstruction in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Current medical treatments can achieve remission of ulcerative colitis (UC). Surgery is required when potent drug treatment is ineffective or when colon cancer or high-grade dysplasia develops. The standard procedure is restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, commonly performed as two- or three-stage RPC with diverting ileostomy. Postoperative stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is frequent, but the causes are not well known.

AIM

To identify the risk factors for SOO after stoma surgery in patients with UC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the files of 148 consecutive UC patients who underwent surgery with stoma construction. SOO was defined as small bowel obstruction symptoms and intestinal dilatation just below the penetrating part of the stoma on computed tomography. Patients were divided into two groups: Those who developed SOO within 30 d after surgery and those who did not. Patient characteristics, intraoperative parameters, the stoma site, and rectus abdominis muscle thickness were collected. Moreover, we identified the patients who repeatedly developed SOO. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for SOO and recurring SOO.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients who underwent two-stage RPC were included between January 2008 and March 2020. Postoperatively, SOO occurred in 25 (16.9%) patients after a median time of 9 d (range 2-26). Compared to patients without SOO, patients with SOO had a significantly higher rate of malignant tumors or dysplasia (36.0% vs 17.1%, P = 0.032), lower total glucocorticoid dose one month before surgery (0 mg vs 0 mg, P = 0.026), higher preoperative total protein level (6.8 g/dL vs 6.3 g/dL, P = 0.048), higher rate of loop ileostomy (88.0% vs 55.3%, P = 0.002), and higher maximum stoma drainage volume (2300 mL vs 1690 mL, P = 0.004). Loop ileostomy (OR = 6.361; 95%CI 1.322–30.611; P = 0.021) and maximum stoma drainage volume (OR = 1.000; 95%CI 1.000–1.001; P = 0.015) were confirmed as independent risk factors for SOO. Eighteen patients with SOO were treated conservatively without recurrence (sSOO group). Seven (28.0%) patients repeatedly developed SOO (rSOO group) during the observation period. A significant difference was observed in the rectus abdominis muscle thickness between the two groups (sSOO 9.3 mm, rSOO 12.7 mm, P = 0.006). Muscle thickness was confirmed as an independent risk factor for recurring SOO (OR = 2.676; 95%CI 1.176-4.300; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In this study, high maximum stoma drainage volume and loop ileostomy are independent risk factors for SOO. Additionally, among patients with a thick rectus abdominis muscle, the risk of SOO recurrence is high.

Role of Fecal Diversion in Complex Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract resulting in progressive tissue damage, which can result in strictures, fistulae, and abscesses formation. The triggering mechanism is thought to be in the fecal stream, and diversion of this fecal stream is sometimes required to control disease when all other avenues of medical and surgical management have been exhausted. Fecal diversion can be temporary or permanent with the indications being defunctioning a high-risk anastomosis, as a result of a surgical complication, for disease control, or due to severe colonic, rectal, or perianal disease. The incidence of ostomy formation in CD has increased epidemiologically over time. The primary indication for ostomy formation is severe perianal fistulizing disease. However, while 64% of patients have an early clinical response after diversion for refractory perianal CD, restoration of bowel continuity is attempted in only 35% of patients, and is successful in only 17%. The current review discusses the indications for ostomy creation in complex CD, strategies for procedure selection, and patient outcomes.

Laparoscopic versus Open stoma creation: A retrospective analysis

Objectives: This study aimed to compare open stoma (OS) creation with laparoscopic stoma (LS) creation considering the operation time, blood loss, time of oral intake, and complications. We also compared multiport LS and single-incision laparoscopic stoma (SILS) creation. Methods: We reviewed the demographic data, diagnosis, indications, operation time, blood loss, time of oral intake, operative procedure, and complications of 50 patients who underwent stoma creation between April 2014 and April 2016. Results: The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the LS group (7.85±18.4 ml) than in the OS group (38.1±73.2 ml; P=0.02). There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of the operation time (LS, 72.1±32.7 min; OS, 61.2±31.2 min; P=0.23) or time of oral intake (LS, 1.0±0 days; OS, 1.91±2.71 days; P=0.17). Peristomal skin problems occurred in 11 patients (47.8%) in the OS group and 5 patients (18.5%) in the LS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SILS and multiport LS groups, considering the operation time, amount of bleeding, and time of oral intake. Conclusions: LS is comparable with OS in terms of operation time and time of oral intake and may cause lesser blood loss. Considering its advantages, LS is a useful approach for patients requiring biopsies or intra-abdominal inspection. SILS is a minimally invasive technique, suitable for patients in whom the stoma site is preoperatively decided.

Incidence and risk factor of outlet obstruction after construction of ileostomy

There are several reports on the usefulness of diverting ileostomy for decreasing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and the severity of pelvic peritonitis. However, a number of complications induced by ileostomy itself have also been reported, including a special condition induced by obstruction at the outlet of the stoma known as “outlet obstruction.” In this study, we examined the frequency and risk factors of this complication based on the data of ileostomy cases in our institution. Methods: One hundred and seven patients who received ileostomy creation at our department from January 2010 to December 2015 were included. The incidence of outlet obstruction and risk factors were analyzed. Results: Outlet obstruction occurred in 18 cases (16.8%). The incidence was significantly higher in total colectomy or proctocolectomy cases as well as in those with left side construction and laparoscopic surgery than in other patients in a univariate analysis. However, in a multivariate analysis, no risk factors were extracted. Conclusions: To determine the true cause of this disease, a prospective study with a large number of cases is needed. Since multiple terms are used for this condition, resulting in confusion, a consensus on the appropriate terms is also important.

Endoscopic colostomy with percutaneous colopexy: an animal feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Indications for colostomy in colorectal diseases are obstruction of the large bowel, such as in cancer, diverticular disease in the acute phase, post-radiotherapy enteritis, complex perirectal fistulas, anorectal trauma and severe anal incontinence. Some critically ill patients cannot tolerate an exploratory laparotomy, and laparoscopic assisted colostomy also requires general anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of performing colostomy assisted by colonoscopy and percutaneous colopexy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five pigs underwent endoscopic assisted colostomy with percutaneous colopexy. Animals were evaluated in post-operative days 1, 2, 5 and 7 for feeding acceptance and colostomy characteristics. On day 7 full colonoscopy was performed on animals followed by exploratory laparotomy.

RESULTS

Average procedure time was 27 minutes (21-54 min). Postoperative mobility and feeding of animals were immediate after anesthesia recovery. Position of the colostomy, edges color, appearance of periostomal area, as well as its function was satisfactory in four animals. Retraction of colostomy was present in one pig. The colonoscopy and laparotomy control on the seventh day were considered as normal. A bladder perforation that was successfully repaired through the colostomy incision occurred in one pig. The main limitation of this study is its experimental nature.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic assisted colostomy with percutaneous colopexy proves to be a safe and effective method with low morbidity for performing colostomy in experimental animals, with possible clinical application in humans.

Laparoscopic colostomy for acute left colon obstruction caused by diverticular disease in high risk patient: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The colostomy is often necessary in complicated divertcular disease. The laparoscopic colostomy is not widely used for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease. Its use in patients with high operative risk is still on debate. The aim of this case report was to present the benefits of laparoscopic colostomy in patients with high peri-and postoperative risk factors.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We present a case of 76-year-old female admitted to emergency unit for left colonic obstruction. The patient had a past history of liver cirrhosis HCV-related with a severe malnutrition, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, diverticular disease, hiatal ernia, previous appendectomy. Patient was classified according to their preoperative risk ASA 3 (classification of the American society of Anestesia-ASA score). Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT revealed a marked thickening in the sigmoid colon and a marked circumferential stenosis in the sigmoid colon in absence of neoplasm, and/or abscess. The laparoscopic procedure is proposed as first intention.

DISCUSSION

The operation time was 50min, and the hospital stay was 4 days. Post operative complications grade I according to the Clavien Dindo Classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic colostomy is safe and feasible procedure in experienced hands. It is associated with low morbidity and short stay in hospital and should be considered a good alternative to a laparotomy.

Single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation: experience with 31 consecutive cases

INTRODUCTION

Fecal diversion may be performed using various techniques. Each technique has advantages that affect patient selection. In this report, we report our experience with 31 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation using only a pre-selected stoma site as the point of port access.

METHODS

A 2.5-cm skin incision was made at a previously marked stoma site, and two 5-mm trocars were placed into the abdomen through the stoma site. An optional third trocar was inserted at the stoma site only if the bowel needed to be mobilized or if adhesions needed to be divided. After full intra-abdominal exploration, a selected intestinal loop was brought up to the stoma site, and the ostomy was then matured using standard techniques.

RESULTS

Between April 2009 and March 2012, 31 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 68 years (range, 46-87 years) underwent single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation. Fecal diversion included ileostomy (n = 18) and colostomy (n = 13). There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients (6.5%) required additional port placement in the midline suprapubic area. Conversion to open laparotomy was required in two patients (6.5%) because of the presence of extensive adhesions. Postoperative complications were observed in two patients and included peristomal ileus and dehydration due to high ileostomy output.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation is an effective technique that allows full intra-abdominal visualization and bowel mobilization, while reducing the need for additional skin incisions beyond that of the stoma site.

Outcome of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer: a critical appraisal

Despite the wide application of laparoscopic surgery for various common surgical conditions, the development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been slow. The obstacle for its advancement is formed by a steep learning curve and concerns about the oncologic safety in cases of malignant diseases. With refinement in instrumentation and improvement in surgical techniques in recent years, laparoscopic colectomy has become a safe and feasible procedure. The short-term advantages in terms of quicker recovery of bowel function, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay of laparoscopic colectomy over conventional treatment seem to be indisputable. Results from large prospective randomized trials revealed the oncologic outcome to be comparable between the two treatments. Furthermore, the incidence of port-site metastasis was shown to be similar between the two approaches. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure. The incidence of postoperative morbidity including anastomotic leakage appears to be comparable between the two treatments. However, the long-term outcome especially for local recurrence and overall survival remains uncertain. Prospective randomized study with long follow-up is required to elucidate this issue.

Laparoscopic management for acute malignant colonic obstruction

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of staged laparoscopic colectomy for acute malignant colon obstruction.

METHODS

Through a laparoscopic approach, emergency blowhole colostomy and subsequent elective resection were performed.

RESULTS

There were 14 men and 8 women, ages ranging from 42 to 79 years. All patients underwent laparoscopic blowhole colostomy for fecal diversion. Of these stomas, 6 were located at the splenic flexure, 7 at the descending colon, and 9 at the sigmoid colon. Subsequently, 20 of the 22 patients achieved an elective laparoscopic resection including takedown of the stoma. They were left hemicolectomy in 11 and anterior resection in 9. The mean total length of hospital stay was 20 ± 4.6 days (range, 16 to 33 d) in these 20 patients. The remaining 2 patients did not undergo reversal of the colostomy. The median follow-up period was 23 months. Seven patients died of disease progression and 15 patients remained alive and well.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that staged laparoscopic colon resection is a feasible and effective technique for acute malignant colonic obstruction. The length of hospital stay is justified as compared with conventional single-staged resection. Our technique can also be recommended when colonic stenting is not available.

Missed Inadvertent Gastrointestinal Injuries during Abdominal Operations: Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Inadvertent gastrointestinal tract injuries (IGITI) during abdominal operations increase postoperative morbidity. Common mechanisms for this type of injury are not well-defined. The risk factors associated with an increase in missed IGITI during elective abdominal surgery and a possible strategy that may contribute to early diagnosis were not previously evaluated. Between 1998 and 2006, all the patients who underwent a subsequent laparotomy within 30 days of an index operation were identified. Patients reoperated for missed IGITI, defined as perforation at sites other than previous anastomosis or bowel repair, were collected. Data pertaining to patients, disease, and primary operations’ characteristics, as well as reoperation findings and outcomes were studied. Methods of diagnosis of perforation for each particular patient were assessed. Thirty-two patients (15 females, 17 males) underwent a second operation for gastrointestinal tract leak within 30 days of an index surgery due to missed IGITI. The mean age was 59.5 ± 18.2 years (range 21–87). The average time between the first and second operation was 5.3 ± 3.5 days (range 1–13). Adhesions (27 patients), previous operations (20 patients), and laparoscopic approach (13 patients) were the most commonly documented factors that may result in missed IGITI. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal leak due to missed IGITI was made clinically in 12 patients. Twenty patients underwent contrast study before reoperation. Careful selection of patients and type of surgery in addition to awareness of this rare complication may decrease the frequency of missed IGITI, lead to earlier diagnosis, and possibly improve outcomes.

Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route

About 50% of patients who have a permanent stoma experience some degree of parastomal hernia formation. To prevent this complication, the extraperitoneal route is considered to be more effective than the transperitoneal route in the case of open colorectal surgery. This technique also has superiority in avoiding postoperative intestinal obstruction. Although laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has not been proved to be as safe as open surgery by a randomized-controlled trial, some studies have shown the equality of long-term results with laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. It is anticipated that cases of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection will increase in the near future. However, a laparoscopic technique for creation of a permanent stoma has hardly been discussed. Most operative procedures for laparoscopic stoma creation have been performed with transperitoneal route, which may cause parastomal hernia and/or intestinal obstruction. This report describes a laparoscopic technique for permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal approach.

Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy

PURPOSE

The use of defunctioning ileostomy is a common practice to reduce the septic complications after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. In open surgery, the fashioning of ileostomy is a straightforward procedure. However, in the laparoscopic approach, this can be a difficult task and obstructive complications can occur postoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken for all patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and defunctioning loop ileostomy over a 15-year period.

RESULTS

In this period, 161 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with defunctioning ileostomy. Eight patients developed obstructive complications in the early postoperative period requiring surgical intervention (5 percent). All patients presented with intestinal obstruction from the fourth to the sixth postoperative day. The median time to reoperation was 9.5 days (range, 5 to 19). The causes of obstructive complications were twisting of the ileostomy (n = 3), adhesive kinking proximal to the ileostomy (n = 3), tight fascia (n = 1), and both tight fascia and twisting of ileostomy (n = 1). Six patients underwent laparotomy for diagnosis and refashioning of ileostomy. The seventh patient had endoscopic decompression of small bowel and refashioning of ileostomy. The last patient was successfully managed with combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Various pitfalls can occur in laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Measures can be taken to minimize these technical errors. Various surgical reinterventions can be attempted to determine the cause. With combined uses of enteroscope and laparoscope, a laparotomy can be avoided.

Surgical progress in inguinal and ventral incisional hernia repair

The goals of this article are to describe the history of hernia repair and how innovations in surgical technique, prosthetics, and technology have shaped current practice.

Palliation of colorectal cancer

Patients with advanced incurable colorectal cancer (CRC) face a grim prognosis. The goal of palliative intervention is directed at alleviating disease-related symptoms and improving quality of life. The provision of optimal palliative care for these patients is a compound and demanding process. This dilemma becomes more challenging when patients with advanced metastatic colorectal disease present with an incurable and asymptomatic primary lesion. Treatment options are numerous and include a variety of surgical and nonsurgical interventions. Most data regarding the role of surgery in palliation of CRC are from retrospective, nonrandomized case series. Surgical resection may provide good palliation of symptoms and prevent future tumor-related complications. Metal stents are also able to provide good palliative relief of obstruction and should be used when appropriate. The best palliative care will often require a multidisciplinary approach that involves input from surgical and nonsurgical teams, where treatment plans will be made in accordance with the wishes of the patient and family with a goal of decreasing morbidity and a focus on quality of life.

Palliative stoma creation: comparison of laparoscopic vs conventional procedures

BACKGROUND

The creation of a stoma is an established therapeutic concept for the palliation of non-resectable rectal carcinomas and advanced tumours infiltrating the pelvis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In two prospective country-wide multicentre studies, each conducted over a similar period of time, the peri-operative course and postoperative short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs laparotomy-based stoma construction were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients underwent palliative laparoscopic construction; 550 patients received a stoma via a laparotomy. The intra-operative complication rate was lower after open surgery than after laparoscopic surgery (2.7 vs 5.6%; p = 0.15), although the difference was not significant. With regard to general (30.9 vs 15.6%; p = 0.003) and also specific postoperative complications (13.8 vs 5.6%; p = 0.029), however, a significant advantage of the laparoscopic approach was seen. Furthermore, mortality in the laparoscopic group was also significantly lower (4.4 vs 14.0%; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Palliative stoma done via laparoscopy had significantly better outcomes in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in comparison with the open surgical procedure.

Surgery insight: minimally invasive surgery for IBD

The most frequently described laparoscopic operations for the management of patients with IBD are restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. For patients with Crohn's disease, there is level 1b evidence that, in experienced hands, laparoscopic ileocolic resection enhances recovery and leads to a shorter hospital stay compared with conventional ileocolic resection. The demonstrated advantages of laparoscopic ileocolic resection with regard to cost and cosmesis, and the acceptable long-term results achieved (which are at least comparable to those achieved by conventional ileocolic resection) favor the use of laparoscopic ileocolic resection over conventional ileocolic resection in patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease. For patients with ulcerative colitis, the expected advantages of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy over conventional restorative proctocolectomy have yet to be clearly shown. Although there is a trend towards a reduced hospital stay (of only 1.6 days) when laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy is performed, operating times are disproportionably prolonged. The most important argument for offering patients with IBD the chance to undergo a laparoscopic procedure, rather than conventional open surgery, is (particularly for women) the long-term superior cosmesis and body image it confers.

Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence

Obstructed defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI) are challenging clinical problems, which are commonly encountered in the practice of colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. These disorders socially and psychologically distress patients and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, often incompletely understood and cannot always be determined. As a consequence, many medical, surgical, and behavioral approaches have been described, with no panacea. Over the past decade, advances in an understanding of these disorders together with rational and similar methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories (ARP), radiology studies, and new surgical techniques have led to promising results. In this brief review, we discuss treatment strategies and recent updates on clinical and therapeutic aspects of obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

No-Trocar Laparoscopic Stoma Creation

Creation of an intestinal stoma may be necessary in a wide variety of colorectal diseases of both benign and malignant character. Open and laparoscopic techniques can be used for the fecal diversion. We report a case of a patient with a diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon with abscess formation and fistulation to the abdominal wall and vagina. Owing to severe comorbidity, a permanent fecal diversion was prepared. We performed a laparoscopic no-trocar technique. Only 1 incision, at the planned stoma site, was used. The abdominal wall was elevated with gaspers, no pneumoperitoneum or trocars were used. The laparoscope and reuseable laparoscopic graspers were introduced through the stoma site to correctly identify and grasp a loop of the terminal ileum. Finally, the loop ileostomy was placed on a bar. This laparoscopic technique is a valid alternative to standard laparoscopic stoma creation. Different techniques for stoma creation are discussed.

Incontinencia fecal.Valoración del paciente. Tratamientos clásicos

Fecal incontinence is a very common disease but its exact prevalence is largely unknown. The condition gives rise to personal and social stigma with severe repercussions for the patient. It can be caused by a large number of physiopathologic disorders and consequently there is a wide variety of treatments. In this article we review the incidence and etiology of fecal incontinence, physical and instrumental examinations (with description of the components of the anorectal laboratory), traditional medical and surgical treatments and, lastly, the results of sphincteroplasties.

Laparoscopic or trephine faecal diversion: is there a preferred approach and why?

BACKGROUND

Faecal diversion is often indicated in perineal sepsis and in the palliation of advanced ano-rectal malignancy. This can be performed open or laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of these two approaches to stoma creation.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic or 'trephine' stoma creation in 49 consecutive unselected patients.

RESULTS

Eighteen (37%) patients (median age 68 years) underwent a laparoscopic approach in which there were no conversions. One patient required a laparotomy for stoma mal-orientation and there were two (11%) deaths. Thirty-one patients (median age 70 years) had a trephine stoma formed with two (6%) conversions but no deaths. Thirteen (42%) of these patients had surgery performed under regional anaesthesia. There was no difference in the hospital stay between the two groups and at a mean follow-up of 16 months, 20 (41%) patients had died mainly from disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Both approaches to faecal diversion give adequate results in the short term. Laparoscopic techniques should be reserved for fitter patients as a trephine stoma can be performed under regional anaesthesia.

Geriatric fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a common problem in the elderly population,particularly in nursing homes, and is one of the common reasons for nursing home placement. In addition to the inconvenience of the incontinence for the patient and caregiver, it is associated with increased mortality. Identifiable physiologic changes in the anorectal region may contribute to the development of fecal incontinence.Fecal incontinence is a disorder of men and women, with an equal or greater prevalence in men in advancing years. All patients who have fecal incontinence warrant an initial medical evaluation,including the exclusion of fecal impaction. Cognitively impaired patients benefit most from habit training. Selected elderly patients who have fecal incontinence may benefit from biofeedback and surgical intervention.

Parastomal hernia following minimally invasive stoma formation

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive intestinal stoma formation using a laparoscopic approach or through a trephine, is widely described in published literature. The incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) following a stoma formed without formal laparotomy is not well reported. The present review aims to assess the current data available on minimally invasive stoma formation, with particular reference to the incidence of PH.

METHODS

A literature search using the Pubmed Medline database was performed, locating English language articles on minimally invasive stoma formation from 1970 to 2002. The manuscripts were searched manually for further references.

RESULTS

The number of published studies describing laparoscopic stoma formation is small (263 stomas) and the follow-up studied were short (none longer than 1 year). The incidence of PH was 0-6.7%. The incidence following a trephine stoma was 6.7-12%, and the number of patients was small (118) and the follow up short (up to 12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PH following minimally invasive stoma formation using a trephine or a laparoscopic technique remains unclear. Studies published to date are generally small and the follow up is short. A prospective randomized trial comparing minimally invasive stoma formation with stoma formation with laparotomy, is required.

Fecal incontinence in the elderly patient

Fecal incontinence is an underreported problem in the general population; it is especially common in elderly persons (aged >or=65 years) residing in the community or in long-term care settings. It affects more women than men during younger years, but this differential narrows with age. Physiological changes such as sphincter muscle and sensory abnormalities in the anorectal region contribute to this problem, as do factors such as dementia, physical disability, and fecal impaction. Treatment with biofeedback is feasible in many elderly patients. Those with advanced dementia or physical disability may benefit from a bowel habit training program. Selected patients may require surgical sphincter repair. Minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency energy application offer promising future treatment options. The purpose of this review is to provide current information on fecal incontinence and its management in the elderly.

Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Iatrogenic rectourethral fistula poses a rare but challenging complication of treatment for prostate cancer. A variety of procedures have been described to treat this condition, none of which has gained acceptance as the procedure of choice. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula was performed, and follow-up was established by telephone interview. Successful repair was defined as absence of a fistula after reversal of fecal and urinary diversions.

RESULTS

Eleven men, mean age of 62 years, underwent 12 gracilis muscle transpositions for rectourethral fistula between 1996 and 2001. Six patients had a history of pelvic radiotherapy, and five patients had previous failed attempts to repair the fistula. In nine patients, the fistula healed following gracilis muscle transposition. One patient developed a rectocutaneous fistula that healed with fibrin glue injection, and one developed perineal sepsis requiring debridement of the transposed gracilis. This patient underwent a second gracilis transposition, which uneventfully healed. Overall, all of the patients had closure of their diverting stomas and maintained healed rectourethral fistulas. There were no intraoperative complications, and the only long-term complication of this procedure was mild medial thigh numbness in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Gracilis muscle transposition is an effective surgical treatment for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. It is associated with low morbidity and a high success rate.

Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Iatrogenic rectourethral fistula poses a rare but challenging complication of treatment for prostate cancer. A variety of procedures have been described to treat this condition, none of which has gained acceptance as the procedure of choice. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula was performed, and follow-up was established by telephone interview. Successful repair was defined as absence of a fistula after reversal of fecal and urinary diversions.

RESULTS

Eleven men, mean age of 62 years, underwent 12 gracilis muscle transpositions for rectourethral fistula between 1996 and 2001. Six patients had a history of pelvic radiotherapy, and five patients had previous failed attempts to repair the fistula. In nine patients, the fistula healed following gracilis muscle transposition. One patient developed a rectocutaneous fistula that healed with fibrin glue injection, and one developed perineal sepsis requiring debridement of the transposed gracilis. This patient underwent a second gracilis transposition, which uneventfully healed. Overall, all of the patients had closure of their diverting stomas and maintained healed rectourethral fistulas. There were no intraoperative complications, and the only long-term complication of this procedure was mild medial thigh numbness in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Gracilis muscle transposition is an effective surgical treatment for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. It is associated with low morbidity and a high success rate.

What role, if any, for laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease of the hindgut?

An outsider to the field of surgery would probably take it for granted that surgeons have a highly developed rationale for choosing a laparoscopic approach to Crohns disease. After all, an increasing number of surgeons are performing laparoscopic surgery for Crohns disease as witnessed by several articles published in the 1990s (Table). In fact this is not quite true. Most papers are case reports or series without controls, capable only of suggesting feasibility. Furthermore, comparison studies often feature selection flaws, and therefore beg the question of whether laparoscopic surgery should or not be considered as standard care. An attempt is made herein to give readers a concise insight of the evidence available in the English language literature. It does not pretend to offer a comprehensive review of the topic rather, it highlights some relevant issues, and then outlines what role, if any, laparoscopic surgery should play in Crohn's disease. There are at least 6 categories for discussion.

Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: current concepts

BACKGROUND

The aim of a laparoscopic approach is reduced pain scores, early mobilization, virtual absence of wound sepsis, rapid return of gastrointestinal function, early discharge from hospital and return to normal activity and improved cosmetics. Potential advantages are fewer complications due to adhesion formation, viz. small-bowel obstruction, infertility and chronic abdominal pain-advantages that are of particular importance to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) since they are young and in the middle of building up their socio-economic life. This review highlights the current status of laparoscopic surgery for patients with IBD.

METHODS

Virtually all abdominal procedures carried out in patients with IBD can be done laparoscopically, and vary from stoma formation to restorative proctocolectomy.

RESULTS

Conversion rates and operating times depend on the surgical expertise and patient-related factors, viz. prior laparotomy, the presence of intestinal fistula or inflammatory masses. Morbidity rates are similar to those of open surgery provided that the procedures are done by expert laparoscopic surgeons. The observed earlier recovery contributed to laparoscopic surgery has not been proved in well-conducted trials; however, an advantage can be expected. A very obvious feature of laparoscopic surgery is the improved cosmetics, which might turn out to be the most important advantage of the laparoscopic approach in this relatively young patient group.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach can be considered the procedure of first choice in patients with IBD provided the surgery is done by expert laparoscopists ensuring low conversion rates, acceptable operating times and low morbidity.

Surgical treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a disabling and distressing condition. Many patients are reluctant to discuss the condition with a physician. A thorough history, good physical examination, and detailed anorectal physiologic investigations can help in the therapeutic decision-making algorithm. Patients with isolated anterior sphincter defects are candidates for overlapping repair. In the presence of unilateral or bilateral pudendal neuropathy, the patient should be counseled preoperatively regarding a [table: see text] lower anticipation of success. If the injury occurred shortly before the planned surgery and neuropathy is present, it may be prudent to wait because neuropathy sometimes can resolve within 6 to 24 months of the injury. Pudendal nerve study may help determine surgical timing. An anterior sphincter defect combined with a rectovaginal fistula can be approached by overlapping sphincter repair and a concomitant transanal advancement flap. Patients who had undergone multiple such procedures may benefit from concomitant fecal diversion at the time of repeat sphincter repair. Patients with global or multifocal sphincter injury may be candidates for a neosphincter procedure. The stimulated graciloplasty and artificial bowel sphincter are reasonable options. In the absence of the availability of these techniques or because of financial constraints, consideration could be given to bilateral gluteoplasty or unilateral or bilateral nonstimulated graciloplasty. The postanal repair still serves a role in patients with isolated decreased resting pressures with or without neuropathy or external sphincter injury with minimal degrees of incontinence. Biofeedback and the Procon device may play a role in these patients. Lastly, fecal diversion must be considered as a means of improving the quality of life because the patient can participate in the activities of daily living without the fear of fecal incontinence.

Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn's disease

Laparoscopy is still controversial when applied for the attempted cure of colorectal cancer. Although some advantages may be possible, some disadvantages also have been postulated. Laparoscopic treatment of benign disease is far less controversial. Three of the best procedures and indications, respectively, are laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis, laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic stoma creation for perianal Crohn's disease. Other potentially advantageous surgeries and indications include laparoscopic-assisted total abdominal colectomy for colonic Crohn's disease, laparoscopic total proctocolectomy for colonic and anorectal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic secondary ileoproctostomy or coloproctostomy as Hartmann reversal procedures. Significant benefits can be expected with these procedures relative to decreased pain; ileus; length of hospital stay; disability, and, possibly, adhesion formation and subsequent bowel obstruction, and improved cosmesis.

The use of temporary laparoscopic loop ileostomy in lumbosacral burns

The technique of laparoscopic formation of loop ileostomies has been previously described for use in a variety of conditions. We present this as an option for faecal diversion in severe burns involving the back and buttock region and describe its use in two cases. Faecal diversion allows for easier wound care and nursing. Intra-abdominal assessment of these very sick patients can also be performed simultaneously. The technique is relatively simple, readily available and associated with minimal morbidity. Furthermore, this technique minimises interference with the abdominal wall as a donor site for skin grafts.

Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent enterotomy is a feared complication of adhesiotomy during abdominal reoperation. The nature and extent of this adhesion-associated problem are unknown.

METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent reoperation between July 1995 and September 1997 were reviewed retrospectively for inadvertent enterotomy, risk factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate parameters, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Inadvertent enterotomy occurred in 52 (19 per cent) of 270 reoperations. Dividing adhesions in the lower abdomen and pelvis, in particular, caused bowel injury. In univariate analysis body mass index was significantly higher in patients with inadvertent enterotomy (mean(s.d.) 25.5(4.6) kg/m2 ) than in those without enterotomy (21.9(4.3) kg/m2 ) (P < 0.03). Patient age and three or more previous laparotomies appeared to be independent parameters predicting inadvertent enterotomy (odds ratio (95 per cent confidence interval) 1.9 (1.3-2.7) and 10.4 (5.0-21.6) respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with inadvertent enterotomy had significantly more postoperative complications (P < 0.01) and urgent relaparotomies (P < 0.001), a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (P < 0.001) and parenteral nutrition usage (P < 0.001), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of inadvertent enterotomy during reoperation is high. This adhesion-related complication has an impact on postoperative morbidity

Gasless laparoscopic-assisted intestinal stoma creation through a single incision

Intestinal stoma creation has been performed using both open and laparoscopic surgery. However, each technique still has disadvantages. We created the intestinal stoma through one incision, with the use of the laparoscope in a gasless fashion. This method has not been reported previously. Fourteen adult patients underwent this technique between February 1996 and December 1998. Indications for stoma creation were for various anorectal disease processes, most commonly for purposes of hygiene in patients with spinal cord injury. The average operative time to perform the stoma was 58 (range, 15-78) minutes, with minimal blood loss (<35 ml). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 22 months. Two cases (14 percent) were converted secondary to severe adhesions. All nonconverted patients were able to tolerate a regular diet within two days of surgery. There was only one stoma-related complication. Two patients (14 percent) died of comorbidities during follow-up. In conclusion, the initial experience with gasless laparoscopic-assisted intestinal stoma creation through a single incision is encouraging. Patients requiring ostomy creation as a single intervention may benefit from this approach.

Complications of abdominal stoma surgery

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to review and summarize the complications of ileostomy and colostomy creation and subsequent closure.

METHODS

The English-language medical literature for at least the past 15 years was reviewed comprehensively.

RESULTS

Complications of surgery for the creation of end, loop, and "end loop" stomas are presented. Technical factors, which might influence complication rates, are discussed. Optimal management of ostomy complications is presented, especially for peristomal hernias. Similarly, techniques and complications for stoma closure are analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Stoma creation is not a trivial undertaking; careful surgical technique minimizes complications (which are relatively frequent), and promotes good ostomy function. Peristomal hernias are difficult to cure permanently. The morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure is also appreciable.

A clinical approach to fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is the impaired ability to control gas or stool. It is a disabling and distressing condition. Its exact incidence and prevalence are unknown. It is a disorder about which patients are frequently reluctant to discuss, even with their physician. However, it is a common condition especially in older individuals, where the prevalence has been reported to approach 60%. In women, incontinence reaches 54% as a result of childbirth. Of the patients surgically treated, the female-to-male ratio is 4 to 1. In an epidemiological study to identify its community-based prevalence, the University of Illinois determined fecal incontinence existed in 2.2% of the general population. There is available treatment for fecal incontinence. Many patients improve with conservative treatment (constipating agents, antidiarrheal medications, dietary changes) or with biofeedback. For patients where conservative treatment has failed, surgical treatment (direct-apposition sphincter repair, overlapping sphincteroplasty, postanal repair, neosphincter procedures) may be successful.