Is cytokine-release syndrome the cause of rituximab treatment-related infusion reactions in children with nephrotic syndrome? Impact of anti-rituximab antibodies

Anti-rituximab antibodies in pediatric steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces sustained remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, there is no consensus on the optimal regimen and monitoring of rituximab. In other autoimmune diseases, anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) have been reported in 10-40% of patients, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. In nephrotic syndrome, data are scarce.

METHODS

We report a single-center retrospective study with immuno- and pharmacological monitoring of rituximab treatment in children with frequent relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We analyzed the monthly monitoring of 24 children, receiving a dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) between December 2017 and April 2018 at the Pediatric Nephrology Department of Robert-Debré hospital, Paris.

RESULTS

ARA were detected in 7/24 patients (29%), sometimes after the first infusion of rituximab. ARA were present at baseline in two patients previously treated with rituximab. Both displayed no B-cell depletion. ARA were also reported in 5/22 patients during follow-up, with antibodies always detected in the first month following B-cell recovery. An incomplete CD19+CD20- B-cell depletion at M1 (5-25/mm³) and low serum rituximab levels was predictive of developing ARA. The development of de novo ARA during follow-up was not associated with shorter B-cell depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ARA are frequent in children with FR/SDNS and that close immuno- and pharmacological monitoring may help personalizing rituximab treatment in patients needing repeated injections.

The Curative Effect of Shuangshen Decoction Combined with Immunological Preparations in the Treatment of Pediatric Nephrotic Syndrome and Its Influence on the Rate of Complicated Infection and Recurrence

BACKGROUND

To explore the curative effect of Shuangshen Decoction combined with immunological preparations in the treatment of pediatric nephrotic syndrome and its influence on concurrent infection and recurrence rate.

METHODS

Ninety children with nephrotic syndrome were divided into the routine group and the combined group. The routine group received conventional treatment and immune agents, and the combined group was treated with Shuangshen Decoction on the basis of the routine group. The clinical indexes of the two groups were analyzed and followed up. The infection rate and recurrence rate were calculated.

RESULTS

The TCM syndrome scores in the combined group were significantly lower than those in the routine group. The total effective rate of the combined group was significantly higher than that of the routine group. The recurrence rate and infection rate of the combined group were significantly lower than those of the routine group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the routine group.

CONCLUSION

Shuangshen Decoction combined with immune preparations is effective in treating pediatric nephrotic syndrome and can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, infection rate, and recurrence rate.

Unfavorable impact of anti-rituximab antibodies on clinical outcomes in children with complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) are associated not only with adverse events, such as infusion reactions (IR) and serum sickness, but also with rituximab efficacy. However, the clinical relevance of ARA in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes of 13 children with complicated SDNS receiving repeated single-dose rituximab treatments at 375 mg/m² to assess whether ARA formation could impact toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab. Pre-rituximab 22 samples collected from patients who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses were measured by electrochemiluminescence analysis.

RESULTS

ARA were identified in 5 of 13 patients (9 of 22 samples). Median time to recovery of CD19⁺ B cells to > 1% of total lymphocytes and median relapse-free time after rituximab treatment were significantly shorter in the 9 ARA-positive samples than the 13 ARA-negative samples (41 vs. 100 days, p < 0.01 and 119 vs. 308 days, p < 0.05, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that time to CD19+ B cell recovery after rituximab was significantly shorter in ARA-positive samples than in ARA-negative samples (p < 0.005). Severe IR developed in two ARA-positive patients and serum sickness in one ARA-positive patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARA formation was high in the pre-rituximab samples of patients with complicated SDNS who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses, suggesting that ARA formation might have an unfavorable impact on the toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab doses in these patients.