Risk evaluation model for failure mode and effect analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy rough number approach

A developed gained and lost dominance score method for risk prioritization in FMEA with Fermatean fuzzy information

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the most effective means for potential systematic risk assessment in a real work environment. Nevertheless, the traditional FMEA approach has been extensively criticized for many deficiencies in coping with risk evaluation and prioritization problems under inter-uncertain environments. To overcome the limitations, in this paper, a synthesized risk priority calculation framework is proposed for FMEA by combining the gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method, the combination ordered weighted averaging (C-OWA) operator, and Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS). Firstly, we use FFS to express the experts’ uncertain risk evaluation information which can depict the fuzziness and ambiguity of the information. Secondly, the C-OWA operator combined with FFS is introduced to build the group risk matrix which can provide a more reasonable risk analysis result. Then, the developed GLDS method with FFS is presented to calculate the risk priority of each failure mode which takes both individual and group risk attitudes into consideration. Finally, a medical device risk analysis case is introduced to demonstrate the proposed FMEA framework. We also perform comparison analyses to confirm the effectiveness and rationality of the hybrid risk prioritization framework for FMEA under a complex and uncertain situation.

An intuitionistic fuzzy cloud model-based risk assessment method of failure modes considering hybrid weight information

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is an effective tool utilized in various fields for discovering and eliminating potential failures in products and services, which is usually implemented based on experts’ linguistic assessments. However, incomprehensive weigh information of risk factors and experts, lacking the consideration of experts’ randomness and hesitation, and incomplete risk factor system is essential challenges for the traditional FMEA model. Therefore, to properly handle these challenges and further enhance the performance of the traditional FMEA, this study develops a new FMEA strategy for assessing and ranking failures’ risks. First, a novel concept of intuitionistic fuzzy clouds (IFCs) is developed by combining the merits of the intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and the cloud model theory in manipulating uncertain information. Some basic operations and the Minkowski-type distance measure of IFCs are also presented and discussed. Further, in the proposed FMEA model, two combination weighting methods are developed to determine the synthetic weights of experts and risk factors, respectively, which consider subjectivity and objectivity simultaneously. In addition, maintenance (M) is considered as a new risk factor to enrich the assessment factor system and facilitate a more reasonable risk assessment result. Finally, a case study is implemented along with comparisons to demonstrate the feasibility and superiority of the presented FMEA model.

An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System

Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a well-known reliability analysis tool for recognizing, evaluating and prioritizing the known or potential failures in system, design, and process. In conventional FMECA, the failure modes are evaluated by using three risk factors, severity (S), occurrence (O) and detectability (D), and their risk priorities are determined by multiplying the crisp values of risk factors to obtain their risk priority numbers (RPNs). However, the conventional RPN has been considerably criticized due to its various shortcomings. Although significant efforts have been made to enhance the performance of traditional FMECA, some drawbacks still exist and need to be addressed in the real application. In this paper, a new FMECA model for risk analysis is proposed by using an integrated approach, which introduces Z-number, Rough number, the Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and the VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method to FMECA to overcome its deficiencies in real application. The novelty of this paper in theory is that the proposed approach integrates the strong expressive ability of Z-numbers to vagueness and uncertainty information, the strong point of DEMATEL method in studying the dependence among failure modes, the advantage of rough numbers for aggregating experts’ diversity evaluations, and the strength of VIKOR method to flexibly model multi-criteria decision-making problems. Based on the integrated approach, the proposed risk assessment model can favorably capture and aggregate FMECA team members’ diversity evaluations and prioritize failure modes under different types of uncertainties with considering the failure propagation. In terms of application, the proposed approach was applied to the risk analysis of failure modes in offshore wind turbine pitch system, and it can also be used in many industrial fields for risk assessment and safety analysis.

A T-spherical fuzzy ELECTRE approach for multiple criteria assessment problem from a comparative perspective of score functions

The theory involving T-spherical fuzziness provides an exceptionally good tool to efficiently manipulate the impreciseness, equivocation, and vagueness inherent in multiple criteria assessment and decision-making processes. By exploiting the notions of score functions and distance measures for complex T-spherical fuzzy information, this paper aims to propound an innovational T-spherical fuzzy ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choice Translating REality) approach to handling intricate and convoluted evaluation problems. Several newly-created score functions are employed from the comparative perspective to constitute a core procedure concerning concordance and discordance determination in the current T-spherical fuzzy ELECTRE method. By the agency of a realistic application, this paper appraises the usefulness and efficacy of available score functions in the advanced ELECTRE mechanism under T-spherical fuzzy uncertainties. This paper incorporates two forms of Minkowski distance measures into the core procedure; moreover, the effectuality of the advocated measure in differentiating T-spherical fuzzy information is validated. The effectiveness outcomes of the evolved method have been investigated through the medium of an investment decision regarding potential company options for extending the business scope. The real-world application also explores the comparative advantages of distinct score functions in tackling multiple criteria decision-making tasks. Finally, this paper puts forward a conclusion and future research directions.