Selective late steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation

Steroid avoidance/withdrawal and maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids have been an integral part of maintenance immunosuppression for pediatric kidney transplantation. However, prolonged steroid therapy is associated with significant toxicities resulting in several SW/avoidance strategies in recent years.

METHOD/OBJECTIVE

This comprehensive review aims to discuss steroid-related toxicities and the safety, efficacy, and benefit of steroid avoidance/withdrawal immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Initial studies of SW/avoidance conducted in the setting of CSA and AZA showed an increased incidence of AR but no increase in graft loss or mortality with SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression. Studies performed under modern immunosuppression (induction therapy, Tac, and MMF) show no significant increase in AR or graft loss with SW/avoidance immunosuppression. Furthermore, SW/avoidance immunosuppression is associated with significant improvement in growth, BMI, BP control, and lipid profile in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Despite these data, SW/avoidance remains controversial, and only 40% of pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the United States are currently on SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression is safe and associated with fewer side effects compared with steroid-inclusive maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation

Over the last decade, steroid minimization became one of the major goals in pediatric renal transplantation. Different protocols have been used by individual centers and multicenter study groups, including early and late steroid withdrawal or even complete avoidance. The timing of steroid withdrawal determines if antibodies are used, as avoidance and early withdrawal require antibody induction, while late withdrawal typically does not. A monoclonal antibody was used in most protocols during an early steroid withdrawal together with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in low immunological risk patients. Polyclonal induction was reported as effective in high-risk patients. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil were used in late steroid withdrawal with no induction. All described protocols were effective in terms of preventing acute rejection and preserving renal graft function. There was no superiority of any specific protocol in terms of clinical benefits of steroid withdrawal. Pre-puberty determined growth benefit while other clinical advantages, including better control of glycemia, lipids, and blood pressure, were age independent. It is not clear whether the steroid withdrawal increases the risk of recurrence of primary glomerular diseases post-transplant, however it cannot be excluded. There is no evidence to date for a higher risk of anti-HLA production in steroid-free children after renal transplantation. Key summary points--Current strategies to minimize the steroid-related adverse effects in pediatric renal graft recipients include steroid withdrawal, early or late after transplantation, or complete steroid avoidance--Early steroid withdrawal or avoidance is generally used following the induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antibodies, while in late steroid withdrawal induction therapy was generally not used- Elimination of steroids (early or late) does not increase the risk of acute rejection and does not deteriorate long-term renal graft function- Early steroid withdrawal is possible in patients at high immunological risk using a combination of polyclonal antibody induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil- All protocols of steroid minimization showed relevant clinical benefits, however the growth-related benefit was limited to pre-pubertal patients in all but one of the studies- Adverse events of steroid withdrawal occurred in a higher incidence of post-transplant bone marrow suppression Key research points - There is no clear evidence of the impact of steroid withdrawal on the risk of recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation in children, therefore further evaluation of this important issue should be performed in prospective trials- There is limited pediatric data on the risk of anti-HLA/donor-specific antibody production in steroid-free patients after renal transplantation. It is not clear whether the selection of the type of induction antibody (lymphocyte depleting versus short, two-dose administration of anti-IL2R inhibitor) is important in this term. The production of anti-HLA antibodies should then be monitored on a regular basis and analyzed in prospective trials.

A study on strategies for improving growth and body composition after renal transplantation

Allograft function and metabolic effects of four treatment regimens, namely, methylprednisone (MP) standard dose (MP-STD), deflazacort (DFZ), MP-late steroid withdrawal (MP-LSW), and MP-very low dose (MP-VLD), were evaluated in prepubertal patients. MP was decreased by month 4 post-transplantation to 0.2 mg/kg/day in MP-STD and DFZ patients and to <0.1 mg/kg/day in MP-LSW and MP-VLD patients. Starting in month 16 post-transplant, MP was switched to DFZ in the DFZ group and totally withdrawn in the MP-LSW group. Creatinine clearance diminished in the MP-STD and MP-LSW groups from 77 +/- 6 to 63 +/- 6 ml/min/1.73 m(2)and from 103 +/- 5 to 78 +/- 3 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Height increased >0.5 SDS only in the MP-LSW and MP-VLD groups. The body mass index and fat body mass for height-age increased only in the MP-STD patients (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Fat body mass decreased in the DFZ group (p < 0.05), total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol increased in the MP-STD group, while LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio decreased in the DFZ group (p < 0.01). Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) for height-age showed an increase in the MP-LSW and MP-VLD groups (p < 0.01). Our data suggest that MP-LSW and MP-VLD strategies improve linear growth, BMD, the peripheral distribution of fat, and preservation of the bone-muscle unit and maintain the normal lipid profile. The MP-LSW patients had a concerning rate of acute rejections and graft function deterioration in prepubertal patients.

Prospective, randomized trial on late steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients under cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND

: Many transplant centers practice late steroid withdrawal after pediatric renal transplantation, but evidence-based data on the overall risk-to-benefit ratio in this patient population are lacking.

METHODS

: We therefore conducted the first prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study to validate this strategy: 42 low-immunologic risk pediatric kidney allograft recipients, aged 10.3+/-4.3 years, on cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids were randomly assigned, more than or equal to 1-year posttransplant, to continue steroids or to withdraw over 3 months. This report contains the 1-year results.

RESULTS

: In response to steroid withdrawal, patients experienced a significant catch-up growth with a mean standardized height gain of 0.3+/-0.1 standard deviation score (SDS) per year (P<0.05 vs. control), whereas mean height SDS in the control group did not change (0.0+/-0.1 SDS). Standardized body mass index declined significantly by 0.68+/-0.23 SDS after steroid withdrawal, but rose significantly by 0.26+/-0.34 SDS in the control group. Patients off steroids had less frequent arterial hypertension (50% vs. 87.5% (P<0.05) and significantly lower serum cholesterol (by 21%) and triglyceride values (by 36%) than control patients. Patient and graft survival were 100%. The incidence of acute rejection episodes in the steroid-withdrawal group was 1 of 23 (4%) compared with 1 of 19 (5%) in controls. Transplant function remained stable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

: Late steroid withdrawal in low-immunologic risk European pediatric kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil is not associated with an increased rate of acute rejection episodes, enables catch-up growth and ameliorates cardiovascular risk factors.

Outcome after renal transplantation. Part II: quality of life and psychosocial adjustment

Knowledge of health-related quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial adjustment (PA) in children after renal transplantation (RTPL) is limited. QOL and PA were evaluated by standardized tests in patients after RTPL. Thirty-seven children of median age 14.5 years (range 6.5-17 years) were investigated a mean 4.5 years (range 0.5-12.8 years) after RTPL. Child- and parent-rated QOL was evaluated with the Child Quality of life Questionnaire of The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academical Medical Centre (TNO-AZL). PA was assessed by the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) providing parental reports of a child's behaviour. In patients' self-ratings, the QOL dimension physical complaints (P < 0.0005) scored significantly better than that of healthy controls, whereas the dimension positive emotional functioning was impaired (P = 0.02). Parents rated motor functioning (P = 0.002), autonomy (P = 0.01), cognition (P = 0.04) and positive emotions (P < 0.0005) as significantly impaired. Parents also assessed PA significantly (P = 0.02) impaired with regard to internalizing behaviour. Dialysis duration, young age at RTPL, living-related donation, steroid treatment, adverse family relationships and maternal distress had a significantly negative impact on QOL and PA (P < 0.05). Patients rated QOL higher than did healthy controls. Parents evaluated their children's QOL and PA more pessimistically than did the patients themselves. Both illness-related variables and family environment played an important role.