Interaction between serotonin reuptake inhibitors, 5-HT3 antagonists, and NK1 antagonists in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a case-control study

Gastroprotective effect of fluvoxamine and ondansetron on stress-induced gastric ulcers in mice

OBJECTIVES

The association between stress and gastric ulcers has been well reported. This study is divided into two parts: the first part of this study is consisted of analyzing the effect of fluvoxamine administration by intracerebroventricular (ICV) and intraperitoneal (IP) injections on stress-induced gastric ulcers. The second part investigates the effect of ondansetron in influencing the protection of the gastric mucous by giving fluvoxamine to the mice before being induced with stress.

METHODS

Water immersion restraint stress (WIRS) was used to induce stress. Fluvoxamine 50 and 100 mg/kg by IP injection, fluvoxamine 9.3 µg, and 18.6 µg by ICV injection 30 min before the induction of stress. Meanwhile, single drug and in combination administered to the mice, ondansetron 3 mg/kg was given by IP at 60 min, and fluvoxamine 50, 100 mg/kg orally at 30 min before stress induction.

RESULTS

The obtained results show fluvoxamine 50 and 100 mg/kg by IP, and fluvoxamine 18.6 µg by ICV had significantly reduced ulcer index with p<0.005, p<0.001, and p<0.005 while fluvoxamine 9.3 µg showed the insignificant result. Fluvoxamine 50 mg/kg, fluvoxamine 100 mg/kg, and ondansetron 3 mg/kg monotherapy have a significant reduction in ulcers with p<0.005, p<0.001, and p<0.05, while the combination drugs showed an insignificant reduction in ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvoxamine with different administration routes and ondansetron monotherapy before stress reduce the occurrence of gastric ulcers, while the combination drugs did not increase the protective effect of the gastric mucosa.

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant drug interactions: a systematic review

AIMS

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant, commonly used for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, alter cytochrome P450 activity. This systematic review evaluates clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with aprepitant and fosaprepitant and describes adverse events ascribed to drug interactions with aprepitant or fosaprepitant.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature to September 11, 2016, to identify articles evaluating drug interactions involving aprepitant/fosaprepitant. The clinical significance of each reported pharmacokinetic drug interaction was evaluated based on the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance document on conducting drug interaction studies. The probability of an adverse event reported in case reports being due to a drug interaction with aprepitant/fosaprepitant was determined using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 4377 publications were identified. Of these, 64 met inclusion eligibility criteria: 34 described pharmacokinetic drug interactions and 30 described adverse events ascribed to a drug interaction. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and bosutinib PO, cabazitaxel IV, cyclophosphamide IV, dexamethasone PO, methylprednisolone IV, midazolam PO/IV, oxycodone PO and tolbutamide PO were identified, as were adverse events resulting from an interaction between aprepitant/fosaprepitant and alcohol, anthracyclines, ifosfamide, oxycodone, quetiapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for a drug interaction with aprepitant and fosaprepitant should be considered when selecting antiemetic therapy.

Use of anticancer agents in gynecological oncology during pregnancy: a systematic review of maternal pharmacokinetics and transplacental transfer

INTRODUCTION

Cancer affects one in a thousand pregnant women and gynecological cancers are one of the most frequent malignancies. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone treatment for gynecological cancer. Although all chemotherapeutic agents can cross the placental barrier, the extent of placental transfer varies considerably. Furthermore, the significant physiological variations observed in pregnant women may have an impact on pharmacokinetic parameters. Given the complexity of predicting placental transfer, in vivo and ex vivo studies are essential in this context. In view of the paucity of data on chemotherapy during pregnancy, the objective of the present study was to summarize all the available data on the transplacental transfer of anticancer drugs used to treat gynecological cancers.

AREAS COVERED

In order to evaluate the in vivo and ex vivo transplacental transfer of the anticancer drugs most frequently used in gynecological malignancies, we carried out a comprehensive review of the literature published from 1967 to 2015. Lastly, we summarized recent clinical guidelines on the treatment of gynecological cancers in pregnant patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The preclinical and scarce clinical data must now be extrapolated to define the maternofetal toxicity/efficacy profile and thus guide the physicians to choose anticancer drugs more efficiently in this complex situation.

Prognostic factors for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting

PURPOSE

to review the topic of prognostic factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Multiple patient factors such as age, gender and alcohol intake have been found that affect the likelihood of emesis with a given chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics has also been explored as a cause for variation in emetic response. In theory these risk factors could be used to optimize antiemetic therapy for individual patients but guidelines for prophylactic antiemetics are based solely upon the type of chemotherapy administered. Attempts to identify subgroups of patients for whom guidelines recommendations are suboptimal have thus far been unsuccessful except for those with a poor experience in a previous cycle of the same chemotherapy. At present, there is no basis for deviating from evidence-based guidelines when prescribing antiemetics prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy.