Elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular disease. A prospective study in 50 patients

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis: a prospective study

Results of this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is a safe, feasible, and effective management strategy.

Background:

Surgical treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease is still debatable. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis. Patients offered laparoscopic surgery presented with acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey type I, II, III), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, bleeding, or sigmoid stenosis caused by chronic diverticulitis.

Method:

All patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy within a 12-year period were prospectively entered into a database registry. One-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis constituted the planned procedure. A 4-trocar approach with suprapubic minilaparotomy was performed. Main data recorded were age, sex, postoperative pain, return of bowel function, operation time, duration of hospital stay, and early and late complications.

Results:

During the study period, 260 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis. The cohort included 104 male and 156 female patients; M to F ratio was 4:6. Postoperative pain was controlled by NSAIDs or weak opioid analgesia. Fifteen patients (5.7%) required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. The most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess, and peritonitis. Mean operative time was 130±54. Average postoperative hospital stay was 10±3 days. A longer hospital stay was recorded for Hinchey type IIb patients. Complications were recorded in 30 patients (11.5%). The most common complications that required reoperation were hemorrhage in 2 patients (0.76) and anastomotic leak in 5 patients (only 3 of them required reoperation). The mortality among them was 2 patients (0.76%).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible, and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

Population-based trend analysis of 2813 patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has become increasingly popular. The objective of this trend analysis was to assess whether clinical outcomes following laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease have improved over the past 10 years.

METHODS

The analysis was based on the prospective database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Some 2813 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease from 1995 to 2006 were included. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Over time, there was a significant reduction in the conversion rate (from 27.3 to 8.6 per cent; P(trend) < 0.001), local postoperative complication rate (23.6 to 6.2 per cent; P(trend) = 0.004), general postoperative complication rate (14.6 to 4.9 per cent; P(trend) = 0.024) and reoperation rate (5.5 to 0.6 per cent; P(trend) = 0.015). Postoperative median length of hospital stay significantly decreased from 11 to 7 days (P(trend) < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This first trend analysis in the literature of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic sigmoid resection, based on almost 3000 patients, has provided compelling evidence that rates of postoperative complications, conversion and reoperation, and length of hospital stay have decreased significantly over the past 10 years.

Colonoscopy assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a case report

INTRODUCTION

We report a case of colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used for the management of sigmoid volvulus.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 68-year-old female who underwent colonoscopy assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. In this procedure, an anvil is inserted into the anus with colonoscopic assistance. An anastomosis is established without removing the colon from the abdominal cavity, and the maximum incision size is approximately 2 cm, similar to that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The risk of infection is lower compared with pure laparoscopic surgery, in which an incision is made for extracting the tissue specimen without opening the colon within the abdominal cavity to maintain anastomosis. The patient was discharged 1 week after surgery without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that this new technique is a feasible approach for the treatment of benign lesions, particularly sigmoid volvulus, which is generally large enough to allow insertion of the anvil.

[Results of sigma resection in acute complicated diverticulitis : method and time of surgical intervention]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to check the results of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for sigmoid diverticular disease with respect to stage of inflammation and time of surgical intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients were divided into four groups: uncomplicated (Group 1) vs complicated diverticular disease (Group 2), and depending on surgical intervention in early elective (4-8 days, Group A) vs late elective sigmoid resection (4-6 weeks, Group B).

RESULTS

At total of 244 patients underwent laparoscopically-assisted resection during the examination period. Differences in favor of Group 1 were found in duration of surgery (153 min vs 167 min), postoperative wound infections (3.55% vs 15.5%), and postoperative hospitalization period (12.2 days vs 14.6 days). Group A had more conversions (7.8% vs 0.9%), more minor complications (25.9% vs 12.9%), and more wound infections (16.4% vs 4.6%) than Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sigmoid resection can be performed in cases of complicated diverticulitis without significantly increasing their overall morbidity. Because of the lower complication rate, we recommend that patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis receive initial antibiotic treatment and then undergo late elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection.

Long-term quality-of-life after open and laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (LSC) is frequently performed for sigmoid diseases with excellent prognosis. We aimed to determine the long-term quality-of-life after open sigmoid colectomy (OSC) compared with LSC.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients were investigated 40.5+/-2.8 months (mean+/-SEM) after LSC. Each LSC patient was matched to a patient after OSC. Patients were interviewed by telephone and the Eypasch quality-of-life questionnaire was answered by mail.

RESULTS

LSC entailed fewer minor complications (P=0.0003) and 97% of the patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result, which was more compared with 63% after OSC (P=0.001). Patients suffering from recurrent diverticulitis had a similar quality-of-life index after LSC and OSC (P=0.945). A minor trend was observed in patients with early-staged colorectal neoplasia in favor of LSC (113.6+/-3.3 vs. 106.0+/-4.2; P=0.21, mean+/-SEM).

CONCLUSIONS

LSC is superior concerning minor complications and cosmesis, whereas quality-of-life is similar in the long term.

The impact of uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis on laparoscopic surgery conversion rates and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis on conversion rates and complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS) for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2004, 125 patients underwent LS [91 laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and 34 hand-assisted (HA) colectomy for diverticular disease, 79 uncomplicated and 46 complicated]. Cases not completed laparoscopically were considered converted. Complicated diverticulitis was defined as diverticular disease associated with abscess, fistula, bleeding or stricture.

RESULTS

The mean age was 59 years with 67 (54%) men with a mean follow-up of 23 months. The conversion rate was 26% (33 patients). The only factor independently associated with conversion was a history of previous abdominal surgery (37% vs. 14%, p = 0.004). Among the subset of patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis, the number of diverticulitis episodes (DE), the time between the first and last DE, and the time between the last DE and surgery, were not significantly associated with conversion. Early complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 30 (25%) patients. Twenty-one long-term complications (>30 days from surgery) occurred in 20 patients and the one and two-year cumulative probabilities of these complications were 14% and 22%, respectively. Early complications were significantly higher among patients requiring conversion (44% vs. 24%, p = 0.04) but were not significantly higher among patients with complicated diverticulitis (39% vs. 24%, p = 0.11). The rates of long-term complications were not significantly higher among patients that required conversion or had complicated diverticulitis (one-year rate 23% vs. 11%, p = 0.47; 18% vs. 13%, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

A previous history of abdominal surgery was associated with a higher conversion rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease. Long-term patient outcomes are not adversely impacted by laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticulitis or laparoscopic surgery requiring conversion to an open procedure.

Can laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection provide uncomplicated management even in cases of complicated diverticulitis?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection has become an accepted method for treating uncomplicated diverticulitis. This prospective study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopic sigmoid resection for uncomplicated and complicated sigmoid diverticular disease used to check the indication for the complicated stages of diverticulitis.

METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for sigmoid diverticulitis at the authors' hospital between 1999 and 2005 were divided into two groups: group 1 (uncomplicated diverticular disease) and group 2 (complicated diverticular disease). The exclusion criteria specified generalized peritonitis, signs of sepsis, and extensive previous abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients (108 men and 95 women) who underwent laparoscopically assisted resection during the examination period, 112 were assigned to group 1 and 91 to group 2. Differences in favor of group 1 were found for the duration of surgery (154 vs 166 min), the conversion rate (1.8% vs 9.9%), the postoperative wound infections (2.7% vs 13.2%), and the postoperative hospitalization period (12.3 +/- 3.9 vs 15.0 +/- 5.6 days). No significant differences were seen in any other areas such as completion of nutritional buildup (4.6 vs 5.0 days) or time until the first postoperative bowel movement (2.8 vs 3.3 days). Total postoperative morbidity (16.1% vs 26.4%; p = 0.10) tended to be increased in group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sigmoid resection can be performed for patients who have complicated diverticulitis without significantly increasing their overall morbidity. This group of patients could benefit from the advantages of the minimally invasive procedure despite a longer operating time and a higher conversion rate.

[Meta-analysis on minimally invasive surgical therapy of sigmoid diverticulitis]

The bowel diverticulitis is a complication of diverticulosis, occuring in 35% patients in 20 years after diagnosis. The study purpose was analysis of the results published in world literature.

METHOD

Double blind electronic search of several databases using key words: diverticulitis, laparoscopy.

RESULTS

11 studies with 415 patients that satisfy the criteria were selected. AGE: 62.7 + 14.2. Hinchey stadiums: I, IIa i IIb of these 44% I and 28% IIa i Iib each. Operative time: 197.4 +/- 49.6 min. Conversions: 11.7 +/- 10.1 (0 - 38.9%). Protective stoma: 5.5%. Bowel sounds: 2.3 - 3.2 postoperative day. Oral feeding: 2.6-5 postoperative day. Hospitalization: 6.1 2.1 dana. Anastomotic dehiscence: 2.8%, wound infection: 7.3%, iatrogen rectum perforation with stapler: 3.3%, bleeding: 3.5%, ileus: 4.4%, reoperation rate: 4.7%.

CONCLUSION

Sigmoid resection with or without a protective "loop" ileostomy is technically feasable by minimally invasive surgical technique, with an acceptable ratio of benefits and complications.

Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It was the aim of this prospective study to compare the outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid and anterior resection for diverticulitis and non-diverticular disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for benign and malignant disease within a 10-year period were entered into the prospective PC database registry. For outcome analysis, patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid and anterior resection for diverticular disease were compared with patients who underwent the same operation for non-inflammatory (non-diverticular) disease. The parameters analyzed included age, gender, co-morbid conditions, diagnosis, procedure, duration of surgery, transfusion requirements, conversion, morbidity including major (requiring reoperation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (postdischarge) complications, stay in the ICU, hospitalization, and mortality. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analyzed. Statistics included Student's t-test and chi-square analysis (p<0.05 was considered statistically significant).

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients were evaluated including 363 with diverticular disease and 313 with non-inflammatory disease. There were no significant differences in conversion rates (6.6 vs. 7.3%, p>0.05), so that the laparoscopic completion rate was 93.4% (n=339) in the diverticulitis group and 92.7% (n=290) in the non-diverticulitis group. The two groups did not differ significantly in age or presence of co-morbid conditions (p>0.05). In the diverticulitis group, recurrent diverticulitis (58.4%), and complicated diverticulitis (27.7%) were the most common indications, whereas in the non-diverticulitis group, outlet obstruction by sigmoidoceles (30.0%) and cancer (32.4%) were the main indications. The most common procedure was laparoscopic sigmoid resection, followed by sigmoid resection with rectopexy and anterior resection. No significant differences were documented for major complications (7.4 vs. 7.9%), minor complications (11.5 vs. 14.5%), late-onset complications (3.0 vs. 3.5), reoperation (8.6 vs. 9.3%) or mortality (0.6 vs. 0.7%) between the two groups (p>0.05). In the postoperative course, no differences were noted in terms of stay in the ICU, postoperative ileus, parenteral analgesics, oral feeding, and length of hospitalization (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that laparoscopic sigmoid and anterior resection can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality for both diverticular disease and non-diverticular disease. The results show in particular that laparoscopic resection for inflammation is not associated with increased morbidity.

Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease

Laparoscopy surgery has achieved wide acceptance for the treatment of benign disease of the colon. A review of the literature regarding the indications, surgical technique, and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is presented.

Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients

BACKGROUND

It was the aim of this prospective study to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease within a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a PC database registry. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages I and IIa), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid stenosis or outlet obstruction caused by chronic diverticulitis. Surgical procedures (sigmoid and anterior resection, left colectomy and resection rectopexy) included intracorporeal dissection and colorectal anastomosis. Parameters studied included age, gender, stage of disease, procedure, duration of surgery, intraoperative technical variables, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, total complication rate including major (requiring re-operation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (post-discharge) complication rates, stay on ICU, hospitalisation, mortality, and recurrence. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analysed. Comparative outcome analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease and experience.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Conversion rate was 6.8% ( n=27), so that laparoscopic completion rate was 93.2% ( n=369). Most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess or fistulas. The most common procedure was sigmoid resection ( n=279), followed by anterior resection ( n=36) and left colectomy ( n=29). Total complication rate was 18.4% ( n=68). Major complication rate was 7.6% ( n=28), whereas the most common complication requiring re-operation was haemorrhage in 3.3% ( n=12). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 1.6% ( n=6). Minor complications were noted in 10.7% ( n=40), late-onset complications occurred in 2.7% ( n=10). Mortality was 0.5% ( n=2). Mean duration of surgery was 193 (range 75-400) min, return to normal diet was completed after 6.8 (range 3-19) days. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 (range 4-71) days. No recurrence of diverticulitis occurred.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: results of a multicenter study in 179 patients

BACKGROUND

We undertook a retrospective multicenter study of elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the safety and the results of the procedure performed by a large number of surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1998 and April 1999, the French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery recruited retrospectively 179 patients from 10 surgical units, operated on for elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. There were 94 men and 85 women with a mean age of 58 years (range, 30-82). The indications for surgery were acute attacks in 123 cases, complicated diverticulitis in 47 cases, and miscellaneous in 9 cases.

RESULTS

The performed procedure was a successful laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomy in 154 cases (with totally intracorporeal anastomosis in 136 cases and hand-sewn anastomosis via small incision in 18 cases). The mean operation time was 223 min +/- 79 (range, 100-480). There was no mortality and 23 complications occurred in 23 patients (14.9%). Postoperative ileus lasted 2.5 +/- 0.9 days (range, 1-6), and oral intake started after 3.3 +/- 1.3 days (range, 1-12). The mean postoperative stay was 9.3 days (range, 4-50). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 25 cases (13.9%). The essential causes of conversion were obesity, severe adhesions, and colonic inflammation. The mean postoperative stay for the 25 converted patients was 13 +/- 8.5 days (range, 7-42).

CONCLUSION

Elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis is feasible and is safe. The complication and mortality rates are similar to those observed after open procedures. For experienced surgical teams, laparoscopic colonic resection is a good approach for selected patients suffering from symptomatic diverticulitis.

Prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for benign colorectal disease

Laparoscopic surgery is not being applied in a widespread manner in the management of benign or malignant colorectal disorders. This is a prospective comparison of 279 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. Colorectal diseases included inflammatory bowel, diverticular disease, colonic inertia, polyps, and rectal prolapse. Data included 136 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (mean age, 51.3 years) and 143 who underwent open surgery (mean age, 56.0 years). Thirteen patients' procedures were converted to open, but their results were included in the laparoscopic surgery group. There was no significant difference in operative time, postoperative complications, morbidity, or mortality between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. More patients in the laparoscopic group had significant cardiac disease (6.0%, laparoscopic; 0.7%, open; = 0.01). More patients in the open group had undergone previous gastrointestinal surgery (3.7%, laparoscopic; 11.2%, open; = 0.02). The laparoscopic group used less postoperative analgesia and resumed oral feeding quicker ( < 0.05). In addition, time to first flatus and bowel movement was faster ( < 0.05), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (7.7 +/- 15.8 versus 11.0 +/- 8.3; = 0.03) was shorter in the laparoscopic surgery group. There are significant advantages in postoperative recovery with the laparoscopic technique. If proven to be cost-effective, laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign diseases should become the standard of surgical care.

Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery is an important postoperative event that leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Postoperative leak rates are frequently used as an indicator of the quality of surgical care provided. Comparison of rates between and within institutions depends on the use of standard definitions and methods of measurement of anastomotic leak. The aim of this study was to review the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after oesophagogastric, hepatopancreaticobiliary and lower gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of the published literature. Searches were carried out on five bibliographical databases (Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and HealthSTAR) for English language articles published between 1993 and 1999. Articles were critically appraised by two independent reviewers and data on definition and measurement of anastomotic leak were extracted.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies were reviewed and a total of 56 separate definitions of anastomotic leak were identified at three sites: upper gastrointestinal (13 definitions), hepatopancreaticobiliary (14) and lower gastrointestinal (29). The majority of studies used a combination of clinical features and radiological investigations to define and detect anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

There is no universally accepted definition of anastomotic leak at any site. The definitions and values used to measure anastomotic failure vary extensively and preclude accurate comparison of rates between studies and institutions.

Treating benign colon disorders using laparoscopic colectomy

Laparoscopic bowel surgery is a recent application of minimally invasive videoscopic techniques. Understanding the anatomy and physiology of the bowel, the background of bowel disorders and their treatment, signs and symptoms of bowel disease, and the patient selection process can help perioperative nurses better care for patients diagnosed with colon polyps, diverticulitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

The need for a conversion is a problem inherent in laparoscopic surgery. The present study points up the significance of conversion for the results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery and identifies the risk factors that establish the need for conversion.

METHOD

The study took the form of a multicentric, prospective, observational study within the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. A total of 33 institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland participated. The study period was 3.5 years. Cases were documented with the aid of a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

Within the framework of the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group, a total of 1,658 patients were recruited to a multicenter study over a period of three and one-half years (from August 1, 1995 to February 1, 1999). The observed conversion rate was 5.2 percent (n = 86). The patients requiring a conversion were significantly heavier (body mass index, 26.5 vs. 24.9) than those undergoing pure laparoscopy. Resections of the rectum were associated with a higher risk for conversion (20.9 vs. 13 percent). Intraoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently in the conversion group (27.9 vs. 3.8 percent). The duration of the operation was significantly increased after conversion in a considerable proportion of the procedures performed. Postoperative morbidity (47.7 vs. 26.1 percent), mortality (3.5 vs. 1.5 percent), recovery time, and postoperative hospital stay were all negatively influenced by conversion, in part significantly. Institutions with experience of more than 100 laparoscopic colorectal procedures proved to have a significantly lower conversion rate than those with experience of fewer than 100 such interventions (4.3 vs. 6.9 percent).

CONCLUSION

Although, of itself, conversion is not considered to be a complication of laparoscopic surgery, it is true that the postoperative course after conversion is associated with appreciably poorer results in terms of morbidity, mortality, convalescence, blood transfusion requirement, and postoperative hospital stay. The importance of experience in laparoscopic surgery can be demonstrated on the basis of the conversion rates. Careful patient selection oriented to the experience of the surgeon is required if we are to keep the conversion, morbidity, and mortality rates of laparoscopic colorectal procedures as low as possible.

Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn's disease

Laparoscopy is still controversial when applied for the attempted cure of colorectal cancer. Although some advantages may be possible, some disadvantages also have been postulated. Laparoscopic treatment of benign disease is far less controversial. Three of the best procedures and indications, respectively, are laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis, laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic stoma creation for perianal Crohn's disease. Other potentially advantageous surgeries and indications include laparoscopic-assisted total abdominal colectomy for colonic Crohn's disease, laparoscopic total proctocolectomy for colonic and anorectal Crohn's disease, and laparoscopic secondary ileoproctostomy or coloproctostomy as Hartmann reversal procedures. Significant benefits can be expected with these procedures relative to decreased pain; ileus; length of hospital stay; disability, and, possibly, adhesion formation and subsequent bowel obstruction, and improved cosmesis.