[Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children]

Gabapentin as a novel adjunct for postoperative irritability after superior cavopulmonary connection operation in children

OBJECTIVES

Describing our institution's off-label use of gabapentin to treat irritability after superior cavopulmonary connection surgery and its impact on subsequent opiate and benzodiazepine requirements.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study including infants who underwent superior cavopulmonary connection operation between 2011 and 2019.

RESULTS

Gabapentin was administered in 74 subjects (74/323, 22.9%) during the observation period, with a median (IQR) starting dose of 5.7 (3.3, 15.0) mg/kg/day and a maximum dose of 10.7 (5.5, 23.4) mg/kg/day. Infants who underwent surgery in 2015-19 were more likely to receive gabapentin compared with those who underwent surgery in 2011-14 (p < 0.0001). Infants prescribed gabapentin were younger at surgery (137 versus 146 days, p = 0.007) and had longer chest tube durations (1.8 versus 0.9 days, p < 0.001), as well as longer postoperative intensive care (5.8 versus 3.1 days, p < 0.0001) and hospital (11.5 versus 7.0 days, p < 0.0001) lengths of stays. The year of surgery was the only predisposing factor associated with gabapentin administration in multivariate analysis. In adjusted linear regression, infants prescribed gabapentin on postoperative day 0-4 (n = 64) had reduced benzodiazepine exposure in the following 3 days (-0.29 mg/kg, 95% CI -0.52 - -0.06, p = 0.01) compared with those not prescribed gabapentin, while no difference was seen in opioid exposure (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Gabapentin was used with increasing frequency during the study period. There was a modest reduction in benzodiazepine requirements associated with gabapentin administration and no reduction in opioid requirements. A randomised controlled trial could better assess gabapentin's benefits postoperatively in children with congenital heart disease.

If we know better, why don't we do better? A rapid quality improvement project to increase utilization of comfort measures to reduce pain and distress in children in a COVID-19 mass vaccination clinic

INTRODUCTION

Many evidence-based tools exist to address pain and distress associated with injections; however, there remains a large gap between the knowledge of these tools and their utilization. Our hospital began a quality improvement (QI) project prior to COVID-19, with the goal of increasing the utilization of Comfort Promise measures during needle procedures. When COVID-19 vaccinations were approved, our mass vaccination clinics provided an opportunity to rapidly increase utilization across the institution. The primary aim was to increase the percentage of comfort measures (CM) offered with COVID-19 vaccinations.

METHODS

Through this QI project, nurses and other professionals implemented CMs during COVID mass vaccination clinics. Clinics occurred in 3 age-based waves. Waves served as Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Families completed post-vaccination surveys to determine what CMs were offered and intention for future use with vaccinations.

RESULTS

Uptake of CMs (PainEase, ShotBlockers, Comfort Positioning, Alternative Focus, Topical Lidocaine, and Breastfeeding/Sucrose) throughout the waves increased and generally remained stable. CMs also seemed to decrease pain/distress with vaccinations (70.5 to 88.7%), and children/caregivers intended to use some combination for future vaccinations (82.5 to 98.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-paced mass vaccination clinics provided an ideal opportunity to significantly increase utilization of CMs. Across age groups CMs yielded high satisfaction and interest in future utilization. Clinic nurses returned to their own sub-specialties and became change agents.

IMPLICATIONS

If all healthcare providers can work together to achieve consensus while incorporating comfort measures into daily practice, sustained change with incorporation of these evidence-based tools can be achieved. Future directions are discussed.

[Pain therapy in children following ophthalmic surgery]

Pain following eye surgery is often described as being relatively moderate; however, there are also procedures that lead to a pronounced pain experience. Particularly in pediatric patients, pain therapy is often insufficient due to a lack of knowledge and fear of complications. These individual and organizational deficits lead to unnecessary discomfort for children and parents. Each institution providing surgical treatment must have pain management concepts in its portfolio for the appropriate age groups. This includes a child-oriented setting, age-appropriate information, systematic pain assessment, and pain protocols. Pain management should be planned prior to surgery and individually adapted as it progresses. Children have a right to a perioperative course with low stress and pain.