Laparoscopic repositioning of an adjustable silicone gastric band for pouch dilatation and stoma obstruction

High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, more than 130,000 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandings (LAGB) have been performed for the treatment of morbid obesity. Nowadays, longer follow-up data are available in the literature and increasing numbers of late complications and treatment failures of gastric banding have been reported. The aim of the present study was the long-term evaluation of two different rescue operations after failed LAGB: conversion to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic gastric rebanding.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and November 2002, 74 consecutive patients underwent either laparoscopic gastric rebanding (n = 44) or LRYGB (n = 30) after failed LAGB. There were 14 men and 60 women, with a median age of 42 (23-60) years. The indication for reoperation was an increasing body mass index (BMI) and band-related complications such as pouch dilatation, band slippage, and penetration after LAGB. Rebandings were done by preference during the initial period of the study and LRYGB was the treatment of choice during the latter period. The success of the rescue operation was assessed by postoperative changes in the BMI, improvements of co-morbidities, and the need for further reoperations (secondary failure). The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-60 months).

RESULTS

Patients who underwent LRYGB had a significantly better weight loss than patients with a rebanding operation (mean -6.1 versus +1.5 BMI points). In addition, the LRYGB patients showed a significantly better control of serum cholesterol during the long term follow-up (-0.6 versus +0.1 mmol/l). Almost half of the patients (45%) in the rebanding group needed a further operative revision, whereas only 20% underwent reoperation after rescue LRYGB. Thus, the secondary failure rate in the rebanding group was significantly higher compared to the bypass group (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The present long-term study confirms our previous finding that LRYGB is a better treatment than rebanding after failed laparoscopic gastric banding regarding weight loss and treatment of co-morbidities. During the long-term follow-up the reoperation rate due to secondary failure became significantly higher in the rebanding group. We therefore recommend that LRYGB should be preferred as rescue procedure after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Retrospective study of laparascopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: results and complications in 127 patients

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic gastric banding is currently the most popular surgical technique for morbId obesity. This wIdespread use of surgery has been evaluated by a number of clinical studies, particularly on weight change.

METHODS

In a retrospective study of 127 obese patients operated between 1996 and 2000, data were collected for weight change, medical and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Of 127 patients, failures of gastric banding were noted during 2 surgical operations. The average follow-up period was 33 +/- 20 Months. Average weight loss in all patients was 19.9 +/- 5.3 kg (15.3 +/- 4.2%). No difference in weight loss was observed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. During the follow-up, data were collected on 53 complications (42.4% of all gastric banding operations). 3 main types of complication were found: access port related complications (22.6% of the total), band slippage (20.7% of the total) and tubing related complications (16.9% of the total). No prognostic factor for these complications could be Identified from multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are very similar to those of other weight evolution studies. We found that there was a significant incIdence of surgical and medical complications during the follow-up because of the meticulous way all complications were recorded, even the most insignificant. This morbIdity must be borne in mind before surgery is performed.

Anterior versus posterior slippage: two different types of eccentric pouch dilatation in patients with adjustable laparoscopic gastric banding

PURPOSE

To describe two different types of band dislocation that may occur in morbidly obese patients following adjustable laparoscopic gastric banding (ALGB) with the LAP-BAND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

170 morbidly obese patients were treated with an LAP-BAND at our institution. In the first 20 patients the band was positioned transbursally, which means that the lesser sac is penetrated during laparoscopic band implantation. In the following 150 patients the operation technique was changed to suprabursal band positioning where the lesser sac is not penetrated. Plain radiographs and single contrast studies of all patients who developed band instability in the follow-up were analyzed retrospectively and compared to the clinical and intraoperative findings and to the operation technique used.

RESULTS

Over a time period of 3.5 years 'posterior slippage' occurred in all 20 patients with transbursal band placement, but it never occurred after suprabursal band placement. Never- theless 4 patients with suprabursal band placement presented with an eccentric pouch dilatation, secondary to 'anterior slippage' after the seromuscular stitches had burst on the anterior and superior surface of the band. All these patients presented with food intolerance and all of them had to be reoperated. The radiographic findings were pathognomonic for each type of band dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Band dislocation is a known major complication that may occur following ALGB and it may present in two different forms. While 'posterior slippage' can be avoided if the band is placed suprabursally, 'anterior slippage' may still occur. It is important to be familiar with both types of band dislocation since they require early detection and surgical band replacement or band refixation.

Lessons learned from laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastric banding is a minimally invasive bariatric operation that is increasing in popularity at many centers worldwide. Although this procedure is not yet approved in the United States, clinical trials are ongoing.

METHODS

We report our results of a 3-year follow-up on 60 patients who underwent the laparoscopic gastric band procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. The procedure was performed at the Wesley Obesity Clinic in Brisbane, Australia.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 51 of the 60 patients (85%) still had the laparoscopic gastric band in place. All of the patients had a lower body weight after undergoing the procedure. The average weight loss was 39 kg (range 2 to 98 kg), representing a loss of 65% of average excess body weight. Twenty-five of 51 patients (49%) regained some weight after their initial loss, but the average amount was only 5 kg. The remaining 26 patients have remained at their lowest body weight recorded after the procedure or are continuing to lose weight. There was no operative mortality. Complications predominantly were caused by band slippage (21%), which has been nearly eliminated in recent practice (1 slip in the last 225 cases). Subsequent modifications in the technique to prevent band slippage included placing the band near the level of the esophagus, with minimal disruption of the posterior gastric attachments and diligent suturing of the band in place.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the laparoscopic gastric band is effective in short- and long-term weight loss. The high rate of reoperation for repositioning has been avoided in current practice.

Treatment of morbid obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding affects esophageal motility

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has become the prefered method for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity in Europe. It is not known whether this procedure may induce gastroesophageal reflux and whether it may impair esophageal peristalsis.

METHODS

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (Swedish band) was performed in 43 patients (median body mass index [BMI] 42.5 kg/m(2)). Preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively all patients were assessed for reflux symptoms. In addition all patients underwent preoperative and postoperative endoscopy, esophageal barium studies and manometry, and 24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring.

RESULTS

The median BMI dropped significantly to 33.1 kg/m(2) (P <0.05). Preoperatively 12 patients complained of reflux symptoms. Mild esophagitis was detected in 10 patients. Postoperatively only 1 patient complained of heartburn and mild esophagitis was diagnosed in another patient. None of the patients had dysphagia. Preoperatively a defective LES and pathologic pH-testing were found in 9 and 15 patients, respectively. These parameters were normal in all of the patients postoperatively. Postoperatively there was significant impairment of LES relaxation and deterioration of esophageal peristalsis with dilatation of the esophagus in some of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding provides a sufficient antireflux barrier and therefore prevents pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. However, it impairs relaxation of the LES, leading to weak esophageal peristalsis.