[Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy]

3D digital analysis of magnetic force-driven orthodontic tooth movement

With the introduction of rare earth magnets like neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB), it has become possible to produce small magnets with high forces, necessary for its usage in the field of dentistry, such as for orthodontic tooth movement. The ultimate goal of this project is to establish magnetic force-driven orthodontic treatment as a future treatment modality for comprehensive orthodontic treatment. In order to utilize magnets for orthodontic treatment, we must first understand the characteristics of tooth movement created by magnetic forces. In this study, we aimed to digitally assess the efficacy of magnetic attraction and repulsion forces by means of a 3D digital analysis of movement (distance, direction, angulation and duration) and rotation (yaw, pitch and roll) of the crown and root of teeth in an ex vivo typodont model. We performed space closure and space gain treatment of maxillary central incisors (n = 30) and analyzed the movement and rotation of the teeth and root apex with 3D digital analysis. The results of the typodont model indicated significant differences on amount, speed and rotation of tooth and root movement created by magnetic attraction and repulsion forces. We also mimicked a moderate crowding typodont case and successfully treated it with a combination of attraction and repulsion magnetic forces. The moderate crowding case utilized magnets and a titanium archwire to guide the planned tooth movements and prevent undesired or unexpected movement. Further ex vivo experiments and considerations for biosafety will be necessary to investigate magnet force-driven orthodontics as a future modality of orthodontic treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 October 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy of PEMF therapy with sham control in patients with OA.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Pain, function, adverse effects and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan V.5.2 was used to perform statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve trials were included, among which ten trials involved knee OA, two involved cervical OA and one involved hand OA. The PEMF group showed more significant pain alleviation than the sham group in knee OA (standardised mean differences (SMD)=-0.54, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.04, p=0.03) and hand OA (SMD=-2.85, 95% CI -3.65 to -2.04, p<0.00001), but not in cervical OA. Similarly, comparing with the sham-control treatment, significant function improvement was observed in the PEMF group in both knee and hand OA patients (SMD=-0.34, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.14, p=0.0006, and SMD=-1.49, 95% CI -2.12 to -0.86, p<0.00001, respectively), but not in patients with cervical OA. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the exposure duration <=30 min per session exhibited better effects compared with the exposure duration >30 min per session. Three trials reported adverse events, and the combined results showed that there was no significant difference between PEMF and the sham group.

CONCLUSIONS

PEMF could alleviate pain and improve physical function for patients with knee and hand OA, but not for patients with cervical OA. Meanwhile, a short PEMF treatment duration (within 30 min) may achieve more favourable efficacy. However, given the limited number of study available in hand and cervical OA, the implication of this conclusion should be cautious for hand and cervical OA.

No effect of a pulsed magnetic field on induced ischemic muscle pain. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of pulsed (electro)magnetic field (PEMF) therapy on chronic and acute pain is equivocal. In the current randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment, impact of a commercially available whole-body PEMF mat on acute ischemic muscle pain induced in the forearm was studied with the participation of 70 healthy volunteers. The device emitted a pulsed magnetic field with a repetition frequency of 2.05Hz and a maximum flux density of 25.3μT (rms). The highest dB/dt was 48mT/s. No differences between the groups receiving actual and sham PEMF were found in terms of pain threshold, pain tolerance, heart rate, and perceived decrease of pain. However, participants' expectation concerning the effectiveness of the intervention improved pain tolerance and affected perceived change of pain. In conclusion, the used PEMF device had no specific effect on acute ischemic muscle pain, while the contribution of the placebo effect was considerable.