1
|
Shah M, Blest F, Blackmur J, Laird A, Dawson S, Aning J. Malignant upper urinary tract obstruction in cancer patients: A systematic review. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:405-416. [PMID: 38751956 PMCID: PMC11090775 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To systematically summarise the current clinical evidence for de novo malignant upper urinary tract obstruction treatment with a focus on standards of reporting, patient outcomes and future research needs. Methods This review protocol was published via PROSPERO (CRD42022341588). OVID MEDLINE (R), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL were searched up to June 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Prospective and retrospective studies were included. Results Of 941 articles identified, 82 with 8796 patients were eligible for inclusion.Most studies in the published literature are retrospective and investigate heterogenous malignancies. Percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteric stenting are the most studied interventions. Few studies describe the outcomes from no intervention or investigate patient perspectives. Overall reported median survival after intervention was around 11.7 months. A lack of standardised reporting of outcomes was evident. Conclusions Malignant upper urinary tract obstruction is an important clinical condition affecting patients globally. Overall survival after intervention appears poor however the current evidence base has significant limitations due to studies of low methodological quality and the lack of a standardised framework for reporting outcomes.We have provided a pragmatic framework for future studies based on the review to ensure a uniform methodology is utilised moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - James Blackmur
- Department of UrologyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCambridgeUK
- Early Cancer InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alexander Laird
- Department of Urology, Western General HospitalEdinburghUK
- Institute of Genetics and CancerThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Jonathan Aning
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead HospitalNorth Bristol TrustBristolUK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conant KJ, Huynh HN, Chan J, Le J, Yee MJ, Anderson DJ, Kaye AD, Miller BC, Drinkard JD, Cornett EM, Gomelsky A, Urits I. Racial Disparities and Mental Health Effects Within Prostate Cancer. Health Psychol Res 2022; 10:39654. [PMID: 36425236 PMCID: PMC9680850 DOI: 10.52965/001c.39654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Disparities in prostate cancer (PCa) exist at all stages: screening, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes, and mortality. Although there are a multitude of complex biological (e.g., genetics, age at diagnosis, PSA levels, Gleason score) and nonbiological (e.g., socioeconomic status, education level, health literacy) factors that contribute to PCa disparities, nonbiological factors may play a more significant role. One understudied aspect influencing PCa patients is mental health related to the quality of life. Overall, PCa patients report poorer mental health than non-PCa patients and have a higher incidence of depression and anxiety. Racial disparities in mental health, specifically in PCa patients, and how poor mental health impacts overall PCa outcomes require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaylynn J Conant
- College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences
| | - Hanh N Huynh
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Science
| | - Jolene Chan
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Science
| | - John Le
- College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences
| | - Matthew J Yee
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health
| | | | | | - Elyse M Cornett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health
| | | | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health
- Southcoast Health, Southcoast Health Pain Management
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hashimoto Y, Hayashi A, Tonegawa T, Teng L, Igarashi A. Cost-saving prediction model of transfer to palliative care for terminal cancer patients in a Japanese general hospital. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2022; 10:2057651. [PMID: 35356234 PMCID: PMC8959529 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2022.2057651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although medical costs need to be controlled, there are no easily applicable cost prediction models of transfer to palliative care (PC) for terminal cancer patients. OBJECTIVE Construct a cost-saving prediction model based on terminal cancer patients' data at hospital admission. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING A Japanese general hospital. PATIENTS A total of 139 stage IV cancer patients transferred to PC, who died during hospitalization from April 2014 to March 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Patients were divided into higher (59) and lower (80) total medical costs per day after transfer to PC. We compared demographics, cancer type, medical history, and laboratory results between the groups. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used for model development and area under the curve (AUC) calculation. RESULTS A cost-saving prediction model (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.85) with a total score of 13 points was constructed as follows: 2 points each for age ≤ 74 years, creatinine ≥ 0.68 mg/dL, and lactate dehydrogenase ≤ 188 IU/L; 3 points for hemoglobin ≤ 8.8 g/dL; and 4 points for potassium ≤ 3.3 mEq/L. CONCLUSION Our model contains five predictors easily available in clinical settings and exhibited good predictive ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hashimoto
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Pharmacy, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akitoshi Hayashi
- Palliative Care Department, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Tonegawa
- Medical Affairs Department, St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lida Teng
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ataru Igarashi
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wen Y, Jiang C, Koncicki HM, Horowitz CR, Cooper RS, Saha A, Coca SG, Nadkarni GN, Chan L. Trends and Racial Disparities of Palliative Care Use among Hospitalized Patients with ESKD on Dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:1687-1696. [PMID: 31387926 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018121256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Study findings show that although palliative care decreases symptom burden, it is still underused in patients with ESKD. Little is known about disparity in use of palliative care services in such patients in the inpatient setting. METHODS To investigate the use of palliative care consultation in patients with ESKD in the inpatient setting, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2006 to 2014 to identify admitted patients with ESKD requiring maintenance dialysis. We compared palliative care use among minority groups (black, Hispanic, and Asian) and white patients, adjusting for patient and hospital variables. RESULTS We identified 5,230,865 hospitalizations of such patients from 2006 through 2014, of which 76,659 (1.5%) involved palliative care. The palliative care referral rate increased significantly, from 0.24% in 2006 to 2.70% in 2014 (P<0.01). Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than white patients to receive palliative care services (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.84, P<0.01 for blacks and aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.68, P<0.01 for Hispanics). These disparities spanned across all hospital subtypes, including those with higher proportions of minorities. Minority patients with lower socioeconomic status (lower level of income and nonprivate health insurance) were also less likely to receive palliative care. CONCLUSIONS Despite a clear increase during the study period in provision of palliative care for inpatients with ESKD, significant racial disparities occurred and persisted across all hospital subtypes. Further investigation into causes of racial and ethnic disparities is necessary to improve access to palliative care services for the vulnerable ESKD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumeng Wen
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai West Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Changchuan Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai West Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Holly M Koncicki
- Division of Nephrology and.,Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.,Department of Population Health Science and Policy and
| | - Richard S Cooper
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Aparna Saha
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Steven G Coca
- Division of Nephrology and.,Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Girish N Nadkarni
- Division of Nephrology and .,Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.,Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; and
| | - Lili Chan
- Division of Nephrology and .,Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsushima T, Miura T, Hachiya T, Nakamura I, Yamato T, Kishida T, Tanaka Y, Irie S, Meguro N, Kawahara T, Nakajima N. Treatment Recommendations for Urological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: Clinical Guidelines from the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine. J Palliat Med 2018; 22:54-61. [PMID: 30289332 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urological symptoms such as gross hematuria, lower and upper urinary tract symptoms, and bladder pain are common in and distressing for patients with advanced cancer. Although palliation of urological symptoms is important to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and their families and caregivers, clinical guidelines for managing urological symptoms in patients with cancer have not been published. METHODS Following the formal guideline development process, the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine (JSPM) developed comprehensive clinical guidelines for the management of urological symptoms in patients with cancer. RESULTS This article summarizes the recommendations and their rationales and provides a short summary of the development process of the JSPM urological symptom management guidelines. We established five recommendations, all of which were based on the best available evidence and expert consensus. CONCLUSION JSPM released the first edition of the "Clinical Guidelines for Urological Symptoms in Cancer Patients." Future clinical research and continuous guideline updates are required to improve the quality of managing urological symptoms in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyasu Tsushima
- 1 Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center , Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Miura
- 2 Department of Urology, Secomedic Hospital , Funabashi, Japan
| | - Takahiko Hachiya
- 3 Department of Urology, Kasukabe Medical Center , Kasukabe, Japan
| | - Ichiro Nakamura
- 4 Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital , Kobe, Japan
| | - Toyoko Yamato
- 5 General Foundation Corporation Junpukai Health Management Center , Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kishida
- 6 Department of Urology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital , Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Tanaka
- 7 Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Musashino Hospital , Musashino, Japan
| | - Shin Irie
- 8 Department of Urology, Kurashiki City Hospital , Kurashiki, Japan
| | | | - Takashi Kawahara
- 10 Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Nakajima
- 11 Division of Community-Based Medicine and Primary Care, University of the Ryukyus Hospital , Nakagami-gun, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ureteral Reimplantation or Percutaneous Nephrostomy: Which One Is Better in Management of Complete Ureteral Obstruction Due to Advanced Prostate Cancer? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.6074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
7
|
High incidence of urological complications in men dying from prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2016; 21:1150-1154. [PMID: 27263107 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-016-0993-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence and clinical characteristics of urological adverse events suffered by patients with lethal prostate cancer (PCa) toward the end of life are not fully understood. METHODS A search of our hospital medical registry identified 3816 individuals diagnosed with PCa, among whom 243 died from the disease and 144 died from other causes (n = 387). We retrospectively reviewed the 387 patients who had died to determine the incidence of PCa-related urological complications, associated factors, and subsequent palliative interventions. RESULTS Major urological complications that required therapeutic intervention were observed in 28.4 % of PCa patients dying from the disease itself, whereas such complications were much less frequent (4.3 %) in PCa patients dying from other causes. Urological complications were associated with local recurrence in men who underwent prostatectomy, lower irradiation dose in men who underwent radiotherapy, and pretreatment higher T stage and absence of metastasis in men who underwent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as the primary treatment. Patients who received long-term ADT for localized disease had the highest risk for urological complications. Therapeutic intervention was highly effective for palliation. CONCLUSION Urological adverse events are very common in PCa patients who are dying from the disease. Prevention or early palliation should be considered in patients at high risk of PCa-related urological complications.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gandaglia G, Bray F, Cooperberg MR, Karnes RJ, Leveridge MJ, Moretti K, Murphy DG, Penson DF, Miller DC. Prostate Cancer Registries: Current Status and Future Directions. Eur Urol 2016; 69:998-1012. [PMID: 26056070 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Disease-specific registries that enroll a considerable number of patients play a major role in prostate cancer (PCa) research. OBJECTIVE To evaluate available registries, describe their strengths and limitations, and discuss the potential future role of PCa registries in outcomes research. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a literature review of the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy included the terms prostate cancer, outcomes, statistical approaches, population-based cohorts, registries of outcomes, and epidemiological studies, alone or in combination. We limited our search to studies published between January 2005 and January 2015. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several population-based and prospective disease-specific registries are currently available for prostate cancer. Studies performed using these data sources provide important information on incidence and mortality, disease characteristics at presentation, risk factors, trends in utilization of health care services, disparities in access to treatment, quality of care, long-term oncologic and health-related quality of life outcomes, and costs associated with management of the disease. Although data from these registries have some limitations, statistical methods are available that can address certain biases and increase the internal and external validity of such analyses. In the future, improvements in data quality, collection of tissue samples, and the availability of data feedback to health care providers will increase the relevance of studies built on population-based and disease-specific registries. CONCLUSIONS The strengths and limitations of PCa registries should be carefully considered when planning studies using these databases. Although randomized controlled trials still provide the highest level of evidence, large registries play an important and growing role in advancing PCa research and care. PATIENT SUMMARY Several population-based and prospective disease-specific registries for prostate cancer are currently available. Analyses of data from these registries yield information that is clinically relevant for the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Freddie Bray
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Departments of Urology and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kim Moretti
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, and the University of South Australia and the University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, University of Melbourne, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, and the VA Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David C Miller
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Okafor PN, Stobaugh DJ, Wong Kee Song LM, Limburg PJ, Talwalkar JA. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Utilization of Colorectal Stents for the Treatment of Malignant Bowel Obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61:1669-76. [PMID: 26738737 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-4019-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal stents are increasingly employed as a bridge to surgery or for palliative relief of malignant large bowel obstruction. AIM To explore determinants of inpatient colorectal stent utilization (CRSU). METHODS An analysis of the 2012 National Inpatient Sample was performed. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes were used to identify discharges associated with CRSU and patient/hospital factors for inclusion in a logistic regression model. RESULTS We identified 217,055 inpatient colonoscopies, approximating 1.1 million inpatient colonoscopies nationwide. Colorectal stents were placed in 1.4 % of all procedures. Across all racial groups, Medicare was the most common payer. Patients with commercial insurance had lower CRSU compared with Medicare patients [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.92]. No gender disparities were identified (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.89-1.03). In addition, no racial differences in CRSU existed between Caucasians versus African-Americans (OR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.83-1.06) and Caucasians versus Hispanics (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.83-1.1). Compared with patients living in less affluent neighborhoods, those residing in more affluent areas had higher CRSU (OR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.46-1.86). This displayed a linear relationship with the odds of CRSU increasing as household income increased. Less affluent patients also had the highest total charges and longest wait time to CRSU. CRSU was highest among patients treated in larger medical centers (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.51-1.93) and teaching hospitals (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 3.2-4.8). CONCLUSION Individuals from less affluent neighborhoods have lower colorectal stent utilization. This disparity is independent of race and likely related to poorer access to healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip N Okafor
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Derrick J Stobaugh
- North Shore University Health System, 4901 Searle Pkwy, Skokie, IL, 60077, USA
| | - Louis M Wong Kee Song
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Paul J Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jayant A Talwalkar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, Al-Nimer Y, Azzouqah O, Rimawi D, Taqash A, Elkhatib M, Klepstad P. Clinical Factors Associated With a Short Survival Time After Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Ureteric Obstruction in Cancer Patients: An Updated Model. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 51:255-61. [PMID: 26497918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Revised: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Patients with advanced cancer can develop ureteric obstruction. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube insertion can relieve this obstruction and prevent renal failure. PCN is associated with complications and can worsen quality of life. Prognostic models of survival after PCN in cancer patients can help identify the patients who will most likely benefit from this intervention. This work updates a prognostic model to predict overall survival in cancer patients after receiving PCN. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to assess survival of patients with malignant urinary obstruction after PCN tube insertion. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with poor prognosis in this group of patients and externally validate an existing model. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 211 patients who had malignant urinary obstruction and received PCN tube insertion. RESULTS The median survival was 5.05 months (95% CI = 3.87-7.11; range 2-963 days). On univariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with shorter survival were type of malignancy, bilateral hydronephrosis, serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL, presence of metastasis, ascites, and pleural effusion (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that type of malignancy, serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL, pleural effusion, and bilateral hydronephrosis were significantly associated with shorter survival (P < 0.05). Using the latter three factors, we stratified patients into four prognostic groups: zero risk factors (32 patients), one risk factor (85 patients), two risk factors (78 patients), and three risk factors (16 patients). Median survival for each group was 17.6 months, 7.7 months, 2.2 months, and 1.7 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Survival in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction can range widely from a few days to a few years. The presented prognostic model is an updated model and can be used to identify patients with poor survival after PCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ola Azzouqah
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | | | | | - Pål Klepstad
- St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bergman J, Lorenz KA, Ballon-Landa E, Kwan L, Lerman SE, Saigal CS, Bennett CJ, Litwin MS. A Scalable Web-Based Module for Improving Surgical and Medical Practitioner Knowledge and Attitudes about Palliative and End-of-Life Care. J Palliat Med 2015; 18:415-20. [PMID: 25748832 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We built a web-based, interactive, self-directed learning module about end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE The study objective was to develop an online module about end-of-life care targeted at surgeons, and to assess the effect of the module on attitudes towards and knowledge about end-of-life care. METHODS Informed by a panel of experts in supportive care and educational assessment, we developed an instrument that required approximately 15 minutes to complete. The module targets surgeons, but is applicable to other practitioners as well. We recruited general surgeons, surgical subspecialists, and medical practitioners and subspecialists from UCLA and the GLA-VA (N=114). We compared pre- and post-intervention scores for attitude and knowledge, then used ANOVA to compare the pre- and postmodule means for each level of the covariate. We performed bivariable analyses to assess the association of subject characteristic and change in score over time. We ran separate analyses to assess baseline and change scores based on the covariates we had selected a priori. RESULTS Subjects improved meaningfully in all five domains of attitude and in each of the six knowledge items. Individuals younger than 30 years of age had the greatest change in attitudes about addressing pain, addressing end-of-life goals, and being actively involved as death approached; they also had the most marked improvement in total knowledge score. Having a family member die of cancer within the last five years or a personal experience with palliative care or hospice were associated with higher change scores. CONCLUSIONS A web-based education module improved surgical and medical provider attitudes and knowledge about end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bergman
- 1 Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diagnostic value of SFRP1 as a favorable predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with prostate cancer. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118276. [PMID: 25719802 PMCID: PMC4342152 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Growing genetic and molecular biological evidence suggests that the disruption of balance between Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein-1 (SFRP1) and β-catenin plays an important role in the initiation and development of multiple cancers. The aim of this study was to examine whether the expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin is associated with the clinical-pathologic features of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), and to evaluate their potential roles as predictive and prognostic biomarkers. In this study, a total of 61 patients with PCa and 10 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were included, and we showed that the expression of SFRP1 and β-catenin was correlated with the Gleason score, survival rate and response for endocrine therapy of PCa. The survival rates of PCa patients with low SFRP1 expression (P = 0.016) or high β-catenin expression (P = 0.004) were significantly poorer. A negative correlation (r = -0.275, P = 0.032) between SFRP1 and β-catenin was observed by Chi-square test. Multivariate analysis suggested that SFRP1 (hazard ratio, 0.429; 95% confidence intervals, 0.227–0.812; P = 0.009) may serve as an independent predictive and prognostic factor for PCa. We also showed that the protein and mRNA levels of SFRP1 in androgen-dependent PCa cell line LNCaP were significantly higher than those in androgen-independent PCa cell lines DU145 and PC3. However, the protein level of β-catenin in LNCaP cells was significantly lower than that in DU145 and PC3 cells, and no significant difference of β-catenin mRNA level was observed in LNCaP, DU145 and PC3 cells. Bisulfite sequencing PCR assay revealed significantly lower methylation level of SFRP1 promoter in LNCaP cells than that in DU145 and PC3 cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that SFRP1, which expression inversely correlates with that of β-catenin, is a favorable predictive and prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
|
13
|
Unger JM, Hershman DL, Martin D, Etzioni RB, Barlow WE, LeBlanc M, Ramsey SR. The diffusion of docetaxel in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 107:dju412. [PMID: 25540245 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diffusion of new cancer treatments can be both inefficient and incomplete. The uptake of new treatments over time (diffusion) has not been well studied. We analyzed the diffusion of docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS We identified metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed from 1995 to 2007 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare database. Medicare claims through 2008 were analyzed. We assessed cumulative incidence of docetaxel by socioeconomic, demographic, and comorbidity variables, and compared diffusion patterns to landmark events including release of phase III results and FDA approval dates. We compared docetaxel diffusion patterns in prostate cancer to those in metastatic breast, lung, ovarian, and gastric cancers. To model docetaxel use over time, we used the classic "mixed influence" deterministic diffusion model. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS We identified 6561 metastatic prostate cancer patients; 1350 subsequently received chemotherapy. Among patients who received chemotherapy, docetaxel use was 95% by 2008. Docetaxel uptake was statistically significantly slower (P < .01) for patients older than 65 years, blacks, patients in lower income areas, and those who experienced poverty. Eighty percent of docetaxel diffusion occurred prior to the May, 2004 release of phase III results showing superiority of docetaxel over standard-of-care. The maximum increase in the rate of use of docetaxel occurred nearly simultaneously for prostate cancer as for all other cancers combined (in 2000). CONCLUSION Efforts to increase the diffusion of treatments with proven survival benefits among disadvantaged populations could lead to cancer population survival gains. Docetaxel diffusion mostly preceded phase III evidence for its efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer, and appeared to be a cancer-wide-rather than a disease-specific-phenomenon. Diffusion prior to definitive evidence indicates the prevalence of off-label chemotherapy use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Unger
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH).
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| | - Diane Martin
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| | - Ruth B Etzioni
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| | - William E Barlow
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| | - Scott R Ramsey
- Affiliations of authors: SWOG Statistical Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (JMU, WEB, ML); University of Washington, Department of Health Services Research, Seattle, WA (DM); Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SRR, RBE); Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY (DLH)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Ryn M, Phelan SM, Arora NK, Haggstrom DA, Jackson GL, Zafar SY, Griffin JM, Zullig LL, Provenzale D, Yeazel MW, Jindal RM, Clauser SB. Patient-reported quality of supportive care among patients with colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:809-15. [PMID: 24493712 PMCID: PMC3940539 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.4302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE High-quality supportive care is an essential component of comprehensive cancer care. We implemented a patient-centered quality of cancer care survey to examine and identify predictors of quality of supportive care for bowel problems, pain, fatigue, depression, and other symptoms among 1,109 patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with new diagnosis of colorectal cancer at any Veterans Health Administration medical center nationwide in 2008 were ascertained through the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry and sent questionnaires assessing a variety of aspects of patient-centered cancer care. We received questionnaires from 63% of eligible patients (N = 1,109). Descriptive analyses characterizing patient experiences with supportive care and binary logistic regression models were used to examine predictors of receipt of help wanted for each of the five symptom categories. RESULTS There were significant gaps in patient-centered quality of supportive care, beginning with symptom assessment. In multivariable modeling, the impact of clinical factors and patient race on odds of receiving wanted help varied by symptom. Coordination of care quality predicted receipt of wanted help for all symptoms, independent of patient demographic or clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION This study revealed substantial gaps in patient-centered quality of care, difficult to characterize through quality measurement relying on medical record review alone. It established the feasibility of collecting patient-reported quality measures. Improving quality measurement of supportive care and implementing patient-reported outcomes in quality-measurement systems are high priorities for improving the processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle van Ryn
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Sean M. Phelan
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Neeraj K. Arora
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - David A. Haggstrom
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - George L. Jackson
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - S. Yousuf Zafar
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Joan M. Griffin
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Dawn Provenzale
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Mark W. Yeazel
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Rahul M. Jindal
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Steven B. Clauser
- Michelle van Ryn and Sean M. Phelan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Joan M. Griffin, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Mark W. Yeazel, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Neeraj K. Arora and Steven B. Clauser, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; David A. Haggstrom, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; George L. Jackson, Leah L. Zullig, and Dawn Provenzale, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; George L. Jackson, S. Yousuf Zafar, and Dawn Provenzale, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Leah L. Zullig, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and Rahul M. Jindal, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stacy S, Hyder O, Cosgrove D, Herman JM, Kamel I, Geschwind JFH, Gurakar A, Anders R, Cameron A, Pawlik TM. Patterns of consultation and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma presenting to a large academic medical center in the US. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17:1600-8. [PMID: 23780638 PMCID: PMC4002207 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2253-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 06/10/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often involves many subspecialist providers, as well as a broad range of treatment options. This study sought to evaluate referral and treatment patterns among patients with HCC at a large academic medical center. METHODS Data from our cancer registry between 2003-2011 were abstracted on 394 patients who were primarily diagnosed/treated for HCC at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH); data on patients who were diagnosed/treated with HCC elsewhere and who received secondary treatment at JHH (n = 391) were also abstracted for comparison purposes. RESULTS Among the main cohort, the most common specialties to be consulted were surgery (n = 225, 57.1%), gastroenterology (n = 225, 57.1%), and interventional radiologist (n = 206, 52.3%), while only 96 (24.4%) were referred to medical oncology. Factors associated with surgical consultation included younger age (odds ratio (OR) 3.35, 95% CI 1.62-6.92), tumor size <5 cm (OR 1.82, 1.09-3.02), and unilobar disease (OR 2.94, 1.31-6.59) (all P < 0.05). Patients initially diagnosed/treated elsewhere had larger tumors (4 vs. 6 cm), bilateral disease (19.2 vs. 26.8%), and were more likely to be seen by interventional radiology (all P < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were seen by surgeons, gastroenterologists, or interventional radiologists, with only a minority being seen by medical oncologists. Referral patterns depended on patient-level factors, as well as extent of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Stacy
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Omar Hyder
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Cosgrove
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph M. Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ihab Kamel
- Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jean-Francois H. Geschwind
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Anders
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Cameron
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|