1
|
A Nomogram Based on Preoperative Lipiodol Deposition after Sequential Retreatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization to Predict Prognoses for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091375. [PMID: 36143160 PMCID: PMC9501090 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is the mainstay treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, BCLC B-stage patients treated with cTACE represent a prognostically heterogeneous population. We aim to develop and validate a lipiodol-deposition-based nomogram for predicting the long-term survival of BCLC B-stage HCC patients after sequential cTACE. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, 229 intermediate-stage HCC patients from two hospitals were separately allocated to a training cohort (n = 142) and a validation cohort (n = 87); these patients underwent repeated TACE (≥4 TACE sessions) between May 2010 and May 2017. Lipiodol deposition was assessed by semiautomatic volumetric measurement with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) before cTACE and was characterized by two ordinal levels: ≤50% (low) and >50% (high). A clinical lipiodol deposition nomogram was constructed based on independent risk factors identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and the optimal cutoff points were obtained. Prediction models were assessed by time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. (3) Results: The median number of TACE sessions was five (range, 4−7) in both cohorts. Before the TACE-3 sessions, the newly constructed nomogram based on lipiodol deposition achieved desirable diagnostic performance in the training and validation cohorts with AUCs of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69−0.74) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68−0.73), respectively, and demonstrated higher predictive ability compared with previously published prognostic models (all p < 0.05). The prognostic nomogram obtained good clinical usefulness in predicting the patient outcomes after TACE. (4) Conclusions: Based on each pre-TACE lipiodol deposition, two sessions are recommended before abandoning cTACE or combining treatment for patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Furthermore, the nomogram based on pre-TACE-3 lipiodol deposition can be used to predict the prognoses of patients with BCLC B-stage HCC.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou L, Zhang LZ, Wang JY, Li YW, Hu HD, Peng XM, Zhao Y, Wang XM, Xie H, Liu CZ, Wang HM. Perioperative safety analysis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with preprocedural leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. Mol Clin Oncol 2017; 7:435-442. [PMID: 28811901 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibit a high incidence of concomitant cirrhosis with leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia. In the present study, perioperative changes in the white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) counts and associated complications were investigated to assess the safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC patients with preprocedural leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. The records of 1,461 HCC patients who received TACE between January 2012 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of complications during the perioperative period and changes in the WBC and PLT counts were recorded. A Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the associations between postoperative infection and preprocedural WBC count and between bleeding at the puncture site and preprocedural PLT count. The WBC count of the majority of the patients increased within 3 days and returned to the preprocedural level within 30 days after TACE. The PLT count decreased within 3 days and returned to the preprocedural level within 30 days after TACE. The major complications were liver decompensation (n=66), puncture site bleeding (n=45), infection (n=33), severe thrombocytopenia (n=8), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n=6), tumor bleeding (n=4) and agranulocytosis (n=3). A Chi-squared test revealed that postoperative infection was not associated with preprocedural WBC count and puncture site bleeding was not associated with decreased PLT count due to hypersplenism. Therefore, TACE was found to be safe for HCC patients with preprocedural thrombocytopenia or leukopenia due to hypersplenism, with a low incidence of major complications during the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Lin-Zhi Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Jing-Yan Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Yong-Wu Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Dong Hu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Ming Peng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Xi-Ming Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Chun-Zi Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| | - Hua-Ming Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Beijing 302 Hospital, Beijing 100039, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The value of [ 11C]-acetate PET and [ 18F]-FDG PET in hepatocellular carcinoma before and after treatment with transarterial chemoembolization and bevacizumab. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1732-1741. [PMID: 28555333 PMCID: PMC5537334 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3724-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This prospective study was to investigate the value of [11C]-acetate PET and [18F]-FDG PET in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before and after treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody (bevacizumab). Methods Twenty-two patients (three women, 19 men; 62 ± 8 years) with HCC verified by histopathology were treated with TACE and bevacizumab (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11). [11C]-acetate PET and [18F]-FDG PET were performed before and after TACE with bevacizumab or placebo. Comparisons between groups were performed with t-tests and Chi-squared tests, where appropriate. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from start of bevacizumab or placebo until the date of death/last follow-up, respectively. Results The patient-related sensitivity of [11C]-acetate PET, [18F]-FDG PET, and combined [11C]-acetate and [18F]-FDG PET was 68%, 45%, and 73%, respectively. There was a significantly higher rate of conversion from [11C]-acetate positive lesions to negative lesions in patients treated with TACE and bevacizumab as compared with that in patients with TACE and placebo (p < 0.05). In patients with negative acetate PET, the mean OS in patients treated with TACE and bevacizumab was 259 ± 118 days and was markedly shorter as compared with that (668 ± 217 days) in patients treated with TACE and placebo (p < 0.05). In patients treated with TACE and placebo, there was significant difference in mean OS in patients with positive FDG PET as compared with that in patients with negative FDG PET (p < 0.05). The HCC lesions had different tracer avidities showing the heterogeneity of HCC. Conclusions Our study suggests that combining [18F]-FDG with [11C]-acetate PET could be useful for the management of HCC patients and might also provide relevant prognostic and molecular heterogeneity information.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pinter M, Ulbrich G, Sieghart W, Kölblinger C, Reiberger T, Li S, Ferlitsch A, Müller C, Lammer J, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Combination with Biweekly Intravenous Administration of Bevacizumab or a Placebo. Radiology 2015; 277:903-12. [PMID: 26131911 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (cTACE) in combination with bevacizumab or a placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a randomized controlled double-blind phase II trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained prior to inclusion. A total of 40 patients (20 patients per group, all 18 years or older) with histologically confirmed early- or intermediate-stage HCC and Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis were scheduled for inclusion. The primary endpoint was radiologic progression at 12 months according to European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. Secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS). Patients underwent cTACE with doxorubicin and intravenous administration of a placebo (cTACE-C) or bevacizumab (cTACE-B) (5 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. After the first TACE procedure, TACE was repeated twice in 4-week intervals if indicated and technically feasible and on demand thereafter. Statistical analyses were performed with statistical software. P < .05 indicated a significant difference. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were recruited between January 2006 and December 2009 (29 male, three female; mean age, 61 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A, n = 4; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B, n = 28; predominant cause, alcohol [n = 15]; Child-Pugh class A disease, n = 22; Child-Pugh class B disease, n = 10; 16 patients received bevacizumab; 16 patients received a placebo). Patients underwent a median of three TACE cycles and received 13 infusions of bevacizumab versus 11 infusions of the placebo before the trial was stopped prematurely for safety reasons. Severe (grade 3-5) septic (n = 8 vs n = 3) and vascular (n = 9 vs n = 0) side effects were observed almost exclusively in the cTACE-B group. Median survival was worse in the cTACE-B group than in the cTACE-C group (5.3 vs 13.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8, 3.6; P = .195) and reached significance in patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis (7.3 vs 26.5 months; HR, 2.6; 95% CI: 1.0, 6.6; P = .049). The primary endpoint was not met, since there was no difference in radiologic response between the groups at 3, 6, or 12 months. CONCLUSION No improvement in radiologic tumor response or OS was observed in patients with HCC who received cTACE and bevacizumab, but severe and even lethal septic and vascular side effects occurred. Thus, bevacizumab cannot be recommended as an adjuvant treatment to cTACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Pinter
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Gregor Ulbrich
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Wolfgang Sieghart
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Claus Kölblinger
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Shuren Li
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Arnulf Ferlitsch
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Christian Müller
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Johannes Lammer
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- From the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (M. Pinter, G.U., W.S., T.R., A.F., C.M., M. Peck-Radosavljevic), Division of Interventional Radiology (C.K., J.L.), and Division of Nuclear Medicine (S.L.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical Division, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria (G.U.); and Vienna Liver Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria (M. Pinter, W.S., M. Peck-Radosavljevic)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peck-Radosavljevic M, Angeli P, Cordoba J, Farges O, Valla D. Managing complications in cirrhotic patients. United European Gastroenterol J 2015; 3:80-94. [PMID: 25653862 DOI: 10.1177/2050640614560452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver cirrhosis is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition. This life-threatening condition usually arises from complications of cirrhosis. While variceal bleeding is the most acute and probably best studied, several other complications of liver cirrhosis are more insidious in their onset but nevertheless more important for the long-term management and outcome of these patients. This review summarizes the topics discussed during the UEG-EASL Hepatology postgraduate course of the United European Gastroenterology Week 2013 and discusses emergency surgical conditions in cirrhotic patients, the management of hepatic encephalopathy, ascites and hepatorenal syndrome, coagulation disorders, and liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Unit of Hepatic Emergencies and Liver Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Juan Cordoba
- Liver Unit, Hospital Valld'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Farges
- Department of HPB surgery HôpitalBeaujon, AP-HP, Université Paris-Diderot, Clichy-la-Garenne, France
| | - Dominique Valla
- Service d'Hépatologie, HôpitalBeaujon, AP-HP, Université Paris-Diderot, Clichy-la-Garenne, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hucke F, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Bota S, Vogel W, Müller C, Heinzl H, Waneck F, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Sieghart W. How to STATE suitability and START transarterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2014; 61:1287-96. [PMID: 25016222 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Revised: 06/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/01/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed to establish an objective point score to guide the decision for the first treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS 277 patients diagnosed with HCC and treated with transarterial treatments between 1/2002 and 12/2011 at the Medical Universities of Vienna (training cohort) and Innsbruck (validation cohort) were included. We investigated the impact of baseline liver function and tumour load on overall survival (OS, log-rank test) and developed a point score (STATE-score: Selection for TrAnsarterial chemoembolisation TrEatment) in the training-cohort (n=131, Vienna) by using a stepwise Cox regression model. The STATE-score was externally validated in an independent validation cohort (n=146, Innsbruck) and thereafter combined with the Assessment for Retreatment with TACE (ART)-score to identify patients who are (un)suitable for TACE. RESULTS The STATE-score starts with the serum-albumin level (g/L), which is reduced by 12 points each, if the tumour load exceeds the up-to-7 criteria and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are ⩾1 mg/dl (maximum reduction: 24 points). The STATE-score differentiated 2 groups (<18, ⩾18 points) with distinct prognosis (median OS: 5.3 vs. 19.5 months; p<0.001) and a lower STATE-score was associated with short-term harm and increased mortality after TACE-1 (39% vs. 14% p<0.001). Sequential use of the STATE and the ART-score (START-strategy) identified the most (un)suitable patients for TACE. Results were confirmed in the external validation-cohort and were independent from recently proposed baseline selection tools. CONCLUSION The STATE-score identifies patients who are (un)suitable for the first TACE. The START-strategy identified the best candidates for multiple TACE sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Hucke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivo Graziadei
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, LKH & Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Simona Bota
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, LKH & Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Müller
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Heinzl
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Fredrik Waneck
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Sieghart
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic liver cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9:e103939. [PMID: 25105961 PMCID: PMC4126673 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess the quality of the currently available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for hepatocellular carcinoma, and provide a reference for clinicians in selecting the best available clinical protocols. Methods The databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and relevant CPGs websites were systematically searched through March 2014. CPGs quality was appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and data analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 software. Results A total of 20 evidence-based and 20 expert consensus-based guidelines were included. The mean percentage of the domain scores were: scope and purpose 83% (95% confidence interval (CI), 81% to 86%), clarity of presentation 79% (95% CI, 73% to 86%), stakeholder involvement 39% (95% CI, 30% to 49%), editorial independence 58% (95% CI, 52% to 64%), rigor of development 39% (95% CI, 31% to 46%), and applicability 16% (95% CI, 10% to 23%). Evidence-based guidelines were superior to those established by consensus for the domains of rigor of development (p<0.001), clarity of presentation (p = 0.01) and applicability (p = 0.021). Conclusions The overall methodological quality of CPGs for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver cancer is moderate, with poor applicability and potential conflict of interest issues. The evidence-based guidelines has become mainstream for high quality CPGs development; however, there is still need to further increase the transparency and quality of evidence rating, as well as the recommendation process, and to address potential conflict of interest.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pinter M, Sieghart W, Schmid M, Dauser B, Prager G, Dienes HP, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Hedgehog inhibition reduces angiogenesis by downregulation of tumoral VEGF-A expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. United European Gastroenterol J 2014; 1:265-75. [PMID: 24917971 DOI: 10.1177/2050640613496605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/12/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysregulation and activation of Hedgehog (Hh) signalling may contribute to tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, and metastatic seeding in several solid tumours. OBJECTIVE We investigated the impact of Hh inhibition on tumour growth and angiogenesis using in-vitro and in-vivo models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS The effect of the Hh pathway inhibitor GDC-0449 on tumour growth was investigated using an orthotopic rat model. Effects on angiogenesis were determined by immunohistochemical staining of von Willebrand factor antigen and by assessing the mRNA expression of several angiogenic factors. In vitro, HCC cell lines were treated with GDC-0449 and evaluated for viability and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Endothelial cells were evaluated for viability, migration, and tube formation. RESULTS In the orthotopic HCC model, GDC-0449 significantly decreased tumoral VEGF expression which was accompanied by a significant reduction of microvessel density and tumour growth. In HCC cells, GDC-0449 had no effect on cell growth but significantly reduced target gene regulation and VEGF expression while having no direct effect on endothelial cell viability, migration, and tube formation. CONCLUSIONS Hh inhibition with GDC-0449 downregulates tumoral VEGF production in vitro and reduces tumoral VEGF expression, angiogenesis, and tumour growth in an orthotopic HCC model.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Liver cancer was traditionally treated by surgery or interventional ablative treatments, or, if these options were not feasible, by best supportive care. Since 2008, systemic therapy with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has become available worldwide and has become the standard of care for unresectable/non-ablatable or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is able to improve the median overall survival by approximately 3 months. Despite this significant advance in the non-surgical/non-interventional management of liver cancer, this improvement in overall survival is only a first step toward more potent, more targeted, and better tolerated oral antitumor treatments. Since the introduction of sorafenib into clinical practice, several attempts have been made to develop even more effective first-line treatments as well as an effective second-line treatment for HCC. None of these endeavors has been successful so far. The development of drug treatments for HCC has been particularly hampered by the unfortunate push to establish the diagnosis of liver cancer by non-invasive imaging alone, without requiring a liver biopsy for histologic confirmation: this precluded the very necessary search for informative biomarkers and the search for molecular targets for drug development in HCC. This important drawback is being increasingly recognized and corrected. Despite several obstacles remaining to be overcome, it seems reasonable to assume that using a rational, data-driven approach, we will be able to develop better drug treatments for liver cancer in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hucke F, Sieghart W, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Müller C, Heinzl H, Waneck F, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART-strategy: sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol 2014; 60:118-26. [PMID: 24012941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Revised: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 08/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recently, we developed the ART score (assessment for re-treatment with TACE) to guide the decision for a second transarterial chemoembolization (TACE-2) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with an ART score of 0-1.5 points gained benefit from a second TACE session, while patients with an ART score ≥2.5 points did not. Here, we investigated (1) the prognostic significance of the ART score prior to the third (TACE-3) and fourth TACE (TACE-4), and (2) the feasibility of an ART score guided re-treatment strategy by sequential assessment of the ART score in HCC patients treated with multiple TACE sessions. METHODS 109 patients, diagnosed with intermediate stage HCC and treated with ≥3 TACE sessions between January 1999 and December 2009 at the Medical Universities of Vienna and Innsbruck, were included. The ART score prior to each TACE session was assessed in comparison to the TACE naïve liver. The prognostic performance of the ART score before TACE-3 and 4 was evaluated with and without stratification based on the ART score prior to the respective last intervention. RESULTS The pre-TACE-3 ART score discriminated two groups with different prognosis and remained a valid predictor of OS independent of Child-Pugh score (5-7 points), CRP-levels and tumor characteristics. Even in patients with an initially beneficial ART score (0-1.5 points) before TACE-2, repeated ART score assessment before TACE-3 identified a subgroup of patients with dismal prognosis (median OS: 27.8 vs. 10.8 months, p<0.001). Similar results were observed when the ART score was applied before TACE-4. CONCLUSIONS The sequential assessment of the ART score identifies patients with dismal prognosis prior to each TACE session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Hucke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Sieghart
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivo Graziadei
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, LKH and Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, LKH and Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Müller
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Heinzl
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Fredrik Waneck
- Department of Interventional Radiology, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH and Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sieghart W, Hucke F, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Müller C, Heinzl H, Trauner M, Peck-Radosavljevic M. The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2013; 57:2261-73. [PMID: 23316013 DOI: 10.1002/hep.26256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We aimed to establish an objective point score to guide the decision for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In all, 222 patients diagnosed with HCC and treated with multiple TACE cycles between January 1999 and December 2009 at the Departments of Gastroenterology/Hepatology of the Medical Universities of Vienna (training cohort) and Innsbruck (validation cohort) were included. We investigated the effect of the first TACE on parameters of liver function and tumor response and their impact on overall survival (OS, log rank test) and developed a point score (ART score: Assessment for Retreatment with TACE) in the training cohort (n = 107, Vienna) by using a stepwise Cox regression model. The ART score was externally validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 115, Innsbruck). The increase of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by >25% (hazard ratio [HR] 8.4; P < 0.001), an increase of Child-Pugh score of 1 (HR 2.0) or ≥2 points (HR 4.4) (P < 0.001) from baseline, and the absence of radiologic tumor response (HR 1.7; P = 0.026) remained independent negative prognostic factors for OS and were used to create the ART score. The ART score differentiated two groups (0-1.5 points; ≥2.5 points) with distinct prognosis (median OS: 23.7 versus 6.6 months; P < 0.001) and a higher ART score was associated with major adverse events after the second TACE (P = 0.011). These results were confirmed in the external validation cohort and remained significant irrespective of Child-Pugh stage and the presence of ascites prior the second TACE. CONCLUSION An ART score of ≥2.5 prior the second TACE identifies patients with a dismal prognosis who may not profit from further TACE sessions. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;57:2261-2273).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Sieghart
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, AKH & Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park JW, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JFH, Goh KL, Han KH, Kudo M, Lee HC, Lee RC, Lesmana LA, Lim HY, Paik SW, Poon RT, Tan CK, Tanwandee T, Teng G, Cheng AL. Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC). Liver Int 2013; 33:327-37. [PMID: 23331661 DOI: 10.1111/liv.12083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents with a high burden of disease in East Asian countries. Intermediate-stage HCC as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system poses a clinical challenge as it includes a heterogeneous population of patients that can vary widely in terms of tumour burden, liver function and disease aetiology. Intermediate HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, due to non-response of the target tumour or the development of further metastasis indicating progressive disease. In September 2011, an Expert Panel Opinion on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC) was convened in HK in an attempt to provide a consensus on the practice of TACE. To that end, current clinical practice throughout Asia was reviewed in detail including safety and efficacy data on TACE alone as well as in combination with targeted systemic therapies. This review summarises the evidence discussed at the meeting and provides expert recommendation regarding the available therapeutic options for unresectable intermediate stage HCC. A key consensus of the Expert Panel was that in order to improve patient outcomes and long-term survival, the possibility of using TACE in combination with targeted agents given systemically should be explored. While the currently available clinical data is promising, the expected completion of several pivotal phase II and III RCTs will provide further evidence in support of the rationale for combination therapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joong-Won Park
- Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sieghart W, Pinter M, Reisegger M, Müller C, Ba-Ssalamah A, Lammer J, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Conventional transarterial chemoembolisation in combination with sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1214-23. [PMID: 22215073 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2368-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2011] [Revised: 11/21/2011] [Accepted: 11/22/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) in combination with sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Patients with Child-Pugh A/B liver function, ECOG performance status 0-2 and HCC treatable with TACE received continuous sorafenib 800 mg/day, and TACE with doxorubicin (75, 50 and 25 mg/m(2) according to serum bilirubin: <1.5, 1.5-3, and >3 mg/dL) and lipiodol 2 weeks after sorafenib initiation and repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS Fifteen patients were included (Child-Pugh A/B, n = 12/3; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-A/B/C, n = 1/9/5; ECOG 0/2, n = 14/1). Median time on sorafenib was 5.2 months (2.6-7.4 months); median number of TACE sessions was 3. Common adverse events were abdominal pain (n = 14), weight loss (n = 13), alopecia (n = 12), fatigue (n = 12) and hyperbilirubinaemia (n = 11). There were 32 serious adverse events (grade ≥ 3); 9/10-unscheduled hospital admissions and 4/5 deaths were considered TACE-related. The study was stopped prematurely because of safety concerns. At 6 months, 2 and 5 patients had complete or partial responses; 1 had stable disease. Median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI: 5.2-16 months). CONCLUSION These findings do not support use of an intensive, high-dose doxorubicin-based TACE regimen in combination with sorafenib in this study population. KEY POINTS • Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is widely used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) • Various antiangiogenic and other agents have been used to augment this treatment • We tested lipiodol-TACE with bilirubin-adjusted doxorubicin dosing in combination with sorafenib • This trial was stopped prematurely because of safety reasons • Our safety results do not support the combination of sorafenib with this TACE regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Sieghart
- Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel, 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|