Controlled-release oxycodone for the treatment of bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain in patients with multiple myeloma

Contributions of neuroimmune interactions to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy development and its prevention/therapy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating sequela that is difficult for both clinicians and cancer patients to manage. Precise mechanisms of CIPN remain elusive and current clinically prescribed therapies for CIPN have limited efficacy. Recent studies have begun investigating the interactions between the peripheral and central nervous systems and the immune system. Understanding these neuroimmune interactions may shift the paradigm of elucidating CIPN mechanisms. Although the contribution of immune cells to CIPN pathogenesis represents a promising area of research, its fully defined mechanisms have not yet been established. Therefore, in this review, we will discuss (i) current shortcoming of CIPN treatments, (ii) the roles of neuroimmune interactions in CIPN development and (iii) potential neuroimmune interaction-targeting treatment strategies for CIPN. Interestingly, monocytes/macrophages in dorsal root ganglia; microglia and astrocytes in spinal cord; mast cells in skin; and Schwann cell near peripheral nerves have been identified as inducers of CIPN behaviors, whereas T cells have been found to contribute to CIPN resolution. Additionally, nerve-resident immune cells have been targeted as prevention and/or therapy for CIPN using traditional herbal medicines, small molecule inhibitors, and intravenous immunoglobulins in a preclinical setting. Overall, unveiling neuroimmune interactions associated with CIPN may ultimately reduce cancer mortality and improve cancer patients' quality of life.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Pain in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and often painful condition that occurs after administration of chemotherapeutic agents. The primary objective of this systematic review was to appraise the literature on conservative, pharmacological, and interventional treatment options for CIPN pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is level I evidence supporting modest to moderate improvement in CIPN pain from duloxetine treatment, as well as short-term modest improvement from physical therapy and acupuncture. Although opioid and cannabis administration may provide short-term modest improvement, administration is commonly limited by side effects. Generally, most studies reported no clinical benefit from yoga, topical neuropathic agents, gabapentinoids, and tricyclic antidepressants. Evidence is currently equivocal for scrambler therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Finally, evidence on neuromodulation options is limited to mostly case reports/series and one observational study highlighting moderate improvement with auricular nerve stimulation. This systematic review provides an overview of conservative, pharmacologic, and interventional treatment modalities for CIPN pain. Furthermore, it provides a level of evidence and degree of recommendation based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for each specific treatment modality.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanisms and Treatment

PURPOSE

This review provides an update on the current clinical, epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence alongside the diagnostic, prevention and treatment approach to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

FINDINGS

The incidence of cancer and long-term survival after treatment is increasing. CIPN affects sensory, motor and autonomic nerves and is one of the most common adverse events caused by chemotherapeutic agents, which in severe cases leads to dose reduction or treatment cessation, with increased mortality. The primary classes of chemotherapeutic agents associated with CIPN are platinum-based drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib and thalidomide. Platinum agents are the most neurotoxic, with oxaliplatin causing the highest prevalence of CIPN. CIPN can progress from acute to chronic, may deteriorate even after treatment cessation (a phenomenon known as coasting) or only partially attenuate. Different chemotherapeutic agents share both similarities and key differences in pathophysiology and clinical presentation. The diagnosis of CIPN relies heavily on identifying symptoms, with limited objective diagnostic approaches targeting the class of affected nerve fibres. Studies have consistently failed to identify at-risk cohorts, and there are no proven strategies or interventions to prevent or limit the development of CIPN. Furthermore, multiple treatments developed to relieve symptoms and to modify the underlying disease in CIPN have failed.

IMPLICATIONS

The increasing prevalence of CIPN demands an objective approach to identify at-risk patients in order to prevent or limit progression and effectively alleviate the symptoms associated with CIPN. An evidence base for novel targets and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is beginning to emerge and has been recognised recently in publications by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and analgesic trial design expert groups such as ACTTION.

Effects of the publication of Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy on the Administration Preferences of Oncology Specialists: Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a questionnaire survey of oncology specialists to investigate the frequency of administration of different drugs for the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Japan in 2015. Our group published Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in 2017 (CIPN-GL2017). In these guidelines, we recommended duloxetine only. To verify the effect of the publication of the CIPN-GL2017, we conducted a questionnaire survey in 2019.

METHODS

In 2015 and again in 2019, we investigated the use of vitamin B12, antiepileptic agents, duloxetine, antidepressants other than duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and the Kampo compound (goshajinkigan) in a questionnaire employing a three-point scale wherein A implies routine or prophylactic administration, B implies occasional administration and C implies infrequent administration.

RESULTS

We sent the questionnaires via email to 971 diplomates of the Subspecialty Board of Japanese Society of Medical Oncology in 2015 and 1239 diplomates in 2019. The administration ratio (A + B) of duloxetine for numbness and pain was 46.8 and 31.7%, respectively, in 2015 and 68.9% (P < 0.01) and 73.1% (P < 0.01) in 2019. In response to the question regarding awareness of the CIPN-GL2017, 53.2% of respondents to the 2019 questionnaire were aware of the CIPN-GL2017. Among the respondents with an awareness of the CIPN-GL2017, the prescription rate of duloxetine (78.3%) for pain was significantly higher than that among respondents without any awareness (67.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible that the publication of CIPN-GL2017 influenced administration preferences of oncology specialists.

Levo-corydalmine Attenuates Vincristine-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Mice by Upregulating the Nrf2/HO-1/CO Pathway to Inhibit Connexin 43 Expression

Antimicrotubulin chemotherapeutic agents, including plant-derived vincaalkaloids such as vincristine, can cause peripheral neuropathic pain. Exogenously activated heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) is a potential therapy for chemotherapy-induced neuroinflammation. In this study, we investigated a role for Nrf2/HO-1/CO in mediating vincristine-induced neuroinflammation by inhibiting connexin 43 (Cx43) production in the spinal cord following the intrathecal application of the HO-1 inducer protoporphyrin IX cobalt chloride (CoPP) or inhibitor protoporphyrin IX zinc (ZnPP), and we analyzed the underlying mechanisms by which levo-corydalmine (l-CDL, a tetrahydroprotoberberine) attenuates vincristine-induced pain. Treatment with levo-corydalmine or oxycodone hydrochloride (a semisynthetic opioid analgesic, used as a positive control) attenuated vincristine-induced persistent pain hypersensitivity and degeneration of the sciatic nerve. In addition, the increased prevalence of atypical mitochondria induced by vincristine was ameliorated by l-CDL in both A-fibers and C-fibers. Next, we evaluated whether nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), an upstream activator of HO-1, directly bound to the HO-1 promoter sequence and degraded heme to produce carbon monoxide (CO) following stimulation with vincristine. Notably, l-CDL dose-dependently increased HO-1/CO expression by activating Nrf2 to inhibit Cx43 expression in both the spinal cord and in cultured astrocytes stimulated with TNF-α, corresponding to decreased Cx43-mediated hemichannel. Furthermore, l-CDL had no effect on Cx43 following the silencing of the HO-1 gene. Taken together, our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which Nrf2/HO-1/CO mediates Cx43 expression in vincristine-induced neuropathic pain. In addition, the present findings suggest that l-CDL likely protects against nerve damage and attenuates vincristine-induced neuroinflammation by upregulating Nrf2/HO-1/CO to inhibit Cx43 expression.

The effect of analgesics on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour in animal models for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy- a meta-analysis

Chemotherapy induced painful peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting side effect of several chemotherapeutic agents. Despite large amounts of human and animal studies, there is no sufficiently effective pharmacological treatment for CIPN. Although reducing pain is often a focus of CIPN treatment, remarkably few analgesics have been tested for this indication in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses regarding the effects of analgesics on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour during CIPN in animal models. This will form a scientific basis for the development of prospective human clinical trials. A comprehensive search identified forty-six studies. Risk of bias (RoB) analyses revealed that the design and conduct of the included experiments were poorly reported, and therefore RoB was unclear in most studies. Meta-analyses showed that administration of analgesics significantly increases pain threshold for mechanical (SMD: 1.68 [1.41; 1.82]) and cold (SMD: 1. 41 [0.99; 1.83]) evoked pain. Subgroup analyses revealed that dexmedetomidine, celecoxib, fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone and tramadol increased the pain threshold for mechanically evoked pain, and lidocaine and morphine for cold evoked pain. Altogether, this meta-analysis shows that there is ground to investigate the use of morphine in clinical trials. Lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, celecoxib, fentanyl, oxycodone and tramadol might be good alternatives, but more animal-based research is necessary.

Common Adverse Effects of Novel Therapies for Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Their Management Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to evaluate management strategies for common adverse effects of novel therapies in multiple myeloma (MM), including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and a histone deacetylase inhibitor.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are several adverse effects that occur across multiple classes of antimyeloma drugs, including rash, peripheral neuropathy, infusion reactions, and cardiotoxicity, but most can be managed without complete discontinuation of the agent or abandonment of the class. Additionally, several agents have critically important drug-drug interactions or dose-modification implications in hepatic or renal insufficiency that can be easily overlooked, and exacerbate adverse effects. As treatment of MM moves from fixed-duration traditional chemotherapy to novel agent-based regimens, commonly administered continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicities, providers must adopt their management strategies for both acute and long-term adverse effects. Early and frequent monitoring for therapy-related complications, dose adjustments when needed, and timely treatment for toxicities are all important steps toward ensuring longevity of treatment from a limited array of therapeutic options that currently exist for a disease with a relapsing and remitting course.

Efficacy and safety of oxycodone/naloxone as add-on therapy to gabapentin or pregabalin for the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Korea

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of oxycodone/naloxone in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) inadequately controlled with pregabalin or gabapentin.

METHODS

This 4-week, multicenter, interventional, single-arm phase IV study included 72 Korean patients with CIPN inadequately controlled with pregabalin or gabapentin (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10; NRS ≥4 at baseline). In addition to pregabalin or gabapentin at existing doses, patients received 20/10 mg/day oxycodone/naloxone (up-titrated to 80/40 mg/day as needed). The primary endpoint was change in NRS score after 4 weeks. Secondary endpoints included Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) scores and safety assessments.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation (SD) dose of oxycodone/naloxone was 23.3 ± 7.5 mg/day. At week 4, NRS score reduction was 1.29 ± 1.84 points (21.4% reduction; P < 0.0001). Patients on taxane-based chemotherapy experienced a significantly smaller mean change in NRS score at week 4 compared to patients on other chemotherapy (-0.63 ± 1.54 [n = 30] vs. -1.83 ± 1.00 [n = 36]; P = 0.0072). Although there were no significant changes in FACT/GOG-NTX total scores, improvements were observed in the neurotoxicity subscale measuring numbness/tingling of hands (mean ± SD change: -0.27 ± 1.04; P = 0.0427) and feet (-0.60 ± 1.09; P < 0.0001). Forty-two (58.3%) patients reported adverse events. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests or vital signs.

CONCLUSION

Oxycodone/naloxone added to pregabalin or gabapentin provided additional pain relief and symptom control in Korean patients with CIPN, without clinically significant safety concerns.

High-dose 8% capsaicin patch in treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: single-center experience

High-dose capsaicin patch is effective in treatment of neuropathic pain in HIV-associated neuropathy and diabetic neuropathy. There are no studies assessing effectiveness of high-dose capsaicin patch in treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. We sought to determine the effectiveness of treatment of pain associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with high-dose capsaicin patch. Our study group consisted of 18 patients with clinically confirmed oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Baseline characteristic including underling disease, received cumulative dose of neurotoxic agent, neuropathic symptoms, prior treatment and initial pain level were recorded. Pain was evaluated with Numeric Rating Scale prior to treatment with high-dose capsaicin and after 1.8 day and after 8 and 12 weeks after introducing treatment. Patients were divided into two groups accordingly to the amount of neurotoxic agent that caused neuropathy (high sensitivity and low sensitivity group). Most frequent symptoms of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy were: pain (88.89%), paresthesis (100%), sock and gloves sensation (100%) and hypoesthesis (100%). Initial pain level was 7.45 ± 1.14. Mean cumulative dose of oxaliplatin after which patients developed symptoms was 648.07 mg/m². Mean pain level after 12 weeks of treatment was 0.20 ± 0.41. When examined according to high and low sensitivity to neurotoxic agent patients with low sensitivity had higher pain reduction, especially after 8 days after introducing treatment (69.55 ± 12.09 vs. 49.40 ± 20.34%; p = 0.02) and after 12 weeks (96.96 ± 5.56 vs. 83.93 ± 18.59%; p = 0.04). High-dose capsaicin patch is an effective treatment for pain associated with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Patients with lower sensitivity to neurotoxic agents have better response to treatment and pain reduction.

[Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and neuropathic pain]

The perception of the media is that chemotherapy is mainly associated with nausea, vomiting and hair loss. In the longer term the development of peripheral neuropathy, i.e. chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is often more important for patients. The CIPN represents a side effect of many antineoplastic substances with severe functional impairment and its prevention and treatment is an important task. In addition to many interventions, which have been shown to be ineffective, physiotherapeutic measures and possibly the prophylactic application of cold are helpful for prevention. Randomized studies on the treatment of painful CIPN provided positive data for duloxetine and to a lesser extent for venlafaxine.

Side effects of analgesia may significantly reduce quality of life in symptomatic multiple myeloma: a cross-sectional prevalence study

Background

Pain is a common symptom in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Many patients are dependent on analgesics and in particular opioids, but there is limited information on the impact of these drugs and their side effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Method

In a cross-sectional study, semi-structured interviews were performed in 21 patients attending the hospital with symptomatic MM on pain medications. HRQoL was measured using items 29 and 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30.

Results

Patients were able to recall a median of two (range 0–4) analgesics. They spontaneously identified a median of two (range 1–5) side effects attributable to their analgesic medications. Patients’ assessment of HRQoL based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questions 29/30 was mean 48.3 (95 % CI; 38.7–57.9) out of 100. Patients’ assessment of their HRQoL in the hypothetical situation, in which they would not experience any side effects from analgesics, was significantly higher: 62.6 (53.5–71.7) (t test, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

This study provides, for the first time, evidence that side effects of analgesics are common in symptomatic MM and may result in a statistically and clinically significant reduction of self-reported HRQoL.

Management options for established chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating condition associated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Clinicians are cognizant of the negative impact of CIPN on cancer treatment outcomes and patients' psychosocial functioning and quality of life. In an attempt to alleviate this problem, clinicians and patients try various therapeutic interventions, despite limited evidence to support efficacy of these treatments. The rationale for such use is mostly based on the evidence for the treatment options in non-CIPN peripheral neuropathy syndromes, as this area is more robustly studied than is CIPN treatment. In this manuscript, we examine the existing evidence for both CIPN and non-CIPN treatments and develop a summary of the best available evidence with the aim of developing a practical approach to the treatment of CIPN, based on available literature and clinical practice experience.

Effectiveness and tolerability of low-dose oral oxycodone/naloxone added to anticonvulsant therapy for noncancer neuropathic pain: an observational analysis

BACKGROUND

Opioids may alleviate chronic neuropathic pain (NP), but are considered second/third-line analgesia due to their poor gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability. A fixed combination of prolonged-release oxycodone and naloxone (OXN) has been developed to overcome the GI effects. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate analgesic effectiveness and tolerability of low-dose OXN in patients with moderate-to-severe noncancer NP despite analgesia.

METHODS

This retrospective observation of consecutive adult patients, treated open-label for 8 weeks at a single Italian centre, evaluated effectiveness (pain intensity numerical rating scale [NRS], Patients' Global Impression of Change [PGIC], Douleur Neuropathique 4 inventory [DN4] and Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory [CPSI]), doses of daily OXN and adjuvant medication, rescue paracetamol use, bowel function index (BFI), laxative use, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 200 patients (mean age 65.9 years; 54% female) with NP included in the analysis; 97% completed 8 weeks' treatment. At the observation start, all patients were taking anticonvulsants and complained of constipation, and 60% were receiving opioids. Pain intensity and DN4 score decreased significantly by endpoint (NRS p < 0.0001; DN4 p < 0.0001) and need for rescue analgesics abated. Reduction in pain intensity throughout the observation was similar regardless of NP aetiology. According to PGIC, 87.8% of patients were much/extremely improved, CPSI (p < 0.0001) and BFI were significantly improved (p < 0.0001) and laxative use decreased. No differences were found between patients <65 years vs those ≥65 years. OXN was generally well tolerated.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Study limitations including the retrospective observational design, the lack of a control group and the single-centre design may limit the generalizability of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose OXN (25.0 ± 12.5 mg/day) added to anticonvulsants was highly effective in controlling noncancer NP of varied aetiology, with reduced need for rescue analgesia and improved quality of sleep, and was well tolerated, with improved bowel function and reduced laxative use. The efficacy and tolerability of OXN demonstrated in this real-world setting suggest its utility in this difficult to manage patient population.

Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release oxycodone for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy and the extension of FOLFOX therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients

Background

The oxaliplatin-based regimen FOLFOX is widely used to treat patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, dose-limiting toxicity after continuous oxaliplatin administration can lead to peripheral neuropathy. Several agents, including opioids, that have been employed to treat oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) have been examined in clinical settings regarding their protective and therapeutic effects. However, the pharmacotherapy of these agents has not yet been established. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone for OIPN and subsequently with FOLFOX therapy in CRC patients.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study of 64 CRC patients who underwent FOLFOX therapy at the Toho University Sakura Medical Center (Sakura, Japan). Controlled-release (CR) oxycodone was concomitantly administered to 29 patients (OXY group), whereas the additional 35 patients (non-OXY group) were not given oxycodone during the FOLFOX treatment course. The incidence and severity of OIPN and the number of FOLFOX cycles were measured and compared between the two groups. Neurological toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Advanced Events, version 3.0.

Results

All study patients had OIPN. Most patients experienced grade 1 or 2 sensory neuropathy. Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was observed in two patients in the non-OXY group. All patients in the OXY group completed the scheduled FOLFOX therapy, whereas FOLFOX therapy was discontinued in ten patients in the non-OXY group due to severe peripheral neuropathy. The median numbers of FOLFOX cycles in the OXY and non-OXY groups were 13 (range, 6–46) and 7 (range, 2–18), respectively (P < 0.05). The median cumulative oxaliplatin doses were 1072.3 mg/m² (range, 408.7–3385.3 mg/m²) in the OXY group and 483.0 mg/m² (range 76.2–1414.1 mg/m²) in the non-OXY group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that CR oxycodone might attenuate the severity of OIPN and extend the use of FOLFOX therapy.