Cyclophosphamide does not benefit patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children

The first randomized controlled trial in pediatric nephrology: the history of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC)

The International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (ISKDC), begun in 1966, conducted the first international collaborative randomized blinded controlled trial in pediatric nephrology and one of the first in either pediatrics or nephrology. For this trial, the ISKDC developed the criteria, such as those for response and relapse, used today to describe the clinical course of the nephrotic syndrome, and the trial generated the nephropathologic terminology and criteria which largely remain the current standards. Over an approximately 20-year span, the ISKDC followed the natural history and evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of therapies in over 500 children with the nephrotic syndrome from three continents. It published 14 peer-reviewed studies and several reports and commentaries, many of which helped create current standards of practice for therapy of childhood nephrotic syndrome and consequently remain highly cited today. The ISKDC continues to be an important model for subsequent collaborative studies and was the impetus for the development of regional and national pediatric nephrology societies leading to the recognition and growth of pediatric nephrology as a separate subspecialty. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale & Objective

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS.

Study Design

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries.

Setting & Participants

Patients with primary and genetic FSGS.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival.

Data Extraction

2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data.

Analytical Approach

Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs.

Results

We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, −25.03; 95% CI, −59.33 to −9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, −7.61 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% CI, −14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m²). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events.

Limitations

Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient–level data.

Conclusions

This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.

Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) remains a challenge for paediatric nephrologists. SRNS is viewed as a heterogeneous disease entity including immune-based and monogenic aetiologies. Because SRNS is rare, treatment strategies are individualized and vary among centres of expertise. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been effectively used to induce remission in patients with immune-based SRNS; however, there is still no consensus on treating children who become either CNI-dependent or CNI-resistant. Rituximab is a steroid-sparing agent for patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, but its efficacy in SRNS is controversial. Recently, several novel monoclonal antibodies are emerging as treatment option, but their efficacy remains to be seen. Non-immune therapies, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, have been proven efficacious in children with SRNS and are recommended as adjuvant agents. This review summarizes and discusses our current understandings in treating children with idiopathic SRNS.

Autoimmunity in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Long-Standing Yet Elusive Association

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histological term that describes a pathologic renal entity affecting both adults and children, with a wide array of possible underlying etiologies. Podocyte damage with scarring, the hallmark of this condition, leads to altered permeability of the glomerular barrier, which may result in massive proteinuria and relentless renal function deterioration. A definite cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis can be confirmed in a minority of cases, while most forms have been traditionally labeled as primary or idiopathic. Despite this definition, increasing evidence indicates that primary forms are a heterogenous group rather than a single disease entity: several circulating factors that may affect glomerular permeability have been proposed as potential culprits, and both humoral and cellular immunity have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease. Consistently, immunosuppressive drugs are considered as the cornerstone of treatment for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, but response to these agents and long-term outcomes are highly variable. In this review we provide a summary of historical and recent advances on the pathogenesis of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, focusing on implications for its differential diagnosis and treatment.

Changing the terminology from kidney replacement therapy to kidney support therapy

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is a common supportive treatment for renal dysfunction, especially acute kidney injury. However, critically ill or immunosuppressed patients with renal dysfunction often have dysfunction in other organs as well. To improve patient outcomes, clinicians began to initiate kidney replacement therapy in situations where nonrenal conditions may lead to acute kidney injury, such as septic shock, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, veno-occlusive renal disease, cardiopulmonary bypass, chemotherapy, tumor lysis syndrome, hyperammonemia, and various others. In this review, we discuss the use of various modes of kidney replacement therapy in treating renal and nonrenal complications to illustrate why kidney support therapy is a more appropriate terminology than kidney replacement therapy.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome newly affects 1-3 per 100,000 children per year. Approximately 85% of cases show complete remission of proteinuria following glucocorticoid treatment. Patients who do not achieve complete remission within 4-6 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In 10-30% of steroid-resistant patients, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor of immune origin is assumed in the remaining ones. Diagnosis and management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission by further immunosuppressive treatment, and severe complications including the development of end-stage kidney disease and recurrence after renal transplantation. A team of experts including pediatric nephrologists and renal geneticists from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), a renal pathologist, and an adult nephrologist have now developed comprehensive clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis and management of SRNS in children. The team performed a systematic literature review on 9 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, formulated recommendations and formally graded them at a consensus meeting, with input from patient representatives and a dietician acting as external advisors and a voting panel of pediatric nephrologists. Research recommendations are also given.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond to corticosteroids in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome (initial resistance) or develop resistance after one or more responses to corticosteroids (delayed resistance) may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). However, response to these agents is limited so newer agents are being assessed for efficacy. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006, 2010 and 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 17 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Studies, which enrolled children and adults but in which paediatric data could not be separated from adult data, were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous outcomes, results were expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Data were pooled using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (1063 participants) were included. Fourteen studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Five and 19 studies were at low risk of performance and detection bias. Fourteen, 14 and 13 studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias respectively. Cyclosporin compared with placebo or no treatment may increase the number of participants who achieve complete remission (4 studies, 74 participants: RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.09 to 11.20) or complete or partial remission (4 studies, 74 children: RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 9.57) by 6 months (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether cyclosporin increases the likelihood of worsening hypertension or reduces the likelihood of end-stage kidney disease (very low certainty evidence). CNI compared with IV cyclophosphamide (CPA) may increase the number of participants with complete or partial remission at 3 to 6 months (2 studies, 156 children: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13) (low certainty evidence) and probably reduces the number with treatment failure (non response, serious infection, persistently elevated creatinine (1 study, 124 participants: RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.58) (moderate certainty evidence) with little or no increase in serious infections (1 study, 131 participants: RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.56) (moderate certainty evidence). Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25) (low certainty evidence) or in the number with worsening hypertension (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.15) (low certainty evidence). Cyclosporin compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and dexamethasone probably makes little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) (moderate certainty evidence) and makes little or no difference to the number dying (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) or with 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.46 to 11.41) (low certainty evidence). Among children, who have achieved complete remission, tacrolimus compared with MMF may increase the number of children who maintain complete or partial response for 12 months (1 study, 60 children: RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.07) (low certainty evidence). Oral CPA with prednisone compared with prednisone alone may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (2 studies, 84 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87) (low certainty evidence). IV CPA compared with oral CPA (2 studies, 61 children: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.65 to 3.85) and IV compared with oral CPA plus IV dexamethasone (1 study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96) may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether rituximab and cyclosporin compared with cyclosporin increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether adalimumab or galactose compared with conservative therapy increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Two studies reported that ACEi may reduce proteinuria in children with SRNS. One study reported that the dual angiotensin II and endothelin Type A receptor antagonist, sparsentan, may reduce proteinuria more effectively than the angiotensin receptor blocker, irbesartan.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date RCTs have demonstrated that CNIs may increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or CPA. For other regimens assessed, it remains uncertain whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better defined groups of patients with SRNS.

Dextran-Sulfate Plasma Adsorption Lipoprotein Apheresis in Drug Resistant Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Patients: Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Intervention Study

Background: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) causes end stage renal disease (ESRD) in significant proportion of patients worldwide. Primary FSGS carries poor prognosis and management of FSGS patients, refractory to standard treatments or resistant to steroids, remains a major challenge. Lipoprotein apheresis is a therapeutic approach for drug resistant primary FSGS and post-renal transplant primary FSGS recurrence. Objectives: To examine the safety and probable benefit at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of apheresis treatment using Liposorber® LA-15 system in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), due to refractory primary FSGS or primary FSGS associated NS, in post renal transplant children. Material and Methods: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm intervention study using Liposorber® LA-15 system. Patients ≤21 years old with drug resistant or drug intolerant NS secondary to primary FSGS with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m² or post renal transplant patients ≤21 years old with primary FSGS associated NS were included in the study. Each patient had 12 dextran-sulfate plasma adsorption lipoprotein apheresis sessions over a period of 9 weeks. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of treatment. Results: Of 17 patients enrolled, six were excluded from the outcome analysis (protocol deviations). Of the remaining 11 patients, all but one have completed apheresis treatments. Three patients were lost to follow-up immediately after completion of apheresis and excluded from outcome analysis. At one-month follow-up, 1 of 7 patients (14.3%) attained partial remission of NS while 2 of 4 subjects (50%) and 2 of 3 subjects (66.7%) had partial/complete remission at 3- and 6-months follow-up, respectively. One of two patients followed up for 12 months had complete remission and one patient had partial remission of NS after 24 months. Improved or stable eGFR was noted in all patients over the follow-up period. Conclusion: The results of our multicenter study showed improvement in the response rates to steroid or immunosuppressive therapy and induced complete or partial remission of proteinuria in some of the patients with drug resistant primary FSGS. The main limitation of our study is the small number of subjects and high dropout rate.

Management of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents

More than 85% of children and adolescents (majority between 1-12 years old) with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome show complete remission of proteinuria following daily treatment with corticosteroids. Patients who do not show remission after 4 weeks' treatment with daily prednisolone are considered to have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Renal histology in most patients shows presence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, and (rarely) mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. A third of patients with SRNS show mutations in one of the key podocyte genes. The remaining cases of SRNS are probably caused by an undefined circulating factor. Treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (ciclosporin and tacrolimus) is the standard of care for patients with non-genetic SRNS, and approximately 70% of patients achieve a complete or partial remission and show satisfactory long-term outcome. Additional treatment with drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin axis is recommended for hypertension and for reducing remaining proteinuria. Patients with SRNS who do not respond to treatment with calcineurin inhibitors or other immunosuppressive drugs can show declining kidney function and are at risk for end-stage renal failure. Approximately a third of those who undergo renal transplantation show recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the allograft and often respond to combined treatment with plasma exchange, rituximab, and intensified immunosuppression.

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children

The incidence of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is 1·15-16·9 per 100 000 children, varying by ethnicity and region. The cause remains unknown but the pathogenesis of idiopathic NS is thought to involve immune dysregulation, systemic circulating factors, or inherited structural abnormalities of the podocyte. Genetic risk is more commonly described among children with steroid-resistant disease. The mainstay of therapy is prednisone for the vast majority of patients who are steroid responsive; however, the disease can run a frequently relapsing course, necessitating the need for alternative immunosuppressive agents. Infection and venous thromboembolism are the main complications of NS with also increased risk of acute kidney injury. Prognosis in terms of long-term kidney outcome overall is excellent for steroid-responsive disease, and steroid resistance is an important determinant of future risk of chronic or end-stage kidney disease.

Exploring the Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome: The PodoNet Registry

Background: Steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a rare condition, accounting for 10-15% of all children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. SRNS can be caused by genetic abnormalities or immune system dysfunction. The prognosis of SRNS varies from permanent remission to progression to end-stage kidney disease, and post-transplant recurrence is common. Objectives: The PodoNet registry project aims to explore the demographics and phenotypes of immune-mediated and genetic forms of childhood SRNS, to assess genotype-phenotype correlations, to evaluate clinical management and long-term outcomes, and to search for novel genetic entities and diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in SRNS. Methods: In 2009, an international registry for SRNS was established to collect retro- and prospective information on renal and extrarenal disease manifestations, histopathological and genetic findings and information on family history, pharmacotherapy responsiveness and long-term outcomes. To date, more than 2,000 patients have been enrolled at 72 pediatric nephrology centers, constituting the largest pediatric SRNS cohort assembled to date. Results: In the course of the project, traditional Sanger sequencing was replaced by NGS-based gene panel screening covering over 30 podocyte-related genes complemented by whole exome sequencing. These approaches allowed to establish genetic diagnoses in 24% of the patients screened, widened the spectrum of genetic disease entities presenting with SRNS phenotype (COL4A3-5, CLCN5), and contributed to the discovery of new disease causing genes (MYOE1, PTPRO). Forty two percent of patients responded to intensified immunosuppression with complete or partial remission of proteinuria, whereas 58% turned out multi-drug resistant. Medication responsiveness was highly predictive of a favorable long-term outcome, whereas the diagnosis of genetic disease was associated with a high risk to develop end-stage renal disease during childhood. Genetic SRNS forms were generally resistant to immunosuppressive treatment, justifying to avoid such pharmacotherapies altogether once a genetic diagnosis is established. Even symptomatic anti-proteinuric treatment with RAS antagonists seems to be challenging and of limited efficacy in genetic forms of SRNS. The risk of post-transplant disease recurrence was around 30% in non-genetic SRNS whereas it is negligible in genetic cases. Conclusion: In summary, the PodoNet Registry has collected detailed clinical and genetic information in a large SRNS cohort and continues to generate fundamental insights regarding demographic and etiological disease aspects, genotype-phenotype associations, the efficacy of therapeutic strategies, and long-term patient and renal outcomes including post-transplant disease recurrence.

Nephrotic syndrome in infants and children: pathophysiology and management

Nephrotic syndrome is defined by nephrotic-range proteinuria (≥40 mg/m²/hour or urine protein/creatinine ratio ≥200 mg/mL or 3+ protein on urine dipstick), hypoalbuminaemia (<25 g/L) and oedema. This review focuses on the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, management strategies and prognosis of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of childhood, and includes a brief overview of the congenital forms.

Immunosuppressive therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis examining the efficacy of cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus in treating steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched until May 02, 2017 using the keywords: immunosuppressive therapy, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, and tacrolimus. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with SRNS treated with an immunosuppressive therapy or placebo.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included, and the number of patients ranged from 30 to 131. Conventional pair-wise meta-analysis indicated a higher odds of complete or partial remission with tacrolimus as compared to cyclophosphamide [odds ratio (OR) 4.908, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.278-10.576, P < 0.001], and cyclophosphamide (OR 0.143, 95% CI 0.028-0.721, P = 0.019) and placebo (OR 0.043, 95% CI 0.012-0.157, P < 0.001) were associated with a lower likelihood of complete or partial remission than cyclosporine. Bayesian analysis indicated that tacrolimus and cyclosporine were the best and the second-best agents for inducing a complete or partial remission (rank probability = 0.53 for tacrolimus and 0.46 for cyclosporine).

CONCLUSION

As compared to cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin, tacrolimus is more effective at inducing remission in patients with SRNS.

Long-Term Outcome of Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

We investigated the value of genetic, histopathologic, and early treatment response information in prognosing long-term renal outcome in children with primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. From the PodoNet Registry, we obtained longitudinal clinical information for 1354 patients (disease onset at >3 months and <20 years of age): 612 had documented responsiveness to intensified immunosuppression (IIS), 1155 had kidney biopsy results, and 212 had an established genetic diagnosis. We assessed risk factors for ESRD using multivariate Cox regression models. Complete and partial remission of proteinuria within 12 months of disease onset occurred in 24.5% and 16.5% of children, respectively, with the highest remission rates achieved with calcineurin inhibitor-based protocols. Ten-year ESRD-free survival rates were 43%, 94%, and 72% in children with IIS resistance, complete remission, and partial remission, respectively; 27% in children with a genetic diagnosis; and 79% and 52% in children with histopathologic findings of minimal change glomerulopathy and FSGS, respectively. Five-year ESRD-free survival rate was 21% for diffuse mesangial sclerosis. IIS responsiveness, presence of a genetic diagnosis, and FSGS or diffuse mesangial sclerosis on initial biopsy as well as age, serum albumin concentration, and CKD stage at onset affected ESRD risk. Our findings suggest that responsiveness to initial IIS and detection of a hereditary podocytopathy are prognostic indicators of favorable and poor long-term outcome, respectively, in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Children with multidrug-resistant sporadic disease show better renal survival than those with genetic disease. Furthermore, histopathologic findings may retain prognostic relevance when a genetic diagnosis is established.

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive medications for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Conventional meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials have shown inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of immunosuppressants for pediatric steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

Objective

To conduct a network meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of available immunosuppressive agents in pediatric patients with SRNS.

Study methods

MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE were searched on January 2017. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The main outcomes analyzed were efficacy [number/portion with complete remission (CR), number/portion with partial remission (PR), and total number/portion in remission (TR)] and safety [adverse secondary event (ASE) rates].

Results

A meta-analysis of 18 RCTs showed that tacrolimus was more efficacious for achieving CR than intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), oral cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, chlorambucil, azathioprine, and plaebo/nontreatment (P/NT), and more efficacious than i.v. cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, and P/NT in terms of TR outcomes. Cyclosporin was associated with a greater CR rate than i.v. cyclophosphamide, MMF, oral cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, azathioprine, or P/NT, and associated with a greater TR rate than i.v. cyclophosphamide, oral cyclophosphamide, or P/NT. MMF was found to be more efficacious than i.v. cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide in terms of TR.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus and cyclosporine may be preferred initial treatments for children with SRNS. MMF may be another option for this patient population. Further studies of the efficacy and safety of these three drugs in children with SRNS should be pursued.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Cyclophosphamide in Steroid-resistant Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

This is a randomized, parallel group, active-controlled trial to compare the efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) with oral cyclophosphamide (OCP) in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children. Fifty consecutive children with idiopathic SRNS were biopsied and then randomized to receive either OCP at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks or IVCP at a dose of 500 mg/m²/month for 6 months. Both groups received tapering doses of oral steroids. The response was evaluated in terms of induction of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR), time to remit, and side effects. The groups were followed up to determine the duration of remission, percentage of patients who remain in sustained remission for more than 1 year after completion of therapy, change in steroid response status, progression to chronic kidney disease stage 3 or more. Of the fifty patients, OCP was given to 25 children and IVCP to 25 children. The demographic data, histopathology, biochemical profile, and duration of follow-up in the two groups were comparable. The rates of induction of CR were 52% versus 44% and of PR were 8% versus 8% in the intravenous (IV) and oral group, respectively. Time to remit was shorter with OCP than IVCP (53 days vs. 84.4 days). Incidence of side effects (both major and minor) was 36% in IVCP versus 20% in OCP group. The actuarial cumulative sustained remission in our study was 12% in IVCP compared with 16% in OCP at 1 year after completion of therapy. Twelve percent children in both the groups exhibited restoration of steroid sensitivity. Thus, in our study, overall, more than half of SRNS patients showed initial response to cyclophosphamide, but only one-fourth patients had sustained remission on follow-up. OCP and IVCP were equally efficacious and safe in idiopathic SRNS in children.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006 and 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register (up to 2 March 2016) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs (820 children enrolled; 773 evaluated) were included. Most studies were small. Eleven studies were at low risk of bias for allocation concealment and only four studies were at low risk of performance bias. Fifteen, eight and 10 studies were at low risk of detection bias, attrition bias and reporting bias respectively. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission. However this was based on only eight children who achieved remission with cyclosporin compared with no children who achieved remission with placebo/no treatment in three small studies (49 children: RR 7.66, 95% CI 1.06 to 55.34). Calcineurin inhibitors significantly increased the number with complete or partial remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide (2 studies, 156 children: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13; I² = 20%). There was no significant differences in the number who achieved complete remission between tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (1 study, 41 children: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.66), cyclosporin versus mycophenolate mofetil plus dexamethasone (1 study, 138 children: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24), oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone versus prednisone alone (2 studies, 91 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87), IV versus oral cyclophosphamide (1 study, 11 children: RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.81 to 12.06), IV cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide plus IV dexamethasone (1 study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96), and azathioprine with prednisone versus prednisone alone (1 study, 31 children: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.15 to 5.84). One study found no significant differences between three agents (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide) used in combination with tacrolimus and prednisone. One study found no significant difference in the percentage reduction in proteinuria (31 children: -12; 95% CI -73 to 110) between rituximab with cyclosporin/prednisolone and cyclosporin/prednisolone alone. Two studies reported ACEi significantly reduced proteinuria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date RCTs have demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or cyclophosphamide. For other regimens assessed, it remains uncertain whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better defined groups of patients with SRNS.

Recent Advances in Treatments of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Children

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a nephrotic syndrome. Up to around 80% of cases of primary FSGS are resistant to steroid treatment. A large proportion of patients with steroid-resistant FSGS progress to end-stage renal disease. The purpose of treatment is to obtain a complete remission of proteinuria, a necessary step that precedes improved renal survival and reduces the risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. When this is not possible, the secondary goal is a partial remission of proteinuria. Reduction or remission of proteinuria is the most important factor predictive of renal survival. We will review the current updated strategies for treatment of primary FSGS in children, including traditional therapies consisting of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors and novel therapies such as rituximab, abatacept, adalimumab, and fresolimumab.

[Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: recommendations of the Nephrology Branch of the Chilean Society of Pediatrics. Part two]

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most common glomerular disease in childhood, affecting 1 to 3 per 100,000 children under the age of 16. It most commonly occurs in ages between 2 and 10. Its cause is unknown, and its histology corresponds to minimal change disease in 90% of cases, or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome represents 10-20% of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in pediatrics. It has a poor prognosis, and its management is a significant therapeutic challenge. Half of patients evolve to end-stage renal disease within 5 years, and are additionally exposed to complications secondary to persistent NS and to the adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapy. The primary goal of treatment is to achieve complete remission, but even a partial remission is associated with a better renal survival than the lack of response. This paper is the result of the collaborative effort of the Nephrology Branch of the Chilean Society of Pediatrics with aims at helping pediatricians and pediatric nephrologists to treat pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. In this second part, handling of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome as well as nonspecific therapies are discussed.

Mycophenolate Mofetil Following Rituximab in Children With Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is being increasingly used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome resistant to standard treatments. In spite of good initial response, rituximab responders always remain prone to further relapse, necessitating either repeat course of rituximab or addition of another steroid-sparing immunosuppressant.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of baseline clinico-pathologic presentation and treatment outcome (complete remission, partial remission, or no response) was performed among 24 children with refractory-idiopathic SRNS over a follow-up period of 24 months. Children received 2 to 4 rituximab infusions (375 mg/m(2) weekly) depending on circulating B-cell level. At 3-month follow-up, a second course of rituximab was administered (if >5 B cells/mm(3)) along with MMF (1200 mg/m(2) per day) maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients, 54% (13/24) and 46% (11/24) had minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, respectively, on renal histopathology. After the first course of rituximab, 21% (5/24) of children achieved complete remission; however, most (4/5) of them relapsed again at a median interval of 53 (interquartile range 46-72) days. Depending on response to the first course of rituximab, MMF was started on 15 children at 3 months. After 6 months, 67% (10/15) of children on MMF achieved complete remission and 33% (5/15) remained at partial remission. At 24 months overall, 25% (6/24) and 42% (10/24) of children were in complete remission and partial remission, respectively; 33% (5/15) of children continued sustained complete remission after postrituximab-MMF maintenance therapy in comparison with no sustained complete remission with rituximab alone at 24 months (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF may be an effective and safe maintenance therapy to consider as an additive immunosuppressant after induction with rituximab in maintaining remission among children with refractory SRNS.

[Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children]

The annual incidence of the nephrotic syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3 per 100,000 children<16 year of age. In children, the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome is idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). INS is defined by the presence of proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia and by definition is a primary disease. Renal biopsy study shows non-specific histological abnormalities of the kidney including minimal changes, focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis, and diffuse mesangial proliferation. Steroid therapy is applied in all cases of INS. Renal biopsy is usually not indicated before starting corticosteroid therapy. The majority of patients (80-90%) are steroid-responsive. Children with INS who do not achieve a complete remission with corticosteroid therapy commonly present focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis and require treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, plus renin-angiotensin system blockade. In this article we review the recent accepted recommendations for the treatment of children with INS.

B cell suppression in primary glomerular disease

Membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and minimal change disease (MCD) are the most common causes of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. For many years prednisone, alkylating agents, and calcineurin inhibitors have been the standard of therapy for these patients. More effective or better tolerated treatment modalities are needed. B cell targeted therapy was recently introduced in clinical practice. In this review, we briefly summarize the current standard therapy and discuss the efficacy of B cell targeted therapy in primary glomerular diseases. Observational, short-term studies suggest that rituximab is effective and comparable to standard therapy in maintaining remissions in patients with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent MCD or FSGS. In contrast, response is limited in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Rituximab also induces remissions in patients with membranous nephropathy. Controlled clinical trials on kidney endpoints are urgently needed to position B cell targeted therapy in clinical practice.

Treatment of FSGS in Children

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a pathologic condition that represents many disease entities. The goals of therapy are to cure the disease. When this is not possible, the secondary goals are to reduce proteinuria to avoid the complications of nephrotic syndrome and to delay progression of kidney disease. Proteinuria remission is one of the most important independent predictors of kidney survival. Children with FSGS who do not achieve partial or complete remission have a 50% risk of progression to ESRD within 5 years whereas those who enter complete remission have a 5-year kidney survival rate of 90%. Treatment of idiopathic FSGS commonly involves immune-based and nonimmunologic therapy options. This manuscript will review the current state of FSGS therapy for children.

Treatment of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children: new guidelines from KDIGO

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recently published the clinical practice guideline on glomerulonephritis (GN) to assist the practitioner caring for patients with GN. Chapter 4 of the guideline focuses on managing children aged 1-18 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), defined by an inability to achieve complete remission with corticosteroid therapy. Guideline development followed a thorough evidence review, and management recommendations and suggestions were based on the best available evidence. Limitations of the evidence, including the paucity of large-scale randomized controlled trials, are discussed. This article provides both the guideline recommendations and a brief review of relevant treatment trials related to each recommendation. This précis serves as a summary of the complete guidelines recently published.

Second-line options for refractory steroid-sensitive and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Although initially, many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome respond to steroid therapy, a repeated course for patients with relapses often causes significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses or steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment, and so far, cyclophosphamide or levamisole have been regarded as first-choice options, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. Data are accumulating that mycophenolic acid may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and are often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment is necessary, raising concerns regarding the accumulation of side effects. Still, some patients show a tendency to relapse even on this maintenance regimen and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data have demonstrated an effect of monoclonal antibodies directed to B cells - rituximab, a drug that may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to initial steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy, since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors (mainly cyclosporine but also, recently, tacrolimus). Cyctotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, has been found to be effective in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome by some studies but is inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. In addition, mycophenolic acid and rituximab have been used in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; however, response seems to be inferior in comparison with patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including steroid-sensitive as well as steroid-resistant patients, is a potentially serious disorder. Although much progress has been made in recent years and a wide arsenal of immunological interventions is available, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardization of treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

Treatment with tacrolimus and prednisolone is preferable to intravenous cyclophosphamide as the initial therapy for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

There are limited data on the relative efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitors and alkylating agents for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children. To clarify this, we compared tacrolimus and intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 131 consecutive pediatric patients with minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis, stratified for initial or late steroid resistance. Patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus for 12 months or 6-monthly infusions of intravenous cyclophosphamide with both arms receiving equal amounts of alternate-day prednisolone. The primary outcome of complete or partial remission at 6 months, based on spot urine protein to creatinine ratios, was significantly higher in children receiving tacrolimus compared to cyclophosphamide (hazard ratio 2.64). Complete remission was significantly higher with tacrolimus (52.4%) than with cyclophosphamide (14.8%). The secondary outcome of sustained remission or steroid-sensitive relapse of nephrotic syndrome at 12 months was significantly higher with tacrolimus than cyclophosphamide. Treatment withdrawal was higher with cyclophosphamide, chiefly due to systemic infections. Compared to cyclophosphamide, 3 patients required treatment with tacrolimus to achieve 1 additional remission. Thus, tacrolimus and prednisolone are effective, safe, and preferable to cyclophosphamide as the initial therapy for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

New therapies in steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

Although many children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) respond initially to steroid therapy, repeated courses for patients with relapses often cause significant steroid toxicity. Patients with frequent relapses who develop steroid dependency thus require alternative treatment. The first such options have been considered to be cyclophosphamide or levamisole, although the latter is no longer available in many countries. There is also an increasing body of data indicating that mycophenolic acid (MPA) may be an alternative for these patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus) are usually effective and often used after cytotoxic treatment, but long-term treatment with these agents is necessary, raising concerns of a possible accumulation of side effects. Some patients show a tendency to relapse even on such maintenance regimens, and some even have a refractory course that creates a medical dilemma. For this situation, recent data indicate that monoclonal antibodies directed to B-cells (e.g. rituximab) may have some effect and that such drugs may also prove to be a therapeutic option in less complicated cases. Patients that do not respond to steroid treatment need genetic testing and a renal biopsy since focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) may be present. Treatment options include pulse methylprednisolone, often in addition to calcineurin inhibitors, mainly in the form of cyclosporine, but tacrolimus has also come into recent favor. Some studies have found cytotoxic treatment, especially intravenous cyclophosphamide, to be effective in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, but it seems to be inferior to calcineurin inhibitors. MPA and rituximab have also been used in children with primary FSGS, but the response seems to be inferior to that in patients with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Taken together, INS in both steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant patients is a potentially complicated disorder, and despite a wide arsenal of immunological interventions, some patients have a treatment refractory course. Prospective studies or at least standardized treatment for complicated cases is urgently needed.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions used to treat idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed quality and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (449 children) were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission (three studies, 49 children: RR 7.66, 95% CI 1.06 to 55.34). Cyclosporin significantly increased the number with complete or partial remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide (one study, 32 children: RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.28). There was no significant difference in the number who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone versus prednisone alone (two studies, 91 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87), IV versus oral cyclophosphamide (one study, 11 children: RR 3.13, 95% CI 0.81 to 12.06), IV cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with IV dexamethasone (one study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96), tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (one study, 41 children: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.66) and azathioprine with prednisone versus prednisone alone (one study, 31 children: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.15 to 5.84). ACEi significantly reduced proteinuria (two studies, 70 children). No studies were identified comparing high dose steroids and cyclosporin with single agents, placebo or no treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate other regimens for idiopathic SRNS including high dose steroids with cyclosporin.

Management of childhood onset nephrotic syndrome

The therapeutic approach to childhood nephrotic syndrome is based on a series of studies that began with an international collaborative effort sponsored by the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children in 1967. The characteristics of children presenting with nephrotic syndrome have changed over recent decades with greater frequency of the challenging condition focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and a greater prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus, which may be resistant to glucocorticoids in the former and exacerbated by long-term glucocorticoid therapy in the latter 2 conditions. The Children's Nephrotic Syndrome Consensus Conference was formed to systematically review the published literature and generate a children's primary nephrotic syndrome guideline for use in educational, therapeutic, and research venues.

An update on the treatment options for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is not a disease but a lesion initially affecting the podocyte. Various factors may induce 'secondary' FSGS, including defects in molecules that contribute to the podocyte slit diaphragm permselectivity to albumin. They do not represent indications for immunosuppression and require symptomatic treatment only, comprising angiotensin 2 and endothelin antagonists. Primary (idiopathic) FSGS is possibly but not certainly of immunologic origin, owing to an elusive glomerular permeability factor (GPF), explaining relapse on a renal transplant and justifying an immunosuppressive treatment. The best prognostic feature of primary nephrotic FSGS is its response to corticosteroids. Alkylating agents are mostly ineffective in steroid-resistant forms. An association of corticosteroids and cyclosporine A (CsA) remains the mainstay of treatment, with a good tolerability when CsA dosage is low. A definite advantage of tacrolimus on CsA has not yet been established. Sirolimus appears ineffective and potentially harmful. Azathioprine is not indicated. A number of mostly uncontrolled trials indicate that mycophenolate mofetil might find an adjunctive place in the treatment. Plasmapheresis is of no avail outside the special case of relapse in a transplanted kidney. Immunoabsorption of the GPF has not led to practical treatment options. Anecdotal reports on rituximab are as yet too few to determine whether this monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody will find a place in the treatment of primary FSGS.

Tacrolimus therapy in adults with steroid- and cyclophosphamide-resistant nephrotic syndrome and normal or mildly reduced GFR

BACKGROUND

In a proportion of adults with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy fails. Tacrolimus may be a promising alternative to cyclophosphamide for such patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

19 adults with SRNS (6 with minimal change nephropathy, 8 with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS], and 5 with mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis) that did not respond to intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy were studied from January 2003 to September 2006. Oral tacrolimus was administered (target trough levels, 5 to 10 ng/mL) for 24 weeks, then reduced doses were given (target trough level, 3 to 6 ng/mL) for another 24 weeks.

FACTORS

Histopathologic types: minimal change nephropathy (n = 6), FSGS (n = 8), and mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (n = 5).

OUTCOMES

MEASUREMENTS

outcome variables included complete remission (decrease in daily proteinuria to protein < or = 0.3 g/d), partial remission (decrease in daily proteinuria to protein < 3.5 g/d but > 0.3 g/d), relapse (increase in daily proteinuria to protein > or = 3.5 g/d in patients who had partial or complete remission), change in kidney function, and tacrolimus dosing and serum levels.

RESULTS

17 patients completed at least 24 weeks of tacrolimus therapy. Complete remission was achieved in 11 patients (64.7%), and partial remission was achieved in 3 (17.6%). Complete or partial remission was achieved in 5 of 5 patients with minimal change nephropathy, 4 of 7 patients with FSGS, and 5 of 5 patients with mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. Primary resistance to tacrolimus was seen in 3 patients (17.6%), all with FSGS. Mean times to achieve partial and complete remission were 5.6 +/- 1.4 and 8.0 +/- 5.1 weeks, respectively. In patients who achieved complete or partial remission, 35.7% experienced relapse during follow-up (mean, 37.6 +/- 13.4 months). Two patients had doubling of serum creatinine levels, both with FSGS.

LIMITATIONS

Observational study.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus rapidly and effectively induced remission of SRNS in Chinese adults with disease refractory to treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide. Treatment may be less effective in patients with FSGS.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To examine whether tacrolimus is more effective and safe than cyclosporine (CsA) in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial, nonblind, parallel group.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

Tertiary-care hospital; 41 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and histological characteristics showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were randomly assigned to treatment with tacrolimus (n = 21) or CsA (n = 20).

INTERVENTION

Tacrolimus (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/d) or CsA (5 to 6 mg/kg/d) for 1 year; cotreatment with alternate-day prednisolone and enalapril.

OUTCOMES

Patients achieving complete remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio < 0.2 g/g and serum albumin > or = 2.5 g/dL) or partial remission (urinary protein-creatinine ratio, 0.2 to 2 g/g, and serum albumin > or =2.5 g/dL) at 6 and 12 months; time to remission; proportion with relapses; side effects.

RESULTS

No patient was lost to follow-up. After 6 months of therapy, remission occurred in 18 (85.7%) and 16 patients (80%) treated with tacrolimus and CsA, respectively (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.41). Rates of remission at 12 months were also similar (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.55). The proportion of patients who experienced relapse was significantly greater in those receiving CsA compared with tacrolimus (RR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 18.2; P = 0.01). The decrease in blood cholesterol levels was greater with tacrolimus compared with CsA (difference in mean values, 45.1 mg/dL; 95% CI, 19.1 to 71.2). Persistent nephrotoxicity necessitating stoppage of medicine was seen in 4.7% and 10% patients, respectively. Cosmetic side effects (hypertrichosis and gum hypertrophy) were significantly more frequent in CsA-treated patients (P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study, small sample size, and short duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus or CsA in combination with low-dose steroids show similar efficacy in inducing remission in patients with SRNS. Therapy with tacrolimus is a promising alternative to CsA in view of the lower risk of relapses and lack of cosmetic side effects.

Experience with tacrolimus in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are at risk of developing renal failure. We report here the results of a single-center retrospective observational study of the remission rate in pediatric patients with SNRS receiving tacrolimus. Serial renal biopsies from children on tacrolimus therapy were evaluated for tubulointerstitial fibrosis and transforming growth factor-beta immunostaining. Of the 16 children with SRNS, 15 went into complete remission after a median of 120 days of therapy. Nine children were able to stop steroids, while the others were on tapering doses. Forty-seven percent had relapses, most of which were steroid-responsive. Serial renal biopsies were obtained from seven children after a median treatment duration of 24 months; two of these children had increased tubulointerstitial fibrosis and four showed increased transforming growth factor-beta tissue staining. Children with worsening histological findings were younger. There was no significant association between tacrolimus exposure and biopsy changes, although the average trough level was higher in those children with worsening histological findings. In conclusion, tacrolimus may be a safe and effective alternative agent for inducing remission in children with SRNS. However, caution needs to be taken when prescribing this agent due to its narrow therapeutic index. Serial renal biopsies are necessary to check for subclinical nephrotoxicity, especially in younger children and those with higher trough levels.

Therapies for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Between 10 and 20% of children with primary nephrotic syndrome are steroid-resistant (SRNS). From earlier studies in children with SRNS, we know that cyclosporin (with or without alternate-day prednisone) and cyclophosphamide (with pulse intravenous corticosteroids) result in comparable complete or partial remission rates of about 60%. An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin has not been possible because of the absence of a head-to-head randomised trial. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie trial, published in this issue of Pediatric Nephrology, has filled this gap in our evidence base. Although there was no difference in the number of patients achieving complete remission, those patients receiving cyclosporin treatment were significantly more likely to achieve partial remission than those receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide. This result suggests that cyclosporin rather than cyclophosphamide should be used as first line therapy for children with SRNS.

Efficacy of intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide treatment versus combination of intravenous dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

We compared, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of a regimen based on intravenous (i.v.) cyclophosphamide therapy with a combination of i.v. dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide therapy in inducing remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). During April 2001 to December 2003, 52 consecutive patients with idiopathic SRNS, normal renal function and renal histology findings showing minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis were enrolled into the study. Patients in group I received i.v. injection of cyclophosphamide once a month for 6 months and prednisolone on alternate days. Those in group II received i.v. treatment with dexamethasone (initially on alternate days, later fortnightly and monthly; total 14 doses), oral cyclophosphamide therapy (for 3 months) and prednisolone on alternate days. Data from 49 patients (26 in group I, 23 in group II) were analyzed; their clinical and biochemical features were similar at inclusion. Following treatment, complete remission was seen in 53.8% and 47.8% patients in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.6). Long-term follow up showed favorable outcome in 14 (53.8%) patients in group I, and 9 (39.1%) in group II. Chief adverse effects, including cushingoid features and serious infections, were similar in both groups. Patients receiving i.v. dexamethasone therapy commonly showed hypertension and hypokalemia, while vomiting and reversible alopecia occurred in those receiving i.v. treatment with cyclophosphamide. In patients with SRNS, the efficacy of treatment intravenously with cyclophosphamide and orally with prednisolone was similar to the combination of dexamethasone intravenously, orally administered cyclophosphamide and prednisolone.

Cyclosporin A is superior to cyclophosphamide in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome-a randomized controlled multicentre trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie

First line immunosuppressive treatment in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children is still open to discussion. We conducted a controlled multicentre randomized open label trial to test the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A (CSA) versus cyclophosphamide pulses (CPH) in the initial therapy of children with newly diagnosed primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and histologically proven minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or mesangial hypercellularity. Patients in the CSA group (n = 15) were initially treated with 150 mg/m(2) CSA orally to achieve trough levels of 120-180 ng/ml, while patients in the CPH group (n = 17) received CPH pulses (500 mg/m(2) per month intravenous). All patients were on alternate prednisone therapy. Patients with proteinuria >40 mg/m(2) per hour at 12 weeks of therapy were allocated to a non-responder protocol with high-dose CSA therapy or methylprednisolone pulses. At week 12, nine of the 15 (60%) CSA patients showed at least partial remission, evidences by a reduction of proteinuria <40 mg/h per m(2). In contrast, three of the 17 (17%) CPH patients responded (p < 0.05, intention-to-treat). Given these results, the study was stopped, in accordance with the protocol. After 24 weeks, complete remission was reached by two of the 15 (13%) CSA and one of the 17 (5%) CPH patients (p = n.s.). Partial remission was achieved by seven of the 15 (46%) CSA and two of the 15 (11%) CPH patients (p <0.05). Five patients in the CSA group and 14 patients in the CPH group were withdrawn from the study, most of them during the non-responder protocol. The number of adverse events was comparable between both groups. We conclude that CSA is more effective than CPH in inducing at least partial remission in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.

Immunosuppressive treatment for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, including focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). However, only about 20% of patients with FSGS experience a partial or complete remission of nephrotic syndrome despite treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive regimes in adults with FSGS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL and handsearched congress reports of the American Society of Nephrology and the European Dialysis and Transplantation Association. Date of search: 31 January 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs which examined the effects of different doses, dose strategies and duration of treatment of steroids, alkylating agents, cyclosporin A and antimetabolites in the treatment of FSGS in adults, where included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed abstracts and/or full text articles to determine which studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Information was entered onto a separate data sheet for each identified study. Data relevant to outcomes (complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome, doubling of serum creatinine, adverse effects) from identified studies were included. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies (108 participants) were included. Three studies investigated cyclosporin A (CSA) with or without prednisone versus prednisone or no treatment and one compared chlorambucil plus prednisone versus no treatment. Outcome data was only available for complete or partial remission and doubling of serum creatinine. There was a significant increase in the number of participants who obtained complete or partial remission with CSA plus low dose prednisone versus prednisone alone (one study, 49 participants: RR 8.85, 95% CI 1.22 to 63.92). Pooled analyses were not performed due to the heterogeneity of the data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adult patients treated with CSA at an initial dose of 3.5-5 mg/kg/d in two divided doses perhaps in combination with oral prednisolone 0.15 mg/kg/d are more likely to achieve a partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome compared with symptomatic treatment or prednisolone alone. However, there is a probability of deterioration of kidney function due to the nephrotoxic effect of CSA in the long term. For CSA, a larger controlled trial with longer follow-up should be performed to prove the benefit of this regimen not only on proteinuria but also on the preservation of kidney function. Present available data do not support the general use of alkylating substances for the treatment of FSGS in adults.

Corticosteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis : an update of treatment options for children

Corticosteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (CRNS) with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a heterogeneous disorder and the most severe and frequent type of all glomerulopathies in children leading to end-stage renal failure. The podocyte is at the center of development and progress of FSGS; this unique cell type plays a major role in the integrity of glomerular structure and permeability. The rate of complete remission of CRNS after induction therapy using different immunosuppressant agents is reported to range between 30% and 84%, depending on the treatment schedule and on the underlying defects of FSGS. Children with genetic types of FSGS barely respond to immunosuppressant therapies and over-treatment prior to transplantation should be avoided. The response of children with an idiopathic type of FSGS to immunosuppressants is superior to those with genetic FSGS. However, many children with idiopathic FSGS do not enter complete remission if they are under-treated, for example, with short-term immunosuppressant monotherapies. If immunosuppressant treatment fails, these patients will have to undergo renal transplantation. However, as unknown pathogenetic mechanisms may persist, more than one-third of these patients with idiopathic FSGS develop a rapid recurrence of CRNS that responds poorly to further long-term therapeutic attempts. In contrast with previously published data, this review takes into account recently identified genetic etiologies of CRNS, and superior results with long-term combination therapy in idiopathic forms to avoid over- and under-treatment.

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: long-term evolution after sequential therapy

We present a retrospective study of 30 children of mean age 3.02 +/- 1.81 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) treated with intravenous injection of methylprednisolone plus orally administered prednisone; 24 children also received cyclophosphamide (CP). Sixteen were resistant to steroids from the beginning, and 14 after a mean of 11.26 +/- 16.61 months. The initial histological diagnosis was: 18 minimal change disease (MCD), 11 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and one diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (DMPG). Total remission was achieved in 22 patients (73.3%), partial response in three (10%) and no response in five (16.6%), two of whom were brothers carrying an NPHS2 gene double mutation. There was no difference in response between the MCD and FSGS patients; the only patient with DMPG did not respond. Only initial resistance was a sign of bad prognosis. At follow-up (6.4 +/- 3.6 years from last pulse), 21/22 were still in remission, 14/21 were without treatment. Six patients required cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil because of steroid dependence. Two non-responders developed end-stage renal failure (ESRF); the remaining patients maintained normal glomerular filtration. The treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, most of the patients treated with sequential therapy consisting of methylprednisolone (MP) (100%) and CP (80%) showed remission and preserved renal function, but 20% developed steroid dependence.

Presenting features and short-term outcome according to pathologic variant in childhood primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

This was a retrospective analysis of children in one center who had primary (idiopathic) FSGS.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

There were 41 patients: 34.1% female, 65.9% male, 80.5% black, and 19.5% white. At presentation, the mean age was 10.9 +/- 0.9 yr. The mean time of follow-up was 3.9 +/- 0.5 yr.

RESULTS

During the observation period, the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) remained stable, serum albumin rose slightly, and the GFR was stable. Among those who received corticosteroids at presentation, 21.2% were steroid sensitive. At last follow-up among all patients, 71% were in remission, 78% had stage 1 or 2 chronic kidney disease, and 4.9% had reached ESRD. At last follow-up, the GFR was significantly higher (P = 0.01) in patients who were initially steroid sensitive. Ethnicity had no effect on clinical data or response to therapy. The pathologic variants were as follows: Cellular, 32%; collapsing, 24%; and not otherwise specified (NOS), 44%. The chronicity scores were as follows: Cellular, 4.3; collapsing 6.4; and NOS, 4.0 (significantly higher, P = 0.02, in collapsing versus NOS). At presentation, SBP (P = 0.03) and DBP (P = 0.03) were significantly higher and GFR was lower (P = 0.03) in patients with the collapsing compared with NOS variant. Remission after the initial course of corticosteroids was less common with the collapsing variant. At last follow-up, SBP (P = 0.02) and DBP (P = 0.04) were significantly higher in patients with the collapsing versus NOS variant.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term outcome in pediatric primary FSGS is generally favorable, but a more guarded prognosis exists for patients with collapsing FSGS.

Predictors of long-term outcome of children with idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Clinical and histological data of children presenting with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and renal biopsy showing focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis from 1980 with a follow-up of over 10 years were reviewed. There were 66 patients; 38 male and 28 female. Age at onset ranged from 0.4-14.1 years (mean 6.4). Tubular atrophy was present at first biopsy in 50/66, capsular adhesions in 35/66, glomerular tip lesions in 8/66 and mesangial expansion in 31/66 patients. In 51 children, cyclophosphamide was prescribed as the first cytotoxic agent, while 15 received cyclosporine A and complete remission was induced in 43 and 40% of the children, respectively. Complete and stable remission was maintained in 35 children, while 22 had reduction of proteinuria with symptomatic relief. Nine were refractory to cytotoxic therapy. Of the 35 patients who entered complete and stable remission, the renal survival was over 90%, while in the 31 non-responders it was 48% in 10 years. The multivariate analysis using unconditional logistic regression method identified the presence of mesangial expansion (p=0.011) and tip lesions (p=0.005) as the independent predictors of favourable response to cytotoxic therapy and the presence of renal impairment (p=0.008) and extensive focal segmental sclerosis (p=0.025) as independent predictors of unfavourable response.