Darbepoetin, effective treatment of anaemia in paediatric patients with chronic renal failure

Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in children with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

Background

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) revolutionized the management of anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) when introduced in the late 1980s. A range of ESA types, preparations and administration modalities now exist, with newer agents requiring less frequent administration. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been published in adults, no systematic review has been conducted investigating ESAs in children.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement for the conduct of systematic reviews was used. All available literature on outcomes relating to ESAs in children with CKD was sought. A search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were published trials in English, children with chronic and end-stage kidney disease and use of any ESA studied against any outcome measure. An assessment of risk of bias was carried out in all included randomized trials using the criteria from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two tables were used for data extraction for randomized and observational studies. Study type, participants, inclusion criteria, case characteristics, follow-up duration, ESA type and dosage, interventions and outcomes were extracted by one author.

Results

Of 965 identified articles, 58 were included covering 54 cohorts. Six were randomized trials and 48 were observational studies. A total of 38 studies assessed the efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), 11 of darbepoetin alpha (DA) and 3 of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), with 6 studies appraising secondary outcome measures exclusively. Recruitment to studies was a consistent challenge. The most common adverse effect was hypertension, although confounding effects often limited direct correlation. Two large cohort studies demonstrated a greater hazard of death independently associated with high ESA dose. Secondary outcome measures included quality of life measures, growth and nutrition, exercise capacity, injection site pain, cardiovascular function, intelligent quotient, evoked potentials and platelet function.

Conclusions

All ESA preparations and modes of administration were efficacious, with evidence of harm at higher doses. Evidence supports individualizing treatments, with strong consideration given to alternate treatments in patients who appear resistant to ESA therapy. Further research should focus on randomized trials comparing the efficacy of different preparations, treatment options in apparently ESA-resistant cohorts and clarification of meaningful secondary outcomes to consolidate patient-relevant indices.

De novo weekly and biweekly darbepoetin alfa dosing in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Darbepoetin alfa is a commonly prescribed erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) for correcting anemia in pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, little information exists on its use in ESA-naïve patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in pediatric patients initiating ESA therapy.

METHODS

One-hundred sixteen pediatric ESA-naïve subjects (aged 1-18 years) with CKD stages 3-5D and hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dl from 43 centers in the US, Europe, and Mexico were randomized by age (three groups) and dialysis status (yes vs. no) to receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly (QW) or every 2 weeks (Q2W) subcutaneously (not on dialysis and peritoneal dialysis subjects) and intravenously (hemodialysis subjects). The drug was titrated to achieve Hb levels of 10.0-12.0 g/dl over 25 weeks. Patient- and parent-reported health-related outcomes were measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) in children ≥2 years.

RESULTS

In both groups, mean Hb concentrations increased to ≥11.0 g/dl over the first 3 months of treatment and remained stable within the 10.0-12.0 g/dl target range. The median time to achieve hemoglobin ≥10 g/dl was slightly longer for subjects <12 years (QW and Q2W, both 28 days) vs. those ≥12 years (23 and 22 days, respectively). Adverse event profiles were similar between groups, with QW, four (7%) and Q2W, five (9%). PedsQL™ scores showed modest increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alfa can be safely administered either QW or Q2W to ESA-naïve pediatric patients with CKD-related anemia to achieve Hb targets of 10.0-12.0 g/dl.

Safety and usage of darbepoetin alfa in children with chronic kidney disease: prospective registry study

BACKGROUND

Limited prospective data are available on the long-term safety of darbepoetin alfa (DA) for treating anemia in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

In this prospective, phase IV, observational registry study, children ≤16 years of age with CKD anemia and receiving DA were observed for ≤2 years. Adverse events (AEs), DA dosing, hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, and transfusions were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were included in the analysis (mean age, 9.1 years), 158 (49.5%) of whom were on dialysis at study entry. Of 434 serious AEs reported in 162 children, the most common were peritonitis (10.0%), gastroenteritis (6.0%), and hypertension (4.1%). Six patients (1.9%) died (unrelated to DA). Four patients (1.3%) experienced six serious adverse drug reactions. The geometric mean DA dose range was 1.4-2.0 μg/kg/month. Mean baseline Hb concentration was 11.1 g/dl; mean values for children receiving and not receiving dialysis at baseline ranged between 10.9 and 11.5 g/dl and 11.2-11.7 g/dl, respectively. Overall, 48 patients (15.0%) received ≥1 transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

No new safety signals for DA were identified in children receiving DA for CKD anemia for ≤2 years. Based on Hb concentrations and transfusion requirements, DA was effective at managing anemia in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa for anemia in children with chronic kidney disease: a multicenter prospective study in Japan

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa (DA), an attractive alternative to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in managing renal anemia, in Japanese children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), and not on dialysis (ND).

METHODS

A total of 31 pediatric CKD patients (13 PD, 2 HD, and 16 ND) were enrolled. DA was administered bi-weekly intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC) for PD or ND patients, and weekly IV for HD patients for 24 weeks. The target Hb was defined as 11.0 to ≤13.0 g/dl. In patients receiving rHuEPO, the initial DA dose was calculated at 1 μg DA for 200 IU rHuEPO. The initial DA dose for naïve patients was determined by body weight, and intended not to exceed 0.5 μg/kg per administration. For some PD or ND patients, the dosing frequency was subsequently changed to once every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean Hb values increased from 10.5 ± 1.1 to 11.1 ± 1.1 g/dl after 4 weeks of DA treatment. The target Hb was achieved in all patients, 64.5 % of whom maintained the value at completion of the study. Hb responses were similar between IV and SC. The dosing frequency was extended to once every 4 weeks in 37.9 % of PD or ND patients. Eighty-seven adverse events were noted in 27 (87.1 %) of 31 patients, none of which were associated with DA.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that IV or SC administration of DA is an effective and safe treatment for renal anemia in Japanese children with CKD.

Comparison of recombinant human erythropoietin and darbepoetin alpha in children

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare the clinical efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) and darbepoetin alpha (DA) in the treatment of anemia in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHOD

Thirty-four (13 female, 21 male) CKD patients were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 11.42 ± 4.05 years. Nine patients were on hemodialysis, 18 were on peritoneal dialysis and seven patients were in CKD stage 4.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients received rHuEPO and the remaining 17 patients received DA. Hemoglobin (Hb) was not significantly different between the two groups during monthly follow up and at the end of 6 months (P > 0.05), but there was a significant increase within each group at the end of 6 months (P = 0.01 for rHuEPO; P = 0.02 for DA). Hb was not different between the patients on and not on dialysis in both groups at the end of the study (P > 0.05). The efficacy of the s.c. and i.v. routes was similar within each group (P > 0.05). Systolic hypertension was observed in only one patient in the DA group, no other adverse effect was observed in either groups.

CONCLUSION

DA is a reasonable alternative to rHuEPO in the treatment of anemia in pediatric CKD patients, due to its clinical efficacy, convenience of use, patient compliance and tolerability.

Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in children undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter prospective study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Darbepoetin alfa (DA) is an attractive alternative to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in managing renal anemia. Since DA has not been approved by the appropriate Japanese drug regulatory agencies for the indication of renal anemia in children in Japan, we have conducted a multicenter prospective study to determine the efficacy and safety of DA in Japanese children undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

Pediatric patients subcutaneously receiving rHuEPO were switched to DA treatment for a period of 28 weeks. The conversion to the initial dose of DA was calculated as 1 μg DA for 200 IU rHuEPO, and DA was administered intravenously once every 2 weeks. The target hemoglobin (Hb) concentration was defined as 11.0 to ≤13.0 g/dL. In some patients, the dose of DA was adjusted appropriately to achieve this target level, and/or the dosing frequency changed to once every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In the 25 patients switched from rHuEPO to DA the mean Hb concentration increased from 9.9 ± 1.0 to 11.1 ± 1.0 g/dL at 8 weeks following commencement of the DA treatment. The target Hb concentration was achieved in 88 % of these patients, and 60 % maintained this target value on completion of the study. The dosing frequency was extended to once every 4 weeks in 60 % of patients. Twenty-four adverse events were noted in 11 of 25 patients (44 %); however, there was no causality between DA and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that intravenous administration of DA once every 2 or 4 weeks is an effective and safe treatment for renal anemia in Japanese children undergoing PD.

Effective treatment of anemia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

MPG-EPO is a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator with a longer half-life than darbepoetin, hence requires less frequent injections. It has been successfully used in adults, but currently, there are no published data available for its use in children. This pilot study was performed to verify the effect of MPG-EPO on Hb levels in children. Twelve patients (age 6.4-17.2 yr) were treated with MPG-EPO as an individual "Heilversuch" according to German law after RTx. Five patients were switched from DA, and seven were naïve to erythropoietin. Over a period of six months, Hb levels were measured monthly. A median MPG-EPO dose of 2.5 μg/kg was administered intravenously in a single dose every four wk. The median Hb value increased in naïve patients from 9.9 to 11.2 g/dL (median, p = 0.004) and from 10.3 to 11.6 g/dL (median, p = 0.39) in patients switched from DA to MPG-EPO. No adverse events secondary to MPG-EPO therapy were detected. Our results indicate that a once-monthly injection of MPG-EPO is an effective treatment of anemia in children after renal transplantation. Larger randomized trials will have to confirm our findings.

2008 Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy: guidelines for renal anemia in chronic kidney disease

The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) guideline committee, chaired by Dr Y. Tsubakihara, presents the Japanese guidelines entitled "Guidelines for Renal Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease." These guidelines replace the "2004 JSDT Guidelines for Renal Anemia in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients," and contain new, additional guidelines for peritoneal dialysis (PD), non-dialysis (ND), and pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Chapter 1 presents reference values for diagnosing anemia that are based on the most recent epidemiological data from the general Japanese population. In both men and women, hemoglobin (Hb) levels decrease along with an increase in age and the level for diagnosing anemia has been set at <13.5 g/dL in males and <11.5 g/dL in females. However, the guidelines explicitly state that the target Hb level in erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy is different to the anemia reference level. In addition, in defining renal anemia, the guidelines emphasize that the reduced production of erythropoietin (EPO) that is associated with renal disorders is the primary cause of renal anemia, and that renal anemia refers to a condition in which there is no increased production of EPO and serum EPO levels remain within the reference range for healthy individuals without anemia, irrespective of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In other words, renal anemia is clearly identified as an "endocrine disease." It is believed that defining renal anemia in this way will be extremely beneficial for ND patients exhibiting renal anemia despite having a high GFR. We have also emphasized that renal anemia may be treated not only with ESA therapy but also with appropriate iron supplementation and the improvement of anemia associated with chronic disease, which is associated with inflammation, and inadequate dialysis, another major cause of renal anemia. In Chapter 2, which discusses the target Hb levels in ESA therapy, the guidelines establish different target levels for hemodialysis (HD) patients than for PD and ND patients, for two reasons: (i) In Japanese HD patients, Hb levels following hemodialysis rise considerably above their previous levels because of ultrafiltration-induced hemoconcentration; and (ii) as noted in the 2004 guidelines, although 10 to 11 g/dL was optimal for long-term prognosis if the Hb level prior to the hemodialysis session in an HD patient had been established at the target level, it has been reported that, based on data accumulated on Japanese PD and ND patients, in patients without serious cardiovascular disease, higher levels have a cardiac or renal function protective effect, without any safety issues. Accordingly, the guidelines establish a target Hb level in PD and ND patients of 11 g/dL or more, and recommend 13 g/dL as the criterion for dose reduction/withdrawal. However, with the results of, for example, the CHOIR (Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency) study in mind, the guidelines establish an upper limit of 12 g/dL for patients with serious cardiovascular disease or patients for whom the attending physician determines high Hb levels would not be appropriate. Chapter 3 discusses the criteria for iron supplementation. The guidelines establish reference levels for iron supplementation in Japan that are lower than those established in the Western guidelines. This is because of concerns about long-term toxicity if the results of short-term studies conducted by Western manufacturers, in which an ESA cost-savings effect has been positioned as a primary endpoint, are too readily accepted. In other words, if the serum ferritin is <100 ng/mL and the transferrin saturation rate (TSAT) is <20%, then the criteria for iron supplementation will be met; if only one of these criteria is met, then iron supplementation should be considered unnecessary. Although there is a dearth of supporting evidence for these criteria, there are patients that have been surviving on hemodialysis in Japan for more than 40 years, and since there are approximately 20 000 patients who have been receiving hemodialysis for more than 20 years, which is a situation that is different from that in many other countries. As there are concerns about adverse reactions due to the overuse of iron preparations as well, we therefore adopted the expert opinion that evidence obtained from studies in which an ESA cost-savings effect had been positioned as the primary endpoint should not be accepted unquestioningly. In Chapter 4, which discusses ESA dosing regimens, and Chapter 5, which discusses poor response to ESAs, we gave priority to the usual doses that are listed in the package inserts of the ESAs that can be used in Japan. However, if the maximum dose of darbepoetin alfa that can currently be used in HD and PD patients were to be used, then the majority of poor responders would be rescued. Blood transfusions are discussed in Chapter 6. Blood transfusions are attributed to the difficulty of managing renal anemia not only in HD patients, but also in end-stage ND patients who respond poorly to ESAs. It is believed that the number of patients requiring transfusions could be reduced further if there were novel long-acting ESAs that could be used for ND patients. Chapter 7 discusses adverse reactions to ESA therapy. Of particular concern is the emergence and exacerbation of hypertension associated with rapid hematopoiesis due to ESA therapy. The treatment of renal anemia in pediatric CKD patients is discussed in Chapter 8; it is fundamentally the same as that in adults.