1
|
Brain computer interface system based on monocular vision and motor imagery for UAV indoor space target searching. Biomed Signal Process Control 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
2
|
Mussi MG, Adams KD. EEG hybrid brain-computer interfaces: A scoping review applying an existing hybrid-BCI taxonomy and considerations for pediatric applications. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1007136. [DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1007136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Most hybrid brain-computer interfaces (hBCI) aim at improving the performance of single-input BCI. Many combinations are possible to configure an hBCI, such as using multiple brain input signals, different stimuli or more than one input system. Multiple studies have been done since 2010 where such interfaces have been tested and analyzed. Results and conclusions are promising but little has been discussed as to what is the best approach for the pediatric population, should they use hBCI as an assistive technology. Children might face greater challenges when using BCI and might benefit from less complex interfaces. Hence, in this scoping review we included 42 papers that developed hBCI systems for the purpose of control of assistive devices or communication software, and we analyzed them through the lenses of potential use in clinical settings and for children. We extracted taxonomic categories proposed in previous studies to describe the types of interfaces that have been developed. We also proposed interface characteristics that could be observed in different hBCI, such as type of target, number of targets and number of steps before selection. Then, we discussed how each of the extracted characteristics could influence the overall complexity of the system and what might be the best options for applications for children. Effectiveness and efficiency were also collected and included in the analysis. We concluded that the least complex hBCI interfaces might involve having a brain inputs and an external input, with a sequential role of operation, and visual stimuli. Those interfaces might also use a minimal number of targets of the strobic type, with one or two steps before the final selection. We hope this review can be used as a guideline for future hBCI developments and as an incentive to the design of interfaces that can also serve children who have motor impairments.
Collapse
|
3
|
Target Detection of Low-Altitude UAV Based on Improved YOLOv3 Network. JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS 2022. [DOI: 10.1155/2022/4065734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Most existing methods are difficult to detect low-altitude and fast-moving drones. A low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) target detection method based on an improved YOLOv3 network is proposed. While keeping the basic framework of the original model unchanged, the YOLOv3 model is improved. That is, multiscale prediction is added to enhance the detection ability of small-target objects. In addition, the two-axis Pan/Tilt/Zoom (PTZ) camera is controlled based on proportional integral derivative (PID), so that the target tends to the center of the field of view. It is more conducive to accurate detection. Finally, experiments are carried out using real UAV datasets. The results show that the mean average precision (mAP), AP50, and AP75 are 25.12%, 39.75%, and 26.03%, respectively, which are better than other methods. Also, the frame rate is 21 frames·s−1, which meets the performance requirements.
Collapse
|