Der Umgang mit „second victims“ als organisationsethische Aufgabe

A Transactional "Second-Victim" Model-Experiences of Affected Healthcare Professionals in Acute-Somatic Inpatient Settings: A Qualitative Metasynthesis

BACKGROUND

"Second victims" are healthcare professionals traumatized by involvement in significant adverse events. Associated burdens, e.g., guilt, can impair professional performance, thereby endangering patient safety. To date, however, a model of second victims' experiences toward a deeper understanding of qualitative studies is missing. Therefore, we aimed to identify, describe, and interpret these experiences in acute-somatic inpatient settings.

METHODS

This qualitative metasynthesis reflects a systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, extended by hand searches and expert consultations. Two researchers independently evaluated qualitative studies in German and English, assessing study quality via internationally approved criteria. Results were analyzed inductively and aggregated quantitatively.

RESULTS

Based on 19 qualitative studies (explorative-descriptive: n = 13; grounded theory: n = 3; phenomenology: n = 3), a model of second-victim experience was drafted. This depicts a multistage developmental process: in appraising their situation, second victims focus on their involvement in an adverse event, and they become traumatized. To restore their integrity, they attempt to understand the event and to act accordingly; however, their reactions are commonly emotional and issue focused. Outcomes include leaving the profession, surviving, or thriving. This development process is alternately modulated by safety culture and healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, this model works systematically from the second-victim perspective based on qualitative studies. Based on our findings, we recommend integrating second victims' experiences into safety culture and root-cause analyses. Our transactional model of second-victim experience provides a foundation for strategies to maintain and improve patient safety.

Coping strategies in health care providers as second victims: A systematic review

AIM

To analyze personal and organizational strategies described in the literature for dealing with the second victim phenomenon among healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND

The second victim phenomenon involves many associated signs and symptoms, which can be physical, psychological, emotional, or behavioral. Personal and organizational strategies have been developed to deal with this phenomenon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases, searching for evidence published between 2010 and 2019 in Spanish, English, German, and Portuguese.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and eighty-three articles were identified. After eliminating duplicates, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and critical analysis tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute, 16 research articles were included: 10 quantitative studies (design: descriptive, correlational, systematic, or integrative review) and six qualitative studies (descriptive, systematic review). There are several different personal and organizational strategies for dealing with the second victim phenomenon. Among these, peer support and learning from adverse events are highly valued. In personal strategies stands out the internal analysis of the adverse event that the professional performs to deal with the generated negative feelings. In organizational strategies, the most valued are second victim support programs with rapid response teams and made up of peers.

CONCLUSIONS

The main organizational coping strategies for tackling this phenomenon are online programs in countries such as the United States, Spain, and other European countries. Formal evaluation of these programs and research is required in Latin America.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICIES

Adequately coping with the second victim phenomenon allows health professionals and organizations to learn from adverse events. Furthermore, by supporting health professionals who suffer from the second victim phenomenon, the organization takes care of its most valuable resource, its human capital. This contributes toward building a culture of healthcare quality in organizations, which will reduce adverse events in the future.

[Handling critical incidents as organizational-ethical challenges using the example of "medical errors"]

Von Mitarbeitenden im Gesundheitswesen wird ein professioneller Umgang mit PatientInnen und Zugehörigen verlangt. Die Begleitung in Lebenskrisen, bei Erkrankung, Sterben und Tod stellt hohe Anforderungen. Als besonders belastend kann erlebt werden, wenn Mitarbeitende bei der Entscheidungsfindung in Gewissenskonflikte geraten oder sich in einer Dilemmasituation wiederfinden. Das Spektrum reicht von außergewöhnlichen Triage-Entscheidungen bis hin zu einem – vergleichsweise häufigeren – Beteiligtsein an einem (mutmaßlichen oder Beinahe‑) Behandlungsfehler. Angesichts der teilweise tragischen Auswirkungen auf die Patienten und Zugehörigen, die ihr Vertrauen in die Institution gesetzt haben, wird der Umgang für die Mitarbeitenden vor allem dann zusätzlich belastend, wenn innerhalb der Organisation kein glaubwürdiges Konzept für einen strukturierten Umgang mit derartigen Ereignissen etabliert und unter den Kolleginnen und Kollegen sowie Vorgesetzten wenig Wissen über hilfreiche Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten vorhanden ist.