Videothoracoscopy an effective method for evaluating and managing thoracic trauma patients

Massive right hemothorax as the source of hemorrhagic shock after laparoscopic cholecystectomy - case report of a rare intraoperative complication

A 62-year old man was referred to our institution in hemorrhagic shock after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, performed at an outside hospital. A chest X-ray revealed a right-sided massive pleural effusion. Urgent surgical exploration was performed through a video-assisted mini-thoracotomy which revealed active bleeding from a pleural adherence. Successful hemostasis was achieved intraoperatively and the patient had an uneventful recovery. In absence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage, a hemothorax should be considered as a potential source of major bleeding in patients who develop symptoms of hypovolemia after laparoscopic surgery.

Thoracoscopy for Trauma

Thoracoscopy has numerous applications for both diagnosis and treatment in thoracic trauma. It is excellent for the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries, mediastinal evaluation, and the assessment of persistent air-leak. It offers therapeutic intervention for diaphragmatic lacerations, thoracic bleeding in stable patients, evacuation of residual hemothorax, air-leaks, and the prevention and treatment of empyema. Judiciously applied, it is a powerful tool in the armamentarium of the trauma surgeon.

Use of a trauma service clinical pathway to improve patient outcomes for retained traumatic hemothorax

INTRODUCTION

Early evacuation of retained hemothorax (RHTX) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. In 2006, our trauma surgery service instituted a clinical pathway for management of RHTX that was designed to decrease time to operation and improve patient outcomes. We report our experience with early evacuation of posttraumatic RHTX after instituting a service-wide clinical pathway.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2007, 29 operations were performed by the trauma surgery service for RHTX. Using the clinical pathway, if patients had a persistent effusion on hospital day 2, the patient underwent thoracoscopic (VATS) evacuation of the hemothorax. A case control cohort (24 patients) was generated from 2003 to 2005 of operations for retained hemothorax before implementation of this pathway.

RESULTS

The mean age was 33.2 years. There was no difference in ISS between groups (p = 0.14). The study group had significantly decreased time to operating room (3.0 +/- 0.33 days vs. 9.9 +/- 2.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stays (10.8 +/- 0.8 days vs. 30.5 +/- 5.8 days, P = 0.003). All 29 study patients had their hemothorax evacuated by VATS, whereas 14 of 29 control patients had evacuation attempted by VATS (P = 0.0003). There were no differences in complications or reoperation between groups. Total hospital charges for the study group were $46,471 in the study group compared with $126,221 in the control group (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a clinical pathway for early evacuation of retained hemothorax can significantly improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital costs. Furthermore, trauma surgeons are capable of safely performing thoracic surgery for evacuation of retained hemothorax.

Videothoracoscopy versus intrapleural streptokinase for management of post traumatic retained haemothorax: a retrospective study of 65 cases

BACKGROUND

Post traumatic retained haemothorax (PRH) may cause pulmonary restrictions or septic pleural complications. Currently, minimally invasive procedures such as videothoracoscopy or intrapleural fibrinolysis have replaced open surgery in an effort to avoid these complications.

OBJECTIVE

We have reviewed retrospectively our use of videothoracoscopy versus intrapleural streptokinase for the management of PRH over the last 10 years.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

There were 56 males and nine females in the study. Thirty-one cases had been managed by intrapleural streptokinase (group I), and videothoracoscopy was performed on 34 cases (group II). Therapeutic results for both groups were determined by chest radiographs.

RESULTS

In the population from which we drew our study group, retained haemothoraces occurred in 10.9% of 596 cases with traumatic haemothorax. In group I, 22 patients had radiological improvement; the others underwent thoracotomy. In this group, mean hospitalisation time was 14.5(+/-4.2) days, and three cases were complicated by empyema. In group II, all patients except four had complete radiological improvement; two of them required a decortication. In this group, mean hospital stay was 9.8(+/-3.7) days. There were no deaths in either group. The differences between group I and group II for length of hospital stay and number of thoracotomies was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Videothoracoscopy is therefore a more effective procedure than intrapleural streptokinase for the management of PRH.

Complications of thoracoscopy

Thoracoscopy is a minimally invasive thoracic surgical technique that is gaining widespread use for several surgical procedures. Although the complication rate is relatively low, there are definable risks associated with the technique. Careful attention to patient selection and an understanding of the complications associated with one-lung ventilation and video-assisted surgical techniques can help one to anticipate and prevent complications.

Thoracoscopic evaluation and treatment of thoracic trauma

VATS has a diagnostic and therapeutic role in the treatment of patients with chest trauma, but the basic rule of safety over technology must be applied. It is an effective means for managing diaphragmatic injuries, hemothorax, empyemas, and persistent air leaks in selected hemodynamically stable patients. An overview of reported series (Table 1) demonstrates that VATS can be used successfully in the evaluation of patients with blunt and penetrating trauma. In appropriately selected cases, thoracoscopy can prove to be useful, with conversion to thoracotomy in only 10% of patients. Additional studies must be performed to determine any cost benefit compared with conventional therapy.

Damage control for thoracic injuries

Some of the earliest damage control techniques were applied to the chest during emergency center thoracotomy. It provided a paradigm that was adapted to other areas. Damage control of chest injuries has a different philosophy than that of abdominal injuries. Damage control in the abdomen primarily consists of multiple staged operations with abbreviated closures. Damage control in the chest consists of different technical maneuvers to use quicker and technically less demanding operations to accomplish the same goal. The philosophy of doing only enough to restore a survivable physiology is still a common theme. The following are the major principles of damage control for thoracic injuries: 1. Emergency center thoracotomy is a damage control prototype. 2. Anterolateral thoracotomy is the empiric incision of choice in the patient in extremis. 3. Nonanatomically stapled lung resections, pulmonary tractotomy, and en masse lobectomy/pneumonectomy are pulmonary damage control procedures. 4. The unique physiology of the chest may require en masse closure of muscles or patch closure of the wound. 5. Cardiopulmonary physiology can be affected by packing. Packing thus has a limited role in thoracic damage control. 6. Prosthetic grafts, intravascular shunts, and ligation are common thoracic vascular damage control techniques. 7. With new technology, an increased role for cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac assistance may develop. 8. New technology must not overly complicate a procedure if it is to be a valuable damage control adjunct.