Stent-related ureteric obstruction in paediatric renal transplantation

Double J stent is superior to externally draining ureteric stent in enhancing recovery after kidney transplantation - A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting lowers the rate of urological complications after kidney transplantation. However, there is no consensus about the optimal stent design and duration. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare the influence of double J (JJ) stents and externally draining percutaneous (PC) stents on the early quality of recovery after living donor kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed in two consecutive cohorts of 40 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at the Radboud university medical center between April 2016 and October 2017. The first cohort of 40 patients received a 6-French externally draining PC stent. The second cohort of 40 patients received a 6-French/14 cm JJ stent. We compared the influence of the stent design on the quality of early post-operative recovery (measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire) and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Patients with a JJ stent scored significantly better on the Quality of Recovery score on the third and fifth postoperative day, when compared to patients with a PC stent. Furthermore, in comparison to patients with a PC stent, patients with a JJ stent were earlier mobilising and independent in daily activities, resulting in a shorter length of hospital stay. The number of postoperative urological complications was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of JJ stents during living donor kidney transplantations improves the postoperative recovery and shortens the length of hospital stay, when compared to PC stents without compromising the number of postoperative urological complications.

How to stent the ureter after kidney transplantation in children?-A comparison of two methods of urinary drainage

Ureteral stenting after pediatric renal transplantation serves to prevent obstruction and urinary leakage, but can also cause complications. This study compares the complication rates of both methods. Data were retrospectively collected at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (splint group, n = 61) and Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada (JJ catheter group, n = 50). Outcome measures included urological interventions and incidence of UTIs during the first 3 months post-transplantation. The splint was removed after a median of 9 (IQR 8-12), the JJ catheter after 42 (IQR 36-50) days. Seven (11.5%) children in the splint group needed at least one urological re-intervention versus two in the JJ catheter group (P-value .20). UTIs developed in 19 children (31.1%) in the splint group and in twenty-five (50.0%) children in the JJ catheter group (P-value .04), with a total number of 27 vs. 57 UTIs (P-value .02). Nine (33.3%) vs. 35 (61.4%) of these, respectively, occurred during the presence of the splint (P-value <.001). Children with a JJ catheter developed more UTIs than children with a splint; the latter, however, tended to require more re-interventions. Modification of either method is needed to find the best way to stent the ureter.

Double-J Versus External Ureteral Stents in Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis

Background:

Kidney transplantation has long been recognized as the best available therapy for end stage kidney disease.

Objectives:

This study aimed to compare outcomes of double-J versus percutaneous ureteral stent placement in renal transplantation.

Patients and Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed on data of renal transplantations performed at our institution in a 12-month period. In this period, external and double-J stents were used in parallel. Length of hospital stay and stent-associated complications were evaluated.

Results:

In 76 kidney transplants, 43 external (group 1) and 33 double-J (group 2) urinary stents were used. No significant difference was observed in the number of urinary tract infections, ureteric stenosis or necrosis. The mean overall length of hospital stay was comparable in both groups (20.7 days in group 1 vs 19.3 days in group 2, P = 0.533). For patients without immunological complications, the hospital stay was significantly reduced using double-J stents (12.9 days in group 1, 10.8 days in group 2, P = 0.018). Leakage of the ureteroneocystostomy occurred in 6 out of 43 patients in group 1 (13.9%). No case of anastomotic insufficiency was observed in group 2 (P = 0.035). Macrohematuria was detected in 13 out of the 43 patients in group 1 (30.2%), compared to 3 out of 33 patients in group 2 (9.1%; P = 0.045).

Conclusions:

This nonrandomized comparison of stent types in kidney transplantation supports the use of prophylactic double-J stents in terms of decreased ureteric complications and reduced length of hospital stay.

Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplantation contribute to patient morbidity and compromise graft function. The majority arise from the vesicoureteric anastomosis and present early after transplantation. Ureteric stents have been successfully used to treat such complications. A number of centres have adopted a policy of universal prophylactic stenting, at the time of graft implantation, to reduce the incidence of urine leaks and ureteric stenosis. Stents are associated with specific complications and some centres advocate a policy of only stenting selected anastomoses.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the benefits and harms of routine ureteric stenting to prevent urological complications in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (up to 8 January 2013) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included in our meta-analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four reviewers assessed the studies for quality against four criteria (allocation concealment, blinding, intention-to-treat and completeness of follow-up). The primary outcome was the incidence of MUCs. Further outcomes of interest were graft and patient survival and the incidence of adverse events (urinary tract infection (UTI), haematuria, irritative symptoms, pain and stent migration). Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs (1154 patients) of low or moderate quality were identified. The incidence of MUCs was significantly reduced (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.77, P = 0.02, NNT 13) by universal prophylactic stenting. This was dependent on whether the same surgeon performed, or was in attendance, during the operations. Two patients lost their grafts to infective urinary tract complications in the stented group. UTIs, in general, were more common in stented patients (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15) unless the patients were prescribed cotrimoxazole 480 mg/d: in which case the incidence was equivalent (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.33). Stents appeared generally well tolerated, although studies using longer stents (≥ 20 cm) for longer periods (> 6 weeks) had more problems with encrustation and migration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Routine prophylactic stenting reduces the incidence of MUCs. Studies comparing selective stenting and universal prophylactic stenting, whilst difficult to design and analyse, would address the unresolved quality of life and economic issues.

Renal transplantation in children: critical analysis of age related surgical complications

To determine age-related risk factors of urological and vascular complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of 202 renal transplantations in 193 children between 1989 and 2007 at a single institution. Out of 193 grafts (combined renal and liver grafts were excluded), we observed urological complications in 42 cases (21.7%) leading to graft loss in one case and vascular complications in 27 cases (13.9%) leading to graft loss in seven. The urological complications were VUR (n=25, 12.4%), ureteral stricture (n=10, 5%), anastomotic leak (n=4, 2%), ureteral necrosis (n=2, 1%), and incrustative pyelitis (n=1, 0.5%). Vascular complications were arterial stricture (n=14, 7.2%), arterial thrombosis (n=4, 2%), venous thrombosis (n=2, 1%), and others (n=7). Donors aged less than six yr were a risk factor of vascular complications leading to graft loss (p=0.0001), whereas patients with PUV had more urological complications (p=0.001). Overall patient and graft survival is 93.1% and 84% at five yr, respectively. Surgical complications remain a major cause of graft loss (12%) and morbidity in children's kidney transplantation (38.9%). Young age of donors is the major risk factor of early graft loss as a result of vascular complication. However, donor selection based on age is limited by the shortage of organs.

Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplantation contribute to patient morbidity and compromise graft function. The majority arise from the vesico-ureteric anastomosis and present early after transplantation. Ureteric stents have been successfully used to treat such complications. A number of centres have adopted a policy of universal prophylactic stenting, at the time of graft implantation, to reduce the incidence of urine leaks and ureteric stenosis. Stents are associated with specific complications and some centres advocate a policy of only stenting selected anastomoses.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the benefits and harms of routine ureteric stenting to prevent urological complications in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles, books and abstracts and contacted companies, authors and experts to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included in our meta-analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four reviewers assessed the trials for quality against four criteria (allocation concealment, blinding, intention-to-treat and completeness of follow-up). The primary outcome was the incidence of MUCs. Further outcomes of interest were graft and patient survival and the incidence of adverse events (urinary tract infection (UTI), haematuria, irritative symptoms, pain and stent migration). Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs (1154 patients) of low or moderate quality were identified. The incidence of MUCs was significantly reduced (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.77, P = 0.02, NNT 13) by universal prophylactic stenting. This was dependent on whether the same surgeon performed, or was in attendance, during the operations. Two patients lost their grafts to infective urinary tract complications in the stented group. UTIs, in general, were more common in stented patients (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15) unless the patients were prescribed cotrimoxazole 480 mg/d: in which case the incidence was equivalent (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.33). Stents appeared generally well tolerated, although trials using longer stents (>/= 20 cm) for longer periods (> 6 weeks) had more problems with encrustation and migration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Routine prophylactic stenting reduces the incidence of MUCs. Trials comparing selective stenting and universal prophylactic stenting, whilst difficult to design and analyse, would address the unresolved quality of life and economic issues.