Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options

Randomized phase II study of zoledronate dosing every four versus eight weeks in patients with bone metastasis from lung cancer (Hanshin Cancer Group0312)

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid (ZA) reduces the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, the optimal dosing interval of ZA for patients with lung cancer is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, feasibility phase 2 trial at eight Japanese hospitals. Patients with bone metastases from lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive either 4 mg of ZA every four weeks (4wk-ZA) or every eight weeks (8wk-ZA). The primary endpoint was the time to the first SRE and the rate and types of SREs after one year. SREs were defined as pathologic bone fracture, bone radiation therapy or surgery, and spinal cord compression. Secondary endpoints were the SRE incidence at six months, pain assessment, changes in analgesic consumption, serum N-telopeptide, toxicity, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between November 2012 and October 2018, 109 patients were randomly assigned to the 4wk-ZA group (54 patients) and the 8wk-ZA group (55 patients). The number of patients who received chemotherapy or molecular-targeted agents was 30 and 23 and 18 and 16 in the 4wk-ZA and 8wk-ZA groups, respectively. The median time to the first SRE could not be calculated because of a low SRE. The time to the first SRE of all patients did not differ between the groups (P = 0.715, HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.48, 2.9). The SRE rate of all patients after 12 months was 17.6% (95% CI = 8.4, 30.9%) in the 4wk-ZA and 23.3% (95% CI = 11.8, 38.6%) in the 8wk-ZA group, without significant differences between the groups. There was no difference in any secondary endpoint between groups, and these endpoints did not differ among treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

An eight-week ZA interval does not increase the SRE risk for patients with bone metastasis from lung cancer and could be considered clinically.

Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the patient and implant survival, clinical and functional outcomes, and the rate of complications resulting in reconstruction failure following endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR) of extensive proximal femoral metastases associated with actual or impending pathological fractures.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients with actual or impending pathological fractures due to metastatic disease of the proximal femur were treated with EPR between 2003 and 2018. Staged surgery, bilateral EPR, was performed in 3 cases. The patients comprised 51 females and 60 males with a mean age of 52.1 ± 12.3 years. The patient and implant survival were recorded. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed by using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) functional scoring, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). The different types of abductor mechanism repair were evaluated by functional tests and existence of Trendelenburg gait at postoperative follow-ups. The complications resulting in reconstruction failure were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 23.1 ± 17.9 months. The overall survival of patients after EPR was 89% at 6 months, 72% at 1 year and 10% at 5 years. The estimated 1- and 5-year overall implant survival was 100% and 97.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively, as the endpoint was defined as complete removal of the prosthesis. Median VAS score before endoprosthetic replacement was 8 and after 3 months 4. Before surgery, the median MSTS score was 40 (30-56.6%) and the median KPS score was 40 (30-50). Postoperative third month, the median MSTS score was 56.6 (53.3-86.6%) and the median KPS score was 60 (40-70). Functional scores were superior in trochanter major split osteotomized group compared to trochanter major removed group. Trendelenburg gait was seen in 20 (17.5%) patients postoperatively. There were 10 (8.7%) complications resulting in reconstruction failure.

CONCLUSION

Endoprosthetic replacement can provide a durable fixation with high implant survival rate and good clinical and functional results in extensive proximal femoral metastases associated with a pathological fracture.

Evaluating factors affecting length of hospital stay in patients with metastatic bone tumors

BACKGROUND

Specific medical conditions known to increase LOS following orthopedic surgery including congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus and COPD. It is also known that patient demographics such as increasing age and non-white race can negatively affect orthopedic surgical outcomes However, there is a lack of research examining the effect of these variables on patients with metastatic bone disease regarding length of hospital stay and ultimately economic burden following surgery. The aim of this study is to identify factors affecting LOS in patients following surgery for bone metastasis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was used to extract data from 93 patients with an underlying diagnosis of bony metastatic cancer who underwent an orthopedic surgical procedure. Data collected included: length of hospital stay, demographic information (age, sex, race, BMI, smoking status), complications (infection, DVT, PE, fractures), pre-operative lab values (WBC, Albumin, Creatinine, HbA1c), primary cancer type, and surgical procedure measures to understand which factors affected LOS.

RESULTS

Increased LOS in this specific patient population was found to be associated with pre-existing diabetes (P = 0.005), obesity (P = 0.025), multiple disease sites (P = 0.042), or disease at the femur (P = 0.035). Patients had a decreased LOS when undergoing a prophylactic procedure (3.53 days vs 5.51 days for non-prophylactic procedure).

DISCUSSION

These findings allow providers to better communicate expectations regarding the duration of admission and allows for a better estimation of cost burden for patients and health systems. The present study demonstrates increased LOS in patients undergoing orthopedic procedures for metastatic bone disease who had pre-existing diabetes, obesity, multiple disease sites, disease in the femur, or surgery for a pathologic fracture (as opposed to a prophylactic procedure). Understanding the factors affecting LOS in this patient population can optimize preoperative care, improve communication between the patient and provider, and ultimately decrease financial burden.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management: an expert panel recommendation from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG)

PURPOSE

The outcome of RCC has improved considerably in the last few years, and the treatment options have increased. LACOG-GU and LARCG held a consensus meeting to develop guidelines to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of RCC patients.

METHODS

Eighty questions addressing relevant advanced RCC treatments were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. Consensus was determined as 75% agreement. For questions with less than 75% agreement, a new discussion was held, and consensus was determined by the majority of votes after the second voting session.

RESULTS

The recommendations were based on the highest level of scientific evidence or by the opinion of the RCC experts when no relevant research data were available.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript provides guidance for advanced RCC treatment according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG expert recommendations.

Systematic review: Incidence, risk factors, survival and treatment of bone metastases from colorectal cancer

Background

Bones are not considered a frequent metastatic site in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of bone metastases (BM) in CRC, to identify possible risk factors for BM, survival after BM, and effect of treatment of BM including antiresorptive treatment.

Material and methods

A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed and EMBASE.

Results

We included 29 studies. One randomized placebo controlled trial (RCT) study, two autopsy studies, five register studies, and twenty retrospective cohort studies. The studies described different cohorts making direct comparison difficult. Three studies analysed the effect of different treatments for BM including one RCT study.

Conclusion

The incidence of bone metastases was 3–7% in patients with CRC, and it was not possible to detect an increase in incidence over time. The most well established risk factors for BM are rectal cancer, having lymph node invasion at surgery of primary tumor, and lung metastases at any time. Other risk factors such as RAS mutation status have been suggested but results are not conclusive. Survival ranges from 5 to 21 months after diagnosis of BM depending on cohort, with survival of about 8 months in unselected patients. Several variables have been suggested as potential prognostic markers but are all poorly investigated. Treatment of BM is not well investigated, though patients seem to benefit from bisphosphonate treatment with regard to lower risk of skeletal related events. This review highlights the need for new research in the area.

Physicians' preferences for bone metastases treatments in France, Germany and the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Several bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are available for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs), but they vary in terms of efficacy, safety and mode of administration. This study assessed data on European physicians' treatment preferences for preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours.

METHODS

Physicians completed a web-based discrete-choice experiment survey of 10 choices between pairs of profiles of hypothetical BTAs for a putative patient. Each profile included five attributes within a pre-defined range (primarily based on existing BTAs' prescribing information): time (months) until the first SRE; time (months) until worsening of pain; annual risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ); annual risk of renal impairment; and mode of administration. Choice questions were developed using an experimental design with known statistical properties. A separate main-effects random parameters logit model was estimated for each country and provided the relative preference for the treatment attributes in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 191 physicians in France, 192 physicians in Germany, and 197 physicians in the United Kingdom completed the survey. In France and the United Kingdom, time until the first SRE and risk of renal impairment were the most important attributes; in Germany, time until the first SRE and delay in worsening of pain were the most important. In all countries, a 120-min infusion every 4 weeks was the least preferred mode of administration (p < 0.05) and the annual risk of ONJ was judged to be the least important attribute.

CONCLUSIONS

When making treatment decisions regarding the choice of BTA, delaying the onset of SREs/worsening of pain and reducing the risk of renal impairment are the primary objectives for physicians.

Kadsurenone is a useful and promising treatment strategy for breast cancer bone metastases by blocking the PAF/PTAFR signaling pathway

Breast cancer (BC) is characterized by high incidences of bone metastases. Current treatment strategies for BC bone metastases primarily focused on breaking the ‘vicious osteolytic cycle’. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent phospholipid mediator, which has previously reported biological activities in BC progression and osteoclast differentiation by activating its receptor PAF receptor (PTAFR). However, the role of PAF in the mediation of BC bone metastases remains elusive. In the present study, it was revealed that the upregulation of PTAFR was associated with an increased incidence of bone metastases. It was also revealed that PAF significantly enhanced the processes of BC cell migration and BC mediated osteoclastogenesis. These results suggest that PAF serves a promotion role in BC bone metastases. It was further demonstrated that the natural PAF antagonist Kadsurenone may effectively attenuate each process by partially blocking the PAF/PTAFR signaling pathway. Therefore, targeting PAF/PTAFR by Kadsurenone may be a promising treatment strategy for BC bone metastases.

The use of bisphosphonates in the management of bone involvement from solid tumours and haematological malignancies - a European survey

Bone metastases in patients with solid tumours (ST) and bone lesions in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are common. Associated skeletal-related events (SREs) cause severe pain, reduced quality of life and place a burden on health care resources. Bone-targeted agents can reduce the risk of SREs. We evaluated the management of bone metastasis/lesions in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) by an observational chart audit. In total, 881 physicians completed brief questionnaires on 17 193 patients during the observation period, and detailed questionnaires for a further 9303 individuals. Patient cases were weighted according to the probability of inclusion. Although a large proportion of patients with bone metastases/lesions were receiving bisphosphonates, many had their treatment stopped (ST, 19%; HM, 36%) or will never be treated (ST, 18%; HM, 13%). The results were generally similar across the countries, although German patients were more likely to have asymptomatic bone lesions detected during routine imaging. In conclusion, many patients who could benefit from bone-targeted agents do not receive bisphosphonates and many have their treatment stopped when they could benefit from continued treatment. Developing treatment guidelines, educating physicians and increasing the availability of new agents could benefit patients and reduce costs.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound for Palliation of Painful Skeletal Metastases: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Bone is one of the most common sites of metastases, with bone metastases-related pain representing a significant source of morbidity among patients with cancer. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound is a noninvasive, outpatient modality with the potential for treating painful bone metastases. The aim of this study is to report our initial experience with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of bone metastases and our preliminary analysis of urinary cytokine levels after therapy.

METHODS

This was a single-center pilot study of 10 patients with metastatic cancer to investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for primary pain control in device-accessible skeletal metastases. Treatments were performed on a clinical magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound system using a volumetric ablation technique. Primary efficacy was assessed using Brief Pain Inventory scores and morphine equivalent daily dose intake at 3 time points: before, day 14, and day 30 after the magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment. Urine cytokines were measured 3 days before treatment and 2 days after the treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 10 patients, 8 were followed up 14 days and 6 were followed up 30 days after the treatment. At day 14, 3 patients (37.5%) exhibited partial pain response and 4 patients (50%) exhibited an indeterminate response, and at day 30 after the treatment, 5 patients (83%) exhibited partial pain response. No treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Of the urine cytokines measured, only Transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα) demonstrated an overall decrease, with a trend toward statistical significance ( P = .078).

CONCLUSION

Our study corroborates magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound as a feasible and safe modality as a primary, palliative treatment for painful bone metastases and contributes to the limited body of literature using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for this clinical indication.

Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures

Background

Surgical treatment options of femoral metastases include intramedullary nailing (IMN) and endoprosthetic reconstruction (EPR). Previous studies have demonstrated functional and oncological advantages of EPR over IMN. The purpose of this study was to (1) report the durability of IMN and (2) establish the indication of IMN for femoral metastases.

Methods

In 2003–2013, among 186 surgically treated femoral metastasis cases, we retrospectively reviewed 80 consecutive IMN cases in 75 patients, including 14 pathological and 66 impending fractures. For the decision of surgical procedure (IMN, EPR, or plating), the following factors are considered: (1) fracture pattern (impending or pathological fracture), (2) Mirels’ score (≥8 or <8), (3) fracture site (femoral head, neck, intertrochanter, subtrochanter, diaphysis, or distal), (4) number of metastases (solitary or multiple), and (5) patient’s estimated prognosis. Patient demographics, postoperative survival, implant survival, and early postoperative mortality were reviewed.

Results

The patients were 37 males and 38 females, with a mean age of 60.1 (20–84) years. Average follow-up period was 11.4 (1–77) months. The most common fracture site was the subtrochanter (46/80), followed by the diaphysis (26/80) and the intertrochanter (8/80). The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (24/80, 32 %), followed by breast cancer (24 %) and melanoma (15 %). With the exception of six cases, all patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy to the affected whole femur. The postoperative patient survival was 14.2 and 8.4 % at 2 and 3 years from surgery, respectively, while the implant survival rate remained 94.0 % at both 2 and 3 years. Three out of 46 subtrochanteric cases required revision surgeries because of proximal breakage of implant 4–50 months after initial surgery for femoral metastases, but all were replaced by mega-prosthesis and did not need further operation until their death. Early postoperative fatal complications were observed in three patients, all of which were pulmonary dysfunction.

Conclusions

The performance of IMN in this study was satisfactory although a large portion of sub- and intertrochanter metastases were included. Broader indication including these parts should be considered, for IMN has advantages such as lower cost and less invasiveness and even an implant failure can be revised by mega-prosthetic reconstruction.

Pain and analgesic use associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases

PURPOSE

Bone metastases secondary to solid tumors increase the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs), including the occurrence of pathological fracture (PF), radiation to bone (RB), surgery to bone (SB), and spinal cord compression (SCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SREs on patients' pain, analgesic use, and pain interference with daily functioning.

METHODS

Data were combined from patients with solid tumors and bone metastases who received denosumab or zoledronic acid across three identically designed phase 3 trials (N = 5543). Pain severity (worst pain) and pain interference were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and each monthly visit. Analgesic use was quantified using the Analgesic Quantification Algorithm.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with moderate/severe pain and strong opioid use generally increased in the 6 months preceding an SRE and remained elevated, while they remained relatively consistent over time in patients without an SRE. Regression analysis indicated that all SRE types were significantly associated with an increased risk of progression to moderate/severe pain and strong opioid use. PF, RB, and SCC were associated with significantly greater risk of pain interference overall. Results were similar for pain interference with emotional well-being. All SRE types were associated with significantly greater risk of pain interference with physical function.

CONCLUSIONS

SREs are associated with increased pain and analgesic use in patients with bone metastases. Treatments that prevent SREs may decrease pain and the need for opioid analgesics and reduce the impact of pain on daily functioning.

Cancer Pain Management

Safe, effective, and evidence-based management of cancer-related pain is a cornerstone of comprehensive cancer care. Despite increasing interest in and efforts to improve its management, pain remains poorly controlled in nearly half of all patients with cancer, with little change in the past 20 years. Limited training in pain assessment and management, overestimation of providers' own skills to treat pain, and failure to refer patients to pain specialists can result in suboptimal pain management with devastating effects on quality of life, physical functioning, and increased psychological distress. From a thorough assessment of cancer-related pain to appropriate treatments that may include opiates, adjuvant medications, nerve blocks, and nondrug interventions, this article is intended as a brief overview of the mechanisms and types of pain as well as a review of current, new, and promising approaches to its management.

Health Economics and Radium-223 (Xofigo®) in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Case History and a Systematic Review of the Literature

Objectives:

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in Western countries. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have caused significant pressure on health care budgets. We aimed to exemplify this dilemma presenting an example, radium-223 (Xofigo®), and review the literature.

Methods:

A 74-year-old man diagnosed with mCRPC was referred to our department in October 2014 for radium-223 therapy. We faced the following dilemma: is radium-223 standard therapy? Is it cost-effective? Medline was searched employing the following search criteria: “radium-223”, “alpharadin”, “Xofigo” and “prostate”. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied. Guidelines and cost-effectiveness analyses were focused. We also searched the websites of ASCO, ESMO and ISPOR. The web was searched, using Yahoo and Google search engines, for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs).

Results:

181 publications were identified in the Medline database. Only four studies included the word “cost”, three “economics” and none “budget” in heading or abstract. None of the publications were thorough of cost analysis (cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-minimizing or cost-of-illness analysis). Six HTAs and eight national guidelines were identified. The cost per quality adjusted life years was indicated €80.000-94,000. HTAs concluded reimbursement being not recommendable or no ultimate statement could be made. One pointed towards a limited use with caution.

Conclusion:

Guidelines were based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Health economics was not considered when guidelines were made. Most HTAs concluded this therapy not cost-effective or there was insufficient data for final conclusions. Licensing and reimbursement processes should be run simultaneously.

Targeting bone metastases in prostate cancer: improving clinical outcome

Bone metastases develop in most patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). They affect the structural integrity of bone, manifesting as pain and skeletal-related events (SREs), and are the primary cause of patient disability, reduced quality of life (QOL) and death. Understanding the pathophysiology of bone metastases resulted in the development of agents that improve clinical outcome, suggesting that managing both the systemic disease and associated bone events is important. Historically, the treatment of CRPC bone metastases with early radiopharmaceuticals and external beam radiation therapy was largely supportive; however, now, zoledronic acid and denosumab are integral to the therapeutic strategy for mCRPC. These agents substantially reduce skeletal morbidity and improve patient QOL. Radium-223 dichloride is the first bone-targeting agent to show improved survival and reduced pain and symptomatic skeletal events in patients with mCRPC without visceral disease. Five other systemic agents are currently approved for use in mCRPC based on their ability to improve survival. These include the cytotoxic drugs docetaxel and cabazitaxel, the hormone-based therapies, abiraterone and enzalutamide, and the immunotherapeutic vaccine sipuleucel-T. Abiraterone and enzalutamide are able to reduce SREs and improve survival in this setting. Novel agents targeting tumour and bone cells are under clinical development.

Clinical and economic burden of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the clinical trials and observational studies literature regarding the clinical and economic burden of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events (SREs) in prostate cancer, and discuss current gaps in understanding the impact of bone metastasis in this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trial data indicate that SREs occur in half of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis in the absence of treatment, and 30-45% among those who receive bone-modifying agents. In the United States, the cost of SRE ranged from $7553 per radiation episode to $88 838 per bone surgery episode. Prevalence of SRE, time to SRE occurrence, and cost of SRE varied across studies because of differences in study populations, follow-up period, and the algorithm used to measure SRE. There is limited evidence on the clinical and economic impact by SRE subtype. Information regarding patient-reported outcomes and costs from the patient's perspective is lacking.

SUMMARY

Bone metastasis and SREs in prostate cancer patients are associated with considerable morbidity, reduced survival, and substantial economic burden. Consistent study methodology, particularly the measurement of SREs, is necessary to allow comparison of estimates across studies. The inclusion of patient-centered clinical and economic outcomes in future research will provide pertinent information regarding the burden of bone metastasis and SREs.

NGF blockade at early times during bone cancer development attenuates bone destruction and increases limb use

Studies in animals and humans show that blockade of nerve growth factor (NGF) attenuates both malignant and nonmalignant skeletal pain. While reduction of pain is important, a largely unanswered question is what other benefits NGF blockade might confer in patients with bone cancer. Using a mouse graft model of bone sarcoma, we demonstrate that early treatment with an NGF antibody reduced tumor-induced bone destruction, delayed time to bone fracture, and increased the use of the tumor-bearing limb. Consistent with animal studies in osteoarthritis and head and neck cancer, early blockade of NGF reduced weight loss in mice with bone sarcoma. In terms of the extent and time course of pain relief, NGF blockade also reduced pain 40% to 70%, depending on the metric assessed. Importantly, this analgesic effect was maintained even in animals with late-stage disease. Our results suggest that NGF blockade immediately upon detection of tumor metastasis to bone may help preserve the integrity and use, delay the time to tumor-induced bone fracture, and maintain body weight.

Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US

PURPOSE

Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months.

METHODS

Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data.

RESULTS

Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.